This study aims to compare prospectively the differences of clinical outcomes being associated with a specific femoral closure (FC) compared to a radial compression (RC) device following percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). This single-center, prospective observational study included consecutively 400 patients either treated by a specific FC (Angio-Seal™, St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, MN) or RC (TR Band^®, Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) device following PCI. The primary outcome was to evaluate overall, access site and non-access site bleedings, the secondary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurring within 30 days of follow-up. 200 patients in each group (FC and RC group) were enrolled following PCI. The prevalence of overall bleedings was 56% in FC and 37% in RC group (p = 0.001). Access site bleedings were significantly higher in the FC (50%) compared to the RC (30%) group (p = 0.001). Most common type of access site bleeding consisted of hematomas (FC 45% vs. RC 27%, p = 0.001). Of these, intermediate and large hematomas were significantly higher in the FC group (p < 0.05). Surgical interventions following device-related bleedings were uncommon in both groups. No significant differences of MACE were observed in both treatment groups. Despite the use of a vascular closure device, the femoral arterial access is still associated with a higher rate of access site bleedings, consisting mostly of intermediate to large hematomas. No differences of MACE were found between FC versus RC following PCI at 30 days. Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov (https://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​ct2/​show/​NCT02455661).