Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

07.05.2018 | Original Article

Chemoprophylaxis during transrectal prostate needle biopsy: critical analysis through randomized clinical trial

verfasst von: Ahmed M. Elshal, Ahmed M. Atwa, Ahmed R. El-Nahas, Mohamed A. El-Ghar, Asaad Gaber, Essam Elsawy, Abdelwahab Hashem, Yasser Farag, Hashim Farg, Ali Elsorougy, Mohamed Fouda, Hossam Nabeeh, Ahmed Mosbah

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 11/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the efficacy of three chemoprophylaxis approaches in prevention of post-transrectal biopsy infectious complications (TBICs).

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned to receive ciprofloxacin 3 days 500 mg B.I.D 3 days starting the night prior to biopsy (standard prophylaxis), augmented prophylaxis using ciprofloxacin and single preprocedure shot of 160 mg gentamicin IM (augmented prophylaxis) and rectal swab culture-based prophylaxis (targeted prophylaxis). Patients were assessed 2 weeks prior to biopsy, at biopsy and 2 weeks after. Primary end point was occurrence of post-TBICs that included simple UTI, febrile UTI or sepsis. Secondary end points were post-biopsy change in the inflammatory markers (TLC, ESR and CRP), unplanned visits, hospitalization and occurrence of fluoroquinolones resistance (FQ-R; bacterial growth on MacConkey agar plate with 10 μg/ml ciprofloxacin) in the fecal carriage of screened men.

Results

Between April/2015 and January/2017, standard, augmented and targeted prophylaxes were given to 163, 166 and 167 patients, respectively. Post-TBICs were reported in 43 (26%), 13 (7.8%) and 34 (20.3%) patients following standard, augmented and targeted prophylaxes protocols, respectively (P = 0.000). Post-TBICs included UTI in 23 (4.6%), febrile UTI in 41 (8.2%) and sepsis in 26 (5.2%) patients. Significantly lower number of post-biopsy positive urine culture was depicted in the augmented group (P = 0.000). The number of biopsy cores was statistically different in the three groups (P = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, augmented prophylaxis had independently lower post-TBICs (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.4, P = 0.000) when compared with the other two groups regardless of the number of biopsy cores taken (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.95–1.17, P = 0.229). Post-biopsy hospitalization was needed in four (2%), one (0.6%) and ten (6%) patients following standard, augmented and targeted prophylaxes, respectively (P = 0.014). However, sepsis-related hospitalization was not statistically different. Post-biopsy changes in the inflammatory markers were significantly less in augmented prophylaxis (P < 0.05). FQ-R was depicted in 139 (83.2%) of the screened men.

Conclusion

Augmented prophylaxis with single-dose gentamicin is an effective and practical approach. Targeted prophylaxis might be reserved for cases with contraindication to gentamicin.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Hakim A, Moussa S (2010) CUA guidelines on prostate biopsy methodology. CUAJ 4(2):89–94CrossRef El-Hakim A, Moussa S (2010) CUA guidelines on prostate biopsy methodology. CUAJ 4(2):89–94CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsu JH, Ma WK, Chan WK, Lam BH, To KC, To WK et al (2015) Prevalence and predictive factors of harboring fluoroquinolone-resistant and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing rectal flora in Hong Kong Chinese men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Urology 85(1):15–21CrossRef Tsu JH, Ma WK, Chan WK, Lam BH, To KC, To WK et al (2015) Prevalence and predictive factors of harboring fluoroquinolone-resistant and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing rectal flora in Hong Kong Chinese men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Urology 85(1):15–21CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Adibi M, Hornberger B, Bhat D, Raj G, Roehrborn CG, Lotan Y (2013) Reduction in hospital admission rates due to post-prostate biopsy infections after augmenting standard antibiotic prophylaxis. J Urol 189(2):535–540CrossRef Adibi M, Hornberger B, Bhat D, Raj G, Roehrborn CG, Lotan Y (2013) Reduction in hospital admission rates due to post-prostate biopsy infections after augmenting standard antibiotic prophylaxis. J Urol 189(2):535–540CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cussans A, Somani BK, Basarab A, Dudderidge TJ (2016) The role of targeted prophylactic antimicrobial therapy before transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy in reducing infection rates: a systematic review. BJU Int 117(5):725–731CrossRef Cussans A, Somani BK, Basarab A, Dudderidge TJ (2016) The role of targeted prophylactic antimicrobial therapy before transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy in reducing infection rates: a systematic review. BJU Int 117(5):725–731CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagenlehner FM, Pilatz A, Weidner W (2011) Urosepsis–from the view of the urologist. Int J Antimicrob Agents 38(Suppl):51–57CrossRef Wagenlehner FM, Pilatz A, Weidner W (2011) Urosepsis–from the view of the urologist. Int J Antimicrob Agents 38(Suppl):51–57CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolf JS Jr, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, Hollenbeck BK, Pearle MS, Schaeffer AJ (2008) Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol 179(4):1379–1390CrossRef Wolf JS Jr, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, Hollenbeck BK, Pearle MS, Schaeffer AJ (2008) Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol 179(4):1379–1390CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai T, Gallelli L, Cocci A, Tiscione D, Verze P, Lanciotti M et al (2017) Antimicrobial prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: fosfomycin trometamol, an attractive alternative. World J Urol 35(2):221–228CrossRef Cai T, Gallelli L, Cocci A, Tiscione D, Verze P, Lanciotti M et al (2017) Antimicrobial prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: fosfomycin trometamol, an attractive alternative. World J Urol 35(2):221–228CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Hasan MN, Lahr BD, Eckel-Passow JE, Baddour LM (2009) Antimicrobial resistance trends of Escherichia coli bloodstream isolates: a population-based study, 1998–2007. J Antimicrob Chemother 64(1):169–174CrossRefPubMedCentral Al-Hasan MN, Lahr BD, Eckel-Passow JE, Baddour LM (2009) Antimicrobial resistance trends of Escherichia coli bloodstream isolates: a population-based study, 1998–2007. J Antimicrob Chemother 64(1):169–174CrossRefPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Reynolds R (2009) Antimicrobial resistance in the UK and Ireland. J Antimicrob Chemother 64(Suppl 1):i19–i23CrossRef Reynolds R (2009) Antimicrobial resistance in the UK and Ireland. J Antimicrob Chemother 64(Suppl 1):i19–i23CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Madden T, Doble A, Aliyu SH, Neal DE (2011) Infective complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy following a new protocol for antibiotic prophylaxis aimed at reducing hospital-acquired infections. BJU Int 108(10):1597–1602CrossRef Madden T, Doble A, Aliyu SH, Neal DE (2011) Infective complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy following a new protocol for antibiotic prophylaxis aimed at reducing hospital-acquired infections. BJU Int 108(10):1597–1602CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Duplessis CA, Bavaro M, Simons MP, Marguet C, Santomauro M, Auge B et al (2012) Rectal cultures before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy reduce post-prostatic biopsy infection rates. Urology 79(3):556–561CrossRef Duplessis CA, Bavaro M, Simons MP, Marguet C, Santomauro M, Auge B et al (2012) Rectal cultures before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy reduce post-prostatic biopsy infection rates. Urology 79(3):556–561CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehinde EO, Al-Maghrebi M, Sheikh M, Anim JT (2013) Combined ciprofloxacin and amikacin prophylaxis in the prevention of septicemia after transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate. J Urol 189(3):911–915CrossRef Kehinde EO, Al-Maghrebi M, Sheikh M, Anim JT (2013) Combined ciprofloxacin and amikacin prophylaxis in the prevention of septicemia after transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate. J Urol 189(3):911–915CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Issa MM, Al-Qassab UA, Hall J, Ritenour CW, Petros JA, Sullivan JW (2013) Formalin disinfection of biopsy needle minimizes the risk of sepsis following prostate biopsy. J Urol 190(5):1769–1775CrossRef Issa MM, Al-Qassab UA, Hall J, Ritenour CW, Petros JA, Sullivan JW (2013) Formalin disinfection of biopsy needle minimizes the risk of sepsis following prostate biopsy. J Urol 190(5):1769–1775CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Shakil J, Piracha N, Prasad N, Kopacz J, Tarasuk A, Farrell R et al (2014) Use of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy prophylaxis in the setting of community-associated multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli rectal colonization. Urology 83(4):710–713CrossRef Shakil J, Piracha N, Prasad N, Kopacz J, Tarasuk A, Farrell R et al (2014) Use of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy prophylaxis in the setting of community-associated multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli rectal colonization. Urology 83(4):710–713CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Nickel JC, Gilling P, Tammela TL, Morrill B, Wilson TH, Rittmaster RS (2011) Comparison of dutasteride and finasteride for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Enlarged Prostate International Comparator Study (EPICS). BJU Int 108(3):388–394CrossRef Nickel JC, Gilling P, Tammela TL, Morrill B, Wilson TH, Rittmaster RS (2011) Comparison of dutasteride and finasteride for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Enlarged Prostate International Comparator Study (EPICS). BJU Int 108(3):388–394CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Nam RK, Saskin R, Lee Y, Liu Y, Law C, Klotz LH et al (2010) Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 183(3):963–969CrossRef Nam RK, Saskin R, Lee Y, Liu Y, Law C, Klotz LH et al (2010) Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 183(3):963–969CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R et al (2013) Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 64(6):876–892CrossRef Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R et al (2013) Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 64(6):876–892CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Norberg M, Holmberg L, Häggman M, Magnusson A (1996) Determinants of complications after multiple transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. Eur Radiol 6(4):457–461CrossRef Norberg M, Holmberg L, Häggman M, Magnusson A (1996) Determinants of complications after multiple transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. Eur Radiol 6(4):457–461CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Summers SJ, Patel DP, Hamilton BD, Presson AP, Fisher MA, Lowrance WT et al (2015) An antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol using rectal swab cultures for transrectal prostate biopsy. World J Urol 33(12):2001–2007CrossRefPubMedCentral Summers SJ, Patel DP, Hamilton BD, Presson AP, Fisher MA, Lowrance WT et al (2015) An antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol using rectal swab cultures for transrectal prostate biopsy. World J Urol 33(12):2001–2007CrossRefPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Enlund AL, Varenhorst E (1997) Morbidity of ultrasound-guided transrectal core biopsy of the prostate without prophylactic antibiotic therapy. A prospective study in 415 cases. Br J Urol 79(5):777–780CrossRefPubMedCentral Enlund AL, Varenhorst E (1997) Morbidity of ultrasound-guided transrectal core biopsy of the prostate without prophylactic antibiotic therapy. A prospective study in 415 cases. Br J Urol 79(5):777–780CrossRefPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Williamson DA, Barrett LK, Rogers BA, Freeman JT, Hadway P, Paterson DL (2013) Infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: new challenges in the era of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli. Clin Infect Dis 57(2):267–274CrossRefPubMedCentral Williamson DA, Barrett LK, Rogers BA, Freeman JT, Hadway P, Paterson DL (2013) Infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: new challenges in the era of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli. Clin Infect Dis 57(2):267–274CrossRefPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Carignan A, Roussy J-F, Lapointe V, Valiquette L, Sabbagh R, Pépin J (2012) Increasing risk of infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: time to reassess antimicrobial prophylaxis? Eur Urol 62(3):453–459CrossRefPubMedCentral Carignan A, Roussy J-F, Lapointe V, Valiquette L, Sabbagh R, Pépin J (2012) Increasing risk of infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: time to reassess antimicrobial prophylaxis? Eur Urol 62(3):453–459CrossRefPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen JE, Landis P, Trock BJ, Patel HD, Ball MW, Auwaerter PG et al (2015) Fluoroquinolone resistance in the rectal carriage of men in an active surveillance cohort: longitudinal analysis. J Urol 193(2):552–556CrossRef Cohen JE, Landis P, Trock BJ, Patel HD, Ball MW, Auwaerter PG et al (2015) Fluoroquinolone resistance in the rectal carriage of men in an active surveillance cohort: longitudinal analysis. J Urol 193(2):552–556CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Fahmy A, Rhashad H, Mohi M, Elabbadie A, Kotb A (2016) Optimizing prophylactic antibiotic regimen in patients admitted for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: a prospective randomized study. Prostate Int 4(3):113–117CrossRefPubMedCentral Fahmy A, Rhashad H, Mohi M, Elabbadie A, Kotb A (2016) Optimizing prophylactic antibiotic regimen in patients admitted for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: a prospective randomized study. Prostate Int 4(3):113–117CrossRefPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Liss MA, Peeples AN, Peterson EM (2011) Detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant organisms from rectal swabs by use of selective media prior to a transrectal prostate biopsy. J Clin Microbiol 49(3):1116–1118CrossRefPubMedCentral Liss MA, Peeples AN, Peterson EM (2011) Detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant organisms from rectal swabs by use of selective media prior to a transrectal prostate biopsy. J Clin Microbiol 49(3):1116–1118CrossRefPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamei J, Yagihara Y, Kume H, Horiuchi T, Sato T, Nakagawa T et al (2017) Prevalence and characteristics of fecal antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli in a cohort of Japanese men undergoing prostate biopsy. Int J Urol 24(4):295–300CrossRef Kamei J, Yagihara Y, Kume H, Horiuchi T, Sato T, Nakagawa T et al (2017) Prevalence and characteristics of fecal antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli in a cohort of Japanese men undergoing prostate biopsy. Int J Urol 24(4):295–300CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Feliciano J, Teper E, Ferrandino M, Macchia RJ, Blank W, Grunberger I et al (2008) The incidence of fluoroquinolone resistant infections after prostate biopsy—are fluoroquinolones still effective prophylaxis? J Urol 179(3):952–955 (discussion 955) CrossRef Feliciano J, Teper E, Ferrandino M, Macchia RJ, Blank W, Grunberger I et al (2008) The incidence of fluoroquinolone resistant infections after prostate biopsy—are fluoroquinolones still effective prophylaxis? J Urol 179(3):952–955 (discussion 955) CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Siriboon S, Tiengrim S, Taweemongkongsup T, Thamlikitkul V, Chayakulkeeree M (2012) Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in fecal flora of patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in Thailand. Urol Int 88(2):187–193CrossRef Siriboon S, Tiengrim S, Taweemongkongsup T, Thamlikitkul V, Chayakulkeeree M (2012) Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in fecal flora of patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in Thailand. Urol Int 88(2):187–193CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Takenaka A, Hara R, Ishimura T, Fujii T, Jo Y, Nagai A et al (2008) A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 11(2):134–138CrossRef Takenaka A, Hara R, Ishimura T, Fujii T, Jo Y, Nagai A et al (2008) A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 11(2):134–138CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Chemoprophylaxis during transrectal prostate needle biopsy: critical analysis through randomized clinical trial
verfasst von
Ahmed M. Elshal
Ahmed M. Atwa
Ahmed R. El-Nahas
Mohamed A. El-Ghar
Asaad Gaber
Essam Elsawy
Abdelwahab Hashem
Yasser Farag
Hashim Farg
Ali Elsorougy
Mohamed Fouda
Hossam Nabeeh
Ahmed Mosbah
Publikationsdatum
07.05.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2319-2

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Adjuvanter PD-L1-Hemmer verhindert Rezidive bei Hochrisiko-Urothelkarzinom

Sind Menschen mit muskelinvasivem Urothelkarzinom für die neoadjuvante platinbasierte Therapie nicht geeignet oder sprechen sie darauf nicht gut an, ist Pembrolizumab eine adjuvante Alternative: Die krankheitsfreie Lebenszeit wird dadurch mehr als verdoppelt.

Nierenzellkarzinom: Kein Nachteil durch subkutan appliziertes Nivolumab

Die subkutane Applikation von Nivolumab ist nach Daten einer Phase-3-Studie ähnlich gut wirksam wie die intravenöse: Die Pharmakokinetik ist vergleichbar, die objektive Response war in der Studie sogar leicht besser als in der Gruppe mit Infusionen.

Auf weichem Fahrradsattel ist nicht gut Kinder zeugen

Männer, die sich gern sportlich verausgaben, riskieren möglicherweise, fürs Vaterwerden nicht genug Kräfte übrig zu haben. In einer Studie fanden sich dafür zwar allenfalls schwache Anzeichen. Es gab jedoch eine Ausnahme.

Vorteile für Androgenentzug plus Androgenrezeptorblockade

Für Männer mit metastasiertem hormonsensitivem Prostata-Ca. (mHSPC), die keine Hormonchemotherapie wollen oder vertragen, ist der Androgenentzug plus Darolutamid eine Alternative: Das Progressionsrisiko wird im Vergleich zum alleinigen Androgenentzug fast halbiert.

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.