Chronic dysphagia caused by Laryngo-vertebral Synostosis after anterior fusion for cervical spine trauma: a case report

Anterior cervical spine surgery is often associated with postoperative dysphagia [1]. Most patients with dysphagia improve over time, but a significant proportion have persistent symptoms, with the incidence of chronic dysphagia reported to be 12.5–35% [2‐4]. Previous reports suggest that adhesion and protrusion of instrumentation or grafts could potentially cause chronic postoperative dysphagia; however, synostosis of the laryngeal cartilages and cervical spine is extremely rare. We report a case of chronic dysphagia caused by synostosis between the cricoid cartilage and cervical spine after anterior surgery for cervical spine trauma.

Computed tomography (CT) scans of the cervical spine revealed almost complete resorption of the bone graft and a posterior shifted esophagus. The injured spinal columns were fused via the posterior and remaining anterior parts of the vertebrae. A bony bridge of heterotopic ossification was observed between the right posterior part of the cricoid cartilage and the right anterior tubercle of the C5 vertebra (Fig. 1). A barium swallow study demonstrated significant barium aspiration into the airway and no laryngeal elevation (Fig. 2) (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1).

The patient underwent resection of the synostosis; the standard Smith-Peterson approach was utilized through the previous surgical scar. The resection was performed using a high-speed bar and small chisels. The ipsilateral omohyoid muscle (OM) was detached from the hyoid cartilage and the flap was inserted between the vertebral bone and cricoid cartilage to prevent recurrence. A laryngeal suspension procedure [5] was added by otorhinolaryngologists. After surgery, his dysphagia resolved and he could swallow liquid and solids without aspiration. A follow-up barium swallow on the 10th postoperative day demonstrated improved laryngeal elevation and no aspiration (Fig. 3) (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 2). The patient has had no dysphagia or recurrence 5 years after the surgery.

Laryngeal cartilages are often ossified. Among men, over 35% of thyroid and 20% of cricoid cartilages are ossified [6], but synostoses between laryngeal bony/cartilaginous structures and vertebrae were extremely rare. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of postoperative synostosis between the cricoid cartilage and cervical spine.

Among the published literature, we found only two cases of synostosis between the other laryngeal cartilaginous structure, thyroid cartilage, and vertebrae. Han et al. reported a case of synostosis between the thyroid cartilage and C5–7 [7]; their patient showed arrested laryngeal elevation, leading to severe dysphagia like our case. Moses et al. reported a case of posttraumatic synostosis between the thyroid cartilage and C3 [8]. Both cases had cervical spine fractures that were treated conservatively. (7, 8) The summary of previously reported cases is provided in Table 1.

The pathogenesis of laryngo-spinal synostosis is unclear. In Han’s report, the authors mentioned that small bony fragments were dispersed between the thyroid cartilage and vertebral bones on initial CT; they suggested these fragments might have formed a bony bridge [7]. Posttraumatic synostosis between two neighboring bones has been investigated mainly in the forearm and ankle [9, 10]. The risk factors for posttraumatic synostosis are classified into two main categories: trauma-related and treatment-related [10, 11]. A significant proportion of these risk factors are associated with systemic or local inflammation, which overlap with the general risk factors for posttraumatic heterotopic ossification (HO) (Table 2) [12‐14]. Previous studies demonstrated that various inflammatory cytokines were increased in the blood and local tissue among patients with severe HO [15, 16]. In this case, infection around the tracheostomy site and almost total resorption of the grafted bone was observed. According to patient history, it is highly likely that the anterior cervical fusion surgical site was also infected. Another possibility is that the patient might have had an esophageal injury due to the spinal injury itself or ACF, although it was not mentioned in the previous hospitalization record and no workup for esophageal injury was performed. The presence of local inflammation due to surgical site infection or esophageal injury might have contributed to the incidence of cricoid-vertebral synostosis in our case. Moreover, our patient showed almost complete resorption of the grafted bone for possibly associated infection and a posterior shifted esophagus. This anatomical change pushed the laryngeal cartilages closer to the vertebra and might have contributed to synostosis formation, along with other factors mentioned earlier. Lastly, non-oral nutrition had continued for over 3 months in this case. This prolonged immobility of the larynx was one possible reason of synostosis. One interesting difference between laryngo-vertebral synostosis and radioulnar synostosis (tibiofibular synostosis usually does not show any symptoms [9]) were the intervals between the initial injury and synostosis symptom onset. Among patients with laryngo-vertebral synostosis, the intervals between the initial injury and onset of dysphagia were 20 months in Moses’s report [8], over 6 years in Han’s case [7], and 12 years in our case, whereas radioulnar synostosis cases showed earlier symptom onset, typically less than 12 months [10, 17, 18]. This might suggest that laryngo-vertebral synostosis demonstrates more gradual development of bridging bone than synostosis of the forearm, or there might be compensating mechanisms of laryngeal movement, which prevent the synostosis from becoming symptomatic.

Laryngo-vertebral synostosis likely impairs the dynamic coordinated movement of swallowing. In our case, synostosis resection yielded an excellent result; the follow-up barium swallow study demonstrated improved laryngeal elevation. Han et al. mentioned that laryngeal elevation improved after synostosis resection. Moses et al. treated their patient conservatively, but the reduced laryngeal elevation and delay in the pharyngeal swallowing phase persisted. For severe dysphagia, we believe that synostosis removal should be considered to ameliorate symptoms.

We used the OM flap as an interposition for preventing recurrence. For synostosis in the forearm, although the supporting evidence is limited, various materials are used for preventing recurrence [11]. Those include bone wax, artificial material sheets (silicon or Gore-Tex®), free or pediculed fat flap, and fascia. The OM flap was used for esophageal or pharyngeal perforation associated with anterior cervical spine surgery [19]. Surek et al. reported two cases of esophageal perforation treated with a superior OM flap; the flap can be easily mobilized during neck exploration and the omohyoid is thin, well-vascularized, and of adequate length to reach the mid-to-lower cervical spine [19]. An OM flap might be a good option for interposition after laryngo-vertebral synostosis resection.