Skip to main content

11.01.2025 | Research

Clinical feasibility of MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsies at 0.55T

verfasst von: Tejinder Kaur, Yun Jiang, Nicole Seiberlich, Hero Hussain, Shane Wells, John Wei, Elaine Caoili, Vikas Gulani

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

In-bore MRI-guided biopsy allows direct visualization of suspicious lesions, biopsy needles, and trajectories, allowing accurate sampling when MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy is not feasible. However, its use has been limited. Wide-bore, lower-field, and lower-cost scanners could help address these issues, but their feasibility for prostate biopsy is unknown. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy using a large-bore (80 cm), 0.55T scanner.

Materials and methods

Nineteen participants (68 ± 10 years) with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) were recruited for this Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved study (May 2023 -October 2024). Prebiopsy diagnostic scans and intra-procedural T2-weighted images were used for lesion localization. PSA levels, lesion sizes, cancer detection rates, positive core volume percentage, ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grade groups (GG), positive volume cores, skin to target distances, and procedure durations were reported.

Results

Seventeen participants underwent biopsies (four transrectal, thirteen percutaneous). Two participants were excluded. Twenty lesions (mean size 1.9 ± 1.2 cm) were biopsied which showed various GG cancers (GG1, GG2, GG3, GG4, and GG5), with positive cores ranging from 10 to 100%. 20% of the lesions were benign. Compared to previous biopsies, 22.2% (2/9) had new cancer detections, 22.2% (2/9) showed a GG upgrade, and 33.3% (3/9) had increased positive core volume, while 11.1% (1/9) showed no upgrade and 11.1% (1/9) had benign findings. Among biopsy-naïve participants, 75% (6/8) had cancer detected, and 25% (2/8) had benign findings. One new cancer was detected near a hip prosthesis due to reduced imaging artifacts. Average total procedure time was 77 ± 21 min for transrectal and 74 ± 22 min for percutaneous biopsies, with times to first core at 45 ± 15 and 53 ± 14 min, respectively.

Conclusion

Identifying and accurately targeting suspicious prostate lesions is feasible using a 0.55T MRI scanner.
Literatur
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Recchimuzzi DZ, Diaz de Leon A, Pedrosa I, Travalini D, Latin H, Goldberg K, et al. Direct MRI-guided In-Bore Targeted Biopsy of the Prostate: A Step-by-Step How To and Lessons Learned. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc 2024;44:e230142. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.230142CrossRef Recchimuzzi DZ, Diaz de Leon A, Pedrosa I, Travalini D, Latin H, Goldberg K, et al. Direct MRI-guided In-Bore Targeted Biopsy of the Prostate: A Step-by-Step How To and Lessons Learned. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc 2024;44:e230142. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1148/​rg.​230142CrossRef
12.
13.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wegelin O, van Melick HHE, Hooft L, Bosch JLHR, Reitsma HB, Barentsz JO, et al. Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique? Eur Urol 2017;71:517–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.041CrossRefPubMed Wegelin O, van Melick HHE, Hooft L, Bosch JLHR, Reitsma HB, Barentsz JO, et al. Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique? Eur Urol 2017;71:517–31. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2016.​07.​041CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Vilanova JC, Pérez de Tudela A, Puig J, Hoogenboom M, Barceló J, Planas M, et al. Robotic-assisted transrectal MRI-guided biopsy. Technical feasibility and role in the current diagnosis of prostate cancer: an initial single-center experience. Abdom Radiol 2020;45:4150–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02665-6CrossRef Vilanova JC, Pérez de Tudela A, Puig J, Hoogenboom M, Barceló J, Planas M, et al. Robotic-assisted transrectal MRI-guided biopsy. Technical feasibility and role in the current diagnosis of prostate cancer: an initial single-center experience. Abdom Radiol 2020;45:4150–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00261-020-02665-6CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical feasibility of MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsies at 0.55T
verfasst von
Tejinder Kaur
Yun Jiang
Nicole Seiberlich
Hero Hussain
Shane Wells
John Wei
Elaine Caoili
Vikas Gulani
Publikationsdatum
11.01.2025
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04783-x

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

KI-gestütztes Mammografiescreening überzeugt im Praxistest

Mit dem Einsatz künstlicher Intelligenz lässt sich die Detektionsrate im Mammografiescreening offenbar deutlich steigern. Mehr unnötige Zusatzuntersuchungen sind laut der Studie aus Deutschland nicht zu befürchten.

Stumme Schlaganfälle − ein häufiger Nebenbefund im Kopf-CT?

In 4% der in der Notfallambulanz initiierten zerebralen Bildgebung sind „alte“ Schlaganfälle zu erkennen. Gar nicht so selten handelt es sich laut einer aktuellen Studie dabei um unbemerkte Insulte. Bietet sich hier womöglich die Chance auf ein effektives opportunistisches Screening?

Die elektronische Patientenakte kommt: Das sollten Sie jetzt wissen

Am 15. Januar geht die „ePA für alle“ zunächst in den Modellregionen an den Start. Doch schon bald soll sie in allen Praxen zum Einsatz kommen. Was ist jetzt zu tun? Was müssen Sie wissen? Wir geben in einem FAQ Antworten auf 21 Fragen.

Stören weiße Wände und viel Licht die Bildqualitätskontrolle?

Wenn es darum geht, die technische Qualität eines Mammogramms zu beurteilen, könnten graue Wandfarbe und reduzierte Beleuchtung im Bildgebungsraum von Vorteil sein. Darauf deuten zumindest Ergebnisse einer kleinen Studie hin. 

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.