Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Translational Medicine 1/2011

Open Access 01.12.2011 | Research

Characteristics of Chinese patients with cough in primary care centre

verfasst von: Qunying Hong, Chunxue Bai, Xiangdong Wang

Erschienen in: Journal of Translational Medicine | Ausgabe 1/2011

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Abstract

Background

Cough is one of the most common respiratory symptoms and is well characterized in specialized cough clinics with high success rates of diagnosis and treatment. However, there is a paucity of data regarding cough in primary care settings. The present study aimed at investigating clinical epidemiology of cough through a national study of two questionnaire surveys sent to primary care physicians in China.

Methods

Approximately 18,000 subjects recruited were having daytime or night symptoms of cough and diagnoses of respiratory disease from February 2005 to April 2006 as Survey 1 and from June 2007 to December 2007 as Survey 2. Patients suffering from respiratory malignancy, hyperthyroidism, hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, severe hypohepatia or renal dysfunction, pregnancy, possible pregnancy or lactation, neutropenia were not eligible. Information regarding demography, history of allergies, symptomatic profile, treatment and curative effects for cough was elicited.

Results

8216 questionnaires were collected in Survey 1 and 9711 in Survey 2. The mean values of ages were 25.7 and 22.3 years old, respectively. Symptoms included expectoration (74% and 76%), wheeze (59% and 74%), breathlessness (22% and 26%), chest pain (9% and 13%) and fever (15% and 18%). About 15% and 23% patients had hypersusceptibility, of whom 6% to 17% had a family history. More than 50% of the cases had histories of allergic rhinitis, asthma, conjunctivitis or atopic dermatitis. Asthma, COPD, and bronchitis were dominant etiologies of cough. Procaterol or the combination of antibiotics and steroids were used as the treatment.

Conclusion

Causes and outcomes of cough differed with ages and time in this particular national study, while successful and precise diagnosis and management of cough in primary care settings need to be further improved in China.
Hinweise
Authors' contributions
QYH performed studies, drafted the manuscript, and performed the statistical analysis. CXB and XDW participated in the study design and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript

Introduction

Cough is one of the most common respiratory symptoms encountered by clinicians [1], with the reported prevalence varying between 5% and 40% [24]. Cough is also one of the critical factors affecting the quality of life in patients with respiratory diseases. Cough management has massive economic consequences. The first guideline on the management of cough with a significant positive impact was championed in 1998 [5], followed by the publication of other guidelines on chronic cough [69]. The Chinese Medical Association published "Diagnosis and treatment guide (draft) of cough" in 2005 [10], and then the American College of Chest Physicians published evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute cough, subacute cough, and chronic cough in adults and chronic cough in children in 2006 [1, 6, 11].
Over-the-counter combination cough medication such as cough syrup including traditional Chinese medicine is usually the first choice in China. The majority of people with cough who consulted a health care professional received the diagnosis and was informed that over the counter cough medications could relieve the symptoms. However, there are still a number of those with unclear diagnosis or failure to respond to therapy. The present study aimed at investigating clinical epidemiology of cough through a national study of two questionnaire surveys sent to primary care physicians in China. Approximately 18,000 subjects with daytime or night symptoms of cough and with diagnoses of respiratory disease were recruited for questionnaires from February 2005 to April 2006 as Survey 1 and from June 2007 to December 2007 as Survey 2. It provided further information about the demographic and symptomatic profile in the population and curative effects for cough in Chinese patients with respiratory diseases. This is one of the national projects organized by the Chinese Medical Doctor Association in order to obtain a better understanding of coughs while hoping the results could lead to new ideas and plans to explore in regard to molecular mechanisms and therapies.

Methods

Patients

The present study identified clinical characteristics of patients with cough from a nationwide-based survey conducted by the Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Subjects recruited had daytime or nighttime symptoms of cough and diagnoses of respiratory diseases, from 85 primary care medical centers. The 85 clinics are primary care centers chosen from the north and south of China as representatives in China. One survey started from February 2005 to April 2006 was named Survey 1 and one from June 2007 to December 2007 was named Survey 2. The two surveys were performed at the same 85 clinics. There was no overlap of the two surveys. The reason for calculating using two surveys was to see the improvement of health care and medical care inbetween the two time periods. Patients were provided with written information prior to obtaining oral consent. The study is a questionnaire survey aimed at investigating the clinical epidemiology of the cough for patients when first visiting the primary care center. Information on patient health care data, e.g. numbers, home address, phone number and others, was protected.

Evaluation Scores

Physicians were invited to complete and follow up the cough questionnaires and were then completed by the referred patients who had been in primary care settings during the first time. After then, they were continuously followed up for an additional 14 days, in order to audit social and demographic factors as well as qualitative measures of responses to treatment. The physicians filled out the questionnaires. Sections of open questions were asked, including demographic details, symptoms, history of the cough, hypersusceptibility patterns, and treatment outcomes. Hypersusceptibility was defined as a cough condition of abnormal susceptibility to stimuli that are entirely innocuous in the normal individual. Cough severity was assessed on a scale of 0 (no cough) to 3(severe cough) and recorded on a daily record. Effectiveness was evaluated as cured (symptom score decreased to 0), markedly improved (symptom score decreased ≥ 4), improved (Symptom score decreased ≥ 2), or no effect (unchanged or aggravated). Adverse events were elicited at each visit by enquiring about the side effects of therapy recorded from a symptom checklist.

Statistics

Data were analyzed by the two-sided test and p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Non-parametric statistics rank sum test was used for the analysis of recovery percentage. The quota target was used and described by statisticians, including the computation arithmetic mean value, the standard deviation, the median, the minimum value, the maximum value. The example number was calculated and the percentage of corresponding was classified with the identification target. Data was analyzed using the SAS 9.1.2 program by Health Statistics Laboratory of Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Results

Of 18000 questionnaires, 8216 were received by the end of April, 2006, and 9711 by the end of Dec 2007, respectively. There were 4655 males and 3561 females with a mean age of 25.7 (standard deviation 24, range 1-98 years) in Survey 1 with 8216 patients. Of them, 46% were less than 10 years old (Table 1 and Table 2). There were 5331 males and 4010 females with a mean age of 22.3 years (standard deviation 22 years) in Survey 2 with 9711 patients, among whom the age of 425 patients were not recorded.
Table 1
Characteristic of the subjects in Survey 1
Age
Male
Female
Total
Years
Cases
Percentage
Cases
Percentage
Cases
Percentage
0-10
2102
45.2%
1710
48.0%
3812
46.4%
11-20
249
5.3%
196
5.5%
445
5.4%
21-30
279
6.0%
281
7.9%
560
6.8%
31-40
519
11.1%
397
11.1%
916
11.2%
41-50
492
10.6%
299
8.4%
791
9.6%
51-60
382
8.2%
239
6.7%
621
7.6%
61-70
321
6.9%
151
4.2%
472
5.7%
71-80
212
4.6%
107
3.0%
319
3.9%
81-90
99
2.1%
181
5.1%
280
3.4%
Total
4655
100%
3561
100%
8216
100%
Table 2
Characteristic of the subjects in Survey 2
Age
Male
Female
Total
 
Cases
Percentage
Cases
Percentage
Cases
Percentage
0-10
2439
45.5%
2252
55.8%
4691
50.5%
11-20
812
15.2%
539
13.4%
1351
14.5%
21-30
216
4.2%
175
4.2%
391
4.2%
31-40
426
8.1%
269
6.6%
695
7.5%
41-50
535
9.9%
249
6.2%
784
8.4%
51-60
361
6.7%
208
5.1%
569
6.1%
61-70
297
5.5%
154
3.8%
451
4.9%
71-80
201
3.8%
132
3.2%
333
3.6%
81-90
14
0.2%
7
0.1%
21
0.2%
Total
5301
100%
3985
100%
9286
100.0%
The cough was reported to be productive in 6256 of 8216 patients (76%) with complaint of wheeze 59%, breathlessness 22%, chest pain 9% and fever 18% in Survey 1, while cough (74%), wheeze (74%), breathlessness (26%), chest pain (13%) and fever (15%) were noticed in Survey 2. Of 8216 patients in Survey 1, 1919 (23%) had hypersusceptibility and 1359 (17%) had a family history of hypersusceptibility. Of 9177 patients in Survey 2, 1444 (15%) had hypersusceptibility and 621 (6%) had a family history of hypersusceptibility. More than 50% of cases had a history of allergic rhinitis, asthma, allergic conjunctivitis or atopic dermatitis (Table 3). Inclusion subjects were given a diagnosis, mainly including COPD and asthma. Table 4 described the details of diagnosis. Tubercular pleurisy, stomatitis, acute pharyngitis, hypertension of pulmonary artery or fewer were listed in the section of others.
Table 3
History of diseases in subjects with cough
Disease
Survey 1
Survey 2
 
Cases
Percentage
Cases
Percentage
Allergic rhinitis
1359
16.5%
1972
20.3%
Asthma
3202
39.0%
6236
64.2%
Allergic conjunctivitis
88
1.1%
227
2.3%
Atopic dermatitis
120
1.5%
104
1.1%
Table 4
Diagnosis of inclusion subjects
Diagnosis
Survey 1
Survey 2
 
Cases
Percentage
Cases
Percentage
Influenza
2
0.02%
1
0.01%
Rhinitis
28
0.34%
30
0.31%
Bronchial hyperreactivity
19
0.23%
0
0.00%
COPD & Asthma
90
1.10%
0
0.00%
Chronic bronchitis
124
1.51%
105
1.08%
Pneumonia
290
3.53%
87
0.90%
Allergic cough
334
4.07%
301
3.10%
Asthmatoid bronchitis
341
4.15%
292
3.01%
Common cold
394
4.80%
31
0.32%
Chronic cough
520
6.33%
249
2.56%
Acute bronchitis
932
11.34%
1000
10.30%
Asthma (except CVA)
1799
21.89%
4521
46.56%
COPD
1303
15.86%
1135
11.69%
Cough variant asthma(CVA)
1723
20.97%
1563
16.10%
others
317
3.86%
400
4.08%
Total
8216
100.00%
9711
100.00%
Patients were treated with Procaterol, of whom 1098 in Survey 1 and 1046 in Survey 2 also had a combination of drugs, including expectorant (Ambroxol, Bromhexine, Carbocisteine), methylxanthines (Aminophylline, Theophylline), antihistamines (Cetirizine, Ketotifen, Cyprohentadine, Loratadine, Chlorphenamine, Tranilast), leukotriene modifiers (Montelukast), beta2 agonists (Salbutamol), inhaled long-acting beta2 agonists, Sametrol/Fluticasone, Formoferol/Budesonide, anticholinergics (Ipratropine). Combined drugs also included cough syrup (e.g. graifenesin, methylephedrine, chlorphenamine syrup, dextromethorphan hydrobromide with chlorpheniramine maleate, or pseudoe phedrine hydiochloride solution), Asmeton, Chinese traditional medicine, inhaled steroids (e.g. budesonide, fluticasone, and beclomethasone dipropionate), systemic steroids (e.g. methylprednisolone, prednisone, and dexamethasone), anti-virus (Ribavirin), or antibiotics(e.g. macrocyclic lactone, quinolone, cephalosporin, benzylpenicillin, and others), as shown Table 5.
Table 5
Treatments of inclusion subjects
Treatment
Survey 1
Survey 2
  
Cases
Percentage
Cases
Percentage
Expectorant
194
2.36%
1
0.01%
Methylxanthines
126
1.53%
39
0.40%
Antihistamines
197
2.40%
48
0.49%
Leukotriene modifiers
104
1.27%
151
1.55%
SABAS
43
0.52%
184
1.89%
LABA
34
0.41%
53
0.55%
Anticholinergics
36
0.44%
2
0.02%
Combination Drugs
82
1.00%
1
0.01%
Chinese traditional medicine
169
2.06%
14
0.14%
Inhaled steroids
180
2.19%
225
2.32%
Systemic Corticosteroids
45
0.55%
22
0.23%
Anti-virus
6
0.07%
0
0.00%
 
Macrocyclic lactone
88
1.07%
5
0.05%
 
Quinolone
51
0.62%
0
0.00%
Antibiotics
Cephalosporin
267
3.25%
243
2.50%
 
Benzylpenicillin
45
0.55%
31
0.32%
 
others
12
0.15%
72
0.74%
Others drugs (unknown)
414
5.04%
19
0.20%
The daily cough diary showed a rapid and highly significant reduction in the cough score (Table 6 and Table 7). Of them, 83% in Survey 1 and 92% in Survey 2 had no symptom during the daytime after 14 days of treatment, while 82% in Survey 1 and 94% in Survey 2 had no symptom during the night. There was a significant difference between before and after the treatments (p < 0.05 or 0.01, respectively). No patient dropped out because of severe adverse events.
Table 6
Daytime cough symptom assessment
Days
Cases in survey 1
Cases in survey 2
 
No symptom
Mild cough
Moderate cough
Severe cough
No symptom
Mild cough
Moderate cough
Severe cough
0
34
807
3146
3926
12
182
2561
6463
1
35
701
2978
3617
7
206
2475
5764
2
87
910
3493
2903
69
557
3337
4568
3
218
1291
4075
1890
227
1016
4371
3156
4
366
1671
4495
846
145
1426
6034
673
5
521
2070
4326
413
309
2390
5394
173
6
805
2692
3682
183
633
3342
4229
65
7
1151
3482
2896
76
1326
3777
3473
42
8
1449
4035
1756
41
890
4810
1614
29
9
1895
4250
1077
24
1438
5065
647
26
10
2382
4199
605
13
2240
4401
251
20
11
3166
3075
304
5
3058
3617
102
19
12
4370
2655
123
7
4758
1859
48
19
13
5280
1799
62
4
5056
966
33
19
14
6083
1388
46
5
5540
704
33
19
Table 7
Night cough symptom assessment
Days
Cases in survey 1
Cases in survey 2
 
No symptom
Mild cough
Moderate cough
Severe cough
No symptom
Mild cough
Moderate cough
Severe cough
0
149
819
2939
3942
43
239
2471
6441
1
80
818
2632
3756
39
272
2424
5690
2
167
944
2967
3165
88
615
2830
4971
3
318
1190
3382
2349
236
1110
4274
3132
4
466
1512
3944
1310
171
1467
5455
1159
5
640
1800
4126
637
339
2198
5420
296
6
895
2223
3826
287
555
3124
4483
92
7
1276
2780
3272
133
1379
3777
3423
39
8
1513
3180
2373
68
978
4664
1747
23
9
1809
3655
1605
28
1395
4759
1091
19
10
2151
3944
936
14
2048
4518
392
15
11
2704
3809
495
4
3096
3591
132
15
12
3711
3077
214
1
4651
1983
48
17
13
4778
2121
87
1
5030
998
28
17
14
5903
1417
48
0
5716
531
24
18

Discussion

Cough is an important defensive reflex of the respiratory tract to clean up and protect the upper airway, while also being the commonest symptom for which patients seek medical advice. Causes and outcomes of cough differ with age and its presentation and other related symptoms vary with time (e.g. seasonality) and habits (e.g. smoking, occupation, body weight, use of drug etc.). Children below 10 years may have more episodes of bronchiolitis and asthma, which is the reason why their prevalence is high among both surveys in the present, while the adults suffer more from pneumonia and other chronic conditions. One of the common causes is chronic upper airway cough syndrome, previously referred to as postnasal drip syndrome, secondary to rhinosinus diseases, common cold, asthma, gastroesophageal reflux disease, bronchitis (e.g. acute bronchitis, chronic bronchitis, acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, or nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis), bronchiectasis, post infectious cough, or others [12]. Thus, it is unexpectedly challenging for clinicians to define the etiology and pathogenesis of coughs in addition to selecting the optimal treatment in primary care settings. According to our knowledge, the present study incorporates the largest population sample yet to study the clinical epidemiology of coughs, which in turn can provide an overall figure indicating personal feelings, signs and clinical indications of coughs in primary care settings.
Subjects recruited in the present study had daytime or night symptoms of cough and diagnoses of respiratory disease, of whom about half were children. The accompanied symptoms included expectoration, fever, chest pain, usually indicative of the respiratory infection, wheezing, and breathlessness, which was usually accompanied with COPD and asthma. The two common diseases were COPD and asthma including cough variant asthma. Breathlessness and cough may be the clinical indicators of COPD or asthma exacerbations [13], while acute bronchitis should not be diagnosed until the common cold, asthma, and an acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis have been ruled out [14]. However, it was often over-diagnosed, leading to the abuse of antibiotics. About 10% of patients were diagnosed as acute bronchitis in the Surveys, which was a lower percentage than that of COPD and asthma. Nasal disease was an important risk factor of cough, especially of chronic cough. It would be more valuable for the therapeutic strategies to further distinguish acute and chronic cough, rhinitis and other nasal disease if the proportion was large enough.
Hypersusceptibility has been suggested as one of major challenging factors in cough. We found that more than half of the patients with cough had a history of allergic rhinitis, asthma, allergic conjunctivitis or atopic dermatitis. About 15% to 23% patients had hyper-susceptibility, while 6% to 17% had a family history of hyper-susceptibility. More patients had a history of asthma in Survey 2 (64%) than in Survey 1 (39%). Allergic rhinitis is a common cause of postnasal drip and coughs, with a high prevalence in patients with asthma [15]. Patients with allergic rhinitis should be identified and clarified in the future study, in order to evaluate the significance and difference of allergic diseases in cough.
Procaterol was used as the treatment of patients, although the symptom of acute cough was sometimes automatically cured [16]. Responses to the used treatment were rapid and efficient, evidenced by the fact that 83% and 92% of patients in Surveys 1 and 2, respectively, had no daytime symptoms and 82% and 94% had no night symptoms after 14 days of treatment. Although our data showed that Procaterol could improve the symptom of cough in patients with respiratory diseases, we do not know the exact effects of the drug as our study was not a randomized controlled trial. Antibiotics were hardly effective for chronic cough and acute cough caused by the common cold, acute bronchitis, asthma, mild exacerbations of chronic bronchitis related to smoking, or environmental irritants [17, 18]. However, the application of antibiotics could be beneficial for upper airway cough syndrome resulted from bacterial sinusitis, and infection in the lower respiratory tract (whooping cough), if given early. The prescription rate of antibiotics was about 4-6% in patients with cough, which was considered as acceptable according to the conditions of the patients studied. Inhaled steroids were used in about 2% of patients, while systemic corticosteroids in 0.6%.
However, a number of limitations in the present study should be improved in future studies. For example, such cross-sectional studies should be followed up longitudinally, results based on self-reports should be compared with clinical information, including physical examinations, imaging and biochemical analyses. More diagnoses should be included in the questionnaire form, including pneumonia, common cold, acute bronchitis, and chronic bronchitis, even though it may be difficult to confirm those diagnoses. More attention on etiology and pathogenesis of cough should be considered as well as further education on cough management should be delivered to physicians working in primary care settings.

Conclusion

In conclusion, cough causes a high level of morbidity in the community, annually resulting in massive health economy consequences. Demography and symptomatology seem to be similar to that reported in specialist hospital centers, but successful and precise diagnosis and treatment of cough was not as satisfactory. Management of cough in primary care needs to be improved in China.

Acknowledgements

The study was sponsored by the Chinese Medical Doctor Association and Zhejiang Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, China.
Conflict statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Authors' contributions
QYH performed studies, drafted the manuscript, and performed the statistical analysis. CXB and XDW participated in the study design and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Boulet LP: Future Directions in the Clinical Management of Cough: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2006, 129: 287-292. 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.287S.CrossRef Boulet LP: Future Directions in the Clinical Management of Cough: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2006, 129: 287-292. 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.287S.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cullinan P: Persistent cough and sputum: prevalence and clinical characteristics in south east England. Resp Med. 1992, 86: 143-149. 10.1016/S0954-6111(06)80231-3.CrossRef Cullinan P: Persistent cough and sputum: prevalence and clinical characteristics in south east England. Resp Med. 1992, 86: 143-149. 10.1016/S0954-6111(06)80231-3.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Faniran AO, Peat JK, Woolcock AJ: Measuring Persistent Cough in Children in Epidemiological Studies: Development of a Questionnaire and Assessment of Prevalence in Two Countries. Chest. 1999, 115: 434-439. 10.1378/chest.115.2.434.CrossRefPubMed Faniran AO, Peat JK, Woolcock AJ: Measuring Persistent Cough in Children in Epidemiological Studies: Development of a Questionnaire and Assessment of Prevalence in Two Countries. Chest. 1999, 115: 434-439. 10.1378/chest.115.2.434.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Irwin RS, Boulet LP, Cloutier MM, Fuller R, Gold PM, Hoffstein V, Ing AJ, McCool FD, O'Byrne P, Poe RH, Prakash UB, Pratter MR, Rubin BK: Managing cough as a defense mechanism and as a symptom. A consensus panel report of the American College of Chest Physicians. Chest. 1998, 114: 133S-181S. 10.1378/chest.114.2_Supplement.133S.CrossRefPubMed Irwin RS, Boulet LP, Cloutier MM, Fuller R, Gold PM, Hoffstein V, Ing AJ, McCool FD, O'Byrne P, Poe RH, Prakash UB, Pratter MR, Rubin BK: Managing cough as a defense mechanism and as a symptom. A consensus panel report of the American College of Chest Physicians. Chest. 1998, 114: 133S-181S. 10.1378/chest.114.2_Supplement.133S.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Irwin RS, Baumann MH, Bolser DC, Boulet LP, Braman SS, Brightling CE, Brown KK, Canning BJ, Chang AB, Dicpinigaitis PV, Eccles R, Glomb WB, Goldstein LB, Graham LM, Hargreave FE, Kvale PA, Lewis S, McCool FD, McCrory DC, Prakash UB, Pratter MR, Rosen MJ, Schulman E, Shannon JJ, Smith Hammond C, Tarlo SM: Diagnosis and Management of Cough Executive Summary: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2006, 129: 1S-23. 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.1S.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Irwin RS, Baumann MH, Bolser DC, Boulet LP, Braman SS, Brightling CE, Brown KK, Canning BJ, Chang AB, Dicpinigaitis PV, Eccles R, Glomb WB, Goldstein LB, Graham LM, Hargreave FE, Kvale PA, Lewis S, McCool FD, McCrory DC, Prakash UB, Pratter MR, Rosen MJ, Schulman E, Shannon JJ, Smith Hammond C, Tarlo SM: Diagnosis and Management of Cough Executive Summary: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2006, 129: 1S-23. 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.1S.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Morice AH, members C: The diagnosis and management of chronic cough. Eur Respir J. 2004, 24: 481-492. 10.1183/09031936.04.00027804.CrossRefPubMed Morice AH, members C: The diagnosis and management of chronic cough. Eur Respir J. 2004, 24: 481-492. 10.1183/09031936.04.00027804.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kohno S, Ishida T, Uchida Y, Kishimoto H, Sasaki H, Shioya T, Tokuyama K, Niimi A, Nishi K, Fujimura M, Matsuse H, Suzaki H: The Japanese Respiratory Society guidelines for management of cough. Respirology. 2006, 11: S135-S186.CrossRefPubMed Kohno S, Ishida T, Uchida Y, Kishimoto H, Sasaki H, Shioya T, Tokuyama K, Niimi A, Nishi K, Fujimura M, Matsuse H, Suzaki H: The Japanese Respiratory Society guidelines for management of cough. Respirology. 2006, 11: S135-S186.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Diagnosis and treatment guide (draft) of cough. Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis. 2005, 28: 738-744. Diagnosis and treatment guide (draft) of cough. Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis. 2005, 28: 738-744.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang AB, Glomb WB, Guidelines for Evaluating Chronic Cough in Pediatrics: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2006, 129: 260-283. 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.260S.CrossRef Chang AB, Glomb WB, Guidelines for Evaluating Chronic Cough in Pediatrics: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2006, 129: 260-283. 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.260S.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat McCrory DC, Lewis SZ: Methodology and grading of the evidence for the diagnosis and management of cough: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2006, 129: S28-S32. 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.28S.CrossRef McCrory DC, Lewis SZ: Methodology and grading of the evidence for the diagnosis and management of cough: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2006, 129: S28-S32. 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.28S.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunton S, Carmichael BP, Colgan R, Feeney AS, Fendrick AM, Quintiliani R, Scott G: Acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: A primary care consensus guideline. Am J Manag Care. 2004, 689-696. 10 Brunton S, Carmichael BP, Colgan R, Feeney AS, Fendrick AM, Quintiliani R, Scott G: Acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: A primary care consensus guideline. Am J Manag Care. 2004, 689-696. 10
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Braman SS: Chronic cough due to acute bronchitis: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2006, 129: S95-S103. 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.95S.CrossRef Braman SS: Chronic cough due to acute bronchitis: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2006, 129: S95-S103. 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.95S.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pratter MR: Chronic upper airway cough syndrome Secondary to Rhinosinus Diseases (Previously referred to as postnasal drip syndrome): ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2006, 129: S63-S71. 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.63S.CrossRef Pratter MR: Chronic upper airway cough syndrome Secondary to Rhinosinus Diseases (Previously referred to as postnasal drip syndrome): ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2006, 129: S63-S71. 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.63S.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelley LK, Allen PJ: Managing acute cough in children: evidence-based guidelines. Pediatr Nurs. 2007, 515-524. 33 Kelley LK, Allen PJ: Managing acute cough in children: evidence-based guidelines. Pediatr Nurs. 2007, 515-524. 33
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Braman SS: Postinfectious cough: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2006, 129: S138-S146. 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.138S.CrossRef Braman SS: Postinfectious cough: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2006, 129: S138-S146. 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.138S.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Footitt J, Johnston SL: Cough and viruses in airways disease: mechanisms. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2009, 22: 108-113. 10.1016/j.pupt.2008.12.022.CrossRefPubMed Footitt J, Johnston SL: Cough and viruses in airways disease: mechanisms. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2009, 22: 108-113. 10.1016/j.pupt.2008.12.022.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Characteristics of Chinese patients with cough in primary care centre
verfasst von
Qunying Hong
Chunxue Bai
Xiangdong Wang
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2011
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Journal of Translational Medicine / Ausgabe 1/2011
Elektronische ISSN: 1479-5876
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-9-149

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

Journal of Translational Medicine 1/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.