Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2018 | Letter | Ausgabe 1/2018 Open Access

Critical Care 1/2018

Clinical benefit of high-volume hemofiltration in severe burn injury: is it removing bad humors or actually avoiding hypervolemia?

Zeitschrift:
Critical Care > Ausgabe 1/2018
Autoren:
Patrick M. Honore, David De Bels, Thierry Preseau, Sebastien Redant, Rachid Attou, Andrea Gallerani, Herbert D. Spapen
Abbreviations
HVHF
High-volume hemofiltration
PCT
Procalcitonin
TBSA
Total burn surface area
Recently, You et al. [ 1] reported that early application of high-volume hemofiltration (HVHF) reduced the incidence of sepsis, septic shock, and organ failure in patients with burns ≥ 50% total burn surface area (TBSA) and improved survival of patients with burns ≥ 80% TBSA. The benefit of HVHF was attributed to hemofiltration/adsorption of proinflammatory cytokines and other sepsis-related mediators and recovery of the patients’ immune status [ 1]. However, HVHF as adjuvant therapy for sepsis has previously been shown to have no significant impact on hemodynamics, short-term morbidity and mortality, and cytokine clearance [ 2, 3]. The results from You et al. are more remarkable because HVHF was performed with a less adsorptive dialysis membrane and a relatively low prescribed effluent rate [ 2, 3]. Moreover, 70–100% of the replacement solution was administered in predilution, which makes convective mediator removal less effective as compared to full postdilution [ 2, 3].
Cytokine levels fell most during the 3-day HVHF treatment. Thereafter, levels followed a rather “flat” course in both treatment groups without surges reflecting the occurrence of sepsis or septic shock. No data are available regarding the origin (pulmonary, catheter, etc.) or type (Gram-negative or Gram-positive, fungal) of sepsis, all of which may determine cytokine and mediator fluxes. It is also questionable that a lower procalcitonin (PCT) level in the HVHF group represents less inflammation. PCT (molecular weight 13 kDa) indeed is easily removed by any form of convective continuous renal replacement therapy, thereby losing sensitivity to detect or assess inflammatory processes [ 4].
The most striking finding is the rapid reversal of shock as mirrored by less vasopressor dependency in the HVHF-treated patients. Liberating patients from vasopressor treatment is of utmost importance in burn patients, not only as an indicator of hemodynamic stabilization but particularly to avoid graft ischemia, rejection, and surinfection [ 3]. The authors associate this “acute” effect with HVHF-induced immune-inflammatory modulation [ 1]. Of note is that no information is provided on fluid administration and evolution of fluid balances. Patients with severe burn injury receive massive fluid loads during the first days of treatment. Early de-resuscitation (i.e., evacuation of excess fluid aiming at zero fluid balance around day 3 of treatment) is a crucial factor to improve morbidity and perhaps mortality in critically ill and injured patients [ 5]. HVHF may thus have acted as an excellent method to rapidly reach de-resuscitation targets.

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Critical Care 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update AINS und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise