Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 5/2020

18.10.2019 | Original Article

Clinical Cirrhosis Dilemmas: Survey of Practice from the 7th International Coagulation in Liver Disease Conference

verfasst von: Jonathan G. Stine, Nicolas M. Intagliata, Neeral L. Shah, Ton Lisman, Francesco Violi, Stephen H. Caldwell, Curtis K. Argo

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and Aim

Hemostatic disorders in chronic liver disease and cirrhosis show continued expansion of research efforts. However, clinical decision making is often practiced on an individual patient level as consensus guidelines are lacking. We aimed to better assess individual day-to-day clinical practice through gauging clinicians’ responses to common clinical scenarios.

Materials and Methods

A series of ten clinical scenarios (seven procedural coagulation and three thrombosis management) were posed to conference attendees utilizing real-time polling software (Poll Everywhere). Responses were binomial and were submitted as “Agree” or “Disagree.” Results were displayed real time following a standardized response period and an open-forum discussion ensued between conference faculty and attendees following response submission.

Results

Twenty conference attendees participated in the clinical scenario plenary session. In general, agreement rates were high. All but one of the ten clinical scenarios had ≥ 70% agreement. Agreement was based both on procedural risk, with greatest agreement seen for low-risk procedures (80–93%), and on peri-procedural coagulation parameters of platelet count and fibrinogen level where > 50,000μ/L and 120 mg/dL were the most agreed upon thresholds, respectively. 75–95% agreement was reached when surveying the need for anticoagulation for mesenteric vein thrombosis in liver transplant candidates; slightly less (71%) agreement was found when deciding to proceed with anticoagulation in non-liver transplant candidates with mesenteric vein thrombosis.

Conclusions

While large-scale, methodologically rigorous randomized controlled trials are lacking to guide clinical decision making in patients with coagulation disorders and chronic liver disease, consensus expert opinion regarding mitigating peri-procedural bleeding risk and treatment of thrombosis appears consistent and strong.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Violi F, Ferro D, Basili S, et al. Ongoing prothrombotic state in the portal circulation of cirrhotic patients. Thromb Haemost. 1997;77:44–47.CrossRef Violi F, Ferro D, Basili S, et al. Ongoing prothrombotic state in the portal circulation of cirrhotic patients. Thromb Haemost. 1997;77:44–47.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Stein SF, Harker LA. Kinetic and functional studies of platelets, fibrinogen, and plasminogen in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. J Lab Clin Med. 1982;99:217–230.PubMed Stein SF, Harker LA. Kinetic and functional studies of platelets, fibrinogen, and plasminogen in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. J Lab Clin Med. 1982;99:217–230.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yerdel MA, Gunson B, Mirza D, et al. Portal vein thrombosis in adults undergoing liver transplantation: risk factors, screening, management, and outcome. Transplantation. 2000;69:1873–1881.CrossRef Yerdel MA, Gunson B, Mirza D, et al. Portal vein thrombosis in adults undergoing liver transplantation: risk factors, screening, management, and outcome. Transplantation. 2000;69:1873–1881.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22:276–282.CrossRef McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22:276–282.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical Cirrhosis Dilemmas: Survey of Practice from the 7th International Coagulation in Liver Disease Conference
verfasst von
Jonathan G. Stine
Nicolas M. Intagliata
Neeral L. Shah
Ton Lisman
Francesco Violi
Stephen H. Caldwell
Curtis K. Argo
Publikationsdatum
18.10.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05884-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 5/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Stanford Multidisciplinary Seminars

Let’s (Not) Twist Again

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.