Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

02.05.2024 | Original Article

Cemented vs cementless stems for revision arthroplasties due to Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fracture

verfasst von: Yuri Lara-Taranchenko, Josep F. Nomdedéu Jr., Andrés Aliaga Martínez, Iñaki Mimendia, Víctor M. Barro, Diego Collado, Ernesto Guerra-Farfán, Alejandro Hernández

Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Ausgabe 5/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

According to Vancouver classification, B2 type fractures are most often treated with removal of the loose stem and implantation of a long stem that bypasses the fracture site. However, there is a controversy about the stem fixation that should be used: cemented or cementless. Hence, this study aims to compare cemented and cementless stems in prosthetic revision due to Vancouver B2 (VB2) periprosthetic hip fracture.

Methods

A retrospective study was done including all the patients treated with stem exchange due to VB2 periprosthetic hip fracture in a tertiary hospital between 2015 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups according to the stem fixation used: cemented or cementless. Functional outcomes, hospital stay, surgical time, complication rate, and mortality were compared between the two groups of patients.

Results

Of the 30 included patients, 13 (43.4%) were treated with cementless stems and 17 (56.7%) with cemented stems. There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, anesthesia risk scale (ASA) or functional capacity prior to the intervention. Patients treated with cementless stems had a higher complication and reintervention rate than those treated with cemented stems: 62 and 45% versus 34 and 6% (p = 0.035; p = 0.010), respectively. Furthermore, in the group of cementless stems a higher proportion of non-union was found (53.8% vs. 17.6%; p = 0.037). Also, the hospital stay (33 vs. 24 days; p = 0.037) and the time to full weight-bearing (21 days vs. 9 days; p < 0.001) were longer in the cementless stem group.

Conclusion

Cemented fixation in stem revision due to Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fracture could be an optimal option with faster recovery which could decrease the rate of complications and reintervention, without compromising the fracture healing and patient mortality. Thus, this option can be considered when an anatomical reduction can be obtained, especially in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities in which a less aggressive surgical option should be considered.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Patsiogiannis N, Kanakaris NK, Giannoudis PV (2021) Periprosthetic hip fractures: an update into their management and clinical outcomes. EFORT Open Rev 6(1):75–92CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Patsiogiannis N, Kanakaris NK, Giannoudis PV (2021) Periprosthetic hip fractures: an update into their management and clinical outcomes. EFORT Open Rev 6(1):75–92CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah RP, Sheth NP, Gray C, Alosh H, Garino JP (2014) Periprosthetic fractures around loose femoral components. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 22(8):482–490CrossRefPubMed Shah RP, Sheth NP, Gray C, Alosh H, Garino JP (2014) Periprosthetic fractures around loose femoral components. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 22(8):482–490CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat González-Martín D, Pais-Brito JL, González-Casamayor S, Guerra-Ferraz A, Ojeda-Jiménez J, Herrera-Pérez M (2022) Treatment algorithm in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures: osteosynthesis vs revision arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 7(8):533–541CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral González-Martín D, Pais-Brito JL, González-Casamayor S, Guerra-Ferraz A, Ojeda-Jiménez J, Herrera-Pérez M (2022) Treatment algorithm in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures: osteosynthesis vs revision arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 7(8):533–541CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Marsland D, Mears SC (2012) A review of periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 3(3):107–120CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Marsland D, Mears SC (2012) A review of periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 3(3):107–120CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Duncan CP, Haddad FS (2014) The unified classification system (UCS): improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Jt J 96-B(6):713–716CrossRef Duncan CP, Haddad FS (2014) The unified classification system (UCS): improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Jt J 96-B(6):713–716CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee S, Kagan R, Wang L, Doung YC (2019) Reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification in periprosthetic fractures around cementless femoral stems. J Arthroplasty 34:S277–S281CrossRefPubMed Lee S, Kagan R, Wang L, Doung YC (2019) Reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification in periprosthetic fractures around cementless femoral stems. J Arthroplasty 34:S277–S281CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan T, Grindlay D, Ollivere BJ, Scammell BE, Manktelow ARJ, Pearson RG (2017) A systematic review of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Bone Jt J 99-B(4 Supple B):17–25CrossRef Khan T, Grindlay D, Ollivere BJ, Scammell BE, Manktelow ARJ, Pearson RG (2017) A systematic review of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Bone Jt J 99-B(4 Supple B):17–25CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Spina M, Scalvi A (2018) Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparative study of stem revision versus internal fixation with plate. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Orthop Traumatol 28(6):1133–1142CrossRef Spina M, Scalvi A (2018) Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparative study of stem revision versus internal fixation with plate. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Orthop Traumatol 28(6):1133–1142CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Smitham PJ, Carbone TA, Bolam SM, Kim YS, Callary SA, Costi K et al (2019) Vancouver B2 peri-prosthetic fractures in cemented femoral implants can be treated with open reduction and internal fixation alone without revision. J Arthroplasty 34(7):1430–1434CrossRefPubMed Smitham PJ, Carbone TA, Bolam SM, Kim YS, Callary SA, Costi K et al (2019) Vancouver B2 peri-prosthetic fractures in cemented femoral implants can be treated with open reduction and internal fixation alone without revision. J Arthroplasty 34(7):1430–1434CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyson Y, Hillman C, Majenburg N, Sköldenberg O, Rolfson O, Kärrholm J et al (2021) Uncemented or cemented stems in first-time revision total hip replacement? An observational study of 867 patients including assessment of femoral bone defect size. Acta Orthop 92(2):143–150CrossRefPubMed Tyson Y, Hillman C, Majenburg N, Sköldenberg O, Rolfson O, Kärrholm J et al (2021) Uncemented or cemented stems in first-time revision total hip replacement? An observational study of 867 patients including assessment of femoral bone defect size. Acta Orthop 92(2):143–150CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Klasan A, Millar J, Quayle J, Farrington B, Misur PN (2022) Comparable outcomes of in-cement revision and uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture at 5 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142(6):1039–1046CrossRefPubMed Klasan A, Millar J, Quayle J, Farrington B, Misur PN (2022) Comparable outcomes of in-cement revision and uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture at 5 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142(6):1039–1046CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Canbora K, Kose O, Polat A, Aykanat F, Gorgec M (2013) Management of Vancouver type B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using an uncemented extensively porous-coated long femoral stem prosthesis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Orthop Traumatol 23(5):545–552CrossRef Canbora K, Kose O, Polat A, Aykanat F, Gorgec M (2013) Management of Vancouver type B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using an uncemented extensively porous-coated long femoral stem prosthesis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Orthop Traumatol 23(5):545–552CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Briant-Evans T, Veeramootoo D, Tsiridis E, Hubble M (2009) Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 80:548–552CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Briant-Evans T, Veeramootoo D, Tsiridis E, Hubble M (2009) Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 80:548–552CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Emara AK, Ng M, Krebs VE, Bloomfield M, Molloy RM, Piuzzi NS (2021) Femoral stem cementation in hip arthroplasty: the know-how of a ‘“lost”’ art. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 14(1):47–59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Emara AK, Ng M, Krebs VE, Bloomfield M, Molloy RM, Piuzzi NS (2021) Femoral stem cementation in hip arthroplasty: the know-how of a ‘“lost”’ art. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 14(1):47–59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdulkarim A, Ellanti P, Motterlini N, Fahey T, O’Byrne J (2013) Cemented versus uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Orthop Rev 5(1):34–44 Abdulkarim A, Ellanti P, Motterlini N, Fahey T, O’Byrne J (2013) Cemented versus uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Orthop Rev 5(1):34–44
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyson Y, Rolfson O, Kärrholm J, Hailer NP, Mohaddes M (2019) Uncemented or cemented revision stems? Analysis of 2296 first-time hip revision arthroplasties performed due to aseptic loosening, reported to the Swedish hip arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 90(5):421–426CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tyson Y, Rolfson O, Kärrholm J, Hailer NP, Mohaddes M (2019) Uncemented or cemented revision stems? Analysis of 2296 first-time hip revision arthroplasties performed due to aseptic loosening, reported to the Swedish hip arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 90(5):421–426CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Roussot MA, Vles GF, Haddad FS (2018) The role of cemented stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. Sem Arthroplast 29(3):177–182CrossRef Roussot MA, Vles GF, Haddad FS (2018) The role of cemented stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. Sem Arthroplast 29(3):177–182CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sponer P, Korbel M, Grinac M, Prokes L, Bezrouk A, Kucera T (2021) The outcomes of cemented femoral revisions for periprosthetic femoral fractures in the elderly: comparison with cementless stems. Clin Interv Aging 16:1869–1876CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sponer P, Korbel M, Grinac M, Prokes L, Bezrouk A, Kucera T (2021) The outcomes of cemented femoral revisions for periprosthetic femoral fractures in the elderly: comparison with cementless stems. Clin Interv Aging 16:1869–1876CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Brew CJ, Wilson LJ, Whitehouse SL, Hubble MJW, Crawford RW (2013) Cement-in-cement revision for selected Vancouver type B1 femoral periprosthetic fractures: a biomechanical analysis. J Arthroplasty 28(3):521–525CrossRefPubMed Brew CJ, Wilson LJ, Whitehouse SL, Hubble MJW, Crawford RW (2013) Cement-in-cement revision for selected Vancouver type B1 femoral periprosthetic fractures: a biomechanical analysis. J Arthroplasty 28(3):521–525CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Cemented vs cementless stems for revision arthroplasties due to Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fracture
verfasst von
Yuri Lara-Taranchenko
Josep F. Nomdedéu Jr.
Andrés Aliaga Martínez
Iñaki Mimendia
Víctor M. Barro
Diego Collado
Ernesto Guerra-Farfán
Alejandro Hernández
Publikationsdatum
02.05.2024
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Ausgabe 5/2024
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-03961-3

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. Zur Fortbildung und Wissenserweiterung, verfasst und geprüft von Expertinnen und Experten der Gesellschaft für Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie (AGA).


Jetzt entdecken!

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Viele Versäumnisse bei Psoriasis-Arthritis

Menschen mit Psoriasis-Arthritis (PsA) müssen länger auf die Diagnose warten und werden zögerlicher behandelt als an rheumatoider Arthritis (RA) Erkrankte. Diese Defizite hat eine Untersuchung in Großbritannien aufgedeckt.

Yoga gegen Kniearthrose nicht schlechter als Krafttraining

Menschen mit Gonarthrose profitieren von Yogaübungen nicht weniger als von gezielten Kräftigungsübungen für die lädierten Knie. In einer Vergleichsstudie haben sich für Yogis und Yoginis sogar einige Vorteile ergeben.

Muskelrelaxanzien wohl nur bei akuten Kreuzschmerzen hilfreich

Bei akuten Rückenschmerzen können Muskelrelaxanzien, eventuell in Kombination mit NSAR, zur Schmerzlinderung beitragen. Wegen der Nebenwirkungen wird jedoch empfohlen, die Medikamente nur über wenige Tage einzusetzen.

Wie bereits der virtuelle "Blick ins Grüne" Schmerzen lindern kann

Dass der Blick in die Natur Menschen dazu bringen kann, Schmerzen weniger stark zu empfinden, konnte bereits mehrfach nachgewiesen werden. Jetzt ließen sich in einer experimentellen Studie sogar allein durch das Betrachten von Videos mit Naturszenen analgetische Effekte erzeugen.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.