Background
The Graffi murine leukemia virus (MuLV) induces a wide spectrum of leukemias in several strains of mice, including lymphoid and non-lymphoid types [
1,
2] making of this virus a good model to gain new insights on lymphoid leukemia development and progression and to identify new oncogenes. Retroviruses have been used as molecular tools to identify oncogenes or tumor suppressors directly targeted through the retroviral integration. However the microarray technology is attractive because it allows identifying, in addition to the retrovirus targeted genes, those involved in the cascade of events that leads to cell transformation, tumor progression, cancer and metastasis. We therefore used this approach to compare the transcriptome of a full panel of leukemias induced by the Graffi MuLV [
2] and we focused our analyses on the lymphoid types [
3]. We identified genes that were deregulated in one type of leukemia when compared to the corresponding control, therefore representing potential markers and oncogenes or tumor suppressor candidates that are specific for B, T or common to both types of leukemia. As expected, many of these genes were known to be specific to a lineage and to leukemia types (for details, see: [
4]). Furthermore, we validated changes in the expression levels of 10 genes selected according to their specificity for lymphoid leukemias. These results clearly validated our approach and identified genes that now deserve more attention. Indeed, we previously reported that the
Fmn2 gene harbors oncogenic potential. It was found specifically over-expressed in murine B-leukemias as well as in human pre-B-ALL especially in children bearing a t(12;21) translocation (TEL/AML1 rearrangement) [
3].
In this study, we focused on genes that are associated with T-CD8+ leukemias. We identified Parm-1 (prostate androgen-regulated mucin-like protein 1), a gene specifically up-regulated in T-CD8+ leukemias induced by Graffi virus. PARM-1 is a member of the mucin family. Very little is known about the physiological and biological function of this gene and its precise role in cellular transformation has not been fully explored.
We characterized the function of PARM-1 and we investigated the oncogenic potential of mouse and human proteins. PARM-1 is a weakly secreted protein which contains a transmembrane domain (TM) and a cytoplasmic tail (CT) in addition to the extracellular (EC) domains. Both human (hPARM-1) and mouse (mPARM-1) proteins are predominantly located at the Golgi and in the early and late endosomes but transiently located at the plasma membrane. PARM-1 trafficking within the cells seems associated with the microtubule cytoskeleton. Also, PARM-1 induced both anchorage and serum-independent growth, enhanced cell proliferation and activated ERK1/2, AKT and STAT3.
Together, these results provide strong evidences for the oncogenic potential of PARM-1 and emphasize their important role in leukemogenesis.
Discussion
The raw microarrays results obtained in our previous microarrays analysis were reanalyzed focusing on genes that were specifically deregulated in T-CD8
+ leukemias when compared to T-cells control. From this analysis 50 probsets were selected (Fold-change of 4). Some of these genes were already known to be involved in T-CD8
+ leukemias:
Il2ra (expressed in primary leukemia cells from a patient with T-CD8
+ prolymphocytic leukemia) [
5]. Our microarray analysis also showed that some other genes were known to be associated with other T-leukemia sub-types or cancer as
Irf4 (an oncogene locus which is frequently translocated in peripheral T-cell lymphomas) [
7],
Depdc6 (when over-expressed, it increases survival of hepatocellular carcinoma cells) [
9] and
Als2cl (a tumor-suppressor gene that contributes to the tumorigenesis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma) [
10]. These results validate our new microarray analysis. More interestingly, we also found other genes that had never been associated with leukemias nor with other types of cancer, or had no assigned function such as the
Exoc3l4[
23],
Hectd2[
24,
25] and AU014947. The complete list of these genes, which are good candidates for specific markers, oncogenes or tumour suppressors for T-CD8
+ leukemias, is presented in Table
1.
From this list, we focused on the
9130213B05Rik that corresponds to the conserved
mParm-1 gene (Additional file
1: Figure S1) and we validated the specificity of its over-expression in Graffi MuLV induced T-CD8
+ tumors (Figure
1).
Our interest for this gene was drained by the fact that
Parm-1 was poorly characterized and had never been clearly associated with cancer. Indeed, the rat
Parm-1 is over-expressed in prostate epithelial cells after androgen deprivation following castration [
26]. However, its human counterpart expression is increased by androgen in the LNCaP prostate cancer cell line and decreased in the CWR22 xenograft upon castration [
17]. Moreover, ectopic expression of
hParm-1 in human prostate cancer cell line enhances their proliferation [
17]. However, the rat
Parm-1 had no effect on rat cancer cell line [
27]. In contrast, even if
in vivo models demonstrated that over-expression of
Parm-1 is not implicated in apoptosis [
26],
in vitro models suggested that
Parm-1 is indirectly involved in the survival program [
27]. Also, it was demonstrated that
Parm-1 silencing in rat cardiac myocytes enhanced apoptotic response to endoplasmic reticulum stress [
28]. Due to these conflicting data, we further characterized the function and determined the oncogenic potential of PARM-1.
The human mucin family can be sub-classified into secreted and membrane-associated mucin forms [
14,
29,
30]. The extracellular domain of most transmembrane mucins is released from the cell surface [
14]. Since PARM-1 shares similar structure with the membrane-associated mucins (Figure
2a and
2b), we determined whether the EC-domain of this highly conserved protein is also released. We showed that hPARM-1 is weakly intact secreted protein (Figure
3 and Additional file
2: Figure S2). This result, although unexpected for proteins of the mucin family, correlates with data reported for many other type I transmembrane proteins such as APP [
31], N-CAM [
32], insulin receptor [
33], recombinant EGF precursor [
34], and c-Kit receptor proto-oncogene [
35].
Our results for PARM-1 subcellular localization agree with previous report [
17], for hPARM-1 and extend our observations to the mPARM-1. Indeed, we show that both proteins co-localized within the Golgi and at early and late endosomes but weakly localized at the plasma membrane (Figure
4). The same localization was observed in NIH/3T3 cells transfected with ∆EC-GFP and ∆SP-GFP mutants (Figure
4g and
4h). However, EC-GFP and ∆TM-GFP mutants showed a GFP-like localization (Figure
4i and
4j) and ∆CT-GFP mutant predominantly showed plasma membrane localization (Figure
4k). These results suggest that TM probably determines the Golgi-endocytic pathway localization. Such observation had already been reported for other proteins as the type I transmembrane BACE1 protein. BACE1 is mainly located in the distal Golgi membrane but not considerably present at the plasma membrane of neuroblastoma cells. It was demonstrated that the TM-domain determines its Trans-Golgi Network (TGN) localization [
36]. Our results also suggest that CT-domain inhibited plasma membrane localization (Figure
4k). This is reinforced by the fact that mutations in the CT (
287YGRL
290 to
287AGRA
290) induced PARM-1 plasma membrane localization [
17]. This YGRL motif acts as a tyrosine-based plasma membrane internalization signal [
37] also present in Syntaxin-6 (STX6) protein which is localized to the TGN. Importantly, it was demonstrated that deletion of this motif prevents STX6 internalization and induces its plasma membrane accumulation [
38]. Our data suggest that YGRL motif induces hPARM-1 internalization. Indeed, we showed that the internalization process of hPARM-1 was temperature-dependent, very dynamic at 37°C and dramatically inhibited at 4°C (Additional file
3: Movie S1). These results suggest a very quick internalization for hPARM-1 and may explain that the protein remains barely detectable at the plasma membrane.
It has been established that endosomes and endocytic proteins can traffic via microtubules [
39,
40]. Our data indicated the important role of microtubules in PARM-1 trafficking. In fact, PARM-1 co-localized with the microtubule cytoskeleton (Figure
4l) and depolymerisation of its network with nocodazole induced a dramatic inhibition of PARM-1 trafficking accompanied by an accumulation of an important portion of PARM-1 at the cell periphery (Additional file
4: Movie S2). We also found that hPARM-1 co-localized with caveolin-1 (Figure
4m). This preliminary result suggests that PARM-1 internalization may be mediated via the caveolae. Further investigations will be needed to confirm the involvement of caveolin-1 in this process.
It is known that mucins are implicated in cancer development [
29] but there were no convincing data yet on the role of
Parm-1 in cellular transformation. We showed that PARM-1 enhanced the proliferative capacities (Figure
5) and confer the serum-independent growth to NIH/3T3 cells (Figure
6a) suggesting that it could induce an autocrine loop in cells thus stimulating their proliferation in absence of growth factors. Using the classical NIH/3T3 colony formation in soft agar test, we demonstrated that ectopic expression of PARM-1 conferred anchorage-independent growth to the cells and we found that both deletion mutants (∆CT-GFP and ∆EC-GFP) seem to retain part of their ability to confer this capacity to the cells (Figure
6b-d). These results let us speculate that the TM-domain should play an important role in the protein function especially in its targeting toward the appropriate cell compartment. It also suggests a complementary or collaborative role for EC- and CT-domains, respectively, with TM to induce anchorage independence. Similar results were reported for the MUC1 protein where EC- and CT-domains contribute separately to the cancer cell line invasiveness and metastasis [
41].
We also analyzed the downstream signaling events leading to proliferation and provided first evidence on the role of PARM-1 in ERK1/2 and especially in AKT and STAT3 dependent signaling pathways (Figure
7). These pathways are a part of a more complex process leading to cell proliferation enhancement. In fact, the AKT is implicated in cell survival, growth and proliferation [
21]. ERK1/2 is also implicated in the cell proliferation. Interestingly, these two pathways are constitutively activated in several human cancers [
20]. Moreover, it is known that the STAT3 Ser-727 is phosphorylated by ERK1/2 [
42,
43] and that STAT3 is also implicated in the proliferation tumor-derived cell lines [
44]. In summary, activation of ERK1/2, AKT, and STAT3 shed further light on the mechanism by which PARM-1 may contribute to transformation.
Methods
Mice sample collection and flow cytometry
To generate leukemias, newborn NFS, FVB/n or Balb/c mice were injected intraperitoneally with GV-1.4 (1. 10
6 PFU) or GV-1.2 (3. 10
6 PFU) viral particles [
1]. Moribund mice were sacrificed. Lymph nodes, thymus, bone marrows and spleens were harvested for flow cytometry analysis [
1,
3] and RNA extraction [
3]. All the experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care Committee of Université du Québec à Montréal.
Microarrays and gene expression analysis
Using the microarrays data set normalized from our anterior study [
3], the RMA values of the 45000 probsets were used to identify differentially expressed genes in T-CD8
+ leukemias. Genes were selected according the following criteria : the expression signal intensity did not vary in B leukemias versus control B-cells and the expression signal intensity was either significantly higher (up-regulated), or lower (down-regulated) in T-CD8
+ leukemias versus control cells (fold-change of 4). The microarray dataset was deposited at Gene Expression Omnibus under the accession number GSE12581 [
3].
Semi-quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA (100 ng) was reverse transcribed using the Omniscript enzyme (QIAGEN) and the oligo(dT) primer. The semi-quantitative PCR reactions were performed with the Taq polymerase kit (Feldan) using an RT reaction corresponding to 10 ng of RNA samples and to 2 ng for actin, (94°C for 3 min, 94°C for 45 s, 56°C for 45 s, 72°C for 30 s with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min). Annealing temperature and number of cycles were optimized for each gene.
Plasmid constructions
The cDNA of the complete coding region of mParm-1 and hParm- 1 were generated by standard PCR amplification method using primers containing specific restriction sites. The PCR products were then inserted in-frame within the pEGFP-N1 (Clontech Laboratories) or pcDNA3.1/Myc-His(+)A (Invitrogen) vectors. Deletions were generated using specific primers that amplify the specific region of interest and the PCR products inserted in-frame in pEGFP-N1.
Cell culture
NIH/3T3 and Jurkat T-cells were obtained from ATCC (Rockville). NIH/3T3 cells were grown in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% CS and Jurkat cells were cultured in RPMI supplemented with 10% FCS (Invitrogen). 50 U penicillin and of streptomycin (Gibco, Invitrogen) were added.
Confocal microscopy
For transient transfection, Jurkat cells (107) were transfected with 15 μg plasmids by electroporation with the Gene Pulser System (Bio-Rad). NIH/3T3 cells were transfected using the polyfect reagent (Qiagen). Both pEGFP-N1 (control) and GFP-tagged mParm-1 or hParm-1 genes were used.
Localization of mPARM-1 and hPARM-1 was performed by confocal microscopy 48 h after transfection. For cell surface membrane co-localization (CellMask™ Plasma Membrane Stains (Invitrogen)), Jurkat cells were pelleted 48 h after transfection, washed in PBS and overlaid for 30 min at 37°C on polylysine coated glass slides [
3]. For co-localization experiments, NIH/3T3 cells were plated on glass coverslips, grown at 50% confluency, and transfected as described above. After 48 h of transfection, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, followed by PBS washes and permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS. Cells were blocked in PBS with 10% goat serum, 10% BSA and 0.1% triton, and incubated with primary antibodies. Coverslips were incubated with Alexa-Fluor-568-conjugated secondary antibody (1/1000, Invitrogen), washed with PBS, mounted onto slides using Prolong Gold antifade reagent (Invitrogen) and observed by confocal microscopy.
For live cell imaging, cells were transfected and sub-cultured into dishes containing glass coverslip. After 48 h, glass coverslips were transferred to coverslip-cell chamber and maintained at 37°C or at room temperature if cells were previously incubated at 4°C before imaging.
Western blot analysis
NIH/3T3 cells were homogenized in lysis buffer (50 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 100 mM sodium fluoride, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 200 μM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10% glycerol, and 1% Triton X-100) supplemented with a complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and phosphatase inhibitors (Sigma). Cells were incubated for 30 min at 4°C, and centrifuged at 15,000 X g for 10 min at 4°C.
For secretion experiment, NIH/3T3 supernatant was collected, centrifuged at 500 X g for 5 min and concentrated twenty times with a 10 kDa cut-off Amicon Ultra (Millipore). Secreted and cell lysate proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane. Membranes were blocked in buffer (PBS, 0.1% Tween 20 [PBS-T] with 5% nonfat dry milk) and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies. Membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibodies diluted in blocking buffer and signal was revealed by Immobilon Western HRP reagent (Millipore).
To determine the anchorage-independent growth, colony formation was tested in soft agar as previously described [
3,
45]. Briefly, NIH/3T3 cells were transiently transfected with the empty vector (pcDNA3.1A/Myc-His or pEGFP-N1), Ras EJ 6.6, mParm-1-pcDNA3.1A or mParm-1-GFP and hParm-1-pcDNA3.1A or hParm-1-GFP expression vectors. After 48 h, cells were mixed with melted 0.3% agarose in DMEM medium and seeded on top of a 0.6% agarose base layer containing the same medium. Cells were fed twice a week for 4 weeks and observed with an optical microscope.
Cell cycle analysis
Flow cytometry was performed using a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). Briefly, 1x106 cells were pelleted, resuspended in 0.2 ml of PBS, added to ice-cold 70% ethanol and incubated overnight at 4°C. Cells were pelleted, resuspended in propidium iodide (40 μg/ml)-RNase (100 μg/ml) solution for 30 min at 37°C and analyzed by flow cytometry for their DNA content.
Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation
BrdU incorporation was monitored using a 5-Bromo-2’-deoxy-uridine labeling and Detection kit I (Roche). Briefly, 48h transfected cells were incubated in the presence of BrdU, fixed with ethanol, washed with PBS and incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-BrdU antibody (clone BMC 6H8). Cells were incubated with an anti-mouse immunoglobulin-fluorescein antibody solution. Cells were incubated in a solution of DAPI (15 000), mounted onto slides using Prolong Gold antifade reagent (Invitrogen) and observed by fluorescent microscopy.
Cell growth in low serum conditions
NIH/3T3 cells were transiently transfected as mentioned above and 48 h later, cells were seeded at a low density in DMEM containing 2.5%, 5% or 10% CS for 5 days. Cells were fixed, stained and photographed.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
CC carried out the design and coordination of the study, performed all experiments and drafted the manuscript. LLCJ helped to Parm-1 cloning. EE and ER contributed to the interpretation of the data and helped to write the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.