Changes in bone mineral density after total parathyroidectomy without autotransplantation in the end-stage renal disease patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism

Renal osteodystrophy is one of the major serious complications in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving long-term hemodialysis [1]. In addition to the abnormalities of bone architecture that contribute to fracture risk [2, 3], renal osteodystrophy is also associated with the development of arterial calcification and cardiovascular disease [4‐6]. Increasing risks of fractures, together with high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rates, have recently drawn much attention to devise an effective treatment plan for renal osteodystrophy that hopefully will lead to an improved outcome.

Osteitis fibrosa cystica, which is the most commonly encountered bone abnormality in renal osteodystrophy, classically appeared as an increased bone turnover that was not only associated with reduced bone density but also with osteopenia and osteoporosis that predisposes to an increased risk of fracture [7]. Since secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) characterized by persistent elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) and marked parathyroid hyperplasia is the leading cause of osteitis fibrosa cystica [8], the current recommended treatment for renal osteodystrophy is to manage secondary hyperparathyroidism, but not typical osteoporosis therapies. At the early stage, improvement of renal osteodystrophy would be an expected consequence of effectively suppressing PTH with phosphate binders, calcitriol analogs and calcimimetics. Whereas, at the late stage, the progressively reducing expression of calcium-sensing receptors and vitamin D receptors might result in resistance to medical therapy and surgical intervention might be gradually necessary to achieve adequate control of refractory secondary hyperparathyroidism [9‐14]. However, it has also been reported that very low PTH levels and over-suppression of PTH were linked with adynamic bone disease, decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and a greater risk for fracture among long-term dialysis patients [15‐17]. The impact of surgical intervention on bone health in secondary hyperparathyroidism remains uncertain, especially total parathyroidectomy without autotransplantation.

Thus, in this study, we sought to investigate the effect of total parathyroidectomy without autotransplantation on bone mineral density in the end-stage renal disease patients with refractory secondary hyperparathyroidism. Besides, we also examined the preoperative and postoperative clinical parameters to identify predictive factors related to the postoperative BMD changes.

Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics and biochemical profiles of our participants were presented in Table 1. The study included 34 patients (14 women and 20 men) with a mean age of 49.7 ± 8.44 years (range, 31–65 years). The mean duration of dialysis before surgery was 84 (60–144) months. The serum intact PTH concentration (median and inter-quartile range) was 852.0 (637.50–1058.78) pg/ml. Besides, the derangements of calcium/phosphate homeostasis with serum phosphorus 2.23 ± 0.409 mmol/L and serum calcium 2.56 ± 0.211 mmol/L were also common seen.

To evaluate the effect of total parathyroidectomy without autotransplantation on BMD changes, we firstly assessed the characteristics of regional bone mineral density at lumbar spine and hip by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry before surgery. We found that there were significant differences in BMD values between various anatomic bone sites as shown in Additional file 2: Table S2. According to the WHO criteria based on T-scores, for lumbar spine, osteoporosis at L1 was revealed in 11.8% patients while at L4 was in 32.4% patients; for the hip, the femoral neck yielded the highest frequency of diagnosis of osteoporosis (23.5%) and next came the intertrochanter (17.6%). These data indicated that the bone involvement in severe secondary hyperparathyroidism had its predilection site and the assessment of changes should be taken separately for different anatomical sites.

Overall, as presented in Additional file 2: Table S2, bone mineral density had improved significantly after total parathyroidectomy. The increases in BMD and T-scores were much greater for the lumbar spine than for the hip. When we analyzed the characterization of improvement in details, in the lumbar area, we found that the increase in bone mineral content was significant while the change in bone area was not obvious (as shown in Fig. 1a-e); while in the hip, although not statistically significant, we found the increase in bone mineral content was always accompanied by the reduction of bone area (as shown in Fig. 2a-d). According to the previous research [18], we likewise defined significant improvement if the patients’ BMD increased > 5% during the postoperative follow-up period and moderate improvement if they had a BMD increase of 0.1–5%. As illustrated in Figs. 1f and 2e, we found that the largest increases in BMD occurred at sites with the lowest pre-operative BMD. At the most frequently affected sites in the lumbar region L4, 86.2% of patients had significant improvement (> 5%) in BMD, 5.9% had moderate improvement (0.1–5%) and 5.9% had declining bone mineral density. Similarly, in the hip region, 76.5% of patients had significant improvement at the femoral neck where yielded the highest frequency of diagnosis of osteoporosis.

On correlation analysis (as shown in Table 2), we found that the percentage change in L1-L3 vertebra BMD but not hip were positively correlated with preoperative intact PTH, postoperative changes of PTH in 24 h and mass of preoperative parathyroid glands. Yet no correlations were observed between BMD changing rates with ages, gender, dialysis vintage, weight and height and time after surgery in both the lumbar spine and hip. As illustrated in Additional file 3: Figure S1, when we divided the patients into three groups according to the postoperative durations, we found that the postoperative durations did not affect the changes in BMD after surgery. Instead, there was a trend of correlation between percentage change in BMD and the preoperative bone lesions. In the multiple linear regression analysis (Table 3), we unexpectedly found that the BMD changes in most measured regions were affected by the mass of resected parathyroid glands. Besides, preoperative BMD, preoperative height, preoperative weight also participated in explaining the changes of BMD.

Secondary hyperparathyroidism, which was ubiquitous in patients on maintenance hemodialysis, has now been recognized as the predominant cause of renal osteodystrophy. In the early stage, by targeting secondary hyperparathyroidism, renal osteodystrophy could easily be managed with medical treatment. However, in the late stage, despite considerable advances in medical therapies, surgical treatment which has already proven to be much more cost effective in the long term remains necessary for treating refractory disease at times [13]. Yet surgical consensus on the optimal procedure has not been reached, total parathyroidectomy without autotransplantation is gradually accepted and recommended because of the higher cure rate and the lower recurrence rate [14, 19‐22]. Concerning the possible adverse impact on bone health in absence of PTH, our present study herein was mainly focused on the bone mineral status in secondary hyperparathyroidism and the effect of total parathyroidectomy without autotransplantation on bone density changes.

In concordance with previous studies, our data demonstrated that most of the patients with refractory SHPT displayed a marked reduction of bone density. And the BMD reduction was preferentially seen at cancellous (e.g. lumbar spine) versus cortical bone sites, although protracted elevation of serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) was held to be associated with cortical, but not cancellous, bone loss [23‐25]. After successful total parathyroidectomy without autotransplantation, further bone loss could be halted and BMD subsequently increased at nearly all skeletal sites. The lumbar spine showed a greater increase in BMD than the hip and the greatest increase in BMD was observed in the weight-bearing L4. This indicated that the sites with lowest BMD might benefit most from surgical cure. However, unlike the increase observed by Mohamed et al. in their parathyroidectomized patients [26], we observed the most marked regain in areas rich in cancellous bone whereas they found the largest increase at sites with predominantly cortical bone. Although the mechanisms underlying this discrepancy is not evident, but in both studies the largest increase in bone density occurred at the sites with the lowest preoperative BMD.

In addition to preoperative bone abnormalities, the effect of curative parathyroid resection on BMD changes was also affected by the preoperative hyperparathyroidism status, but not by age, gender, dialysis vintage and postoperative period. In the previous studies, Mohamed et al. have demonstrated that the parathyroidectomy resulted in an increased bone mass during the first 6–12 months after surgery [26]; Aiji Yajima et al. have further demonstrated that the osteoblast number increased 1 week after surgery compared with before parathyroidectomy, and the production of lamellar osteoid was detected [24]. These studies suggested that the postoperative BMD might increase mainly within the first year. That might be the reason why we found that the postoperative durations did not affect the changes in BMD after surgery. Most interestingly, with Spearman’s correlation, we found that percentage changes in BMD were correlated with both preoperative intact PTH levels and preoperative parathyroid masses; whereas, with linear regression which was determined as the best way to predict effect from cause, percentage changes in BMD were predicted only by preoperative parathyroid masses but not intact PTH levels. As we pointed in the previous study [9], PTH levels might be influenced by multiple pharmaceutical drugs in short term, while the size of parathyroid gland might be a much more accurate marker reflecting the long-term hyperparathyroidism status. Base on this point, our data suggested that the bone mineral status in secondary hyperparathyroidism and changes after surgical cure were strongly associated with chronic hyperparathyroidism status. However, since our study was based on the retrospective and uncontrolled data, there are many limitations of our study, such as selection bias, lack of close follow up, lack of data on bone biopsy, bone metabolic markers, and fracture risk. In the future, well designed randomized controlled trials are still needed to come to a solid conclusion.

In summary, despite the limitation of a small sample size, the lack of matched control group and the lack of bone histomorphometric data, our present study, in combination with previous report [27, 28], still provided some useful bone informations that amelioration of biochemical consequences of secondary hyperparathyroidism by total parathyroidectomy without autotransplantation might have a positive effect in BMD.