Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2012 | Research | Ausgabe 1/2012 Open Access

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2012

Challenges to fair decision-making processes in the context of health care services: a qualitative assessment from Tanzania

Zeitschrift:
International Journal for Equity in Health > Ausgabe 1/2012
Autoren:
Elizabeth H Shayo, Ole F Norheim, Leonard E G Mboera, Jens Byskov, Stephen Maluka, Peter Kamuzora, Astrid Blystad
Wichtige Hinweise

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

EHS participated in the development of the tools, collected and refined the data, carried out the analysis and drafted the manuscript. AB was central in the process of developing the guides, made a follow-up visit to the field site during data collection, took part in the analysis process and revised the draft manuscripts. PK participated in the development of the tools, took part in the data collection process and reviewed the manuscript. OFN, LEGM and SM reviewed the manuscript several times. JB conceived the idea of the project, developed the methodology and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Abstract

Background

Fair processes in decision making need the involvement of stakeholders who can discuss issues and reach an agreement based on reasons that are justifiable and appropriate in meeting people’s needs. In Tanzania, the policy of decentralization and the health sector reform place an emphasis on community participation in making decisions in health care. However, aspects that can influence an individual’s opportunity to be listened to and to contribute to discussion have been researched to a very limited extent in low-income settings. The objective of this study was to explore challenges to fair decision-making processes in health care services with a special focus on the potential influence of gender, wealth, ethnicity and education. We draw on the principle of fairness as outlined in the deliberative democratic theory.

Methods

The study was carried out in the Mbarali District of Tanzania. A qualitative study design was used. In-depth interviews and focus group discussion were conducted among members of the district health team, local government officials, health care providers and community members. Informal discussion on the topics was also of substantial value.

Results

The study findings indicate a substantial influence of gender, wealth, ethnicity and education on health care decision-making processes. Men, wealthy individuals, members of strong ethnic groups and highly educated individuals had greater influence. Opinions varied among the study informants as to whether such differences should be considered fair. The differences in levels of influence emerged most clearly at the community level, and were largely perceived as legitimate.

Conclusions

Existing challenges related to individuals’ influence of decision making processes in health care need to be addressed if greater participation is desired. There is a need for increased advocacy and a strengthening of responsive practices with an emphasis on the right of all individuals to participate in decision-making processes. This simultaneously implies an emphasis on assuring the distribution of information, training and education so that individuals can participate fully in informed decision making.
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe