Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Cancer 1/2018

Open Access 01.12.2018 | Research article

Characteristics of people living in Italy after a cancer diagnosis in 2010 and projections to 2020

verfasst von: Stefano Guzzinati, Saverio Virdone, Roberta De Angelis, Chiara Panato, Carlotta Buzzoni, Riccardo Capocaccia, Silvia Francisci, Anna Gigli, Manuel Zorzi, Giovanna Tagliabue, Diego Serraino, Fabio Falcini, Claudia Casella, Antonio Giampiero Russo, Fabrizio Stracci, Bianca Caruso, Maria Michiara, Anna Luisa Caiazzo, Marine Castaing, Stefano Ferretti, Lucia Mangone, Giuseppa Rudisi, Flavio Sensi, Guido Mazzoleni, Fabio Pannozzo, Rosario Tumino, Mario Fusco, Paolo Ricci, Gemma Gola, Adriano Giacomin, Francesco Tisano, Giuseppa Candela, Anna Clara Fanetti, Filomena Pala, Antonella Sutera Sardo, Massimo Rugge, Laura Botta, Luigino Dal Maso

Erschienen in: BMC Cancer | Ausgabe 1/2018

Abstract

Background

Estimates of cancer prevalence are widely based on limited duration, often including patients living after a cancer diagnosis made in the previous 5 years and less frequently on complete prevalence (i.e., including all patients regardless of the time elapsed since diagnosis). This study aims to provide estimates of complete cancer prevalence in Italy by sex, age, and time since diagnosis for all cancers combined, and for selected cancer types. Projections were made up to 2020, overall and by time since diagnosis.

Methods

Data were from 27 Italian population-based cancer registries, covering 32% of the Italian population, able to provide at least 7 years of registration as of December 2009 and follow-up of vital status as of December 2013. The data were used to compute the limited-duration prevalence, in order to estimate the complete prevalence by means of the COMPREV software.

Results

In 2010, 2,637,975 persons were estimated to live in Italy after a cancer diagnosis, 1.2 million men and 1.4 million women, or 4.6% of the Italian population. A quarter of male prevalent cases had prostate cancer (n = 305,044), while 42% of prevalent women had breast cancer (n = 604,841). More than 1.5 million people (2.7% of Italians) were alive since 5 or more years after diagnosis and 20% since ≥15 years. It is projected that, in 2020 in Italy, there will be 3.6 million prevalent cancer cases (+ 37% vs 2010). The largest 10-year increases are foreseen for prostate (+ 85%) and for thyroid cancers (+ 79%), and for long-term survivors diagnosed since 20 or more years (+ 45%). Among the population aged ≥75 years, 22% will have had a previous cancer diagnosis.

Conclusions

The number of persons living after a cancer diagnosis is estimated to rise of approximately 3% per year in Italy. The availability of detailed estimates and projections of the complete prevalence are intended to help the implementation of guidelines aimed to enhance the long-term follow-up of cancer survivors and to contribute their rehabilitation needs.
Hinweise
Adriano Giacomin is deceased.

Background

Estimates of cancer prevalence are widely based on limited duration prevalence, including only patients living after a cancer diagnosis made in the previous 5 years [1, 2]. Prevalence, regardless of the time since diagnosis (i.e., complete prevalence), is less frequently estimated than limited duration prevalence [39]. Overall age-standardized cancer incidence and mortality rates have declined over the past 10 years in the majority of high income countries, whereas the complete prevalence has been consistently increasing in the early 2000s [3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11]. Complete prevalence is generally measured in absolute numbers and proportions, i.e., not age-standardized. Thus, improved survival [12, 13] and population ageing (increasing absolute number of new cancer diagnoses) imply a progressive increase in tumour prevalence.
Cancer prevalence includes patients currently treated for cancer; those who have become cancer free, but still have a measurable excess risk of recurrence or death; and, finally, patients having death rates similar to those of the general population who can be considered “cured patients” [14]. Many of these individuals are possibly affected by physical, cognitive, and/or psychosocial limitations [15].
The aim of this study was to provide a description of the number of people living in Italy at January 1, 2010 after a cancer diagnosis, for all cancers combined and for a selection of cancer types by sex, age, and time since diagnosis. In addition, projections of cancer prevalence in Italy are presented up to the year 2020. Estimates and projections of complete tumour prevalence and characteristics of prevalent patients are necessary to help clinicians and health care planners in improving long-term care of patients and in allocating appropriately health care resources. Moreover, they may provide helpful information to a growing number of cancer patients or former patients.

Methods

Study design and data sources

This is a descriptive analysis of individual data collected during the period 1976-2009 from 27 population-based Italian cancer registries (i.e., 32% of the entire Italian population in 2010), which agreed to participate in the study and were able to provide at least 7 years of cancer registration as of December 31, 2009 (Appendix 1) and follow-up of vital status as of December 31, 2013. The Italian legislation identifies Cancer Registries as collectors of personal data for surveillance purposes without explicit individual consent. The approval of a research ethic committee is not required, since this descriptive study was conducted without any direct or indirect intervention on patients.
Prevalence for all malignant tumours (ICD-10: C00-C43, C45-C96) and 34 cancer types or their combinations were estimated and presented in this study for all age groups. Urinary bladder cancers with benign or uncertain behaviour, and in situ tumours were also included. Only non melanoma skin cancers (ICD-10 C44) were excluded. ICD-O-3 morphology codes were used to define specific subtypes.

Statistical methods

The clinical and demographic characteristics of the persons registered with a diagnosis of cancers in the Italian CRs were used to estimate: 1) how many of them were still alive at January 1, 2010 regardless of time since diagnosis -i.e., complete prevalence count- by cancer type, sex, and age group; 2) the prevalence proportion in Italy at 2010 for each cancer type, by sex, and age; 3) the complete prevalence (count and proportion) at 1st January 2015 and 2020, overall and by time since diagnosis; and 4) describe the changing over time of these estimates.
For each cancer registry we computed the limited duration prevalence, i.e. the number of patients diagnosed in the period of the registration activity (between 7 and 34 years) at January 1, 2010, using the counting method implemented in SEER*Stat software [16]. This maximum limited duration prevalence was corrected, using the COMPREV software [17], by means of completeness index [18, 19], to estimate the total number of cancer patients alive, regardless of when they were diagnosed. Completeness indices were estimated by cancer type, sex, age, and time since diagnosis. Prevalence was computed as an absolute number, as well as a proportion per 100,000 residents people by cancer type, sex, age group, area of residence, and years since diagnosis. Patients with more than one primary cancer were included in the computation of prevalence for each cancer type or combination. In the analyses for all types combined, only the first cancer was considered. Completeness indices were obtained by statistical regression models of incidence and survival using data from 8 long-term registries (Appendix 1) with an available observation period of at least 18 years before 2010 [20, 21]. Relative survival and incidence functions were estimated by means of parametric models within the period 1985-2011 for survival and 1985-2009 for incidence. The survival model was a parametric cure model assuming that a proportion of individuals with cancer were bound to die (fatal cases) with a survival following a Weibull distribution, while the remaining proportion (cured fraction) had the same mortality rate as that of the general population with the same age and gender stratification [14, 20]. The parameters of the survival model were estimated by cancer type, sex, and age class (0-14, 15-44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75+ years) through the SAS procedure NLIN. A period effect was included on the hazard of dying of cancer. Incidence data were categorised according to cancer type, sex, five-year age group, and birth cohort (< 1899, 1900-1904,…, 2005-2009). A sixth degree polynomial age-cohort model of crude incidence rates was fitted through the SAS LOGISTIC procedure for each cancer type and sex [21].
Complete prevalence proportions were projected to 2020 by cancer type, sex, age, and registry, assuming that complete prevalence will follow a linear function, based on the trend of the last three calendar years (i.e., 2007-2009). This simplified assumption (linear and constant trend) may not be valid for long-term projections, but it is reasonable for short or medium-term (e.g., 10-year) ones. Other assumptions (e.g., log-linear models) were explored [4, 6], showing consistent results for common cancer types, but unstable projections for the rarest.
The absolute number of prevalent cases in Italy was obtained using proportions of prevalence estimates (age-, sex-, and cancer type-specific) from CRs included in this study, multiplied by the Italian national population by sex and age observed at January 1, 2010. Proportions projected to 2020 were thus multiplied to Italian population forecasted at January 1, 2020 [22].

Results

Prevalence estimates at 2010

In Italy in 2010, 2,637,975 persons were alive after a cancer diagnosis, corresponding to 4.6% of all the Italian population (Appendix 2). Prevalence proportions increase with age: 3.1% at age 45-54 years, 6.6% at 55-64 years, 12.1% at 65-74 years, and nearly 17% after age 75 years (Appendix 2) with differences by sex (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 1
Complete cancer prevalence by cancer type and age in Italian men at January 1, 2010
Cancer type
Prevalent cases
Prevalence proportion per 100,000 men
All ages
%
00-14
15-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75-84
85+
All ages
00-14
15-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75-84
85+
All types but skin non-melanoma
1,194,033
 
4844
84,172
87,091
198,505
363,932
357,051
98,439
4250
111
732
2079
5715
13,029
20,534
21,955
Upper aero-digestive tract
26,745
2.2%
19
1654
3320
6536
8063
5786
1367
100
0
15
84
199
311
337
313
Esophagus
3067
0.3%
0
54
252
722
1105
781
153
12
0
1
7
23
45
51
40
Stomach
45,970
3.8%
2
764
2583
6661
13,618
16,538
5802
158
0
6
58
180
470
926
1268
Small intestine
3384
0.3%
0
221
350
760
987
850
216
13
0
2
8
23
38
52
46
Colon, rectum, anus
185,532
15.5%
3
2718
8722
29,332
59,931
63,698
21,130
654
0
23
210
840
2108
3618
4682
Liver
17,454
1.5%
57
317
1539
3831
6347
4752
610
63
2
3
37
110
228
280
142
Biliary tract
4251
0.4%
0
70
238
713
1365
1443
421
15
0
0
6
20
47
80
103
Pancreas
5856
0.5%
3
198
598
1383
1876
1462
336
21
0
2
14
39
69
84
75
Larynx
44,810
3.8%
0
236
2105
8399
15,082
14,819
4169
160
0
2
51
240
540
854
965
Lung
63,048
5.3%
16
804
2771
11,014
22,765
21,682
3996
219
0
7
64
306
787
1229
890
Thymus, heart, mediastinum
2290
0.2%
42
384
435
548
516
331
33
7
1
3
9
14
18
18
9
Bone
4808
0.4%
152
1910
924
771
596
418
37
16
3
16
20
21
19
22
10
Skin melanoma
44,977
3.8%
21
6730
7411
9817
11,117
7867
2014
165
0
61
181
291
408
470
488
Mesothelioma
2090
0.2%
0
72
127
457
913
466
54
8
0
1
3
13
34
27
12
Kaposi sarcoma
5611
0.5%
3
567
658
864
1255
1498
766
21
0
5
17
26
46
90
174
Connective tissue
11,757
1.0%
226
2685
1696
2043
2459
2002
647
41
6
23
41
59
87
111
144
Penis
4285
0.4%
0
91
413
795
1309
1255
422
14
0
1
9
22
45
68
84
Prostate
305,044
25.5%
3
438
3387
34,764
112,958
122,376
31,118
1112
0
5
88
1048
4138
7143
6878
Testis
37,937
3.2%
86
17,116
8495
5349
3317
2389
1187
133
2
149
197
152
128
133
243
Kidney
62,815
5.3%
314
2842
5609
12,652
19,613
17,524
4262
226
7
25
134
364
703
1030
984
Bladder
192,611
16.1%
25
2802
8582
28,948
59,204
70,749
22,302
686
0
26
204
821
2104
4074
5053
Choroidal melanoma
1801
0.2%
0
115
209
365
484
519
109
7
0
1
6
11
18
30
25
Brain and central nervous system
16,110
1.3%
568
5391
2881
2930
2525
1423
391
54
13
46
65
81
82
78
66
Thyroid
25,512
2.1%
31
6428
5811
5876
4665
2351
349
89
1
56
137
165
166
136
80
Hodgkin lymphoma
27,821
2.3%
165
9685
5488
5229
4133
2684
437
95
4
83
129
139
141
148
99
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
56,808
4.8%
629
8344
8754
11,691
13,802
11,185
2403
203
14
72
206
339
501
655
574
Leukemias
36,105
3.0%
1939
7620
4086
5656
8050
6703
2051
124
43
65
94
158
276
373
444
Multiple myeloma (plasma cell)
12,787
1.1%
0
326
1158
2636
4050
3680
938
45
0
3
27
75
143
215
207
Table 2
Complete cancer prevalence by cancer type and age in Italian women at January 1, 2010
Cancer type
Prevalent cases
Prevalence proportion per 100,000 women
All ages
%
00-14
15-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75-84
85+
All ages
00-14
15-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75-84
85+
All types but skin non-melanoma
1,443,942
 
3903
112,527
176,656
277,374
363,646
357,146
152,690
4836
93
988
4095
7496
11,243
13,994
14,500
Upper aero-digestive tract
15,433
1.1%
19
1562
1687
3156
3696
3624
1688
54
0
14
41
87
123
148
158
Esophagus
1125
0.1%
0
17
102
199
348
358
101
4
0
0
3
6
13
16
11
Stomach
35,537
2.5%
0
651
1896
3992
8619
12,953
7426
117
0
5
41
104
254
497
698
Small intestine
2597
0.2%
0
136
277
495
688
752
250
9
0
1
6
14
21
29
28
Colon, rectum, anus
171,847
11.9%
12
2754
8640
24,517
45,322
59,479
31,123
571
0
24
204
658
1377
2287
2901
Liver
7331
0.5%
61
258
371
943
2182
2926
589
25
1
2
9
25
68
114
58
Biliary tract
5565
0.4%
3
60
286
836
1517
1932
931
18
0
0
6
22
44
72
84
Pancreas
6271
0.4%
0
326
495
1239
1699
1733
780
21
0
3
11
33
55
68
69
Larynx
4407
0.3%
2
68
364
898
1211
1358
508
16
0
1
8
26
41
55
52
Lung
23,721
1.6%
5
611
2373
4933
7158
6662
1980
80
0
6
53
133
224
268
186
Thymus, heart, mediastinum
2212
0.2%
61
514
406
410
443
306
72
7
2
4
9
9
12
11
7
Bone
9124
0.6%
100
2259
2163
1950
1306
973
374
28
3
19
43
47
38
38
32
Skin melanoma
57,515
4.0%
30
10,718
9929
10,950
11,657
9953
4278
198
1
98
237
302
372
404
432
Mesothelioma
674
0.0%
0
18
68
148
224
174
42
2
0
0
2
4
8
8
5
Kaposi sarcoma
1990
0.1%
0
105
60
197
349
750
528
7
0
1
2
6
12
30
49
Connective tissue
9917
0.7%
203
1893
1399
1812
1890
1791
929
34
5
17
32
49
62
71
91
Breast
604,841
41.9%
0
26,663
82,068
128,514
165,456
142,658
59,483
2046
0
236
1906
3516
5164
5643
5751
Vagina and vulva
9689
0.7%
17
256
557
982
2377
3570
1931
32
0
2
13
27
71
137
183
Cervix uteri
58,879
4.1%
4
4321
8073
10,569
13,177
15,641
7093
193
0
38
184
280
397
591
675
Corpus uteri (endometrium)
103,321
7.2%
0
1490
5745
21,047
31,548
31,158
12,333
342
0
13
135
553
964
1198
1147
Ovary
45,620
3.2%
65
4058
6617
10,544
11,399
9729
3209
149
1
34
154
276
352
372
291
Kidney
35,250
2.4%
411
2369
2841
5290
9461
10,650
4229
122
9
21
68
149
293
436
418
Bladder
47,822
3.3%
6
1362
2562
6101
11,410
16,786
9594
164
0
12
62
172
359
676
897
Choroidal melanoma
1713
0.1%
0
149
210
294
445
414
202
6
0
1
4
9
14
18
21
Brain and central nervous system
23,145
1.6%
501
6210
3661
3565
3875
3978
1355
72
12
52
82
96
114
133
105
Thyroid
93,341
6.5%
68
22,813
21,805
21,597
16,956
8578
1524
307
2
199
498
571
521
356
153
Hodgkin lymphoma
20,433
1.4%
102
9116
3990
3104
2222
1401
498
67
2
79
93
84
67
58
43
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
53,907
3.7%
262
5635
6626
10,917
13,615
12,731
4120
181
6
49
153
290
422
505
407
Leukemias
31,196
2.2%
1450
7445
3465
4400
5626
6067
2742
101
34
64
78
115
166
235
256
Multiple myeloma (plasma cell)
12,278
0.9%
0
217
887
2367
3611
3814
1382
41
0
2
22
64
112
150
124
Men living in Italy after a cancer diagnosis in 2010 were 1,194,033, corresponding to 4.3% (4250/100,000) of all Italian male population (Table 1). This proportion increased from less than 1% below the age of 45 years, to > 20% for men aged ≥75 years. The most frequent tumours in terms of prevalence were prostate (305,044 of prevalent cases at January, 1st 2010) representing 25.5% of all cases or 1.1% of all Italian men, followed by bladder (192,611 men, 16.1%) and colorectal (185,532 men, 15.5%) tumours.
Italian women living after a cancer diagnosis were 1,443,942 (Table 2), corresponding to 4.8% of all Italian women. Breast cancer represented 41.9% of all cancers (604,841), followed by colorectal cancers (171,847, 11.9% of all female prevalent cases, 0.6% of all Italian women) and by endometrial cancers (103,321, 7.2% and 0.3%, respectively). Notably, the fourth most frequent cancer type diagnosed in Italian prevalent women is thyroid (93,341 women, 6.5% of all female prevalent cases). Prevalent women were younger than men. Women aged 15-44 years living after a diagnosis represented 1% of the whole Italian population, they were 4% at ages 45-54 years, 7% at ages 55-64 years, 11% at ages 65-74 years, and 14% for women aged ≥75 years (Table 2).
More than 1.5 million people (i.e., 2.7% of all Italian residents) were alive after ≥5 years since diagnosis. They were 60% of all prevalent cases, 64% of women and 55% of men. The distribution of prevalent cases by time since diagnosis depends on cancer type (Fig. 1). The percentage of prevalent cases diagnosed since less than 2 years varied from 39% for lung cancer patients to 15% for female breast and 7% for cervical cancer patients. Conversely, the percentage of prevalent cases diagnosed ≥15 years before was 59% for cervical cancer, 35% for stomach cancer and 31% for endometrial cancer, but only 4% for prostate and 13% for lung cancer patients. Notably, patients diagnosed ≥15 years before were 21% of all prevalent cases (16% among men and 25% among women).

Prevalence projections for 2020

In 2020, there will be 3.6 million prevalent cancer cases in Italy (Table 3), 1.9 million women and 1.7 million men, with a 10-year increase of 37% (41 and 33% in men and women, respectively). In 2020, 2.6% of all Italian women (0.8 millions) will be alive after a breast cancer diagnosis and more than half a million patients (2.1% of all men) will be alive after a prostate cancer diagnosis (Table 3). The largest 10-year increases are foreseen for prostate (+ 85%) and for thyroid cancers (+ 79%, 212,863 cases), which will become the third most frequent prevalent cancer types among Italian women. A more than 50% increases are also expected in 2020 for prevalence after diagnosis of testicular cancer (63,395 patients) or skin melanoma (169,900). A limited change in prevalence (variations < 10%) is expected for ovary, larynx, and stomach, with cervical cancer being the only cancer type showing a decline in prevalence (− 13%) (Table 3).
Table 3
Projected complete prevalence (cases) at January 1,  2020 by sex and 10-year variations in Italy
 
Prevalent cases
Variation (%)
 
2020
10-year period
Cancer Typea
Men
Women
Total
Men
Women
Total
All types but skin non-melanoma
1687,049
1,922,086
3,609,135
41.3%
33.1%
36.8%
Upper aero-digestive tract
36,081
21,831
57,911
34.9%
41.5%
37.3%
Stomach
50,327
32,033
82,360
9.5%
−9.9%
1.0%
Colon, Rectum, Anus
280,277
233,245
513,522
51.1%
35.7%
43.7%
Liver
25,234
8531
33,765
44.6%
16.4%
36.2%
Larynx
47,015
6006
53,020
4.9%
36.3%
7.7%
Lung
77,159
40,657
117,816
22.4%
71.4%
35.8%
Skin Melanoma
80,069
89,831
169,900
78.0%
56.2%
65.8%
Connective Tissue
17,040
11,815
28,855
44.9%
19.1%
33.1%
Female Breast
 
834,154
834,154
 
37.9%
37.9%
Cervix Uteri
 
51,136
51,136
 
−13.2%
−13.2%
Corpus Uteri (endometrium)
 
122,553
122,553
 
18.6%
18.6%
Ovary
 
49,807
49,807
 
9.2%
9.2%
Prostate
563,960
 
563,960
84.9%
 
84.9%
Testis
63,395
 
63,395
67.1%
 
67.1%
Kidney
97,249
47,151
144,400
54.8%
33.8%
47.2%
Bladder
255,015
58,608
313,624
32.4%
22.6%
30.4%
Brain and central nervous system
23,505
29,314
52,819
45.9%
26.7%
34.6%
Thyroid
45,949
166,914
212,863
80.1%
78.8%
79.1%
Hodgkin Lymphoma
37,692
29,314
67,006
35.5%
43.5%
38.9%
Non- Hodgkin Lymphoma
82,780
73,584
156,364
45.7%
36.5%
41.2%
Leukaemias
45,880
39,100
84,980
27.1%
25.3%
26.3%
Multiple Myeloma
19,472
17,159
36,631
52.3%
39.8%
46.1%
a Cancer types with more than 20,000 prevalent cases at 2010
Table 4
Projected complete prevalence at January 1, 2020 by sex and age groups in Italy a
SEX, Cancer type
Prevalent cases
Prevalence proportion per 100,000
All ages
%
00-44
45-74
75+
All ages
00-44
45-74
75+
MEN and WOMEN
 All types but skin non-melanoma
3,609,135
100.0%
228,145
1,897,543
1,483,448
5731
726
16,383
21,657
 Colon, rectum, anus
513,522
14.2%
4954
231,800
276,767
808
15
2080
3952
 Skin melanoma
169,900
4.7%
24,038
101,180
44,682
271
76
857
673
 Female breast
834,154
23.1%
29,758
498,614
305,781
2622
201
8215
7297
 Corpus uteri (endometrium)
122,553
3.4%
1707
65,765
55,081
379
10
1104
1269
 Prostate
563,960
15.6%
1174
255,514
307,272
2056
12
5634
12,343
 Bladder
313,624
8.7%
4130
128,332
181,162
563
15
1323
2836
 Thyroid
212,863
5.9%
41,112
145,562
26,189
309
127
1084
379
 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
156,364
4.3%
14,948
87,255
54,161
247
47
739
789
MEN
 All types but skin non-melanoma
1687,049
100%
95,056
834,967
757,026
5444
615
15,678
28,728
 Colon, rectum, anus
280,277
16.6%
2250
135,206
142,821
902
13
2573
5267
 Skin melanoma
80,069
4.7%
8760
50,437
20,872
256
57
898
815
 Prostate
563,960
33.4%
1174
255,514
307,272
2056
12
5634
12,343
 Bladder
255,015
15.1%
2636
106,086
146,294
958
20
2323
5932
 Thyroid
45,949
2.7%
9141
31,444
5364
142
59
490
209
 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
82,780
4.9%
8959
49,513
24,309
271
58
871
946
WOMEN
 All types but skin non-melanoma
1,922,086
100%
133,089
1,062,575
726,422
5992
888
17,374
17,007
 Colon, rectum, anus
233,245
12.1%
2704
96,594
133,947
720
17
1633
3105
 Skin melanoma
89,831
4.7%
15,278
50,742
23,811
284
102
822
581
 Breast
834,154
43.4%
29,758
498,614
305,781
2622
201
8215
7297
 Corpus uteri (endometrium)
122,553
6.4%
1707
65,765
55,081
379
10
1104
1269
 Bladder
58,608
3.0%
1494
22,246
34,868
195
10
405
859
 Thyroid
166,914
8.7%
31,971
114,119
20,825
508
218
1761
516
 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
73,584
3.8%
5989
37,743
29,852
225
37
618
688
a Most frequent cancer types are shown: Cancer types or combinations with > 100,000 prevalent cases
Nearly 22% (21,657/100,000) of population aged ≥75 years in 2020 will have had a previous cancer diagnosis (Table 4). Below 45 years of age, prevalent cases will be 228,145 (i.e., 0.8% of all cases, 726/100,000) and, in both sexes, the most frequent cancer type will be thyroid cancer, experienced by 31,971 women and 9141 men.
Prevalent cases diagnosed within 2 years were the only group showing a negligible increase from 2010 to 2020 (+ 3% in the examined period), while a 19% increase was observed for cases diagnosed between 2 and 5 years before, 30-34% for cases diagnosed between 5 and 20 years earlier, and 45% increased for long-term survivors diagnosed ≥20 years before (Fig. 2).

Discussion

In 2010, 2.6 million people were living in Italy after a cancer diagnosis and this number will reach 3.6 million in 2020, increasing from 4.6% to 5.7% (i.e., one out of 17 Italians) of the overall population. The estimated overall trend in the present decade in Italy (+ 3.2% per year) is comparable to that estimated in the same period in the USA (+ 2.8% per year) [5], UK (+ 3.3%) [4], and Switzerland (+ 2.5%) [6].
The expected 37% increase in the present decade in Italy will be more marked (i.e., nearly + 50%) among long-term survivors diagnosed ≥20 years before; they will be more than half a million in Italy (519,356), 14% of all prevalent cases (11% in men and 18% in women). Most of them can be considered as cured since they had already reached a similar life expectancy (i.e., death rates) of the corresponding general population [14].
A higher proportion of women (55%) than that of men emerged among prevalent cancer cases at 2010 in the present Italian study, in agreement with findings from most studies conducted in other countries [46, 9] but France (where 53% were men, 6.4% of the French population) [8]. In Italy, female breast cancer cases represented 23% of all prevalent cases, and affected the distribution of cancer prevalence by age. The thyroid cancer epidemic in Italy also contributed to an excess in females, below age 45 years thyroid cancer was the most frequent prevalent type in 2010 (29,340 men and women), and this number will substantially increase to more than 41,000 in 2020. It should be noted, however, that a large proportion of thyroid cancer incidence and prevalence may be affected by overdiagnosis; i.e., the detection of cancer cases that would not otherwise result in causing symptoms or deaths [23, 24].
An important role on variation of cancer prevalence is played by screening programmes, inducing a reduction of cervical and colorectal prevalent cancers cases, while early detection of breast and prostate cancers may inflate number of prevalent cases [25]. In particular, screening can prevent cervical cancer, with a consequent major effect on prevalence reduction, i.e., − 13% in 10 years in the present study.
Distribution of cancer prevalence by age is also noteworthy. In 2010, 37% of prevalent patients were 75 years or older (38% in men, 35% in women). In this age group, they will reach 41% in 2020, with more than 20% of men and 14% of women will have experienced a previous cancer diagnosis. These proportions were similar to those reported by other studies, showing also that elderly cancer patients had more severe comorbidity conditions than non cancer patients [26].
At the opposite end of the age spectrum, 8% of Italian prevalent cases were younger than 44 years of age and 10% were aged 45–54 years. It has been recently estimated that 44,135 persons living in Italy in 2010 had had a cancer diagnosis during childhood [27]; they represented 0.07% of the Italian population and 1.7% of prevalent cases diagnosed at any age. In similar studies conducted in the USA [28], a substantial proportion of morbidities emerged in childhood cancer patients several years after diagnosis, and there is growing awareness on potentially long-term risks affecting the survivors’ future physical, cognitive, and/or psychosocial health [29]. The impact of a cancer diagnosis is rather different between younger and older survivors, the first facing more pronounced socio-economic consequences [30, 31], as well as psychosocial impairments in fertility and sexuality [32, 33].
We acknowledge the several limitations of our analyses. First, data from Italian cancer registries (AIRTUM) included one third of the Italian population in 2010 and the representativeness for the national prevalence estimates may be questionable [34]. To overcome this issue, we adjusted estimated proportions in cancer registry areas for the age distribution of the whole Italian population. Moreover, since cancer registries have been active in Italy from a relatively recent time period, the complete prevalence has been estimated through statistical models. Notably, the validation of complete prevalence estimation by means of COMPREV method in Italy and elsewhere [19] is reasonably reassuring. In particular, the validation of COMPREV method shows negligible (i.e., < 5%) differences, when comparing observed prevalence for cancer registries with ≥30 years of observation and estimated prevalence using complete indexes applied to the same registries and truncated data [21, page 34].
On the other hand, the strengths of this population-based study are represented by the size of the study population, which included nearly 1.7 million incident cancer cases, and its long-term follow-up, more than a half of these cases were followed-up for > 20 years post diagnosis. In addition, data and period used were updated in the present study (see Appendix 1), including an additional number of years of observation and follow-up, in comparison with previous studies on the same topic [21].
The accuracy of future projections of prevalence is necessarily uncertain and lies on statistical models based on assumptions reflecting unknown evolution of incidence, survival, and demographic changes. This may also affect comparisons with trends reported in other countries, obtained using different assumptions and statistical models [4, 6, 26]. In our medium-term projections, the hypothesis that complete prevalence at 2020 can be predicted by a linear function of calendar year as regressor variable is supported by empirical evidence, at least for all cancer types combined and for most frequent cancer types, consistently showing an approximate linear trend in recent years [5, 21]. Notably, the use of a longer period (5 calendar years) to estimate linear slope did not materially modify the estimates.
Detailed estimates and projections of numbers of persons living after different cancer diagnoses are particularly relevant for policy makers to better plan health care resource allocation and meet cancer patients needs, including not only initial treatment, but also rehabilitation and long-term surveillance. However, to date, guidelines pertaining to survivorship care have been largely based on consensus rather than on empirical evidence [3537].
In the USA, the main driver of cancer costs growth is population ageing, with an overall increase of 27% by the year 2020 from 2010 levels [38]. The largest increase in expenditures is attributable to the continuing phase of care (i.e., > 1-year post-diagnosis and > 1 year from death) for prostate and female breast cancer, with 42 and 32% increase respectively [38]. Although health care costs in the continuing phase of care is lower than in the first course of treatment (first year since diagnosis) and in the last year of life, the large number of survivors in the continuing phase of care is driving most of healthcare resources. Similar findings, on the distribution of cancer burden by phase of care, are expected in Italy [39].

Conclusions

The availability of reliable and accurate estimates of complete prevalence and predictions of the rising tide of people living after cancer diagnosis may be helpful not only to epidemiologists and health-care planners, but also to clinicians in developing guidelines to enhance and standardize the long-term follow-up of cancer survivors. Furthermore, these estimates are intended for patients to help recovering social activities and supporting rehabilitation demands.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mrs. Luigina Mei for editorial assistance.

Funding

The study was funded by the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) (grant no. 16921). Role of funding source: The funding sources had no role in study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit the article for publication.

Availability of data and materials

Dataset supporting our findings is available, according to AIRTUM guidelines, at the following website: www.​registri-tumori.​it.
The Italian legislation identifies Cancer Registries as collectors of personal data for surveillance purposes without explicit individual consent. The approval of a research ethic committee is not required, since this study is a descriptive analysis of individual data without any direct or indirect intervention on patients (Decreto del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri, 3/3/2017, Identificazione dei sistemi di sorveglianza e dei registri di mortalità, di tumori e di altre patologie, 17A03142, GU Serie Generale n.109 del 12-05-2017 (Available at: http://​www.​gazzettaufficial​e.​it/​eli/​id/​2017/​05/​12/​17A03142/​sg, last access: 31/01/2018).
Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Anhänge

Appendix 1

Population and incident cases in Italian cancer registries with ≥7 years of registration in period 1976-2009
CANCER REGISTRY
Period of activity
Population at January 1st 2010
Incident cases up to 2009a
 
Period of registration
Years included to 2009
(per 1000)
 
Alto Adige - Sudtirol
1995–2010
15
494
37,119
Biella
1995–2010
15
185
20,362
Catania-Messina
2003–2011
7
1727
58,753
Catanzaro
2003–2009
7
230
7755
Como
2003–2011
7
577
24,963
Ferrarab
1991–2011
19
354
50,925
Friuli Venezia Giulia
1995–2010
15
1219
128,738
Genovab
1986–2009
24
592
112,812
Latina
1996–2011
14
531
32,330
Mantova
1999–2010
11
404
27,541
Milano
1999–2010
11
1215
103,283
Modenab
1988–2011
22
676
84,155
Napoli
1996–2011
14
561
28,250
Nuoro
2003–2011
7
219
7889
Palermo
2003–2011
7
1239
40,926
Parmab
1978–2011
32
420
80,744
Ragusab
1981–2011
29
303
31,283
Reggio Emilia
1996–2011
14
508
41,379
Romagna
1993–2011
17
1058
119,458
Salerno
1996–2009
14
1089
63,293
Sassarib
1992–2011
18
467
37,988
Siracusa
1999–2011
11
400
18,927
Sondrio
1998–2011
12
181
13,003
Trapani
2002–2009
8
429
15,591
Umbria
1994–2011
16
875
85,138
Vareseb
1976-2011
34
860
137,184
Venetob
1990–2009
20
2097
245,898
All CRs
  
18,909
1,655,687
Italy
  
59,190
 
a All types but skin non-melanoma
b CRs included to estimate model-based incidence and survival (47% of all cancer cases)

Appendix 2

Complete cancer prevalence (cases and proportion) by cancer type and age at prevalence in Italian men and women at  January 1, 2010
Cancer type
Prevalent cases
Prevalence proportion ×  100,000a
All ages
%
00-14
15-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75-84
85+
All ages
00-14
15-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75-84
85+
All types but skin non-melanoma
2,637,975
 
8747
196,699
263,746
475,879
727,578
714,197
251,129
4552
102
859
3103
6635
12,068
16,620
16,700
Upper aero-digestive tract
42,178
1.6%
38
3216
5007
9692
11,759
9410
3055
76
0
14
62
142
209
224
204
Esophagus
4192
0.2%
71
354
921
1453
1139
254
8
0
5
15
28
30
20
Stomach
81,507
3.1%
2
1415
4479
10,654
22,237
29,491
13,229
137
0
6
49
141
354
669
866
Small intestine
5981
0.2%
356
627
1255
1675
1602
466
11
2
7
18
29
38
33
Colon, rectum, anus
357,379
13.5%
15
5472
17,362
53,849
105,252
123,177
52,253
611
0
23
207
746
1715
2821
3426
Liver
24,785
0.9%
119
575
1910
4774
8529
7678
1199
43
1
3
23
66
142
180
83
Biliary tract
9816
0.4%
3
131
524
1549
2882
3375
1352
16
0
0
6
21
45
75
90
Pancreas
12,128
0.5%
3
524
1093
2622
3575
3194
1116
21
0
2
12
36
61
75
71
Larynx
49,217
1.9%
2
304
2469
9297
16,293
16,177
4676
86
0
1
29
129
271
376
321
Lung
86,769
3.3%
21
1415
5144
15,947
29,923
28,343
5976
147
0
6
58
216
484
654
394
Thymus, heart, mediastinum
4501
0.2%
103
898
842
958
959
636
105
7
1
3
9
11
15
14
8
Bone
13,932
0.5%
251
4168
3087
2721
1902
1391
411
22
3
17
32
34
29
32
26
Skin melanoma
102,492
3.9%
52
17,448
17,339
20,767
22,774
17,820
6292
182
1
80
210
296
388
430
448
Mesothelioma
2763
0.1%
90
195
605
1137
640
96
5
0
2
8
20
15
7
Kaposi sarcoma
7601
0.3%
3
672
718
1061
1605
2248
1294
14
0
3
9
16
27
54
86
Connective tissue
21,674
0.8%
429
4578
3095
3855
4349
3793
1576
37
6
20
37
54
74
87
107
Female breast
604,841
22.9%
26,663
82,068
128,514
165,456
142,658
59,483
2046
236
1906
3516
5164
5643
5751
Vagina and vulva
9689
0.4%
17
256
557
982
2377
3570
1931
32
0
2
13
27
71
137
183
Cervix uteri
58,879
2.2%
4
4321
8073
10,569
13,177
15,641
7093
193
0
38
184
280
397
591
675
Corpus uteri (endometrium)
103,321
3.9%
1490
5745
21,047
31,548
31,158
12,333
342
13
135
553
964
1198
1147
Ovary
45,620
1.7%
65
4058
6617
10,544
11,399
9729
3209
149
1
34
154
276
352
372
291
Penis
4285
0.2%
91
413
795
1309
1255
422
14
1
9
22
45
68
84
Prostate
305,044
11.6%
3
438
3387
34,764
112,958
122,376
31,118
1112
0
5
88
1048
4138
7143
6878
Testis
37,937
1.4%
86
17,116
8495
5349
3317
2389
1187
133
2
149
197
152
128
133
243
Kidney
98,065
3.7%
725
5211
8450
17,941
29,073
28,174
8491
172
8
23
101
253
483
674
585
Bladder
240,433
9.1%
31
4164
11,144
35,049
70,614
87,535
31,896
416
0
19
132
485
1165
2041
2123
Choroidal melanoma
3514
0.1%
264
419
658
929
933
311
6
1
5
10
16
23
22
Brain and central nervous system
39,255
1.5%
1069
11,602
6542
6495
6400
5401
1746
63
13
49
74
89
99
111
94
Thyroid
118,853
4.5%
99
29,241
27,617
27,474
21,622
10,929
1872
202
1
127
321
375
357
268
131
Hodgkin lymphoma
48,254
1.8%
266
18,801
9478
8333
6355
4085
935
81
3
81
111
110
101
94
59
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
110,715
4.2%
891
13,979
15,380
22,608
27,417
23,916
6523
191
10
61
179
314
458
565
456
Leukemias
67,301
2.6%
3389
15,065
7551
10,057
13,676
12,770
4793
112
39
64
86
136
217
291
312
Multiple myeloma (plasma cell)
25,066
1.0%
542
2044
5003
7662
7494
2320
43
2
24
69
126
176
149
a For sex-specific types proportions were also sex-specific
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Crocetti E, De Angelis R, Buzzoni C, Mariotto A, Storm H, Colonna M, Zanetti R, Serraino D, Michiara M, Cirilli C, Iannelli A, Mazzoleni G, Sechi O, Sanoja Gonzalez ME, Guzzinati S, Capocaccia R, Dal Maso L, AIRTUM Working group. Cancer prevalence in United States, Nordic Countries, Italy, Australia, and France: an analysis of geographic variability. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:219–28.CrossRef Crocetti E, De Angelis R, Buzzoni C, Mariotto A, Storm H, Colonna M, Zanetti R, Serraino D, Michiara M, Cirilli C, Iannelli A, Mazzoleni G, Sechi O, Sanoja Gonzalez ME, Guzzinati S, Capocaccia R, Dal Maso L, AIRTUM Working group. Cancer prevalence in United States, Nordic Countries, Italy, Australia, and France: an analysis of geographic variability. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:219–28.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer survival and prevalence in Australia: period estimates from 1982 to 2010. Cancer series no. 69. Cat. no. CAN 65. Canberra: AIHW; 2012. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer survival and prevalence in Australia: period estimates from 1982 to 2010. Cancer series no. 69. Cat. no. CAN 65. Canberra: AIHW; 2012.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Maddams J, Utley M, Møller H. Projections of cancer prevalence in the United Kingdom, 2010-2040. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:1195–202.CrossRef Maddams J, Utley M, Møller H. Projections of cancer prevalence in the United Kingdom, 2010-2040. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:1195–202.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat De Moor JS, Mariotto AB, Parry C, Alfano CM, Padgett L, Kent EE, Forsythe L, Scoppa S, Hachey M, Rowland JH. Cancer survivors in the United States: prevalence across the survivorship trajectory and implications for care. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2013;22:561–70.CrossRef De Moor JS, Mariotto AB, Parry C, Alfano CM, Padgett L, Kent EE, Forsythe L, Scoppa S, Hachey M, Rowland JH. Cancer survivors in the United States: prevalence across the survivorship trajectory and implications for care. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2013;22:561–70.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mallone S, De Angelis R, van der Zwan JM, Trama A, Siesling S, Gatta G, Capocaccia R, RARECARE WG. Methodological aspects of estimating rare cancer prevalence in Europe: the experience of the RARECARE project. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013;37:850–6.CrossRef Mallone S, De Angelis R, van der Zwan JM, Trama A, Siesling S, Gatta G, Capocaccia R, RARECARE WG. Methodological aspects of estimating rare cancer prevalence in Europe: the experience of the RARECARE project. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013;37:850–6.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Colonna M, Mitton N, Bossard N, Belot A, Grosclaude P, French Network of Cancer Registries (FRANCIM). Total and partial cancer prevalence in the adult French population in 2008. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:153.CrossRef Colonna M, Mitton N, Bossard N, Belot A, Grosclaude P, French Network of Cancer Registries (FRANCIM). Total and partial cancer prevalence in the adult French population in 2008. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:153.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hovaldt HB, Suppli NP, Olsen MH, Steding-Jessen M, Hansen DG, Møller H, Johansen C, Dalton SO. Who are the cancer survivors? A nationwide study in Denmark, 1943-2010. Br J Cancer. 2015;112:1549–53.CrossRef Hovaldt HB, Suppli NP, Olsen MH, Steding-Jessen M, Hansen DG, Møller H, Johansen C, Dalton SO. Who are the cancer survivors? A nationwide study in Denmark, 1943-2010. Br J Cancer. 2015;112:1549–53.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Parry C, Kent EE, Mariotto AB, Alfano CM, Rowland JH. Cancer survivors: a booming population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2011;20:1996–2005.CrossRef Parry C, Kent EE, Mariotto AB, Alfano CM, Rowland JH. Cancer survivors: a booming population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2011;20:1996–2005.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gatta G, Mallone S, van der Zwan JM, Trama A, Siesling S, Capocaccia R, EUROCARE Working Group. Cancer prevalence estimates in Europe at the beginning of 2000. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:1660–6.CrossRef Gatta G, Mallone S, van der Zwan JM, Trama A, Siesling S, Capocaccia R, EUROCARE Working Group. Cancer prevalence estimates in Europe at the beginning of 2000. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:1660–6.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, Francisci S, Baili P, Pierannunzio D, Trama A, Visser O, Brenner H, Ardanaz E, Bielska-Lasota M, Engholm G, Nennecke A, Siesling S, Berrino F, Capocaccia R, EUROCARE-5 Working Group. Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5, a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:23–34.CrossRef De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, Francisci S, Baili P, Pierannunzio D, Trama A, Visser O, Brenner H, Ardanaz E, Bielska-Lasota M, Engholm G, Nennecke A, Siesling S, Berrino F, Capocaccia R, EUROCARE-5 Working Group. Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5, a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:23–34.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Allemani C, Weir HK, Carreira H, Harewood R, Spika D, Wang XS, Bannon F, Ahn JV, Johnson CJ, Bonaventure A, Marcos-Gragera R, Stiller C, Azevedo e Silva G, Chen WQ, Ogunbiyi OJ, Rachet B, Soeberg MJ, You H, Matsuda T, Bielska-Lasota M, Storm H, Tucker TC, Coleman MP, CONCORD Working Group. Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2). Lancet. 2015;385:977–1010. Erratum in: Lancet. 2015;385:946CrossRef Allemani C, Weir HK, Carreira H, Harewood R, Spika D, Wang XS, Bannon F, Ahn JV, Johnson CJ, Bonaventure A, Marcos-Gragera R, Stiller C, Azevedo e Silva G, Chen WQ, Ogunbiyi OJ, Rachet B, Soeberg MJ, You H, Matsuda T, Bielska-Lasota M, Storm H, Tucker TC, Coleman MP, CONCORD Working Group. Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2). Lancet. 2015;385:977–1010. Erratum in: Lancet. 2015;385:946CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dal Maso L, Guzzinati S, Buzzoni C, Capocaccia R, Serraino D, Caldarella A, Dei Tos AP, Falcini F, Autelitano M, Masanotti G, Ferretti S, Tisano F, Tirelli U, Crocetti E, De Angelis R, AIRTUM Working group. Long-term survival, prevalence, and cure of cancer: a population-based estimation for 818902 Italian patients and 26 cancer types. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:2251–60.CrossRef Dal Maso L, Guzzinati S, Buzzoni C, Capocaccia R, Serraino D, Caldarella A, Dei Tos AP, Falcini F, Autelitano M, Masanotti G, Ferretti S, Tisano F, Tirelli U, Crocetti E, De Angelis R, AIRTUM Working group. Long-term survival, prevalence, and cure of cancer: a population-based estimation for 818902 Italian patients and 26 cancer types. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:2251–60.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat De Santis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Siegel RL, Stein KD, Kramer JL, Alteri R, Robbins AS, Jemal A. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:252–71.CrossRef De Santis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Siegel RL, Stein KD, Kramer JL, Alteri R, Robbins AS, Jemal A. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:252–71.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Capocaccia R, De Angelis R. Estimating the completeness of prevalence based on cancer registry data. Stat Med. 1997;16:425–40.CrossRef Capocaccia R, De Angelis R. Estimating the completeness of prevalence based on cancer registry data. Stat Med. 1997;16:425–40.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Merrill RM, Capocaccia R, Feuer EJ, Mariotto A. Cancer prevalence estimates based on tumour registry data in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29:197–207.CrossRef Merrill RM, Capocaccia R, Feuer EJ, Mariotto A. Cancer prevalence estimates based on tumour registry data in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29:197–207.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat De Angelis R, Capocaccia R, Hakulinen T, Soderman B, Verdecchia A. Mixture models for cancer survival analysis: application to population-based data with covariates. Stat Med. 1999;18:441–54.CrossRef De Angelis R, Capocaccia R, Hakulinen T, Soderman B, Verdecchia A. Mixture models for cancer survival analysis: application to population-based data with covariates. Stat Med. 1999;18:441–54.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahn HS, Kim HJ, Kim KH, Lee YS, Han SJ, Kim Y, MJ KO, Brito JP. Thyroid cancer screening in South Korea increases detection of papillary cancers with no impact on other subtypes or thyroid cancer mortality. Thyroid. 2016;26:1535–40.CrossRef Ahn HS, Kim HJ, Kim KH, Lee YS, Han SJ, Kim Y, MJ KO, Brito JP. Thyroid cancer screening in South Korea increases detection of papillary cancers with no impact on other subtypes or thyroid cancer mortality. Thyroid. 2016;26:1535–40.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Bray F, Plummer M, Dal Maso L. Worldwide thyroid-cancer epidemic? The increasing impact of overdiagnosis. New Engl J Med. 2016;375:614–7.CrossRef Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Bray F, Plummer M, Dal Maso L. Worldwide thyroid-cancer epidemic? The increasing impact of overdiagnosis. New Engl J Med. 2016;375:614–7.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Shieh Y, Eklund M, Sawaya GF, Black WC, Kramer BS, Esserman LJ. Population-based screening for cancer: hope and hype. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13:550–65.CrossRef Shieh Y, Eklund M, Sawaya GF, Black WC, Kramer BS, Esserman LJ. Population-based screening for cancer: hope and hype. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13:550–65.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bluethmann SM, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH. Anticipating the “Silver Tsunami”: prevalence trajectories and comorbidity burden among older cancer survivors in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2016;25:1029–36.CrossRef Bluethmann SM, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH. Anticipating the “Silver Tsunami”: prevalence trajectories and comorbidity burden among older cancer survivors in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2016;25:1029–36.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Francisci S, Guzzinati S, Dal Maso L, Sacerdote C, Buzzoni C, Gigli A, AIRTUM Working Group. An estimate of the number of people in Italy living after a childhood cancer. Int J Cancer. 2017;140:2444–50.CrossRef Francisci S, Guzzinati S, Dal Maso L, Sacerdote C, Buzzoni C, Gigli A, AIRTUM Working Group. An estimate of the number of people in Italy living after a childhood cancer. Int J Cancer. 2017;140:2444–50.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips SM, Padgett LS, Leisenring WM, Stratton KK, Bishop K, Krull KR, Alfano CM, Gibson TM, de Moor JS, Hartigan DB, Armstrong GT, Robison LL, Rowland JH, Oeffinger KC, Mariotto AB. Survivors of childhood cancer in the United States: prevalence and burden of morbidity. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2015;24:653–63.CrossRef Phillips SM, Padgett LS, Leisenring WM, Stratton KK, Bishop K, Krull KR, Alfano CM, Gibson TM, de Moor JS, Hartigan DB, Armstrong GT, Robison LL, Rowland JH, Oeffinger KC, Mariotto AB. Survivors of childhood cancer in the United States: prevalence and burden of morbidity. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2015;24:653–63.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeltzer LK, Lu Q, Leisenring W, Tsao JC, Recklitis C, Armstrong G, Mertens AC, Robison LL, Ness KK. Psychosocial outcomes and health-related quality of life in adult childhood cancer survivors: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17:435–46.CrossRef Zeltzer LK, Lu Q, Leisenring W, Tsao JC, Recklitis C, Armstrong G, Mertens AC, Robison LL, Ness KK. Psychosocial outcomes and health-related quality of life in adult childhood cancer survivors: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17:435–46.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dumas A, Berger C, Auquier P, Michel G, Fresneau B, Setcheou Allodji R, Haddy N, Rubino C, Vassal G, Valteau-Couanet D, Thouvenin-Doulet S, Casagranda L, Pacquement H, El-Fayech C, Oberlin O, Guibout C, de Vathaire F. Educational and occupational outcomes of childhood cancer survivors 30 years after diagnosis: a French cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2016;114:1060–8.CrossRef Dumas A, Berger C, Auquier P, Michel G, Fresneau B, Setcheou Allodji R, Haddy N, Rubino C, Vassal G, Valteau-Couanet D, Thouvenin-Doulet S, Casagranda L, Pacquement H, El-Fayech C, Oberlin O, Guibout C, de Vathaire F. Educational and occupational outcomes of childhood cancer survivors 30 years after diagnosis: a French cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2016;114:1060–8.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Frobisher C, Lancashire ER, Jenkinson H, Winter DL, Kelly J, Reulen RC, Hawkins MM, British Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (BCCSS) Steering Group. Employment status and occupational level of adult survivors of childhood cancer in Great Britain: the British childhood cancer survivor study. Int J Cancer. 2017;140:2678–92.CrossRef Frobisher C, Lancashire ER, Jenkinson H, Winter DL, Kelly J, Reulen RC, Hawkins MM, British Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (BCCSS) Steering Group. Employment status and occupational level of adult survivors of childhood cancer in Great Britain: the British childhood cancer survivor study. Int J Cancer. 2017;140:2678–92.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Armuand G, Skoog-Svanberg A, Bladh M, Sydsjö G. Reproductive patterns among childhood and adolescent cancer survivors in Sweden: a population-based matched-cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(14):1577–83.CrossRef Armuand G, Skoog-Svanberg A, Bladh M, Sydsjö G. Reproductive patterns among childhood and adolescent cancer survivors in Sweden: a population-based matched-cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(14):1577–83.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs LA, Pucci DA. Adult survivors of childhood cancer: the medical and psychosocial late effects of cancer treatment and the impact on sexual and reproductive health. J Sex Med. 2013;10(Suppl 1):120–6.CrossRef Jacobs LA, Pucci DA. Adult survivors of childhood cancer: the medical and psychosocial late effects of cancer treatment and the impact on sexual and reproductive health. J Sex Med. 2013;10(Suppl 1):120–6.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Guzzinati S, Buzzoni C, De Angelis R, Rosso S, Tagliabue G, Vercelli M, Pannozzo F, Mangone L, Piffer S, Fusco M, Giacomin A, Traina A, Capocaccia R, Dal Maso L, Crocetti E, AIRTUM working group. Cancer prevalence in Italy: an analysis of geographic variability. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23:1497–510.CrossRef Guzzinati S, Buzzoni C, De Angelis R, Rosso S, Tagliabue G, Vercelli M, Pannozzo F, Mangone L, Piffer S, Fusco M, Giacomin A, Traina A, Capocaccia R, Dal Maso L, Crocetti E, AIRTUM working group. Cancer prevalence in Italy: an analysis of geographic variability. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23:1497–510.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Howell D, Hack TF, Oliver TK, Chulak T, Mayo S, Aubin M, Chasen M, Earle CC, Friedman AJ, Green E, Jones GW, Jones JM, Parkinson M, Payeur N, Sabiston CM, Sinclair S. Models of care for post-treatment follow-up of adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence. J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6:359–71.CrossRef Howell D, Hack TF, Oliver TK, Chulak T, Mayo S, Aubin M, Chasen M, Earle CC, Friedman AJ, Green E, Jones GW, Jones JM, Parkinson M, Payeur N, Sabiston CM, Sinclair S. Models of care for post-treatment follow-up of adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence. J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6:359–71.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Laudicella M, Walsh B, Burns E, Smith PC. Cost of care for cancer patients in England: evidence from population-based patient-level data. Br J Cancer. 2016;114:1286–92.CrossRef Laudicella M, Walsh B, Burns E, Smith PC. Cost of care for cancer patients in England: evidence from population-based patient-level data. Br J Cancer. 2016;114:1286–92.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010–2020. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:117–28.CrossRef Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010–2020. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:117–28.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Gigli A, Warren JL, Yabroff KR, Francisci S, Stedman M, Guzzinati S, Giusti F, Miccinesi G, Crocetti E, Angiolini C, Mariotto A. Initial treatment for newly diagnosed elderly colorectal cancer patients: patterns of Care in Italy and the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013;46:88–98.CrossRef Gigli A, Warren JL, Yabroff KR, Francisci S, Stedman M, Guzzinati S, Giusti F, Miccinesi G, Crocetti E, Angiolini C, Mariotto A. Initial treatment for newly diagnosed elderly colorectal cancer patients: patterns of Care in Italy and the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013;46:88–98.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Characteristics of people living in Italy after a cancer diagnosis in 2010 and projections to 2020
verfasst von
Stefano Guzzinati
Saverio Virdone
Roberta De Angelis
Chiara Panato
Carlotta Buzzoni
Riccardo Capocaccia
Silvia Francisci
Anna Gigli
Manuel Zorzi
Giovanna Tagliabue
Diego Serraino
Fabio Falcini
Claudia Casella
Antonio Giampiero Russo
Fabrizio Stracci
Bianca Caruso
Maria Michiara
Anna Luisa Caiazzo
Marine Castaing
Stefano Ferretti
Lucia Mangone
Giuseppa Rudisi
Flavio Sensi
Guido Mazzoleni
Fabio Pannozzo
Rosario Tumino
Mario Fusco
Paolo Ricci
Gemma Gola
Adriano Giacomin
Francesco Tisano
Giuseppa Candela
Anna Clara Fanetti
Filomena Pala
Antonella Sutera Sardo
Massimo Rugge
Laura Botta
Luigino Dal Maso
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2018
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Cancer / Ausgabe 1/2018
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4053-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

BMC Cancer 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.