nach oben

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology

Erschienen in:

25.04.2024 | Original Article

Circular frame versus reamed intramedullary tibial nail in the treatment of grade III open tibial diaphyseal fractures

verfasst von: Aatif Mahmood, Krishnakumar Subbaraman, Moheeb Gadullah, David Hawkes, Deepa Bose, Paul Fenton

Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Ausgabe 5/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Grade III open tibial diaphyseal fractures are challenging to treat and controversy exists on whether to treat them with an intramedullary nail (IMN) or a circular frame (CF). This study aims to compare outcomes for intramedullary nail and circular frame in the treatment of open tibial diaphyseal fractures.

Methodology

Retrospective study at a major trauma center of all patients admitted with a grade III open tibial diaphyseal fracture between January 2016 and January 2022. The primary outcome measures were major complications: non-union, malunion, refracture, DBI and amputation. Secondary outcome measures were time to union and reoperation rates.

Results

Fifty-five patients were included in the study, 32 patients in CF group and 23 patients in IMN group. There were no significant differences in the baseline demographics of patients in both groups. Major complications were recorded in 13 limbs (54%) in IMN group and in 18 limbs (56%) in CF group which were not statistically significant (p = 0.797). Deep bone infection rates were noted in 4 (12.5%) in the CF group, compared to 1 (4%) in IMN group; however, the result was not statistically significant (p = 0.240). Amputation rates as a result of infected non-unions were seen in 1 limb (4%) in IMN group and 2 limbs (6%) in CF group (p = 0.99). Median time to union was significantly shorter in IMN group at 30 weeks compared to 30 weeks for CF group (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

IMN should be the treatment of choice in the treatment of grade III open tibial diaphyseal fracture, but CF should be considered for delayed treatment and in patients with bone loss.

Harris AM, Althausen PL, Kellam J, Bosse MJ, Castillo R (2009) Complications following limb-threatening lower extremity trauma. J Orthop Trauma 23(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31818e43ddCrossRefPubMed

Papakostidis C, Kanakaris NK, Pretel J, Faour O, Morell DJ, Giannoudis PV (2011) Prevalence of complications of open tibial shaft fractures stratified as per the Gustilo-Anderson classification. Injury 42(12):1408–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.015CrossRefPubMed

Schade AT, Khatri C, Nwankwo H, Carlos W, Harrison WJ, Metcalfe AJ (2021) The economic burden of open tibia fractures: a systematic review. Injury 52(6):1251–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.022CrossRefPubMed

Melvin JS, Dombroski DG, Torbert JT, Kovach SJ, Esterhai JL, Mehta S (2010) Open tibial shaft fractures:II. definitive management and limb salvage. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18(2):108–117. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-201002000-00005CrossRefPubMed

Foote CJ, Guyatt GH, Vignesh KN, Mundi R, Chaudhry H, Heels-Ansdell D, Thabane L, Tornetta P 3rd, Bhandari M (2015) Which surgical treatment for open tibial shaft fractures results in the fewest reoperations? A network meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(7):2179–2192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4224-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Trafton PG (1988) Closed unstable fractures of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 230:58–67CrossRef

Sarmiento A, Gersten LM, Sobol PA, Shankwiler JA, Vangsness CT (1989) Tibial shaft fractures treated with functional braces. Experience with 780 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71(4):602–609. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.71b4.2768307CrossRefPubMed

Metsemakers WJ, Morgenstern M, McNally MA, Moriarty TF, McFadyen I, Scarborough M, Athanasou NA, Ochsner PE, Kuehl R, Raschke M, Borens O, Xie Z, Velkes S, Hungerer S, Kates SL, Zalavras C, Giannoudis PV, Richards RG, Verhofstad MHJ (2018) Fracture-related infection: a consensus on definition from an international expert group. Injury 49(3):505–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.040CrossRefPubMed

. https://www.ouh.nhs.uk/limbreconstruction/information/documents/MicrosoftWord-MONPingradingsystem2012.pdf.

10.

Inan M, Halici M, Ayan I, Tuncel M, Karaoglu S (2007) Treatment of type IIIA open fractures of tibial shaft with Ilizarov external fixator versus unreamed tibial nailing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(8):617–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0332-9CrossRefPubMed

11.

Khatod M, Botte MJ, Hoyt DB, Meyer RS, Smith JM, Akeson WH (2003) Outcomes in open tibia fractures: relationship between delay in treatment and infection. J Trauma 55(5):949–954. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.Ta.0000092685.80435.63CrossRefPubMed

12.

Natalwala I, Chuo CB, Shariatmadari I, Barlow G, Moulder E, Bates J, Sharma H (2021) Outcomes and Incidence of deep bone infection in grade III diaphyseal open tibial fractures: circular fixator vs intramedullary nail. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 16(3):161–167. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1536CrossRef

13.

Keeling JJ, Gwinn DE, Tintle SM, Andersen RC, McGuigan FX (2008) Short-term outcomes of severe open wartime tibial fractures treated with ring external fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(12):2643–2651. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.G.01326CrossRefPubMed

14.

Patel KH, Logan K, Krkovic M (2021) Strategies and outcomes in severe open tibial shaft fractures at a major trauma center: a large retrospective case-series. World J Orthop 12(7):495–504. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i7.495CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Modern external ring fixation versus internal fixation for treatment of severe open tibial fractures: a randomized clinical trial (FIXIT Study) (2022). J Bone Joint Surg Am 104 (12):1061–1067. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.21.01126

16.

Dickson DR, Moulder E, Hadland Y, Giannoudis PV, Sharma HK (2015) Grade 3 open tibial shaft fractures treated with a circular frame, functional outcome and systematic review of literature. Injury 46(4):751–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.025CrossRefPubMed

17.

Shields DW, Iliadis AD, Kelly E, Heidari N, Jamal B (2022) Pin-site infection: a systematic review of prevention strategies. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 17(2):93–104. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1562CrossRef

18.

Paley D (1990) Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250:81–104CrossRef

19.

Cortez A, Urva M, Haonga B, Donnelley CA, von Kaeppler EP, Roberts HJ, Shearer DW, Morshed S (2022) Outcomes of intramedullary nailing and external fixation of open tibial fractures: three to 5-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 104(21):1877–1885. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.22.00016CrossRefPubMed

20.

Garg S, Khanna V, Goyal MP, Joshi N (2019) Unreamed intra-medullary nail versus half pin external fixator in grade III [A & B] open tibia fractures. J Clin Orthop Trauma 10(5):941–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2018.10.016CrossRefPubMed

21.

Kisitu DK, O’Hara NN, Slobogean GP, Howe AL, Blachut PA, O’Brien PJ, Stockton DJ (2022) Unreamed intramedullary nailing versus external fixation for the treatment of open tibial shaft fractures in uganda: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Trauma 36(9):349–357. https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002362CrossRefPubMed

22.

Henley MB, Chapman JR, Agel J, Harvey EJ, Whorton AM, Swiontkowski MF (1998) Treatment of type II, IIIA, and IIIB open fractures of the tibial shaft: a prospective comparison of unreamed interlocking intramedullary nails and half-pin external fixators. J Orthop Trauma 12(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199801000-00001CrossRefPubMed

23.

Holbrook JL, Swiontkowski MF, Sanders R (1989) Treatment of open fractures of the tibial shaft: Ender nailing versus external fixation. a randomized prospective comparison. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(8):1231–1238CrossRefPubMed

24.

Tornetta P 3rd, Bergman M, Watnik N, Berkowitz G, Steuer J (1994) Treatment of grade-IIIb open tibial fractures. a prospective randomised comparison of external fixation and non-reamed locked nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(1):13–19CrossRefPubMed

25.

Rodrigues FL, de Abreu LC, Valenti VE, Valente AL, Cestari RD, Pohl PH, Rodrigues LM (2014) Bone tissue repair in patients with open diaphyseal tibial fracture treated with biplanar external fixation or reamed locked intramedullary nailing. Injury 45(Suppl 5):S32-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-1383(14)70018-xCrossRefPubMed

26.

Chua W, Murphy D, Siow W, Kagda F, Thambiah J (2012) Epidemiological analysis of outcomes in 323 open tibial diaphyseal fractures: a nine-year experience. Singapore Med J 53(6):385–389PubMed

27.

Al-Hourani K, Donovan R, Stoddart MT, Foote CJ, Kelly MB, Tornetta P 3rd (2021) Definitive fixation outcomes of open tibial shaft fractures: systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 35(11):561–569. https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002090CrossRefPubMed

28.

Giovannini F, de Palma L, Panfighi A, Marinelli M (2016) Intramedullary nailing versus external fixation in Gustilo type III open tibial shaft fractures: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 11(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11751-016-0245-7CrossRef

29.

Webb LX, Bosse MJ, Castillo RC, MacKenzie EJ (2007) Analysis of surgeon-controlled variables in the treatment of limb-threatening type-III open tibial diaphyseal fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(5):923–928. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.F.00776CrossRefPubMed

30.

Hing CB, Tutton E, Smith TO, Glaze M, Stokes JR, Cook J, Dritsaki M, Phelps E, Cooper C, Trompeter A, Pearse M, Law M, Costa ML (2021) Reamed intramedullary nailing versus circular frame external fixation for segmental tibial fractures (STIFF-F): a mixed methods feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 7(1):93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00821-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Circular frame versus reamed intramedullary tibial nail in the treatment of grade III open tibial diaphyseal fractures
verfasst von: Aatif Mahmood
Krishnakumar Subbaraman
Moheeb Gadullah
David Hawkes
Deepa Bose
Paul Fenton
Publikationsdatum: 25.04.2024
Verlag: Springer Paris
Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Ausgabe 5/2024
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-03946-2

Temporary immobilization methods for closed low-energy ankle fracture-dislocations: comparative analysis of a retrospective cohort

Original Article

Impact of age on clinical outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Original Article

Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantages associated with increased rates of revisions, readmissions, and complications after total joint arthroplasty

Original Article

Usefulness of double plate fixation after failed ORIF for clavicle shaft fracture

Open Access
Original Article

The ROSA knee robotic system demonstrates superior precision in restoring joint line height and posterior condylar offset compared to conventional manual TKA: a retrospective case–control study

Open Access
Original Article

A novel anatomical locked medial femoral condyle plate: a biomechanical study

Original Article

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. Zur Fortbildung und Wissenserweiterung, verfasst und geprüft von Expertinnen und Experten der Gesellschaft für Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie (AGA).

Jetzt entdecken!

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Viele Versäumnisse bei Psoriasis-Arthritis

17.04.2025
Psoriasis-Arthritis
Nachrichten

Menschen mit Psoriasis-Arthritis (PsA) müssen länger auf die Diagnose warten und werden zögerlicher behandelt als an rheumatoider Arthritis (RA) Erkrankte. Diese Defizite hat eine Untersuchung in Großbritannien aufgedeckt.

Yoga gegen Kniearthrose nicht schlechter als Krafttraining

15.04.2025
Gonarthrose
Nachrichten

Menschen mit Gonarthrose profitieren von Yogaübungen nicht weniger als von gezielten Kräftigungsübungen für die lädierten Knie. In einer Vergleichsstudie haben sich für Yogis und Yoginis sogar einige Vorteile ergeben.

Muskelrelaxanzien wohl nur bei akuten Kreuzschmerzen hilfreich

14.04.2025
Rückenschmerzen
Nachrichten

Bei akuten Rückenschmerzen können Muskelrelaxanzien, eventuell in Kombination mit NSAR, zur Schmerzlinderung beitragen. Wegen der Nebenwirkungen wird jedoch empfohlen, die Medikamente nur über wenige Tage einzusetzen.

Wie bereits der virtuelle "Blick ins Grüne" Schmerzen lindern kann

07.04.2025
Nichtmedikamentöse Schmerztherapie
Nachrichten

Dass der Blick in die Natur Menschen dazu bringen kann, Schmerzen weniger stark zu empfinden, konnte bereits mehrfach nachgewiesen werden. Jetzt ließen sich in einer experimentellen Studie sogar allein durch das Betrachten von Videos mit Naturszenen analgetische Effekte erzeugen.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Circular frame versus reamed intramedullary tibial nail in the treatment of grade III open tibial diaphyseal fractures