Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2019

01.12.2019 | Original Paper

Chinese patients’ preference for pharmaceutical treatments of osteoporosis: a discrete choice experiment

verfasst von: Lei Si, Liudan Tu, Ya Xie, Andrew J. Palmer, Yuanyuan Gu, Xuqi Zheng, Jiamin Li, Qing Lv, Jun Qi, Zhiming Lin, Mingsheng Chen, Jieruo Gu, Mickaël Hiligsmann

Erschienen in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Summary

While adherence to osteoporosis treatment is low, patients’ preference for osteoporosis treatment is unknown in Chinese patients. Chinese patients are willing to receive treatments with higher clinical efficacy and lower out-of-pocket cost. In addition, annual intravenous infusion and 6-month subcutaneous injection are preferred over weekly oral tablets.

Purpose

This study was performed to elicit Chinese patients’ preferences for osteoporosis medication treatment and to investigate the heterogeneities of the preferences in subgroups.

Methods

A discrete choice experiment comprising 15 choice sets with 4 important attributes was conducted in a Chinese population at risk of osteoporotic fracture. The four attributes were treatment efficacy in reducing the risk of fracture, out-of-pocket cost per year, adverse effects of treatment, and mode of administration. The patients were asked to choose between two hypothetical treatments; they could also choose no treatment. Mixed logit models were used, and any observed heterogeneity in the patients’ preferences was further assessed in subgroup analyses.

Results

In total, 267 patients were analysed. On average, the patients preferred to receive treatment rather than no treatment. The patients preferred treatment with higher efficacy in preventing fracture and lower out-of-pocket cost. The least preferred adverse effect of medication was gastrointestinal disorders, followed by flu-like symptoms and finally skin reactions. The most preferred mode of administration was annual intravenous infusion, followed by 6-month subcutaneous injection, a weekly oral tablet, and daily nasal spray; daily oral tablets ranked as the least preferred mode of administration. The differences in the patients’ preferences among all attributes were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Patients’ age was found to contribute to the observed preference heterogeneity in most of the included attributes.

Conclusions

This study revealed Chinese patients’ preferences for osteoporosis treatments. Annual intravenous infusion and 6-month subcutaneous injection were significantly preferred over weekly oral tablets in this Chinese population.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA (2002) Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 359:1929–1936CrossRef Kanis JA (2002) Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 359:1929–1936CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Silverman S, Gold DT (2010) Compliance and persistence with osteoporosis medications: a critical review of the literature. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 11:275–280CrossRef Silverman S, Gold DT (2010) Compliance and persistence with osteoporosis medications: a critical review of the literature. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 11:275–280CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cotté F-E, Mercier F, De Pouvourville G (2008) Relationship between compliance and persistence with osteoporosis medications and fracture risk in primary health care in France: a retrospective case—control analysis. Clin Ther 30:2410–2422CrossRef Cotté F-E, Mercier F, De Pouvourville G (2008) Relationship between compliance and persistence with osteoporosis medications and fracture risk in primary health care in France: a retrospective case—control analysis. Clin Ther 30:2410–2422CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hiligsmann M, Rabenda V, Gathon H-J, Ethgen O, Reginster J-Y (2010) Potential clinical and economic impact of nonadherence with osteoporosis medications. Calcif Tissue Int 86:202–210CrossRef Hiligsmann M, Rabenda V, Gathon H-J, Ethgen O, Reginster J-Y (2010) Potential clinical and economic impact of nonadherence with osteoporosis medications. Calcif Tissue Int 86:202–210CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen M, Si L, Winzenberg TM, Gu J, Jiang Q, Palmer AJ (2016) Cost-effectiveness of raloxifene in the treatment of osteoporosis in Chinese postmenopausal women: impact of medication persistence and adherence. Patient Prefer Adherence 10:415–423PubMedPubMedCentral Chen M, Si L, Winzenberg TM, Gu J, Jiang Q, Palmer AJ (2016) Cost-effectiveness of raloxifene in the treatment of osteoporosis in Chinese postmenopausal women: impact of medication persistence and adherence. Patient Prefer Adherence 10:415–423PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rees G, Leong O, Crowston JG, Lamoureux EL (2010) Intentional and unintentional nonadherence to ocular hypotensive treatment in patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmology 117:903–908CrossRef Rees G, Leong O, Crowston JG, Lamoureux EL (2010) Intentional and unintentional nonadherence to ocular hypotensive treatment in patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmology 117:903–908CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Clifford S, Barber N, Horne R (2008) Understanding different beliefs held by adherers, unintentional nonadherers, and intentional nonadherers: application of the Necessity-Concerns Framework. J Psychosom Res 64:41–46CrossRef Clifford S, Barber N, Horne R (2008) Understanding different beliefs held by adherers, unintentional nonadherers, and intentional nonadherers: application of the Necessity-Concerns Framework. J Psychosom Res 64:41–46CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hiligsmann M, Salas M, Hughes DA, Manias E, Gwadry-Sridhar FH, Linck P, Cowell W (2013) Interventions to improve osteoporosis medication adherence and persistence: a systematic review and literature appraisal by the ISPOR Medication Adherence & Persistence Special Interest Group. Osteoporos Int 24:2907–2918CrossRef Hiligsmann M, Salas M, Hughes DA, Manias E, Gwadry-Sridhar FH, Linck P, Cowell W (2013) Interventions to improve osteoporosis medication adherence and persistence: a systematic review and literature appraisal by the ISPOR Medication Adherence & Persistence Special Interest Group. Osteoporos Int 24:2907–2918CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M (2008) Discrete choice experiments in a nutshell. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Netherlands Antilles, AN. Springer Academic Publishers, pp 13–46 Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M (2008) Discrete choice experiments in a nutshell. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Netherlands Antilles, AN. Springer Academic Publishers, pp 13–46
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hiligsmann M, Dellaert BG, Dirksen CD, van der Weijden T, Goemaere S, Reginster J-Y, Watson V, Boonen A (2014) Patients’ preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment. Arthritis Res Ther 16:R36–R36CrossRef Hiligsmann M, Dellaert BG, Dirksen CD, van der Weijden T, Goemaere S, Reginster J-Y, Watson V, Boonen A (2014) Patients’ preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment. Arthritis Res Ther 16:R36–R36CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hiligsmann M, Dellaert BG, Dirksen CD, Watson V, Bours S, Goemaere S, Reginster JY, Roux C, McGowan B, Silke C, Whelan B, Diez-Perez A, Torres E, Papadakis G, Rizzoli R, Cooper C, Pearson G, Boonen A (2017) Patients’ preferences for anti-osteoporosis drug treatment: a cross-European discrete choice experiment. Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 56:1167–1176CrossRef Hiligsmann M, Dellaert BG, Dirksen CD, Watson V, Bours S, Goemaere S, Reginster JY, Roux C, McGowan B, Silke C, Whelan B, Diez-Perez A, Torres E, Papadakis G, Rizzoli R, Cooper C, Pearson G, Boonen A (2017) Patients’ preferences for anti-osteoporosis drug treatment: a cross-European discrete choice experiment. Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 56:1167–1176CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Si L, Winzenberg TM, Jiang Q, Chen M, Palmer AJ (2015) Projection of osteoporosis-related fractures and costs in China: 2010-2050. Osteoporos Int 26:1929–1937CrossRef Si L, Winzenberg TM, Jiang Q, Chen M, Palmer AJ (2015) Projection of osteoporosis-related fractures and costs in China: 2010-2050. Osteoporos Int 26:1929–1937CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng TT, Yu SF, Hsu CY, Chen SH, Su BY, Yang TS (2013) Differences in adherence to osteoporosis regimens: a 2-year analysis of a population treated under specific guidelines. Clin Ther 35:1005–1015CrossRef Cheng TT, Yu SF, Hsu CY, Chen SH, Su BY, Yang TS (2013) Differences in adherence to osteoporosis regimens: a 2-year analysis of a population treated under specific guidelines. Clin Ther 35:1005–1015CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohrbaugh J (1981) Improving the quality of group judgment: social judgment analysis and the nominal group technique. Organ Behav Hum Perform 28:272–288CrossRef Rohrbaugh J (1981) Improving the quality of group judgment: social judgment analysis and the nominal group technique. Organ Behav Hum Perform 28:272–288CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hiligsmann M, van Durme C, Geusens P, Dellaert BG, Dirksen CD, van der Weijden T, Reginster J-Y, Boonen A (2013) Nominal group technique to select attributes for discrete choice experiments: an example for drug treatment choice in osteoporosis. Patient Prefer Adherence 7:133–139CrossRef Hiligsmann M, van Durme C, Geusens P, Dellaert BG, Dirksen CD, van der Weijden T, Reginster J-Y, Boonen A (2013) Nominal group technique to select attributes for discrete choice experiments: an example for drug treatment choice in osteoporosis. Patient Prefer Adherence 7:133–139CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohrbaugh J (1981) Improving the quality of group judgment: social judgment analysis and the nominal group technique. Organ Behav Hum Perform 28(2):272–288 Rohrbaugh J (1981) Improving the quality of group judgment: social judgment analysis and the nominal group technique. Organ Behav Hum Perform 28(2):272–288
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen M, Zhao Y, Si L (2014) Who pays for health care in China? The case of Heilongjiang province. PLoS One 9:e108867–e108867CrossRef Chen M, Zhao Y, Si L (2014) Who pays for health care in China? The case of Heilongjiang province. PLoS One 9:e108867–e108867CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Qu B, Ma Y, Yan M, Wu HH, Fan L, Liao DF, Pan XM, Hong Z (2014) The economic burden of fracture patients with osteoporosis in western China. Osteoporos Int 25:1853–1860CrossRef Qu B, Ma Y, Yan M, Wu HH, Fan L, Liao DF, Pan XM, Hong Z (2014) The economic burden of fracture patients with osteoporosis in western China. Osteoporos Int 25:1853–1860CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Working group on guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of senile osteoporosis in China, Osteoporosis Society of China Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics (2018) 2018 China guideline for diagnosis and treatment of senile osteoporosis [in Chinese]. Chin J Osteoporos 24:1541–1567 Working group on guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of senile osteoporosis in China, Osteoporosis Society of China Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics (2018) 2018 China guideline for diagnosis and treatment of senile osteoporosis [in Chinese]. Chin J Osteoporos 24:1541–1567
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wells GA, Cranney A, Peterson J, Boucher M, Shea B, Robinson V, Coyle D, Tugwell P (2008) Alendronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Cd001155 Wells GA, Cranney A, Peterson J, Boucher M, Shea B, Robinson V, Coyle D, Tugwell P (2008) Alendronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Cd001155
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Cranney A, Tugwell P, Zytaruk N, Robinson V, Weaver B, Shea B, Wells G, Adachi J, Waldegger L, Guyatt G (2002) Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. VI. Meta-analysis of calcitonin for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 23(4):540–551 Cranney A, Tugwell P, Zytaruk N, Robinson V, Weaver B, Shea B, Wells G, Adachi J, Waldegger L, Guyatt G (2002) Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. VI. Meta-analysis of calcitonin for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 23(4):540–551
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Black DM, Delmas PD, Eastell R, Reid IR, Boonen S, Cauley JA, Cosman F, Lakatos P, Leung PC, Man Z, Mautalen C, Mesenbrink P, Hu H, Caminis J, Tong K, Rosario-Jansen T, Krasnow J, Hue TF, Sellmeyer D, Eriksen EF, Cummings SR (2007) Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 356:1809–1822CrossRef Black DM, Delmas PD, Eastell R, Reid IR, Boonen S, Cauley JA, Cosman F, Lakatos P, Leung PC, Man Z, Mautalen C, Mesenbrink P, Hu H, Caminis J, Tong K, Rosario-Jansen T, Krasnow J, Hue TF, Sellmeyer D, Eriksen EF, Cummings SR (2007) Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 356:1809–1822CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cummings SR, Martin JS, McClung MR et al (2009) Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 361:756–765CrossRef Cummings SR, Martin JS, McClung MR et al (2009) Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 361:756–765CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Deaton A (1997) The analysis of household surveys: a microeconometric approach to development policy. The World Bank, Deaton A (1997) The analysis of household surveys: a microeconometric approach to development policy. The World Bank,
25.
Zurück zum Zitat de Bekker-Grob EW, Donkers B, Jonker MF, Stolk EA (2015) Sample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: a practical guide. Patient 8(5):373–384 de Bekker-Grob EW, Donkers B, Jonker MF, Stolk EA (2015) Sample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: a practical guide. Patient 8(5):373–384
26.
Zurück zum Zitat McFadden D, Train K (2000) Mixed MNL models for discrete response, vol 15, pp 447–470 McFadden D, Train K (2000) Mixed MNL models for discrete response, vol 15, pp 447–470
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hensher DA, Greene WH (2003) The mixed logit model: the state of practice. Transportation 30:133–176CrossRef Hensher DA, Greene WH (2003) The mixed logit model: the state of practice. Transportation 30:133–176CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hole AR (2007) Estimating mixed logit models using maximum simulated likelihood. Stata J 7:388–401CrossRef Hole AR (2007) Estimating mixed logit models using maximum simulated likelihood. Stata J 7:388–401CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Breckenridge AJDDTT (2011) Patient opinions and preferences in drug development and regulatory decision makingW. 8:e11–e14 Breckenridge AJDDTT (2011) Patient opinions and preferences in drug development and regulatory decision makingW. 8:e11–e14
30.
Zurück zum Zitat van Til JA, Ijzerman MJ (2014) Why Should Regulators Consider Using Patient Preferences in Benefit-risk Assessment? PharmacoEconomics 32:1–4 van Til JA, Ijzerman MJ (2014) Why Should Regulators Consider Using Patient Preferences in Benefit-risk Assessment? PharmacoEconomics 32:1–4
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho M, Saha A, McCleary KK, Levitan B, Christopher S, Zandlo K, Braithwaite RS, Hauber AB (2016) A framework for incorporating patient preferences regarding benefits and risks into regulatory assessment of medical technologies. Value Health 19(6):746–750 Ho M, Saha A, McCleary KK, Levitan B, Christopher S, Zandlo K, Braithwaite RS, Hauber AB (2016) A framework for incorporating patient preferences regarding benefits and risks into regulatory assessment of medical technologies. Value Health 19(6):746–750
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Mithal A, Ebeling P, Kyer C, JIof, Nyon (2013) The Asia-Pacific regional audit: epidemiology, costs & burden of osteoporosis in 2013 Mithal A, Ebeling P, Kyer C, JIof, Nyon (2013) The Asia-Pacific regional audit: epidemiology, costs & burden of osteoporosis in 2013
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hiligsmann M, Bours SPG, Boonen A (2015) A review of patient preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment. Curr Rheumatol Rep 17(9):61–61 Hiligsmann M, Bours SPG, Boonen A (2015) A review of patient preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment. Curr Rheumatol Rep 17(9):61–61
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Reginster JY, Rabenda V, Neuprez A (2006) Adherence, patient preference and dosing frequency: understanding the relationship. Bone 38:S2–S6CrossRef Reginster JY, Rabenda V, Neuprez A (2006) Adherence, patient preference and dosing frequency: understanding the relationship. Bone 38:S2–S6CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Emkey R, Koltun W, Beusterien K, Seidman L, Kivitz A, Devas V, Masanauskaite D (2005) Patient preference for once-monthly ibandronate versus once-weekly alendronate in a randomized, open-label, cross-over trial: the Boniva Alendronate Trial in Osteoporosis (BALTO). Curr Med Res Opin 21:1895–1903CrossRef Emkey R, Koltun W, Beusterien K, Seidman L, Kivitz A, Devas V, Masanauskaite D (2005) Patient preference for once-monthly ibandronate versus once-weekly alendronate in a randomized, open-label, cross-over trial: the Boniva Alendronate Trial in Osteoporosis (BALTO). Curr Med Res Opin 21:1895–1903CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Modi A, Fan C-PS, Tang J, Weaver JP, Sajjan S (2016) Association of gastrointestinal events with osteoporosis treatment initiation and treatment compliance in Germany: an observational study. Bone Reports 5:208–213CrossRef Modi A, Fan C-PS, Tang J, Weaver JP, Sajjan S (2016) Association of gastrointestinal events with osteoporosis treatment initiation and treatment compliance in Germany: an observational study. Bone Reports 5:208–213CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Mangham LJ, Hanson K, McPake B (2009) How to do (or not to do) … designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. Health Policy Plan 24:151–158CrossRef Mangham LJ, Hanson K, McPake B (2009) How to do (or not to do) … designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. Health Policy Plan 24:151–158CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Shane E, Khosla S, Burr D (2013) Osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femoral fractures. Osteoporosis. Elsevier, pp 1873–1908 Shane E, Khosla S, Burr D (2013) Osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femoral fractures. Osteoporosis. Elsevier, pp 1873–1908
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Reed Johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D, Kilambi V, Mühlbacher A, Regier DA, Bresnahan BW, Kanninen B, Bridges JFP (2013) Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health 16(1):3–13 Reed Johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D, Kilambi V, Mühlbacher A, Regier DA, Bresnahan BW, Kanninen B, Bridges JFP (2013) Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health 16(1):3–13
Metadaten
Titel
Chinese patients’ preference for pharmaceutical treatments of osteoporosis: a discrete choice experiment
verfasst von
Lei Si
Liudan Tu
Ya Xie
Andrew J. Palmer
Yuanyuan Gu
Xuqi Zheng
Jiamin Li
Qing Lv
Jun Qi
Zhiming Lin
Mingsheng Chen
Jieruo Gu
Mickaël Hiligsmann
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2019
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Elektronische ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0624-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.