Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 5/2012

01.05.2012 | Original Article

Center-by-center results of a multicenter prospective trial to determine the inter-observer correlation of the simplified POP-Q in describing pelvic organ prolapse

verfasst von: N. Lemos, J. E. Korte, M. Iskander, R. Freeman, A. Arunkalaivanan, D. Rizk, M. Halaska, C. Medina, J. C. Conceição, M. Parekh, A. Martan, O. Sorinola, E. Wlazlak, Gamal Ghoniem, S. Swift

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 5/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This study was conducted to determine the differences in the inter-observer agreement of the simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system from center to center in a large international multicenter study.

Methods

This is a secondary analysis of the results of a large prospective single blind multicenter trial studying the inter-observer agreement of a simplified POP-Q exam. Twelve centers from four continents with a total of 511 subjects were included in this study. The number of subjects recruited per center ranged from 20 to 81. Each patient was independently examined by two investigators, with examination order randomly assigned and investigators blinded to each other’s result. The weighted kappa statistic was used to evaluate the inter-observer agreement.

Results

Good and significant associations were observed on the anterior, posterior, and apical segments. Six out of 11 sites did not provide adequate number of subjects with prior hysterectomy for weighted kappa statistics or achieve significance regarding vaginal cuff measurement.

Conclusions

The simplified POP-Q demonstrated good inter-examiner agreement across multiple centers.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo BLP, DeLancey JOL, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith ARB (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMedCrossRef Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo BLP, DeLancey JOL, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith ARB (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Treszezamsky AD, Rascoff L, Shahryarinejad A, Vardy MD (2010) Use of pelvic organ prolapse staging systems in published articles of selected specialized journals. Int Urogynecol J 21(3):359–363PubMedCrossRef Treszezamsky AD, Rascoff L, Shahryarinejad A, Vardy MD (2010) Use of pelvic organ prolapse staging systems in published articles of selected specialized journals. Int Urogynecol J 21(3):359–363PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Auwad W, Freeman RM, Swift S (2004) Is the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Int Urogynecol J 15:324–327 Auwad W, Freeman RM, Swift S (2004) Is the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Int Urogynecol J 15:324–327
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Swift SE, Morris S, McKinnie V, Freeman R, Petri E, Scotti RJ, Dwyer P (2006) Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Int Urogynecol J 17:615–620CrossRef Swift SE, Morris S, McKinnie V, Freeman R, Petri E, Scotti RJ, Dwyer P (2006) Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Int Urogynecol J 17:615–620CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Parekh M, Swift S, Lemos N, Iskander M, Freeman R, Arunkalaivanan A, Martan A, Sorinola S, Rizk D, Halaska M, Surkont G, Medina C, Conceicao JC, Korte J (2011) Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system. Int Urogynecol J 22(6):645–650. doi:10.1007/s00192-011-1395-2, Online FirstTMPubMedCrossRef Parekh M, Swift S, Lemos N, Iskander M, Freeman R, Arunkalaivanan A, Martan A, Sorinola S, Rizk D, Halaska M, Surkont G, Medina C, Conceicao JC, Korte J (2011) Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system. Int Urogynecol J 22(6):645–650. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-011-1395-2, Online FirstTMPubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Manonai J, Mouritsen L, Palma P, Contreras-Ortiz O, Korte JF, Swift S (2011) The inter-system association between the simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (S-POP) and the standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) in describing pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 22:347–352PubMedCrossRef Manonai J, Mouritsen L, Palma P, Contreras-Ortiz O, Korte JF, Swift S (2011) The inter-system association between the simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (S-POP) and the standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) in describing pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 22:347–352PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GC, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society Pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1467–1471PubMedCrossRef Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GC, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society Pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1467–1471PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Steele A, Mallapeddi P, Welgoss J, Soled S, Kohli N, Karram M (1998) Teaching the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1458–1464PubMedCrossRef Steele A, Mallapeddi P, Welgoss J, Soled S, Kohli N, Karram M (1998) Teaching the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1458–1464PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Prien-Larsen J, Mouritsen L (2001) Pelvic organ prolapse: is ICS-grading without POP-Q measurement reliable? Int Urogynecol J 12(supp 3):S45, abstract Prien-Larsen J, Mouritsen L (2001) Pelvic organ prolapse: is ICS-grading without POP-Q measurement reliable? Int Urogynecol J 12(supp 3):S45, abstract
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Karp DR, Jean-Michel M, Peterson TV, Lefevre R, Aguilar VC, Davila GW (2009) “Eyeball” PPOP-Q examination: shortcut or valid assessment tool. Int Urogynecol J 20(Suppl 2):S73–S239, Abstract Karp DR, Jean-Michel M, Peterson TV, Lefevre R, Aguilar VC, Davila GW (2009) “Eyeball” PPOP-Q examination: shortcut or valid assessment tool. Int Urogynecol J 20(Suppl 2):S73–S239, Abstract
Metadaten
Titel
Center-by-center results of a multicenter prospective trial to determine the inter-observer correlation of the simplified POP-Q in describing pelvic organ prolapse
verfasst von
N. Lemos
J. E. Korte
M. Iskander
R. Freeman
A. Arunkalaivanan
D. Rizk
M. Halaska
C. Medina
J. C. Conceição
M. Parekh
A. Martan
O. Sorinola
E. Wlazlak
Gamal Ghoniem
S. Swift
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1593-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2012

International Urogynecology Journal 5/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.