The 5-year survival rate for childhood cancers exceeds 80%, resulting in a growing population of long-term survivors. One in 570 young adults between ages 20 and 34 years is a childhood cancer survivor [
1], and 40% of them have at least one chronic medical condition which include neurocognitive toxicity [
2‐
4]. In many cases, especially those from the late 1900s, neurocognitive toxicity is the result of combined polychemotherapy and radiation treatments. However, recent systematic multicenter longitudinal studies of intellectual development of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients treated solely with polychemotherapy also document lower performance IQ (intelligence quotient) scores and worse intellectual outcomes in patients diagnosed and treated prior to the 6th year of life [
5]. Given that the tumor burden reflected by low versus increased risk did not affect IQ scores, the investigators attributed this adverse effect to treatment rather than to the disease burden. In another study on pediatric B-cell ALL survivors, the authors described the development of leukoencephalopathies as late as 7.7 years after the end of treatment [
6]. In this study, 40% of patients scored < 86 on either Verbal or Performance IQ. Children had significant attention problems and neurocognitive impairments, which were dependent upon treatment protocol. This strongly supports concerns about intensive chemotherapy being a major contributor to CNS late effects [
6].
Deficits are consistently reported in visual processing, visual-motor function, attention, concentration, working memory, and executive functions [
7‐
11]. Buizer and colleagues [
9] reviewed 21 trials comparing patients with ALL and controls and described long-term deficits in attention and executive function, worse among the younger female patients. There are also studies which did not detect significant neurocognitive deficits in ALL survivors. Von der Weid and coinvestigators [
12] found no significant differences between 132 survivors of ALL versus not-CNS solid tumors in global IQ. Jansen and colleagues reported in a prospective longitudinal, sibling-controlled study of children with ALL, treated with chemotherapy only, no major differences between patients and siblings up to 4.5 years from diagnosis except for a significant diminution in complex fine motor functioning in the patients at the last evaluation [
13].
Understanding the pathomechanisms via which chemotherapy impacts on central nervous system (CNS) integrity is crucial to the development of cancer therapies that will spare the CNS.
Many studies have been performed in children with brain tumors and leukemia to explore chemotherapy impact on the developing CNS [
14‐
16]. Studies of intellectual development of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients treated solely with polychemotherapy document worse intellectual outcomes in patients diagnosed and treated prior to the 6th year of life [
5]. Our understanding of how chemotherapy injures the pediatric brain, what the pathomechanisms of this injury are and what accounts for the higher vulnerability of children under 6 years of age remains limited. We know that chemotherapy associates with leukoencephalopathies and low white matter/grey matter volumes in pediatric B-cell ALL survivors, but we know very little about the biochemical and microstructural changes that lead to these states. More systematic research in this area is urgently needed in order to characterize mechanisms of chemotherapy neurotoxicity in children, identify biomarkers which signal critical CNS toxicity, and also design strategies to prevent it.
The great majority of clinical studies addressing neurotoxicity of chemotherapy in children with cancer are cross-sectional studies performed after cancer treatment has been completed. There are few studies focusing on dynamic changes in brain morphology and function and molecular changes in biological fluids during chemotherapy in children, and there is a dearth of longitudinal prospective clinical studies that examine timely progression and potential reversibility of evolving sequelae. This is the type of studies needed to help explore what acute effects cancer and cancer treatment exert on the developing brain, how early they occur, what the earliest indicators and mechanisms are, and whether treatments can be developed to counteract and/or prevent them.
Neurochemical biomarkers in body fluids in cancer patients
Few studies have focused on analysis of chemical and molecular biomarkers indicative of chemotherapy-induced CNS toxicity in cancer patients. Oesterlundh and colleagues [
29] analyzed neurochemical markers of brain injury in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) during induction treatment for acute ALL in children (
n = 121; mean age 6.4 years/1.3–16.8 years) on days 0, 8, 15, and 29. They reported significant increases in the levels of neuron-specific-enolase, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and neurofilament protein light chain which suggest that cell injury, involving both neurons and astroglia, occurs during induction chemotherapy in children. Elevation of homocysteine and excitatory amino acid neurotransmitters in the CSF of children who receive methotrexate for cancer treatment has been reported [
30] as well as increased beta-glucuronidase activity in the CSF of children with ALL undergoing treatment with high-dose methotrexate [
31]. Beta glucuronidase levels correlated with plasma methotrexate levels. The authors concluded that increased beta-glucuronidase activity was due to enzyme leakage through the cell membranes caused by the toxic effect of methotrexate on the cells of the CNS [
31].
In a small prospective study, it was shown that neuron-specific enolase CSF levels increase during induction chemotherapy for ALL and remain elevated during consolidation [
32]. The authors also reported increased levels of nerve growth factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the CSF during induction and consolidation therapy for ALL, which were interpreted as indicating activation of neuroprotective mechanisms.
Van Gool and colleagues [
33] described increase in CSF-Tau, CSF-P-Tau, and CSF-neuromodulin after induction chemotherapy and one intrathecal injection of methotrexate followed by 7 days of systemic corticosteroids. CSF-Tau remained high during induction treatment whereas CSF-P-Tau and CSF-neuromodulin decreased suggesting different mechanisms of neurotoxicity in the course of induction chemotherapy. Similary, Krawzuk-Rybak and coinvestigators [
34] measured elevated tau protein levels in the CSF of ALL patients. A negative correlation was found between Tau protein levels obtained from the last CSF (during last routine lumbar puncture) with total and verbal IQ, performance IQ, and perceptual organization index. They concluded that WM injury occurs during chemotherapy and that elevated Tau protein levels in the CSF at the end of treatment indicate future neurocognitive difficulties.
Higher degrees of oxidative stress in the CNS, as measured by levels of oxidized CSF phospholipids in 88 children undergoing chemotherapy for ALL, correlated with higher degree of cognitive dysfunction [
35]. Elevated CSF levels of F2 isoprostanes (oxidative marker) and caspase 3/7 (apoptosis markers) were reported in three patients with methotrexate toxicity following intrathecal chemotherapy and high-dose methotrexate [
36].
Finally, CSF folate and homocysteine levels were studied in patients with ALL [
37]. CSF folate dropped during the first month of therapy and remained low throughout treatment. CSF homocysteine was inversely related to cognitive function prior to treatment and increased during treatment. Of 36 patients who had imaging after completion of chemotherapy, 9 had periventricular or subcortical white matter abnormalities consistent with leukoencephalopathy. In these patients, CSF peak tau concentrations were the highest suggesting that these biomarkers may have predictive value for neurologic outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood ALL [
37].
Mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity and gliotoxicity
Cytostatic drugs utilize various mechanisms via which they attack cancers. Alkylating agents alkylate electron-rich atoms, form covalent bonds, and react with DNA bases. This reaction prevents cells from replicating (39). Cisplatin and analogues form monofunctional and bifunctional adducts which lead to intrastrand or interstrand DNA cross-links interrupting separation, replication and transcription of the DNA (39). Antimetabolites disturb the biosynthesis and function of nucleic acids and impair formation of new DNA and RNA, which leads to cell cycle arrest. Finally, DNA topoisomerase inhibitors form single- or double-strand breaks in the DNA double helix, which relaxes the torsional stress that occurs when the DNA double helix unwinds. Accumulation of torsionally strained and supercoiled DNA interferes with vital cell processes leading to cytotoxic DNA damage causing cell arrest, apoptosis, or necrosis [
38].
There has been considerable preclinical research, which demonstrated that cytostatic drugs can produce cognitive impairment in small animal models (for review, see [
39‐
41]). The pathomechanisms of this toxicity have been explored in vivo and in vitro.
It appears that toxicity induced by cytostatic drugs within the central nervous system utilizes pathways which are also involved in other brain injury syndromes such as hypoxia/ischemia, traumatic injury, and neuroinflammation.
Oxidative stress is attributed to disruption of mitochondrial DNA leading to formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Production of ROS has been demonstrated for various agents, including cyclophosphamide, cytarabin, doxorubicin, methotrexate, and carboplatin [
42‐
51].
Disruption of neurogenesis has been shown to occur within the hippocampus following treatment with carmustine, cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, or cisplatin [
40,
41,
53‐
58].
Excitotoxicity and apoptosis
In many acute and chronic brain injury syndromes, such as hypoxia-ischemia, trauma, status epilepticus, and neurodegeneration in the context of mitochondrial dysfunction [
59‐
62], toxic stimuli operate via two well-characterized mechanisms to cause neuronal death.
Excitotoxicity is a form of passive neuronal death caused by excessive stimulation of excitatory amino acid (EAA) receptors [
60‐
62]. Three subtypes of EAA receptors,
N-methyl-
d-aspartate, alpha-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-isoxazol-4-propionic acid, and kainate receptors, are coupled to ion channels and are called ionotropic. Excessive stimulation of ionotropic glutamate receptors causes excitotoxic neuronal death in vitro and in vivo [
63]. Active caspase-mediated cell death or
apoptosis represents a form of slower degeneration that occurs in hypoxic and traumatic brain injury as well as in the context of mitochondrial dysfunction [
59,
60,
62,
64]. Caspase-mediated cell death can be triggered by a primary excitotoxic stimulus of low intensity [
65].
In the developing brain, active cell death that occurs after hypoxic or traumatic brain injury markedly resembles morphologically physiological apoptosis [
59,
66,
67]. Rzeski and colleagues undertook a series of studies aimed to evaluate whether anticancer agents may exert direct neurotoxic effects and also explored whether excitotoxic and caspase-mediated death comprise components of this toxicity. They investigated neurotoxic effects of common cytotoxic drugs in vitro in neuronal and glial cultures and in vivo in the developing rat brain [
68]. When neurons and astroglia were exposed to cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, vinblastin, or thiotepa, a concentration-dependent neurotoxic effect was observed. Neurotoxicity was potentiated by nontoxic glutamate concentrations and blocked by ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonists and a pancaspase inhibitor. To investigate neurotoxicity in vivo, Rzeski and colleagues administered to infant rats cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, or ifosfamide and analyzed their brains. All tested compounds produced widespread lesions within cortex, thalamus, hippocampal dentate gyrus, and caudate nucleus in a dose-dependent fashion [
68]. Early histological analysis demonstrated dendritic swelling and relative preservation of axonal terminals, which are morphological features indicating excitotoxicity. After longer survival periods, degenerating neurons displayed morphological features consistent with active, caspase-mediated cell death. These results demonstrate that anticancer drugs are potent neurotoxins in vitro and in vivo; they activate excitotoxic mechanisms but also trigger active, caspase-mediated neuronal death. Other investigators have reported similar findings [
46,
69,
70].
A direct toxic effect of some cytostatic drugs on oligodendrocytes and their precursors has been described [
52,
54,
71] and likely contributes to white matter pathology seen in pediatric cancer survivors.
Neuroinflammation
Systemic inflammation with cytokine release, which may occur in cancer patients as a response to mucositis and systemic infections, may facilitate a process of
neuroinflammation, microglial activation, and suppression of neurogenesis [
72‐
77].
Brain perfusion
A reduction by chemotherapy of regional blood flow, possibly due to a reduction in blood vessel density, has also been reported [
78‐
80], including more recently a clinical study in pediatric cancer survivors [
81]. Using positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MR), these investigators measured significantly lower cerebral blood flow and metabolic activity in key brain areas compared to control subjects.
The role of the blood–brain barrier
The brain is protected against potentially harmful medications by the blood–brain barrier, which consist of capillary endothelial unfenestrated cells, linked by tight junctions. Efflux transporters such as P-glycoprotein control and limit invasion of cytotoxic drugs [
39]. Moreover, pericytes inhibit the expression of molecules that increase vascular permeability and CNS immune cell infiltration [
82]. Multiple studies suggest that the blood–brain barrier is already mature and effective in the fetal brain [
83,
84].
To penetrate the blood–brain barrier, drug molecules need to be small (< 500 Da) and lipophilic so they can passively diffuse. Drugs that can use inward transport systems but remain unrecognized by efflux transporters, can also enter the brain [
85]. The blood–brain barrier can be disrupted in the proximity to brain tumors and brain metastases, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, following radiation and when brain disruptors are used [
86]. In these cases, chemotherapeutic agents can easily penetrate into the central nervous system. Furthermore, in a number of pediatric malignancies, intrathecal chemotherapy is administered which increases the risk for neurologic complications.
Chemotherapy-induced neuropathology
Some cancer chemotherapeutics have been studied in rodents. The studies have focused on methotrexate, alkylating agents (ifosfamide, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin), and vincristine (see reviews [
5,
39]). Neuropathological and neurophysiological correlates of CNS toxicity in infant, young, and adult rodents have included marked increase of apoptosis, decline in neurogenesis, impairment of long-term potentiation (LTP), synaptic remodeling, increased blood–brain barrier permeability, impaired cell division and migration, and increased markers for oxidative stress [
5,
39]. Table
1 summarizes the types of CNS toxicity described in rodent models at different ages.
Table 1
Neurotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents in rodent models [
25]
Methotrexate
antimetabolite
| Apoptotic and excitotoxic neuronal death, decline in neurogenesis, decrease in myelination, oxidative stress | 7 days 3 months 3 months 12 months | Cortex, thalamus, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, corpus callosum, cerebellum, pons, medulla, hypothalamus [ 40, 41, 50, 68, 87, 88] |
Cyclophosphamide Ifosfamide
alkylating
| Apoptotic and excitotoxic neuronal death, decline in neurogenesis, impairment of LTP, cytokine dysregulation, reduced glutathione, and glutathione peroxidase | 7 days 8–10 weeks 2 months Adult 7 months 12 months Embryo | Cortex, thalamus, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, corpus callosum, neural tube [ 58, 68, 87‐ 91] |
Cisplatin
alkylating
| Apoptotic and excitotoxic neuronal death, Decreased cell division, altered granule cell migration and Purkinje cell dendrite growth, increased blood–brain barrier permeability, DNA damage due to oxidative stress | 7 days 10 days 8 days 1 day Embryo Adult | Cortex, thalamus, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, cerebellar cortex, cerebellar granule neurons, hypothalamus [ 52, 68, 70, 92‐ 98] |
Vincristine
anti-mitotic
| Apoptosis | 8 days | Cortex, thalamus, caudate nucleus, hippocampus [ 68, 70] |
In humans, brain pathology can be studied using MRI techniques. Assigning a particular type of toxicity to one medication is very difficult, given the fact that multidrug regimen are used to treat pediatric malignancies. In addition, radiotherapy is often coadministered.
A most recent study by van der Plas and colleagues in survivors of childhood B-cell ALL who received no radiotherapy describes smaller volumes of both grey and white matter structures, indicating that there has been cell loss in these areas and/or their development was compromised [
99]. Nevertheless, there are distinct forms of brain toxicity that have been associated with certain chemotherapeutic drugs.
Leukoencephalopathy is a known complication of chemotherapy, in children and adults, in particular for regimens that include methotrexate, BCNU, melphalan, fludarabine, cytarabine, 5-fluorouracil, levamisole, and cisplatin [
100‐
104]. In many cases, a mild and reversible form of injury occurs. When methotrexate is combined with radiation therapy, the degree of white matter injury increases dramatically and, in such cases, leukoencephalopathy may be irreversible. Determining the relative contributions of each treatment modality to brain injury is practically impossible under such circumstances [
101,
102,
105‐
109].
However, methotrexate has been shown to cause the same type of toxic leukoencephalopathy in the absence of radiation, in cases with intrathecal or intraventricular administration [
110‐
113]. The greatest injury is seen surrounding a leaky or misplaced ventriculostomy tube used to administer methotrexate via an Ommaya reservoir [
100,
109,
114‐
116]. Risk factors for toxicity are also not well understood, but appear to relate to dosages of methotrexate and radiation, modes of administration, types of diluent, preexisting folate deficiency, and idiosyncratic predispositions [
86,
101].
An early asymptomatic form of leukoencephalopathy has been reported in children with medulloblastoma and supratentorial primary neuroectodermal tumors receiving combination chemotherapy, with or without concomitant radiation [
117‐
119]. In most cases, these lesions were transient and reversible, but there was an increased risk of subsequent neurocognitive deficits. An acute and transient form of encephalopathy has been reported in children receiving high-dose methotrexate for acute lymphoblastic leukemia or osteosarcoma [
120]. It has been postulated that under such circumstances a disruption of the blood–brain barrier occurs. In biopsies of such lesions, myelin pallor, vacuolation, axonal spheroids, modest macrophage infiltrates, and gliosis have been reported [
86].
Disseminated necrotizing leukoencephalopathy (DNL) presents with a miliary distribution of lesions, ranging from small rounded foci to large confluent zones of non-inflammatory demyelination or white matter necrosis [
86,
108,
121,
122]. This disease was first described in children with metastatic meningeal acute lymphoblastic lymphoma (ALL) treated with high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy and whole brain irradiation [
108,
123]. In adults, DNL has been described in patients with other tumor types, primary CNS and systemic lymphomas, carcinomas, sarcomas, and primitive/embryonal neoplasms [
100,
106,
107,
111,
124‐
127], and in high-grade gliomas treated with intra-arterial BCNU, both with and without irradiation [
128‐
131].
Clinical presentation of DNL is that of a rapidly progressive subcortical dementia. Symptoms present after completion of therapy to many months later and may progress to dementia, seizures, coma, and death within months [
86].
Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome
Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLES) or posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) presents with acute cortical blindness, headache, mental status changes, and sometimes seizures [
132]. Malignant hypertension and T2-weighted/FLAIR MRI signal abnormalities in the occipital and posterior temporo-parietal regions are the hallmarks of this disease entity. Lesions may affect grey matter [
133‐
140]. High-dose corticosteroids and various single or combination chemotherapeutic regimens, including cisplatin, cytarabine, cyclophosphamide, and methotrexate, have been identified as triggers.
Symptoms may develop at initiation of therapy or may be delayed for days to weeks. The mechanism of toxicity is poorly understood, although radiologic studies suggest vasogenic edema as the main pathology. Proposed mechanisms have included endothelial damage with blood–brain barrier disruption, transient episodes of hypertension overloading the autoregulatory capabilities of the posterior circulation, and electrolyte imbalances, such as hypomagnesemia [
133‐
140]. In rarely obtained biopsies, vasogenic edema without vascular damage or infarct was detected [
137]. In some patients, permanent deficits were encountered suggesting that ischemic damage is possible in severe cases or delays in making the diagnosis and instituting blood pressure control.
Future challenges
There is increasing knowledge from preclinical studies about the effects of cancer chemotherapeutic agents on the mammalian brain, but little information is available on how such findings from various animal models translate and apply to the human pediatric brain.
Advanced neuroimaging studies in cancer patients have started to shed light on the structural and functional impact of chemotherapy on the pediatric and adult brain. There are few studies focusing on dynamic changes in brain morphology and function during chemotherapy in children, and there is a dearth of longitudinal prospective clinical studies that examine step by step their progression and potential reversibility. This is the type of studies needed to help explore what acute effects cancer and cancer treatment exert on the developing brain, how early they occur, what the earliest indicators and mechanisms are, and whether treatments can be developed to counteract and/or prevent them.
Better understanding of pathomechanisms and identification of biomarkers which can trace neurotoxicity risk in individual patients will allow for timely modifications of treatment to minimize toxicity.