Background
Malaria is one of the most serious and widespread parasitic diseases of humans. Globally, in 2015 an estimated 3.2 billion people were at risk of being infected with malaria parasites and contracting the disease, with approximately 214 million people becoming infected resulting in a mortality of 438,000 [
1]. With the emergence of drug-resistant parasites to all available anti-malarials, control of malaria is becoming difficult [
1,
2]. This has led to efforts in developing novel strategies and in a search for new drug targets with which to combat the scourge of malaria.
The availability of the complete genome sequence of
Plasmodium falciparum, the causative agent of fatal malaria, has opened new avenues to identify genes important for parasite survival. Many potential chemotherapeutic targets involved in various metabolic pathways at different malaria parasite life stages have been identified recently [
3]. Among these, helicases constitute a highly conserved group of enzymes important in all aspects of nucleic acid metabolism, such as replication, recombination, repair, transcription and (RNA) stability [
3‐
6].
RuvB is an ATP-dependent DNA helicase with a hexameric ring structure and its architecture has been suggested to be related to those of members of ATPases associated with various cellular activities (AAA+) protein class [
6]. In
Escherichia coli, RuvAB helicase is an ATP-driven translocase that promotes branch migration of Holliday junction and formation of heteroduplex DNA [
6], in addition to being essential for replication fork reversal at occurrences of DNA replication defects [
7]. Expression of
E. coli ruvB genes is required for DNA repair and maintaining normal levels of cellular resistance to stress-induced mutagenesis, so their resulting mutants are thereby defective in recombination [
8,
9]. In eukaryotes, RuvB proteins, such as yeast RvB1 and RvB2, are nuclear proteins indispensable for cell cycle progression and RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription [
10]. In addition, RuvBs are involved directly in the regulation of transcription of over 5% of yeast genes as essential components of a chromatin remodelling complex determining genes regulated by the complex [
11] and indirectly by recruiting the TATA-binding protein (TBP) to the promoter and its impairment confer growth defects [
12], and they are essential for viability in all model organisms including
Saccharomyces cerevisiae [
13],
Drosophila melanogaster [
14] and
Caenorhabditis elegans [
15]. Mutations in the conserved ATP-binding and hydrolysis motifs of RuvBs decrease viability of these organisms [
11].
Given that RuvBs play essential roles in nearly all aspects of nucleic acid metabolism,
P. falciparum RuvBs should be no exception. Analysis of
P. falciparum genome database identifies at least three
RuvB homologues, namely,
PfRuvB1, PfRuvB2 and PfRuvB3 [
16].
PfRuvB3, located on chromosome 13, comprises of 1452 bp encoding for a 483-amino acid protein [
17]. Recombinant PfRuvB1 and PfRuvB2 containing both helicase and ATPase activities, and have been heterologously produced in
E. coli and their properties characterized [
18,
19]. However, recombinant PfRuvB3 shows only ATPase activity, unlike that of the purified parasite protein that contains both helicase and ATPase activities [
19,
20]. It is possible that the reported conditions for cloning and expression were not optimal for producing fully active enzyme. Here, conditions for generating PfRuvB3 dual activity in
E. coli were examined and the effects of a number of known helicase inhibitors on the recombinant enzyme were also evaluated.
Methods
Cloning of Plasmodium falciparum ATP-dependent DNA helicase gene (PfRuvB3)
Full length
PfRuvB3 from
P. falciparum K1, a chloroquine and pyrimethamine-resistant strain from Thailand [
21], was PCR amplified using primers 5′-TCC
CCCGGGGCATGAAGCTCGAAGAAG-3′ (with a
SmaI site (underlined) upstream of the start codon) and 5′-CCG
CTCGAGATTACTTGTACTTGAATTTTCCG-3′ (with a
XhoI site shown underlined) based on genome sequence of
P. falciparum 3D7 (NCBI database accession no. XM001350297.1). Thermocycling conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 5 min; followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 61.5 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 1 min; with a final step at 72 °C for 90 s. The PCR was carried out using Phusion
® High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA) and amplicon was purified using Nucleospin
® extract II kit (Macherey-Magel, Düren, Germany), digested with
SmaI and
XhoI, and then ligated to similarly digested pQE-TriSystem His-Strep 2 expression vector (Qiagen, Germany) using T4 DNA ligase. The presence of
PfRuvB3 in the recombinant plasmid was further verified for its nucleotide sequence by BioDesign (Pathumthani, Thailand).
Heterologous expression of PfRuvB3 and purification of recombinant protein
Recombinant pQE-TriSystem His-Strep 2-PfRuvB3 plasmid was transfected into Mix & Go Competent Cells-Strain JM109 (Zymo Research Corporation, CA, USA) and transformed cells were selected on LB agar containing 100 μg/ml of ampicillin at 37 °C overnight. Cultures were inoculated into LB broth containing 100 μg/ml of ampicillin and grown at 37 °C until A600 nm reached 0.4-0.6, and then treated with 1 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 37 °C for 1 h with shaking. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 2000×g at 4 °C for 15 min, washed with buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4 pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl and 10 mM imidazole) and re-suspended in buffer supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (complete™ ULTRA Tablets, Roche, Germany) before being lysed by sonication. Following centrifugation at 9500×g at 4 °C for 45 min, supernatant was applied onto a Ni–NTA affinity column (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), which was washed with washing buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4 pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole and 1 mM PMSF) until no protein was detected in washed fractions. Recombinant PfRuvB3 was eluted with elution buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4 pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl and 250 mM imidazole) and fractions collected were subjected to analysis SDS-PAGE. Fractions containing the 6xHistidine-tag fusion protein were pooled and applied onto a 1 ml Strep-Tactin® Sepharose® column (Iba Life Sciences, Germany), which was washed with 5 ml of buffer A (100 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl and 1 mM EDTA) and recombinant PfRuvB3 was eluted with buffer A containing 2.5 mM desthiobiotin. The recombinant protein was concentrated using an Amicon® Ultra-15 filtration unit and stored in buffer B (50 mM NaH2PO4 pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl and 30% glycerol). Protein concentration was measured using Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) and protein purity was checked by SDS-PAGE.
Western blot and tandem mass spectrometry analysis
Following SDS-PAGE protein was transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad), which then was incubated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 3% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.5% (v/v) Tween 20 for 1 h at room temperature, washed three times with PBS buffer containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 and incubated with Strep-Tactin® horse radish peroxidase conjugate (diluted 1:100 in PBS/BSA/Tween buffer) for 1 h at room temperature. After washing 2 times, protein was visualized using SuperSignal™ West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Scientific). Protein band stained with Coomassie blue dye was eluted from SDS–polyacrylamide gel, digested with trypsin and amino acid sequence of the peptides analyzed using Synapt HDMS Q-TOF LC–MS/MS equipped with MASCOT software (Waters, UK).
Preparation of DNA helicase substrates
DNA helicase substrates (Table
1) were prepared as follows. Oligodeoxynucleotides were 5′-end labelled using T4 polynucleotide kinase and [γ-
32P] ATP (800 CimMol
−1; PerkinElmer, MA, USA). Partial duplex of either short or long oligonucleotide was produced by annealing 34 μM [
32P]-labelled oligodeoxynucleotide type 1 or 4 (Table
1) to single-stranded circular M13mp18 (+) DNA (New England Biolabs, MA, USA) in 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5 containing 10 mM MgCl
2, 100 mM NaCl and 1 mM DTT, incubating at 95 °C for 5 min and then cooling down slowly to room temperature over a period of 1 h [
22]. Blunt ended DNA duplex was constructed by annealing 5 ng of 5′ end [
32P]-labelled oligonucleotide type 5–50 ng of oligodeoxynucleotide type 6 in 40 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5 containing 20 mM MgCl
2, and 50 mM NaCl at 95 °C for 5 min and then cooling to room temperature as described above. Fork-like substrates with 3′, 5′ or both 3′ and 5′ overhanging ends were generated by annealing single-stranded circular M13mp18 (+) DNA with 5′ end [
32P]-labelled oligodeoxynucleotide type 2, 3 and 7, respectively.
Table 1
Oligonucleotides and DNA duplex substrates used in the study
1. 17mer | 5′-GTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3′ |
2. 32mer-I | 5′-TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTGTTTTCCCAGTCACGAC-3′ |
3. 32mer-II | 5′-GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT-3′ |
4. 34mer | 5′-ATAAAAATTTTTAGAACCCTCATATATTTTAAAT-3′ |
5. 41mer-I | 5′-AATTCGAGCTCGGTACCCGGGGATCCTCTAGAGTCGACCTG-3′ |
6. 41mer-II | 5′-CAGGTCGACTCTAGAGGATCCCCGGGTACCGAGCTCGAATT-3′ |
7. 47mer | 5′-TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT-3′ |
Short oligonucleotide | M13mp18 + 17mer |
Long oligonucleotide | M13mp18 + 34 mer |
Blunted end | 41 mer-I + 41 mer-II |
3′overhang | M13mp18 + 32 mer-II |
5′overhang | M13mp18 + 32 mer-I |
3′and 5′ overhang | M13mp18 + 47 mer |
DNA helicase activity assay
Unwinding of [
32P]-labelled partial duplex DNA was employed as a measurement of helicase activity. The reaction mixture (10 µl) contained 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 9.0, 8 mM DTT, 2 mM MgCl
2, 2 mM ATP, 10 mM KCl, 4% (w/v) sucrose, 80 mg/ml BSA, [
32P]-labelled DNA duplex substrate (Table
1) and purified PfRuvB3. The assay was performed at 37 °C for 90 min (unless indicated otherwise) and terminated with addition of 10X DNA loading dye (Fermentas, USA) and further incubation at 37 °C for 5 min. Helicase substrate and product were separated by 12% non-denaturing PAGE and then the gel was exposed to an X-ray film. DNA unwinding was quantified by densitometric analysis of exposed substrate and product bands using GeneTools (Syngene). Percent unwinding is calculated using the following formula: [band density of product [single-stranded (ss)DNA] / (band density of ssDNA + band density of substrate (duplex DNA)] × 100 minus [percent unwinding in the absence of enzyme].
Requirement of co-factors and effects of other factors
The ability of PfRuvB3 to hydrolyze different NTPs was studied by including 2 mM dATP, dCTP, dGTP, or dTTP in place of ATP in the standard reaction assay. The effects of ATP concentrations ranging from 0.3 to 20 mM on helicase activity were also determined. Divalent cation requirement was investigated mixture 2 mM CaCl2, CuCl2, NiSO4, ZnCl2, FeSO4, MnCl2 or MgSO4 in place of MgCl2. Effects of salt (0-200 mM NaCl in place of 10 mM KCl) and EDTA (5 mM) also were evaluated.
Effect of DNA helicase inhibitors on PfRuvB3 activity
Known DNA helicase inhibitors, aphidicolin genistein, daunorubicin, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, and netropsin (Sigma, USA) were prepared as 10−2 M stock solutions in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and stored at −20 °C until used. All compounds were diluted with 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 9.0 to specified concentrations for the assay. M13-17-mer duplex DNA was pre-incubated with 0.1 to 50 μM drug for 10 min prior to addition to the standard helicase assay mixture. The 0.5% (v/v final concentration) of DMSO was used as solvent control to determine its effects on helicase activity. The dose–response curves of relative activities of PfRuvB3 and various drug concentrations were generated, and half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), the concentration of compound to inhibit enzyme activity by 50%, was obtained using GraphPad Prism 6.01 software.
PfRuvB3 ATPase activity assay
ATPase reaction mixture (10 μl), containing reaction buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 8 mM DTT, 2 mM MgCl
2, 10 mM KCl, 4% (w/v) sucrose and 80 mg/ml BSA), 1 μg of recombinant PfRuvB3, 50 ng of M13 mp18 (New England Biolabs, USA) or short oligonucleotide duplex (Table
1), 1 mM ATP and 85 nM [α-
32P] ATP (Perkin and Elmer, USA), was incubated at 37 °C for 90 min. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 2 µl of 100 mM EDTA. One µl aliquot of the reaction mixture was spotted onto a PEI cellulose thin layer chromatography plate (Sigma), which was developed in 2 M acetic acid containing 1.5 M LiCl
2 to separate ADP and ATP. Plate was dried and exposed to X-ray film and exposed bands quantified by densitometry as described above. Percent of [α-
32P] ATP hydrolyzed is calculated using the formula: (band density of ADP/band density of ADP + band density of ATP) ×100 minus (percent ATP hydrolyzed in the absence of enzyme). Effective helicase inhibitors were investigated for their inhibitory effects on PfRuvB3 ATPase activity.
Discussion
RuvBs are highly conserved ATP-binding proteins that belong to the AAA+ family of ATPases that are present in many organisms and are implicated in many cellular pathways [
13,
14,
23‐
25]. In the
P. falciparum genome, three
P. falciparum proteins have been annotated as putative RuvB proteins. Phylogenetic comparison of the three PfRuvB protein sequences with those of
E. coli, yeast and humans reveals that PfRuvB1 and PfRuvB2 are closer to human/yeast RuvBL1, but PfRuvB3 appears to be a homolog of human/yeast RuvBL2 [
19].
A previous study [
20] reported that PfRuvB3 isolated directly from the parasite organism displayed both DNA helicase and ATPase and activities, but the recombinant protein is able only to recapitulate the ATPase activity [
20]. Because the recombinant protein in the previous study originated from resolubilized bacteria-expressed inclusion bodies, it is possible that the refolded PfRuvB3 lost the requisite motif(s) to unwind DNA duplexes.
With that in mind, full-length PfRuvB3 of P. falciparum K1 strain was cloned using pQE-TriSystem His-Strep 2 Vector expression vector whereby the Strep-tag sequence (for identification in western blotting) is fused to PfRuvB3 N-terminus and the 8x His-tag sequence (for affinity purification) is located at the C-terminus, so as to minimize misfolding of the resulting recombinant protein. DNA sequencing revealed that RuvB3 of P. falciparum K1 strain is 100% identical to that of strain 3D7 (NCBI database accession no. XM001350297.1). This putative PfRuvB3 (54 kDa) was confirmed by western blot and mass spectral analysis.
Purified heterologously expressed soluble recombinant PfRuvB3 has ATP-dependent DNA helicase without the need for any protein partner, a property similar to that of human RuvBL2 [
26]. However, PfRuvB2/PfRuvB3 complex exhibits a higher helicase activity than PfRuvB2 alone [
19]. Electron microscopic images of yeast Rvb1/Rvb2 complex showed conformational changes after exposure to nucleotide [
27‐
29] and this complex has stronger DNA helicase activity than the individual proteins [
28]. On the other hand, human RuvBL1/RuvBL2 complex has ATPase activity but lacks helicase function [
27]. It is possible that in a complex form the enzyme(s) may require additional cofactors for appreciable helicase activity or that to become fully active the enzyme complex needs to establish a tight-binding ATP pocket. Thus, whether a DNA helicase functions better alone or as a complex depends on the species of interest.
Recombinant PfRuvB3 unwinds DNA duplexes containing short (17-mer), long (34-mer) and fork-like (32 and 47-mer) oligonucleotides similar to
Mycoplasma pneumoniae RuvB homolog [
30]. That PfRuvB3 is unable to handle blunt-ended duplex DNA substrate indicates that the enzyme requires a stretch of single-stranded DNA for initial binding, a property similar to that of
E. coli RuvA [
31].
Recombinant PfRuvB3 is dependent on the presence of divalent cations and ATP as found in other organisms [
25‐
27,
30,
31]. High concentrations of divalent cations and salt were suggested to alter protein conformation or to interact directly to negatively charged groups of the enzyme, resulting in decreased enzyme activity [
32,
33]. Approximately, 98% of enzyme activity was inhibited by NaCl at concentration of 200 mM (Table
2) which is higher than 154 mM of the physiological concentration. Interestingly, optimal PfRuvB3 helicase activity is able of utilizing dATP (but not the other three dNTPs), a feature it shares in common with that of
E. coli,
M. pneumonia, yeast and human homologs [
30,
34,
35], although bacterial homologs show a relatively low level response in the presence of dCTP [
35,
36]. These results suggest that ATP and dATP may promote stable formation of the conformation required for interaction between NTP and DNA binding domain of PfRuvB3. Similar to homologs in
E. coli,
Mycoplasma pneumonia,
Mycoplasma genitalium, yeast and humans [
25,
27,
36‐
38], recombinant PfRuvB3 manifests ATPase activity in the presence of single- and double-stranded DNA.
Recombinant PfRuvB3 helicase activity was susceptible to inhibition by some DNA intercalators (daunorubicin and doxorubicin) but not to others (genistein and mitoxantrone), to DNA minor groove binder netropsin and not to non-intercalating topoisomerase inhibitor aphidicolin. None of these six compounds affected PfRuvB ATPase activity. All the effective inhibitors bind strongly to DNA [
39], and so they most likely interfere with PfRuvB3 unwinding function, whose domain ought to be distant from that of ATPase. PfRuvB3 is more sensitive to daunorubicin (IC
50 of 0.76 μM) than other helicases, such as
P. falciparum DNA helicase A (PfDH A) [
22],
P. falciparum UvrD helicase (PfUDN) [
40],
P. falciparum 45 kDa helicase (PfH45) [
41],
P. falciparum 60 kDa DNA helicase (PfDH60) [
42] and human DNA helicase (HDH II) [
43] (IC
50s of 2.0, 4.4, 5.0 3.0, 6.23 μM, respectively). However, it is less sensitive to netropsin (IC
50 of 7.09 μM) than PfUDN, PfH45, PfDH60 and
P. falciparum Dbp5/DDX19 homolog (PfD66) [
44] (IC
50s of 3.3, 0.8, 0.5, 3.2 μM, respectively). Inhibition of PfRuvB3 activity by daunorubicin (IC
50 of 0.76 μM) and doxorubicin (IC
50 of 2.6 μM) did not correlate with parasite growth inhibition (IC
50s of 2.5 and 1.5 μM respectively) [
22] suggesting that they may have different cell permeability and metabolic properties.
Authors’ contributions
PL performed the experiments, analyzed the data and helped write the manuscript. PS participated in characterizing the enzyme function. SM, UL, SP and MW participated in designing the study and editing the manuscript. PCP was involved in study design, data analysis, discussion and editing of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.