Introduction
Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most common malignancy of the oral cavity [
1]. Oral SCC (OSCC) is SCC that arises from the oral mucosal epithelium and has different histological subtypes, including basaloid, verrucous, spindle cell, papillary, adenosquamous, acantholytic, and caniculatum variants [
1]. Clear cell SCC (CCSCC) is a rare histological variant of SCC and is characterized by the presence of abundant clear cytoplasm [
2]. Kuo first described CCSCC of the skin [
3], and Frazier et al. reported CCSCC of the oral cavity [
4]. Clear cell change occurs extremely rarely in mucosal SCC, and only 12 cases of CCSCC developed in the oral cavity have been reported to date, including the present case [
4‐
16] (Table
1). Based on a limited number of CCSCC cases reported in the oral cavity, CCSCC has been purported to be an aggressive variant of SCC that has a poor prognosis [
9,
11‐
13] (Table
1).
Table 1
Clinical characteristics of clear cell squamous cell carcinoma cases in the oral cavity origin
1 | | 59/F | Mandibular gingiva | N/A | N/A | Lost |
2 | | 70/F | Anterior maxilla and right mandibular (2 sites) | N/A | LN | Died within 2 months |
3 | | 52/M | Buccal mucosa | N/A | LN | Died within 3 months |
4 | | 35/F | Lateral tongue and lingual vestibule | N/A | No | N/A |
5 | | 66/F | Tongue to the floor of the mouth | N/A | Lung (3 months later) | N/A |
6 | | 55/M | Maxillary alveolar ridge | N/A | LN | Alive 5 months |
7 | | 59/M | Upper jaw | N/A | N/A | N/A |
8 | | 42/F | Mandibular alveolar mucosa | + (6 months later) | N/A | Lost |
9 | | 70/M | Tongue | + | LN and Lung (3 months later) | N/A |
10 | | 60/M | Posterolateral border of the tongue | N/A | N/A | Lost |
11 | Mahamad Apandi et al. [ 16] | 65/M | Floor of the mouth | + (26 months later) | Lung (34 months later), LN (38 months later) | N/A |
12 | Present case | 89/F | Maxillary alveolar ridge | + (3 months later) | LN (8 months later) | Died within 8 months |
Activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT and RAS/RAF signaling pathways, which regulate cell proliferation and growth, apoptosis, autophagy, invasion, and migration, is observed in various malignancies, including SCC [
17,
18]. Mutations in the genes involved in signaling pathways are closely related to cancer development and prognosis [
17,
18]. Currently, efforts are focused on understanding the molecular and cellular consequences of these mutations and the opportunities for targeted therapies [
18‐
21]. Detailed analysis of genetic mutations in pathways involving potential targets for antitumor therapy may lead to an improved prognosis for CCSCC. However, no reports identifying genetic mutations in CCSCC exist, and the genetic characteristics are still unknown. Moreover, various clear cell neoplasms may be found in the oral cavity, which must be considered in the differential diagnosis of CCSCC [
6]. These clear cell neoplasms that are independent of SCC have well-defined genetic profiles that may help specify diagnoses in difficult cases (Table
2). Here, we report a case of CCSCC of the maxillary gingiva with
PIK3CA and
HRAS mutations and review the literature on CCSCC of the oral cavity.
Table 2
Staining panel and molecular findings for the differential diagnosis of clear cell neoplasms in the oral cavity
Clear MEC | + | + | − | − | − | − | + | CRTC1/3::MAML2 |
Clear MEca | + | + | + | + | − | − | − | EWSR1 rearrangement PLGA1 rearrangement |
HCCC | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | EWSR1::ATF1 EWSR1::CREM |
CCOC | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | EWSR1::ATF1, EWSR1::CREM |
Malignant melanoma | − | − | + | + | + | − | − | BRAF mutation |
CCRCC | + | − | − | − | − | + | − | |
Present case | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | PIK3CA mutation HRAS mutation |
Discussion
CCSCC of the oral cavity is rare, and its genetics relative to conventional SCC are unclear. To date, only 12 cases of CCSCC in the oral cavity have been reported, including our case [
4,
7‐
16]. Previous reports have described that, histologically, CCSCC cells show abundant clear cytoplasm along with enlarged and centrally placed round nuclei [
7,
9‐
11,
14]. It has been suggested that the proportion of clear cells required to define CCSCC is > 25% [
2,
5]. Our case was consistent with the definition of CCSCC, both in the cytopathological findings and the proportion of clear cells in the lesion. Thus, our case is the first case of CCSCC, to our knowledge, in which a gene mutation has been described.
In the oral cavity, it is necessary to distinguish CCSCC from other tumors composed of clear cells: salivary gland carcinomas (clear cell variant mucoepidermoid carcinoma, clear cell myoepithelial carcinoma, and hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma [HCCC]), odontogenic carcinoma (clear cell odontogenic carcinoma [CCOC]), malignant melanoma, and metastatic carcinoma [
6,
23] (Table
2). The lack of intracellular mucin, confirmed by d-PAS, mucicarmine, and Alcian blue staining results, excluded the diagnosis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma [
6]. The lack of myoepithelial markers (such as SMA and S100) excluded clear-cell myoepithelial carcinoma [
6]. The tumor location on the oral surface and the histology of squamous differentiation excluded HCCC and CCOC [
6,
23]. The lack of S100, Melan-A, and HMB45 immunoreactivity excluded malignant melanoma [
6,
23]. Metastatic tumors, such as clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), were excluded because there were no signs of tumors in the other organs and CD10 immunoreactivity was absent [
6]. These pathological and clinical findings led to the diagnosis of CCSCC in our case. Besides, our case of CCSCC was genetically different from other clear cell neoplasms in that
MAML2 rearrangement (characteristic of mucoepidermoid carcinoma),
EWSR1 rearrangement/translocation (characteristics of clear cell variants of myoepithelial carcinoma, HCCC, and CCOC), and
BRAF mutations (detected in malignant melanoma and odontogenic tumors) were not detected (Table
2) [
6,
23]. On the other hand, both
PIK3CA (p.E542K) and
HRAS (p.G12A) oncogenic mutations were detected, which are hardly detected in SCC (Fig.
5a, b) [
1]. Thus, genetically, CCSCC may be an entity of SCC and distinct from other clear cell neoplasms in the oral cavity.
PIK3CA and
RAS (
KRAS,
NRAS, and
HRAS) mutations activate the PI3K/AKT and RAS/RAF pathways, respectively [
17,
18]. Both pathways are critical drivers of tumorigenesis and potential targets for antitumor therapy [
17‐
21]. Oncogenic mutations in
PIK3CA and
RAS have been identified in various malignancies, and both occasionally coexist [
24]. However, in head and neck SCC (HNSCC), including OSCC, most genetic mutations are associated with tumor suppressor genes such as
TP53, and genetic mutations in the PI3K/AKT or RAS/RAF pathways are rare [
1,
25‐
32]. Kobayashi et al. reported that the most frequently mutated gene among 284 HNSCC cases was
TP53 (67%), followed by
PIK3CA (8%),
AKT1 (4%), and
HRAS (3%) [
27]. Among HNSCC cases, only one had both
PIK3CA and
HRAS mutations [
27]. In OSCC, the mutation frequency of
PIK3CA ranges from 0 to 13.92% [
30‐
32]. No significant correlation was found between
PIK3CA mutations and survival rates in HNSCC and OSCC [
27,
30‐
32]. Mutation frequencies of
HRAS in OSCC range from 5 to 17.4% [
30‐
32]. Carrying an
HRAS mutation is considered a high-risk factor for poor prognosis and survival in HNSCC and OSCC [
31‐
33]. HNSCC with
HRAS mutations shows poor clinical outcomes with a high recurrence rate following primary definitive treatment (50–67% recurrence within 6 months), short disease-free survival (4.0 months; 95% CI 1.0 to 36.0), and overall survival (15.0 months; 95% CI 6.0 to 52.0) [
33]. In this context, CCSCC recurred 3 months after primary resection in our patient, who had clear surgical margins at the time of resection, and the patient subsequently died 8 months later from complications related to tumor recurrence. Further studies are required to determine the association between
HRAS mutations and poor prognoses in other CCSCC cases.
Several PI3K/AKT and RAS/RAF targeting agents are currently undergoing clinical trials, and molecular profiling of these targets needs to be investigated [
17‐
21]. A recent study demonstrated that tipifarnib, a farnesyltransferase inhibitor that disrupts HRAS function, dramatically improved clinical outcomes in patients with
HRAS-mutant HNSCC [
21]. Moreover, PI3K inhibitors have demonstrated antiproliferative, pro-apoptotic, and antitumor activities in a range of preclinical cancer models as a single agent or in combination with other anticancer therapies [
19,
20]. CCSCC of the oral cavity is considered an SCC variant [
8,
11,
13‐
15]. Thus, the PI3K/AKT and RAS/RAF pathways may be important potential targets for future therapeutic options in patients with CCSCC.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.