Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics 8/2015

01.08.2015 | Original Paper

Cementless femoral revision in patients with a previous cemented prosthesis

verfasst von: Min Zeng, Jie Xie, Mingqing Li, Shaoru Lin, Yihe Hu

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 8/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness associated with the use of the cementless femoral revision in patients with a previous cemented prosthesis.

Methods

This study reviewed 92 revision femoral stem performed by a single senior surgeon between January 2006 and December 2012 at our institution. All patients complained of unbearable pain before operation, of which 19 cases had extensively porous-coated revision in Paprosky type I or II femoral defects and 73 had modular tapered revision in type IIIA or IIIB defects. All patients had clinical and radiographic follow-up for an average of 3.9 years (range two to seven years), with a mean age of 62.5 years (range 46–86 years) at surgery.

Results

There was no re-revision for loosening. Complications included delayed wound healing in two (2.2 %) patients, dislocation in four (4.3 %), intra-operative femoral fracture in 11 (12.0 %), and periprosthetic fracture postoperatively in three (3.3 %).The average Harris hip scores (HHS) increased from 38.1 (range 20–70) pre-operatively to 82.5 (range 40–95), and the average visual analog scores (VAS) decreased from 8 .3 (range 4–10) pre-operatively to 1.5 (range 0–5) at final follow-up. Radiographic results including stress shielding, subsidence of the stems, bone ingrowth and prosthesis loosening showed that prostheses were stably fixed postoperatively.

Conclusion

This supported that cementless fixation, with the use of extensively porous-coated stems or modular tapered stems, was efficient in patients with a previous failed cemented stem.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartman CW, Garvin KL (2012) Femoral fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 61:313–325PubMed Hartman CW, Garvin KL (2012) Femoral fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 61:313–325PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss RJ, Stark A, Karrholm J (2011) A modular cementless stem vs. cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip: a population-based study from the Swedish hip arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 82(2):136–142PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Weiss RJ, Stark A, Karrholm J (2011) A modular cementless stem vs. cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip: a population-based study from the Swedish hip arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 82(2):136–142PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Donaldson AJ, Thomson HE, Harper NJ, Kenny NW (2009) Bone cement implantation syndrome. Br J Anaesth 102(1):12–22PubMedCrossRef Donaldson AJ, Thomson HE, Harper NJ, Kenny NW (2009) Bone cement implantation syndrome. Br J Anaesth 102(1):12–22PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdulkarim A, Ellanti P, Motterlini N, Fahey T, O'Byrne JM (2013) Cemented versus uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 5(1):e8CrossRef Abdulkarim A, Ellanti P, Motterlini N, Fahey T, O'Byrne JM (2013) Cemented versus uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 5(1):e8CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bohm P, Bischel O (2001) Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(7):1023–1031PubMed Bohm P, Bischel O (2001) Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(7):1023–1031PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Reikeras O, Gunderson RB (2006) Excellent results with femoral revision surgery using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem: 59 patients followed for 10–16 years. Acta Orthop 77(1):98–103PubMedCrossRef Reikeras O, Gunderson RB (2006) Excellent results with femoral revision surgery using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem: 59 patients followed for 10–16 years. Acta Orthop 77(1):98–103PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Duncan WW, Hubble MJ, Howell JR, Whitehouse SL, Timperley AJ, Gie GA (2009) Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(5):577–582PubMedCrossRef Duncan WW, Hubble MJ, Howell JR, Whitehouse SL, Timperley AJ, Gie GA (2009) Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(5):577–582PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Neumann D, Dueckelmann L, Thaler C, Dorn U (2012) Revision total hip arthroplasty using a cementless tapered revision stem in patients with a mean age of 82 years. Int Orthop 36(5):961–965PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Neumann D, Dueckelmann L, Thaler C, Dorn U (2012) Revision total hip arthroplasty using a cementless tapered revision stem in patients with a mean age of 82 years. Int Orthop 36(5):961–965PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheth NP, Nelson CL, Paprosky WG (2013) Femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(10):601–612PubMedCrossRef Sheth NP, Nelson CL, Paprosky WG (2013) Femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(10):601–612PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pak JH, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Lawrence JM (1993) Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (295): 172–178 Pak JH, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Lawrence JM (1993) Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (295): 172–178
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69(1):45–55PubMed Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69(1):45–55PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sporer SM, Paprosky WG (2004) Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res (429):227–231 Sporer SM, Paprosky WG (2004) Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res (429):227–231
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res (257):107–128 Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res (257):107–128
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon KH, Kang JS, Lee SH, Jung SR (2009) Revision total hip arthroplasty using an extensively porous coated femoral stem. Clin Orthop Surg 1(2):105–109PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Moon KH, Kang JS, Lee SH, Jung SR (2009) Revision total hip arthroplasty using an extensively porous coated femoral stem. Clin Orthop Surg 1(2):105–109PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Woolson ST, Delaney TJ (1995) Failure of a proximally porous-coated femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10(Suppl):S22–S28PubMedCrossRef Woolson ST, Delaney TJ (1995) Failure of a proximally porous-coated femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10(Suppl):S22–S28PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sporer SM, Paprosky WG (2003) Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res (417):203–209 Sporer SM, Paprosky WG (2003) Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res (417):203–209
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Richards CJ, Duncan CP, Masri BA, Garbuz DS (2010) Femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of two stem designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):491–496PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Richards CJ, Duncan CP, Masri BA, Garbuz DS (2010) Femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of two stem designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):491–496PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Babis GC, Sakellariou VI, O'Connor MI, Hanssen AD, Sim FH (2010) Proximal femoral allograft-prosthesis composites in revision hip replacement: a 12-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(3):349–355PubMedCrossRef Babis GC, Sakellariou VI, O'Connor MI, Hanssen AD, Sim FH (2010) Proximal femoral allograft-prosthesis composites in revision hip replacement: a 12-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(3):349–355PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawrence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE, Lauro GR (1994) Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(7):965–973PubMed Lawrence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE, Lauro GR (1994) Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(7):965–973PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bugbee WD, Culpepper WN, Engh CJ, Engh CS (1997) Long-term clinical consequences of stress-shielding after total hip arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(7):1007–1012PubMed Bugbee WD, Culpepper WN, Engh CJ, Engh CS (1997) Long-term clinical consequences of stress-shielding after total hip arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(7):1007–1012PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel PD, Klika AK, Murray TG, Elsharkawy KA, Krebs VE, Barsoum WK (2010) Influence of technique with distally fixed modular stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25(6):926–931PubMedCrossRef Patel PD, Klika AK, Murray TG, Elsharkawy KA, Krebs VE, Barsoum WK (2010) Influence of technique with distally fixed modular stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25(6):926–931PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lakstein D, Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Safir O, Lee P, Gross AE (2010) Revision total hip arthroplasty with a modular tapered stem. Hip Int 20(2):136–142PubMed Lakstein D, Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Safir O, Lee P, Gross AE (2010) Revision total hip arthroplasty with a modular tapered stem. Hip Int 20(2):136–142PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang L, Dai Z, Wen T, Li M, Hu Y (2013) Three to seven year follow-up of a tapered modular femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(2):275–281PubMedCrossRef Wang L, Dai Z, Wen T, Li M, Hu Y (2013) Three to seven year follow-up of a tapered modular femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(2):275–281PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J (1999) Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (369):230–242 Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J (1999) Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (369):230–242
Metadaten
Titel
Cementless femoral revision in patients with a previous cemented prosthesis
verfasst von
Min Zeng
Jie Xie
Mingqing Li
Shaoru Lin
Yihe Hu
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2696-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2015

International Orthopaedics 8/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.