Skip to main content

15.05.2020 | Original Article | Ausgabe 10/2020

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 10/2020

Changing epidemiology and resistance patterns of pathogens causing neonatal bacteremia

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases > Ausgabe 10/2020
Ayelet Mintz, Meirav Mor, Gil Klinger, Oded Scheuerman, Avinoam Pirogovsky, Nir Sokolover, Ruben Bromiker
Wichtige Hinweise

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


To conduct a survey of the local prevalent bacteria and antibiotic resistance in a referral tertiary neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), in order to assess the efficacy of local antibiotic policies. We reviewed all positive blood and cerebrospinal fluid cultures obtained between January 2007 and December 2017 in the NICU of Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel. Early and late-onset bacteremia were defined as episodes occurring within or after the first 3 calendar days of life respectively. Empiric treatment included ampicillin and gentamicin or piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin for early or late-onset bacteremia respectively. The prevalence and antibiotic resistance of the bacteria were described and compared over time. Eight hundred and twenty nine of 15,947 (5.2%) newborns had at least one episode of bacteremia; 81 had multiple episodes. The most common bacteria were Escherichia coli (32.35%) and group B Streptococcus (19.11%) or coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) (60.5%) and Klebsiella sp. (12.4%) in early or late-onset bacteremia respectively. Overall, all Gram-positive bacteria were susceptible to vancomycin and most non-CoNS to ampicillin. Nosocomial vs. vertical bacteremia had increased resistance to ampicillin and cephalosporins. Resistance of nosocomial bacteria to piperacillin-tazobactam was 22.4%, to amikacin 3.3%, and to meropenem 1.8%. Changes over time: Gram-negative bacteria had a significant increase in resistance to cotrimoxazole and piperacillin. The resistance to gentamicin doubled. Our empiric antibiotic regimen covers the most frequent isolates. Amikacin may replace gentamicin for selected sick patients in early-onset bacteremia. Piperacillin-tazobactam should be combined with amikacin until susceptibility is available.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag als Mediziner

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2020

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 10/2020 Zur Ausgabe
  1. Sie können e.Med Innere Medizin 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Innere Medizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

© Springer Medizin