Introduction
27-Hydroxycholesterol (27HC) is an abundant oxysterol in blood and plays an intermediate role in cholesterol catabolism to bile acids. Two key enzymes produced from cytochrome P450 genes are involved in 27HC regulation: cholesterol 27-hydroxylase (CYP27A1) and oxysterol 7-alpha-hydroxylase (CYP7B1). CYP27A1 is responsible for conversion of cholesterol into 27HC whereas CYP7B1 catabolizes 27HC toward bile acid synthesis [
1]. Experimental studies identified 27HC as an endogenous selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) [
2]. 27HC binds to both the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) [
2,
3], though with greater affinity for ERβ [
3]. Although the precise roles of ERβ in breast cancer remain to be delineated [
4], ERβ was demonstrated to be expressed in a majority of breast cancers, including those lacking ERα expression. Independent from estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated actions, 27HC is a liver X receptor (LXR) ligand [
5] and has been implicated in breast cancer metastasis via the LXR in experimental animal models [
6].
The role of 27HC in the etiology and progression of breast cancer has been investigated in experimental animal models [
6,
7], with limited data in epidemiologic studies and patient populations to date [
8‐
10]. In experimental cell-line models, 27HC induced cell proliferation through ER activation, though administration of 27HC reduced estradiol-induced proliferation [
2]. Higher 27HC was associated with disease progression in experimental animal models [
6,
7]. One prospective trial in breast cancer patients reported a significant increase of 27HC in response to aromatase inhibitor but not to tamoxifen treatment [
9]. Our group previously published on prediagnosis circulating 27HC and breast cancer risk, reporting an inverse association between circulating 27HC and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women and no significant heterogeneity by tumor ERα status (clinically measured) [
8]. Higher tumor
CYP27A1 mRNA expression has been associated with better prognosis in women 50 or younger and with ERα-positive breast cancer [
10], though other studies have not observed an association in a broader population [
6,
7].
CYP7B1 expression has been shown to be lower in ERα-positive breast tumors, relative to normal breast tissue [
7], and associated with better prognosis [
6,
7]. Correlates of tumor protein expression of CYP27A1 and CYP7B1 with cancer characteristics, reproductive and lifestyle factors are not well established in cancer [
6,
10,
11], including breast cancer [
6,
10].
In the context of recent evidence linking circulating 27HC to breast cancer risk, prior data on 27HC and breast cancer progression, and relationships between circulating 27HC and CYP27A1, CYP7B1, LXR-β, and ERβ, the aims of the present study were to investigate the associations between (i) protein expression of these markers in the breast tumor tissue and breast cancer case characteristics, (ii) protein expression of these markers in the breast tumor tissue and epidemiological factors and circulating sex steroids and lipids, and (iii) prediagnostic 27HC concentrations in blood and breast cancer risk by these markers. This was an exploratory study in which we hypothesized potential differential protein expression by case characteristics (e.g., CYP27A1 associated with favorable prognostic characteristics such as tumor grade), and heterogeneity in associations between 27HC and breast cancer risk by tumor protein expression (e.g., stronger association between 27HC and breast cancer among cases with CYP27A1-positive tumors). This study was conducted within the Heidelberg, Germany cohort of the European Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).
Discussion
Following our findings on circulating 27HC and breast cancer risk [
8], this exploratory study provides novel data on associations between breast cancer case characteristics and epidemiologic factors and 27HC-related markers in breast tumor tissue, and is the first study on circulating 27HC and breast cancer risk by CYP27A1, CYP7B1, LXR-β, or ERβ tumor markers. We observed limited differences in the evaluated characteristics, and limited statistically significant heterogeneity in the association between circulating 27HC and breast cancer risk was observed by tumor tissue expression of the investigated markers.
The literature to date on the role of 27HC in the etiology of breast cancer is conflicting with potentially different roles for this oxysterol in risk and progression, for example experimental models suggested a growth-promotion role [
6,
7], and epidemiologic studies showing an inverse association between circulating 27HC and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women [
8] and
CYP27A1 mRNA expression and death in breast cancer patients age 50 years and younger [
10]. 27HC and circulating cholesterol are well correlated in our data (
r = 0.45). On balance, prior studies do not support a strong association between circulating cholesterol and breast cancer risk [
18] or survival [
19,
20], with an inverse association reported between total and HDL cholesterol and risk in a meta-analysis [
18] and postmenopausal women in the current study population [
8]. Cholesterol-lowering drug use and breast cancer risk (predominantly statins) [
21,
22] and survival [
10,
23,
24] have been investigated with cholesterol-lowering medications, again mainly statins, proposed as a strategy to improve prognosis [
24]. However, the association between statins and prognosis remains to be confirmed. Data on 27HC in the female breast is limited, though an analysis evaluating 27HC in the breast tissue of 40 breast cancer patients and 17 control women reported higher 27HC in the normal breast tissue of women with breast cancer (3x higher vs. controls) with elevated concentrations in the tumor tissue itself (6.9x higher than controls) [
7].
CYP27A1 and CYP7B1 are expressed in both normal and malignant breast tissue, indicating capacity for local 27HC synthesis and catabolism. Differences in CYP27A1 and CYP7B1 in the normal breast as compared to malignant tissue are not well established. However, one study suggests similar expression of CYP27A1 but markedly different CYP7B1 in normal vs. breast tumor tissue. Specifically, CYP7B1 was 50% lower in ER+ tumor tissue relative to normal tissue [
7] suggesting lower CYP7B1 may be responsible for the elevated 27HC observed in breast tumors. We investigated CYP27A1 and CYP7B1 protein expression in the tumor as markers indicative of local 27HC metabolism. Neither marker was associated with circulating 27HC, in line with previous findings on CYP27A1 [
10] and a prior study reporting no association between tumor and circulating 27HC [
7]. Tumor CYP27A1 protein expression was associated with lower circulating HDL concentrations, while tumor CYP7B1 was associated with lower triglycerides. In premenopausal women, tumor CYP27A1 protein expression was associated with higher circulating DHEAS concentrations, and in perimenopausal women, tumor CYP7B1 was associated with lower testosterone. To our knowledge, this has not previously been reported. One cell-line study suggested a role of CYP7B1 in androgenic signaling regulation [
25] notably by converting androgen receptor ligands into less active metabolites. This association was also investigated in prostate cancer showing correlation between
CYP7B1 expression and androgen signaling activity [
26,
27].
We observed no associations between CYP27A1 expression and breast cancer case characteristics, whereas CYP7B1-positive tumors were more likely to be PR-positive than CYP7B1-negative tumors. Kimbung et al. observed consistent differences in ER and nodal status, molecular subtype, and histologic grade by
CYP27A1 mRNA “low” vs. “high” [
10]. Differences in grade, ER, and PR status have previously been reported using IHC [
6]. We observed no significant heterogeneity in associations between circulating 27HC and breast cancer risk by CYP27A1 or CYP7B1 tumor expression though a statistically significant positive association between perimenopausal circulating 27HC and CYP7B1-negative breast cancer risk was observed.
The ERβ has been recognized for more than two decades; however, the clinical significance of the ERβ, in contrast to the clinically measured ERα, has not been established. 27HC causes conformational change in both the ERα and ERβ [
2], and ERβ is known to be expressed in both ERα-positive and ERα-negative tumors [
16] as observed in the current study (16.5% of ERβ-positive tumors were ERα/PR-negative). A higher proportion of ERβ-positive tumors were Bcl-2-low; prior studies have evaluted associations between tumor hormone receptor status and Bcl-2 expression, and expression of ERβ or Bcl-2 as prognostic markers [
28‐
32]. The lack of association between other breast cancer characteristics observed in the current study is in line with previous studies [
33,
34], though an association between ERβ expression and lower-tumor grade has been reported, as have significant associations between ERβ and ERα, between ERβ and PR, and between ERβ and HER2 expression (all
p < 0.01) [
16]. We observed no statistically significant heterogeneity in the association between circulating 27HC and breast cancer risk by ERβ expression, 27HC was only significantly associated with lower breast cancer risk among women postmenopausal at blood collection and negative for the ERβ. To our knowledge, this has not previously been described. In lung cancer, one prior study showed that treatment with 27HC increased cell proliferation in ERB-positive lung cancers [
35]. No heterogeneity by ERα was observed in our previous investigation [
8]. 27HC has been shown to exert effects beyond the ER (e.g., immune pathway [
36], LXR [
6,
7]).
In a previous experimental study, 27HC was shown to increase the transcriptional activity of LXR and thus was suggested to be an endogenous ligand for these receptors [
37]. 27HC appears to increase metastases through the liver X receptor (LXR), and not the ER, notable given LXR agonists are generally associated with inhibition of breast cancer growth [
38‐
40]. 27HC and LXR agonist GW3965 induced an increase in lung metastases, whereas estradiol had no effect [
6]. This LXR-mediated increase in metastases appeared to be independent of the ER. We observed no heterogeneity in the associations between circulating 27HC and breast cancer by LXR-β status except among perimenopausal women where the risk of LXR-β-negative breast cancer was higher with higher circulating 27HC concentrations. These results are not in line with the above described literature, and we are unaware of any underlying biological explanation for this association. These results should be interpreted with caution given the limited sample size in this subgroup (
n = 54 total perimenopausal cases) and wide confidence intervals associated with the ORs. Our study measured LXR-β expression rather than using a marker of LXR activity such as ABCA1 expression. LXR-α has also been implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis and in the 27HC-mediated response [
36] and should therefore be considered in future studies.
No association with tumor makers was observed for reproductive and lifestyle factors in the current study. The literature is sparse regarding factors associated with circulating 27HC. Our cross-sectional study, which aimed to characterize the association between dietary, reproductive, lifestyle, and anthropometric factors and circulating 27HC in a sample of women without cancer [
41], showed no or only a very modest impact of dietary habits, reproductive factors, and lifestyle factors on circulating 27HC concentrations.
27HC concentrations were measured in serum samples collected at study baseline, and repeat blood samples were not available; however, our prior study showed a high within-person reproducibility for circulating 27HC over 1 year [
42]. We had tumor blocks available only for a subset of the cases, which may impact the generalizability of our findings to a broader population of breast cancer cases, given cases with tumor tissue available and included on the TMAs were younger at diagnosis, diagnosed with more advanced cancer (grade II or III) and ductal morphology (
p < 0.001), compared to cases not included on the TMAs. Absolute differences in age at blood collection were relatively small (e.g., cases having TMAs available were, on average, 2.8 years younger than the cases not included in the analysis) and, while menopausal status has a weak, but statistically significant, impact on circulating 27HC (6.45% lower in premenopausal vs. postmenopausal women [
41]), the proportion of postmenopausal women did not differ by TMA availability (with 51% and without 50% TMA), and the risk analyses were stratified by menopausal status. Thus, it is unlikely that differences in epidemiologic characteristics by TMA availability substantially impacted our results. An additional limitation is that the characterization of ERβ remains an issue due to its various isoforms [
16] and the lack of specificity [
43] of IHC assays. Thus, our results, as well as those in other studies using ERβ IHC antibodies, should be considered in light of the described issues with ERβ characterization using IHC. The distribution of positive/negative status for the tumor markers was comparable with distributions of ERβ [
16,
33,
34], CYP27A1 [
6], and CYP7B1 [
15] previously reported. In the interpretation of our results, it should also be noted that preclinical studies implicate 27HC in breast cancer progression, while our epidemiological study evaluated circulating 27HC and breast cancer risk. Finally, we made many statistical comparisons in this investigation and did not adjust for multiple comparisons, thus we cannot rule out chance as an explanation for our statistically significant findings.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.