Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 7/2016

07.01.2016

Clinical application of navigator-gated three-dimensional balanced turbo-field-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 T: prospective intraindividual comparison with 1.5 T

verfasst von: Ryo Itatani, Tomohiro Namimoto, Syutaro Atsuji, Kazuhiro Katahira, Yasuyuki Yamashita

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 7/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate and compare the clinical utility of balanced turbo-field-echo (BTFE) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) sequences obtained at 3 and 1.5 T.

Methods

We acquired three-dimensional (3D) BTFE MRCP scans with a navigator-gated technique at 3 T on a different day after 1.5 T in 39 consecutive patients. Two radiologists independently rated the image quality and visibility of anatomical structures (right and left hepatic duct, cystic duct, gallbladder, common bile duct, and main pancreatic duct) using a four-point scale. For quantitative analysis, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and acquisition time were evaluated.

Results

All visual scores tended to be higher for 1.5 T than 3 T images. There was a significant difference in the image quality and the depiction of the main pancreatic duct (p < 0.01). The image acquisition time was significantly shorter for 3 T than 1.5 T (199.3 ± 40.1 vs. 264.0 ± 86.5 s, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in SNR and CNR.

Conclusions

3D-BTFE MRCP scans acquired at 3 T were of sufficient image quality with respect to the biliary tree. SNR and CNR were comparable on 3 and 1.5 T scans, although the acquisition time was significantly shorter with the 3 T scanner.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor AC, Little AF, Hennessy OF, et al. (2002) Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree. Gastrointest Endosc 55:17–22CrossRefPubMed Taylor AC, Little AF, Hennessy OF, et al. (2002) Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree. Gastrointest Endosc 55:17–22CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Limanond P, Raman SS, Ghobrial RM, et al. (2004) The utility of MRCP in preoperative mapping of biliary anatomy in adult-to-adult living related liver transplant donors. J Magn Reson Imaging 19:209–215CrossRefPubMed Limanond P, Raman SS, Ghobrial RM, et al. (2004) The utility of MRCP in preoperative mapping of biliary anatomy in adult-to-adult living related liver transplant donors. J Magn Reson Imaging 19:209–215CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sodickson A, Mortele KJ, Barish MA, et al. (2006) Three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo MRCP: comparison with two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo techniques. Radiology 238:549–559CrossRefPubMed Sodickson A, Mortele KJ, Barish MA, et al. (2006) Three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo MRCP: comparison with two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo techniques. Radiology 238:549–559CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakaura T, Kidoh M, Maruyama N, et al. (2013) Usefulness of the SPACE pulse sequence at 1.5T MR cholangiography: comparison of image quality and image acquisition time with conventional 3D-TSE sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:1014–1019CrossRefPubMed Nakaura T, Kidoh M, Maruyama N, et al. (2013) Usefulness of the SPACE pulse sequence at 1.5T MR cholangiography: comparison of image quality and image acquisition time with conventional 3D-TSE sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:1014–1019CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Arizono S, Isoda H, Maetani YS, et al. (2008) High-spatial-resolution three-dimensional MR cholangiography using a high-sampling-efficiency technique (SPACE) at 3T: comparison with the conventional constant flip angle sequence in healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:685–690CrossRefPubMed Arizono S, Isoda H, Maetani YS, et al. (2008) High-spatial-resolution three-dimensional MR cholangiography using a high-sampling-efficiency technique (SPACE) at 3T: comparison with the conventional constant flip angle sequence in healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:685–690CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Arizono S, Isoda H, Maetani YS, et al. (2010) High spatial resolution 3D MR cholangiography with high sampling efficiency technique (SPACE): comparison of 3T vs. 1.5T. Eur J Radiol 73:114–118CrossRefPubMed Arizono S, Isoda H, Maetani YS, et al. (2010) High spatial resolution 3D MR cholangiography with high sampling efficiency technique (SPACE): comparison of 3T vs. 1.5T. Eur J Radiol 73:114–118CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Itatani R, Namimoto T, Kajihara H, et al. (2013) Preoperative evaluation of the cystic duct for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of navigator-gated prospective acquisition correction- and conventional respiratory-triggered techniques at free-breathing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography. Eur Radiol 23:1911–1918CrossRefPubMed Itatani R, Namimoto T, Kajihara H, et al. (2013) Preoperative evaluation of the cystic duct for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of navigator-gated prospective acquisition correction- and conventional respiratory-triggered techniques at free-breathing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography. Eur Radiol 23:1911–1918CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsunaga K, Ogasawara G, Tsukano M, et al. (2012) Usefulness of the navigator-echo triggering technique for free-breathing three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Magn Reson Imaging 31:396–400CrossRefPubMed Matsunaga K, Ogasawara G, Tsukano M, et al. (2012) Usefulness of the navigator-echo triggering technique for free-breathing three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Magn Reson Imaging 31:396–400CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Glockner JF, Lee CU (2014) Balanced steady state-free precession (b-SSFP) imaging for MRCP: techniques and applications. Abdom Imaging 39:1309–1322CrossRefPubMed Glockner JF, Lee CU (2014) Balanced steady state-free precession (b-SSFP) imaging for MRCP: techniques and applications. Abdom Imaging 39:1309–1322CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Glockner JF, Saranathan M, Bayram E, et al. (2013) Breath-held MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) using a 3D Dixon fat-water separated balanced steady state free precession sequence. Magn Reson Imaging 31:1263–1270CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Glockner JF, Saranathan M, Bayram E, et al. (2013) Breath-held MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) using a 3D Dixon fat-water separated balanced steady state free precession sequence. Magn Reson Imaging 31:1263–1270CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Schick F (2005) Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential. Eur Radiol 15:946–959CrossRefPubMed Schick F (2005) Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential. Eur Radiol 15:946–959CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Merkle EM, Dale BM (2006) Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. Am J Roentgenol 186:1524–1532CrossRef Merkle EM, Dale BM (2006) Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. Am J Roentgenol 186:1524–1532CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl CK, Traber F, Schild HH (2008) Whole-body high-field-strength (3.0-T) MR imaging in clinical practice. Part I. Technical considerations and clinical applications. Radiology 246:675–696CrossRefPubMed Kuhl CK, Traber F, Schild HH (2008) Whole-body high-field-strength (3.0-T) MR imaging in clinical practice. Part I. Technical considerations and clinical applications. Radiology 246:675–696CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Merkle EM, Haugan PA, Thomas J, et al. (2006) 3.0-versus 1.5-T MR cholangiography: a pilot study. Am J Roentgenol 186:516–521CrossRef Merkle EM, Haugan PA, Thomas J, et al. (2006) 3.0-versus 1.5-T MR cholangiography: a pilot study. Am J Roentgenol 186:516–521CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Regan DP, Fitzgerald J, Allsop J, et al. (2005) A comparison of MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla. Br J Radiol 78:894–898CrossRefPubMed O’Regan DP, Fitzgerald J, Allsop J, et al. (2005) A comparison of MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla. Br J Radiol 78:894–898CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Isoda H, Kataoka M, Maetani Y, et al. (2007) MRCP imaging at 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T: preliminary experience in healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:1000–1006CrossRefPubMed Isoda H, Kataoka M, Maetani Y, et al. (2007) MRCP imaging at 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T: preliminary experience in healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:1000–1006CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Itatani R, Namimoto T, Takaoka H, et al. (2015) Clinical impact of 3-dimensional balanced turbo-field-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 T: prospective intraindividual comparison with 3-dimensional turbo-spin-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 39:19–24CrossRefPubMed Itatani R, Namimoto T, Takaoka H, et al. (2015) Clinical impact of 3-dimensional balanced turbo-field-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 T: prospective intraindividual comparison with 3-dimensional turbo-spin-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 39:19–24CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lanzman RS, Kropil P, Schmitt P, et al. (2012) Nonenhanced ECG-gated time-resolved 4D steady-state free precession (SSFP) MR angiography (MRA) of cerebral arteries: comparison at 1.5 T and 3 T. Eur J Radiol 81:e531–e535CrossRefPubMed Lanzman RS, Kropil P, Schmitt P, et al. (2012) Nonenhanced ECG-gated time-resolved 4D steady-state free precession (SSFP) MR angiography (MRA) of cerebral arteries: comparison at 1.5 T and 3 T. Eur J Radiol 81:e531–e535CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Zho SY, Park J, Choi JY, et al. (2010) Respiratory motion compensated MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:726–732CrossRefPubMed Zho SY, Park J, Choi JY, et al. (2010) Respiratory motion compensated MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:726–732CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical application of navigator-gated three-dimensional balanced turbo-field-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 T: prospective intraindividual comparison with 1.5 T
verfasst von
Ryo Itatani
Tomohiro Namimoto
Syutaro Atsuji
Kazuhiro Katahira
Yasuyuki Yamashita
Publikationsdatum
07.01.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 7/2016
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0633-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2016

Abdominal Radiology 7/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The “abdominal whirlpool” sign

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.