Introduction
Surgical treatment of inguinal hernias in children is one of the most common operative procedures worldwide [
1]. In most cases, the hernia is lateral to the epigastric vessels. The incidence of inguinal hernia is higher in preterm infants (9–11%) than in term infants (1–5%) [
2,
3]. The surgical treatment of inguinal hernia in children is performed differently to inguinal hernia in adults. Reconstructive procedures with narrowing of the inguinal canal are avoided in order to prevent testicular atrophy. Surgical treatment with using a mesh implant is not common, only in exceptional cases such as recurrence hernias or femoral hernias [
4‐
6]. Moreover, the inguinal hernia repair in children is by default performed as an open surgery. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children is associated with higher recurrence rates and longer operating times. Laparoscopy only offers advantages in cases of bilateral inguinal hernias, whereby the recurrence rate can be reduced to the rate for open treatment by an experienced surgeon [
7].
After inguinal hernia repair in adults, chronic pain develops in approximately 10–14% of cases [
8]. Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) is defined as pain lasting at least 3 months postoperatively with restrictions in everyday life. Although CPIP resolves within one year postoperatively in up to 70% of cases, 30% of patients suffer from it permanently [
9]. In children, research on CPIP after inguinal hernia repair is limited. Retrospective studies found a prevalence of CPIP in children of 2–3%, thus considerably lower than in adults [
10,
11]. However, in these studies, patients were followed-up after 16 to 50 years, a period after which pain may have been resolved. Accordingly, one study with a maximum follow-up period of 48 months reported a higher CPIP rate (5.1%) [
12]. This reinforces the assumption that CPIP can also resolve over a longer period of time. The purpose of this retrospective study is to investigate the prevalence of CPIP in children after open inguinal hernia repair and possible risk factors for the development of a CPIP.
Materials and methods
Study design
All patients aged 4 to 15 years at the time of the survey who underwent inguinal hernia surgery at the Department of Surgery at the University Hospital Würzburg between January 1st 2020 and December 31th 2022 were included in this retrospective single-center data analysis. The minimum age of 4 years at the time of the survey ensured that the children were able to recognize simple pictograms and answer questions, in addition to the anamnesis by the parents [
13]. The primary endpoint of the analysis is the incidence of CPIP after inguinal hernia surgery. Secondary endpoints are possible risk factors, the length of hospital stay, the period and intensity of persistent pain postoperatively as well as the duration of analgesic medication postoperatively. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (No. 103/23). Sample size calculations revealed that 96 included patients are necessary to detect a potential prevalence of 2–5% CPIP patients after pediatric inguinal hernia repair (with an α-error of 0.05 and β-error of 0.20).
Data acquisition
In all cases, clinical data and perioperative information was collected using the local database.
-
Baseline patient characteristics: gender, age at operation, premature birth, ASA classification of the physical status, Body Mass Index (BMI), pre-existing conditions, pre-existing chronic pain, previous inguinal hernia repair.
-
Perioperative and clinical data: localization of the hernia, surgical technique (open or laparoscopic), operating time, caudal epidural block, pain medication during hospital stay, length of hospital stay, readmission and analgesics score to enable comparison of postsurgical pain [
14].
A postoperative follow-up was performed using a defined questionnaire. This questionnaire contained questions on current pain, pain intensity and duration, as well as information on the length for pain medication postoperatively and days missed at work by the parents due to the child’s illness (Supplemental material
1). All data was collected using the REDCap platform [
15]. All Patients with reported CPIP underwent a clinical follow-up to exclude other pathologies such as hernia recurrence.
Definition of CPIP in this study
In our data analysis, we defined CPIP according to the current EuraHS guidelines as inguinal pain of ≥ 3 on a visual analog scale (VAS) of 0–10 with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing maximal pain lasting more than 3 months postoperatively [
16]. In addition, children with CPIP were divided into two subgroups: children with persistent CPIP (pCPIP) at the time of the survey and children with resolved CPIP (rCPIP), who had pain for more than 3 months postoperatively, but no longer any pain at the time of the survey.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS 28.0 (IBM SPSS, Armonk, New York, USA). Differences between groups were calculated using Welch’s t-test and Chi2-test as well as single factor variance and analysis of covariance or as repeated measure ANOVA. In the case of multiple t-tests, Bonferroni correction was performed account for multiple testing. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Descriptive analyses included mean (MV), minimum (min), and maximum (max) values given as range, percentage, and standard deviation.
Discussion
Our study population showed a prevalence of 3.4% for the development of CPIP after inguinal hernia repair. This is in line with the prevalences already described in the literature (1–5%) [
2,
3]. Compared to adults, who show a CPIP rate after surgical repair of inguinal hernias of approx. 10–14% [
14,
17], the prevalence is significantly lower. However, in pediatric CPIP, resolution appears lower than in adults (50% vs. 70%) [
9]. In summary, CPIP is less common in children, but has a higher risk of persistence.
Compared to previous studies, our follow-up period was shorter, focusing on the acute phase [
10,
11]. Importantly, this allowed to distinguish between resolved and persistent CPIP.
By analyzing the retrospective data, several potential risk factors for CPIP were identified in this study: older age at operation, female gender and a history of chronic pain. Young age and female gender are reported as risk factors for the development of CPIP in adults after inguinal hernia repair [
18].
In this study, the Analgesics score as a known tool to enable comparison of chronic postsurgical pain could not be evaluated as a predictor of CPIP after inguinal hernia repair in children [
14]. As surgical treatment was usually performed on an outpatient basis, no information on type and dosage of analgesics after discharge could be obtained. An attempt close this gap by retrospectively interviewing the parents yielded fruitless, due to inaccuracies. A reliable statement can be made only about the duration of postoperative analgesia after discharge. In principle, patients who develop a CPIP have a longer duration of pain medication intake due to the longer-lasting postoperative pain. In our study cohort patients with rCPIP took pain medication for a significantly longer period postoperative than patients with pCPIP. The differences between rCPIP and pCPIP patients in the duration of use point towards a protective and resolving effect of adequate analgesia after discharge.
Previous studies have already shown that causa epidural blocks are an effective option for analgesia in the context of inguinal hernia repair in children, resulting in lower postoperative pain levels [
19,
20]. As a result, systematic analgesics can be spared, resulting in less side effects [
21]. This was confirmed by our subgroup analysis on caudal epidural block. Interestingly, the caudal epidural block might protect against CPIP development: In our study, CPIP prevalence was significantly reduced after intraoperative CEB. This finding is in line with previous findings and should be confirmed in a prospective study [
22].
In summary, our study not only confirmed the lower prevalence rates of CPIP in children but detected putative factors regulating CPIP emergence. Thus, the routine use of CEB, short surgical intervention, and adequate postoperative analgesia might help to further reduce CPIP prevalence in children.
Strength and limitations
The strength of this study is the representation of real-life conditions and thus reliable answers to the questions. The main limitations of our study are its retrospective nature and single institution design. In addition, the sample of patients with CPIP is significantly smaller due to its low prevalence. Thus, all inferential statistics of this group must be interpreted with caution. Therefore, a prospective study with structured observation would have to be carried out to clarify these indications. We plan to start this study in the next year and want to encourage other centers to take part in this study.
Conclusion
The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of CPIP in children after open inguinal hernia surgery and to identify possible risk factors and protective factors for the development of CPIP. In our study population, the structured follow-up showed a CPIP rate of 3.4%. Initial risk factors such as female gender, older patient age and a history of chronic pain were identified. In addition, we found indications of possible protective factors such as an intraoperative caudal epidural block and adequate postoperative analgesia. However, further studies are required to clarify the pathogenesis and to confirm predictors and protective factors in order to improve therapeutic approaches.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.