Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2018 | Short report | Ausgabe 1/2018 Open Access

Journal of Neuroinflammation 1/2018

Cellular and behavioral effects of lipopolysaccharide treatment are dependent upon neurokinin-1 receptor activation

Zeitschrift:
Journal of Neuroinflammation > Ausgabe 1/2018
Autoren:
Hannah D. Fulenwider, Britessia M. Smith, Anna S. Nichenko, Jessica M. Carpenter, Sadie E. Nennig, Kejun Cheng, Kenner C. Rice, Jesse R. Schank
Abbreviations
EMSA
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay
IL-1β
Interleukin-1β
LPS
Lipopolysaccharide
NFkB
Nuclear factor kappa light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells
NK1R
Neurokinin-1 receptor
qPCR
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction
SP
Substance P
TNF-α
Tumor necrosis factor-α

Background

Discovered by Sen and Baltimore in 1986, nuclear factor kappa light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFkB) is a widely expressed transcription factor known for its involvement in inflammation and the innate immune system [13]. NFkB is activated after exposure to a variety of stimuli, such as oxidative stressors or pathogens, and induces the expression of genes involved in the innate immune response [4]. For example, systemic treatment with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a bacterial endotoxin, leads to significant increases in NFkB activity and proinflammatory cytokine production [5]. NFkB activation and subsequent cytokine production have also been shown to influence depressive-like behaviors, specifically social avoidance and anhedonia [611]. Human studies have also demonstrated that NFkB activation by low-dose LPS injection induces anhedonia, as evidenced by decreased striatal activity during a reward-related task, and LPS-exposed subjects also reported depressed mood [12]. Additional studies have also found that stress-induced anhedonia and decreased hippocampal neurogenesis are dependent on the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and NFkB activation [13].
The neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R) is the primary endogenous target of the neuropeptide substance P (SP). SP and the NK1R are widely expressed throughout the central nervous system (CNS) and, like NFkB, are involved in stress, anxiety, and depression [1420]. The NK1R has also been found to play a prominent role in inflammatory responses within the CNS and in the periphery via a process known as neurogenic inflammation [21, 22]. NK1Rs are expressed by glial cells, and their stimulation by SP can enhance the expression and release of inflammatory cytokines [2325]. NK1R inhibition, either by genetic deletion or pharmacological antagonism, also attenuates CNS inflammation in response to bacterial infection [2628].
The NK1R and NFkB have been found to interact directly. For example, NK1R stimulation leads to increased NFkB activation [24, 25, 29]. Treatment with SP causes increased NFkB activation and proinflammatory cytokine production, which is attenuated by selective NK1R antagonism [30, 31]. This relationship may be bidirectional, as it is known that the TACR1 gene (gene for NK1R) contains NFkB responsive elements in its promoter [32]. In regard to LPS treatment specifically, NK1R antagonist treatment prevents cytokine release and the detrimental effects of LPS exposure in the lung and liver [31, 33]. Additionally, the central SP/NK1R system mediates the fever response to peripheral LPS administration [34, 35]. However, the role of the NK1R specifically in LPS-induced cytokine expression and NFkB activation within the CNS, and the resulting behavioral consequences, has not been assessed in an in vivo model.
The current study aims to characterize the cellular relationship between the NK1R and NFkB systems in the brain, as well as resulting effects on behavior, specifically, motivated behavior that drives sucrose consumption. We hypothesized that systemic antagonism of the NK1R prior to LPS administration would prevent the LPS-induced increase in NFkB activity, proinflammatory cytokine expression, and anhedonic behavior.

Methods

Animals

All experiments were conducted using adult male Wistar rats (Charles River Laboratories, 175–200 g at time of arrival). All rats were provided food and water ad libitum and were housed on a 12:12 light/dark cycle. After arrival, animals were allowed 1 week to habituate to the facility and an additional week of handling prior to any experimentation. Rats used for electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) experiments were group housed, and rats used for the sucrose preference experiment were singly housed. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were in accordance with NIH guidelines.

L822429 and lipopolysaccharide treatment

The NK1R antagonist L822429 was dissolved in 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (45% w/v) and injected i.p. at a dose of 30 mg/kg in a volume of 2 ml/kg. L822429 treatment was administered 1 h prior to LPS treatment. LPS (strain 0111:B4, Sigma) was dissolved in sterile 0.9% saline and injected i.p. at a dose of 200 μg/kg in a volume of 1 ml/kg. In EMSA and qPCR experiments, rats were sacrificed by live decapitation 2 h after injection. Brains were extracted, hippocampal tissue was dissected, and samples were snap frozen in isopentane. Samples were stored at − 80 °C until tissue processing.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay

To investigate the role of the NK1R in LPS-induced activation of NFkB-DNA-binding potential, rats (n = 6/group) were treated systemically with vehicle or L822429 followed by injection of saline or LPS. Nuclear protein extracts were prepared using Active Motif Nuclear Extract Kit (Active Motif), and protein concentration in each sample was determined using Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For EMSA, nuclear protein samples (15 μg) were incubated with Odyssey® EMSA Buffer Kit (LI-COR) and NFkB IRDye® 700 infrared dye-labeled oligonucleotide. Loading dye was added to each sample, and the gel (6% DNA retardation gel, Invitrogen, Life Technologies) was run at 200 V at 4 °C. Gels were imaged, and band intensity was quantified using Li-Cor Odyssey CLx Infrared Imaging System.

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction

The expression of proinflammatory cytokines IL1β, IL6, and TNFα is known to be strongly activated by NFkB. To evaluate the role of the NK1R in LPS-induced increases in proinflammatory cytokine expression, rats (n = 5–6/group) were treated systemically with vehicle or L822429 followed by injection of saline or LPS. Hippocampal samples were homogenized, and RNA was extracted using PureLink™ RNA Mini Kit (Ambion, Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We chose to analyze cytokine mRNA levels within the hippocampus based on previous work demonstrating a significant effect of LPS treatment on proinflammatory cytokine expression in this region [36, 37]. Samples were then reversed transcribed using SuperScript® III Kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR was performed on each sample in triplicate using the following Taqman primers: TNF-α (Rn0152859_g1), IL-6 (Rn0140330_m1), IL-1β (Rn0058432_m1), and GAPDH for internal control (Rn01775763_g1; Life Technologies). qPCR analysis was performed on a Life Technologies QuantStudio6 machine.

Sucrose preference test

To assess the effect of NK1R antagonism on LPS-induced anhedonic-like behavior, a sucrose preference test was conducted [3840]. Rats (n = 6/group) were provided with one bottle containing 1% (w/v) sucrose solution and one bottle containing water for 2 days to establish a baseline sucrose preference. Bottle position was switched every 24 h to prevent development of a side preference. Sucrose solution was then removed so that only water was available, and rats were treated with L822429 or vehicle, followed by saline or LPS. The 1% sucrose solution was reintroduced 12 h after LPS treatment, and water and sucrose intake was measured 12 h later. Baseline and post-treatment sucrose preference was expressed as proportion of fluid intake that was accounted for by consumption from the sucrose bottle. For example, a value of 0.8 would indicate that 80% of the total fluid consumption was from the bottle containing the sucrose solution.

Results

NK1R antagonism attenuates LPS-induced increase in NFkB-DNA-binding potential in the hippocampus

One-way ANOVA indicated that optical density of shift bands in the EMSA assay were significantly different between treatment groups (Fig. 1a, F2,15 = 6.158, p < 0.05). Representative image shown in Fig. 1b. Post hoc analysis using Newman-Keuls tests revealed that vehicle-LPS-treated subjects had significantly higher intensity when compared to both vehicle-saline-treated subjects and L822429-LPS treated subjects (p < 0.05 for both comparisons). Intensity in the L822429-LPS-treated group was not significantly different from the vehicle-saline-treated group. This suggests that LPS induced an increase in NFkB translocation to the nucleus and NFkB-DNA-binding potential that was attenuated by pretreatment with the NK1R antagonist.

NK1R antagonism attenuates LPS-induced increase in proinflammatory cytokine expression in the hippocampus

One-way ANOVA revealed that IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 mRNA levels were significantly different between treatment groups (Fig. 2a: F2,13 = 31.89, p < 0.0001; Fig. 2b: F2,13 = 25.29, p < 0.0001; Fig. 2c: F2,13 = 7.048, p < 0.01, respectively). Post hoc analysis using Newman-Keuls tests revealed that the vehicle-LPS-treated group had significantly higher expression of IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 when compared to the vehicle-saline-treated group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.05, respectively) and when compared to the L822429-LPS-treated group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.01, respectively). IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 levels were not significantly different between L822429-LPS-treated and vehicle-saline-treated groups. These results indicate that LPS induces increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines in the hippocampus and this is attenuated by NK1R antagonism.

NK1R antagonism attenuates LPS-induced anhedonia

Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of test phase (baseline versus post-treatment; F1,15 = 11.03, p < 0.01) and a significant interaction between the factors of test phase and treatment (F2,15 = 4.512, p < 0.05). Post hoc analysis using Newman-Keuls tests revealed that during the baseline phase, the average sucrose preference did not differ between groups. However, the vehicle-LPS-treated group had significantly decreased sucrose preference post-treatment when compared to both the vehicle-saline-treated group and the L822429-LPS-treated group (Fig. 3, p < 0.01 for both comparisons). Sucrose preference post-treatment in the L822429-LPS-treated group and the vehicle-saline-treated group were not significantly different. These data suggest that NK1R activation is, at least in part, required for LPS-induced suppression of sucrose preference.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrate that the cellular and behavioral effects of LPS administration are in part dependent upon NK1R signaling. First, we show that NFkB-DNA-binding potential and subsequent expression of proinflammatory cytokines by systemic LPS injection is attenuated by systemic injection of the NK1R antagonist L822429. We show these effects in ex vivo brain tissue homogenates from the hippocampus. In previous studies, the role of NK1R in LPS-induced cellular effects has been demonstrated in vitro or in non-neural tissue; here, we extend those findings to show that this mechanism functions in the nervous system in vivo. Furthermore, many in vivo studies examining the impact of LPS on NFkB activation use the endpoint measure of cytokine expression. Here, we use this measure as well but also demonstrate that NFkB binding potential is increased by systemic LPS treatment. This is important because NFkB is unlikely to be the only transcription factor that influences the expression of proinflammatory genes. Additionally, we show that the anhedonia-inducing effects of LPS administration are also influenced by the NK1R. Thus, both the cellular and behavioral effects of LPS injection depend, at least in part, upon the action of the NK1R.
In this study, we assessed the effect of systemic administration of LPS on NFkB/cytokine activity in the hippocampus. However, it is unlikely that LPS injected through the intraperitoneal route reaches the brain. Thus, there is likely to be an intermediate signaling process that induces the CNS effect that we observe. Alternatively, NK1R actions in the periphery could influence the amount of peripheral cytokine release that is induced following LPS injection. Future experiments will examine these specific routes by which the NK1R may influence LPS effects.
Here, we show that LPS-induced anhedonia is influenced by NK1R activation. In addition to this anhedonia effect, LPS exposure has been shown to influence other behaviors of interest including sensitivity to painful stimuli [41], alcohol intake [42], and anxiety [43, 44]. Future studies will examine the role of the NK1R in additional LPS-induced behaviors. This is of particular interest because there is a considerable overlap between the types of behaviors that are influenced by NK1R signaling and those that are induced by LPS.

Conclusions

Taken together, the results presented here suggest that the NK1R contributes to multiple aspects of LPS challenge. The role of the NK1R may also extend to neuroinflammatory responses in general, and this receptor may thus influence psychiatric conditions that are mediated by chronic inflammation including depression, chronic pain, alcohol dependence, and others. FDA-approved NK1R antagonists are currently on the market; aprepitant has been used for several years to treat chemotherapy-induced nausea. Therefore, the efficacy of this drug could be tested in clinical trials for psychiatric conditions mediated by inflammation. While past clinical trials using NK1R antagonists have produced mixed results, negative findings have possibly been influenced by complex factors including drug dosing and pharmacogenetic interactions (see [45, 46] for discussion of this topic).

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by NIH K99/R00 Pathway to Independence Award AA021805 (J.R.S.). A portion of this work was supported by the intramural research programs of the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse (K.C.R).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Journal of Neuroinflammation 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe


 

Neu in den Fachgebieten Neurologie und Psychiatrie

Meistgelesene Bücher in der Neurologie & Psychiatrie

  • 2016 | Buch

    Neurologie

    Das Lehrbuch vermittelt Ihnen das gesamte Neurologie-Prüfungswissen für Ihr Medizinstudium und bereitet auch junge Assistenzärzte durch detailliertes Fachwissen optimal auf die Praxis vor. Die komplett überarbeitete Auflage enthält sechs neue, interdisziplinäre Kapitel.

    Herausgeber:
    Werner Hacke
  • 2016 | Buch

    Komplikationen in der Neurologie

    Das Buch schildert Ereignisse im Rahmen der Neuromedizin, die während der Diagnostik und Therapie neurologischer Erkrankungen und Symptome auftreten können. Die Fallbeispiele sensibilisieren Sie für mögliche Risikofaktoren, um das Auftreten solcher Komplikationen zu vermeiden.

    Herausgeber:
    Frank Block
  • 2017 | Buch

    Facharztwissen Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie

    Leitsymptome, Untersuchungsmethoden, Krankheitsbilder, Notfälle & Co. – mit der Neuauflage des "Facharztwissens" sind Sie auf die Facharztprüfung in Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie optimal vorbereitet. In dieser 2. Auflage sind die Kapitel zu psychosomatischen Störungen deutlich ausgebaut.

    Herausgeber:
    Prof. Dr. Dr. Frank Schneider
  • 2012 | Buch

    Kompendium der Psychotherapie

    Für Ärzte und Psychologen

    Wer in den vorhandenen Lehrbüchern der Psychotherapie den Brückenschlag zur täglichen praktischen Arbeit vermissen – ist mit diesem Werk gut bedient. In knapper, manualisierter Form werden verständlich und übersichtlich die Schritte, Techniken und konkreten, evidenzbasierten Vorgehensweisen beschrieben.

    Herausgeber:
    Prof. Dr. med. Tilo Kircher
Bildnachweise