Background
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in critically ill patients and has high morbidity and mortality [
1]. Systemic and renal perfusion noticeably determines the development of AKI. However, optimal hemodynamic indicators of the risk of AKI have not been identified [
2]. Although elevated fluid volume improves renal perfusion, aggressive fluid loading may lead to elevated central venous pressure (CVP). Given the traditional acceptance of higher CVP levels [
3,
4], clinicians ignore elevated CVP, and the incidence of AKI is potentially interlaced.
CVP, a local hemodynamic parameter, reflects intravascular volume and is determined by the interaction between venous return and cardiac function [
5]. Therefore, CVP is generally used for bedside assessment of volume status and responsiveness in critically ill patients [
6]. Nonetheless, the validity of CVP in critical care settings has recently been challenged [
7]. Based on the rationale provided by the Starling curves and Guyton theory on cardiac function [
8], elevated CVP may increase venous pressure and decrease renal perfusion pressure, which further contributes to AKI. However, in critically ill patients with multiple comorbidities, including sepsis, heart failure, arrhythmias, hypertension, diabetes or others, the association between elevated CVP and AKI remains unclear.
Until recently, studies have shown inconsistent conclusions about the association of CVP and AKI in critically ill patients [
9‐
11]. Herein, we sought to characterize the association of elevated CVP and AKI in critical care settings using the large, public, deidentified clinical database Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III [
12]. Specifically, we hypothesized that elevated CVP is associated with an increased incidence of AKI in critically ill patients with multiple comorbidities.
Methods
Data source
We conducted a large-scale, single-center, retrospective cohort study using data collected from the MIMIC-III open source clinical database (version 1.4), which was developed and maintained by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Philips Healthcare, and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center [
12]. One author (Qi Guo) obtained access to the database and was responsible for data extraction (certification number: 25233333). Information derived from the 61,532 electronic medical records of critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) between 2001 and 2012 was included in this free, accessible database. The database was approved for research use by the Institutional Review Boards of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and studies using the database were granted a waiver of informed consent.
Study population
All patients in the database were screened according to the following inclusion criteria for this study: (1) adults (≥18 years of age at ICU admission); (2) ICU stay ≥1 day; and (3) for patients with multiple ICU stays, only the data for the first stay were considered. Patients with censored age, no CVP records, or no creatinine records were excluded.
Variables
CVP, creatinine, and urine output records during the ICU stay were extracted. Other day 1 ICU measurement records were also extracted, including age, sex, weight, blood pressure and admission illness scores (the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) [
13] and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score) [
14]. Moreover, data on the use of vasopressors, inotropes, sedatives, diuretics, invasive mechanical ventilation, and comorbidities, including sepsis, congestive heart failure (CHF), arrhythmias, hypertension, diabetes, chronic renal failure and cancer, were extracted from the database. In this study, vasopressors included norepinephrine, epinephrine, phenylephrine, vasopressin, and dopamine. Inotropes included dobutamine and milrinone. Chronic renal failure was defined as abnormalities of kidney structure or function (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73m
2), present for more than 3 months, with implications for health [
15]. Cardiac surgery recovery unit (CSRU) was used as variable to indicate the ICU type one patient stayed was CSRU. The comorbidities were determined from the International Classification of Disease, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification codes.
Exposure
The primary exposure was the mean CVP during the first 7 days after ICU admission. We divided the mean CVP into four levels according to interquartile range as follows: quartile 1, CVP ≤ 8.29 mmHg; quartile 2, 8.29 < CVP ≤ 10.64 mmHg; quartile 3, 10.64 < CVP ≤ 13.20 mmHg; and quartile 4, CVP > 13.20 mmHg.
Outcomes
The primary outcome was the odds of 2-day and 7-day AKI after ICU admission. We defined AKI by serum creatinine based on the KDIGO criteria [
16]. AKI was categorized as Stage 1 if there was a 1.5–1.9 times serum creatinine increase from baseline, a 0.3 mg/dL serum creatinine increase or a urine output < 0.5 ml/kg/h for 6–12 h. Stage 2 was when there was a 2.0–2.9 times serum creatinine increase from baseline or a urine output < 0.5 ml/kg/h for ≥12 h, and Stage 3 was when there was a ≥ 3 times serum creatinine increase from baseline or a ≥ 4.0 mg/dL serum creatinine increase or urine output < 0.3 ml/kg/h for ≥24 h. The first serum creatinine record measured on ICU Day 1 was considered the “baseline”.
We calculated the CVP fluctuation within the first 2 days as follows: (mean CVP on the second day – mean CVP on the first day)/mean CVP on the first day. Patients were divided into 3 CVP trend groups: decreasing trend (fluctuation ≤ − 10%), increasing trend (fluctuation ≥10%), and stable trend (− 10% < fluctuation< 10%). Among the study population, 7397 patients suffered continuous CVP monitoring within the first 2 days. The association between this CVP trend group and AKI outcome was then evaluated for these patients.
Adjusted variables included age, male sex, weight, CSRU, ventilation use, vasopressor use, inotropes use, sedative use, diuretic use, SAPS score, SOFA score, sepsis, CHF, arrhythmias, hypertension, diabetes, chronic renal failure, cancer, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure.
The association between CVP and AKI was further evaluated in patients using mechanical ventilation. To evaluate whether ventilation parameter influence our results, models were adjusted for age, male sex, weight, CSRU, ventilation use, vasopressor use, inotropes use, sedative use, diuretic use, SAPS score, SOFA score, sepsis, CHF, arrhythmias, hypertension, diabetes, chronic renal failure, cancer, SBP, diastolic blood pressure, and positive end-expiratory pressure.
Statistical analysis
Normally distributed continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, whereas nonnormally distributed data are presented as the median (interquartile range). Categorical variables are presented as numbers (percentages). Baseline characteristics were stratified by quartiles of mean CVP during the first 7 days after ICU admission. Baseline data were compared using the analysis of variance test or rank-sum test, as appropriate, for continuous variables, and the chi-square test was used for categorical variables. We performed linear and logistic regression to compute odds ratios (ORs) for the association of mean CVP with the odds of AKI.
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 23.0, IBM, New York, USA) and R software (version 3.6.3, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Discussion
To our knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate the association between elevated CVP and AKI in critically ill patients with multiple comorbidities from a large-scale, public, deidentified clinical database (MIMIC-III). The three principal findings are summarized as follows: (1) Elevated mean CVP is associated with an increased risk of AKI in critically ill patients; (2) A 1 mmHg increase in CVP increases the odds of AKI in critically adult patients; (3) For critically ill patients with an older age, low SBP, a history of treatment with diuretics, vasopressors and ventilation, comorbidities of sepsis, or in the CSRU, the mean CVP level remained a significant predictor of AKI.
Clinicians use CVP as a measure of venous congestion in critically ill patients. Indeed, CVP has been censured as an unusable measurement of venous congestion due to other variables that can alter its value, including the relative height of the intravenous catheter to that of the barometer, artificial ventilation patterns, and changes in cardiac performance [
17]. Despite the valid criticism, CVP is a potentially useful measure of venous congestion when we recognize its fluctuations due to the above variables [
18].
The association between CVP and AKI has been determined previously [
19], and a higher CVP is associated with poorer kidney function [
9,
11,
20]. However, these findings were restricted to patients receiving diuretics, undergoing cardiac surgery and experiencing heart failure. Therefore, the association between elevated CVP and AKI remains unclear in critically ill patients overall after adjustment for demographics, treatments and comorbidities. Legrand et al. found a linear relationship between CVP and the incidence of AKI [
21], and a meta-analysis demonstrated that a 1 mmHg increase in CVP increases the odds of AKI in critically adult patients [
10], which is consistent with the findings of our study. In particular, in subgroups of patients with older age, low SBP and cardiac surgery, those undergoing treatment with vasopressors, diuretics and ventilation and those with sepsis as a comorbidity, we found that elevated CVP was still correlated with the odds of AKI. However, in subjects with CHF or with use of inotropes, a trend was not found possibly due to the limited sample size.
A more thorough understanding enables revaluation of the interaction between CVP and AKI. As an indicator of cardiac preload and renal afterload, CVP is determined by the interaction between cardiac function and venous return [
22,
23]. Decreased renal function would lead to more liquid retention and further increase the CVP [
17]. On the other hand, based on Guyton’s theory, cardiac output equals venous return, and venous reflux is dependent on the mean circulatory filling pressure (MCFP) and CVP gradient [
8]. Specifically, extra fluid only increases CVP and tissue edema but does not significantly increase end-diastolic volume or stroke volume. When CVP was increased or MCFP was decreased, venous reflux was decreased; in contrast, venous reflux was increased when CVP was decreased or MCFP was increased [
24,
25]. Therefore, lower CVP is necessary to ensure venous reflux and cardiac output when MCFP is in the flat part of the Starling curve. In fact, a healthy individual has a relatively low CVP [
26]. According to this theory, it is hypothesized that a high CVP is transmitted backward, increasing renal venous pressure, reducing renal perfusion pressure and increasing renal venous congestion, further leading to AKI [
19,
27].
In septic patients, CVP was reported to be associated with AKI risk even after adjustment for positive end-expiratory pressure [
21]. Likewise, our study showed that the positive association between CVP and AKI risk persisted after adjustment for positive end-expiratory pressure in subgroup with use of ventilation. Both CVP and positive end-expiratory pressure were shown to be independently associated with worsening of renal function [
28]. Meanwhile, several studies demonstrated that the increase of positive end-expiratory pressure could led an increase in CVP [
29,
30]. Taken together, high positive end-expiratory pressure might involve with AKI, at least partly, by increasing CVP. Nevertheless, the mediating effect of CVP deserves further investigations.
Our study was based on data extracted from electronic medical records in MIMIC-III v1.4 [
12], a large open clinical database, allowing precise research on the effects of an elevated CVP load. The use of database technologies and statistics played a critical role in achieving the meaningful conclusion of the present study. Additionally, this study has several limitations. First, this study is imperfect due to its retrospective nature and the source of the data used. Given the retrospective cohort study design, it is impossible to identify a causal link between AKI and CVP. Hence, no valid causal relationship can be established. Next, preadmission serum creatinine determinations were unavailable, and some patients may have already developed AKI on admission. Thus, the odds of AKI may have been underestimated during the ICU stay. Finally, although some predictors of disease severity were included in our study and adjusted analysis confirmed the association between elevated CVP and the incidence of AKI, the results may be affected by other confounding factors associated with AKI. Additional prospective studies should be conducted to evaluate these parameters and the potential effect of elevated CVP load.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.