nach oben

Erschienen in:

19.02.2020 | Review

Clinical pediatric positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance program: a guide to successful implementation

verfasst von: Sandra Saade-Lemus, Elad Nevo, Iman Soliman, Hansel J. Otero, Ralph W. Magee, Elizabeth T. Drum, Lisa J. States

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Children with malignancies undergo recurrent imaging as part of tumor diagnosis, staging and therapy response assessment. Simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance (MR) allows for decreased radiation exposure and acts as a one-stop shop for disease in which MR imaging is required. Nevertheless, PET/MR is still less readily available than PET/CT across institutions. This article serves as a guide to successful implementation of a clinical pediatric PET/MR program based on our extensive clinical experience. Challenges include making scanners more affordable and increasing patient throughput by decreasing total scan time. With improvements in workflow and robust acquisition protocols, PET/MR imaging is expected to play an increasingly important role in pediatric oncology.

Cheng G, Servaes S, Zhuang H (2013) Value of (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan versus diagnostic contrast computed tomography in initial staging of pediatric patients with lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 54:737–742PubMedCrossRef

London K, Cross S, Onikul E et al (2011) 18F-FDG PET/CT in paediatric lymphoma: comparison with conventional imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38:274–284PubMedCrossRef

Jadvar H, Connolly LP, Fahey FH, Shulkin BL (2007) PET and PET/CT in pediatric oncology. Semin Nucl Med 37:316–331PubMedCrossRef

Chawla SC, Federman N, Zhang D et al (2010) Estimated cumulative radiation dose from PET/CT in children with malignancies: a 5-year retrospective review. Pediatr Radiol 40:681–686PubMedCrossRef

Krille L, Zeeb H, Jahnen A et al (2012) Computed tomographies and cancer risk in children: a literature overview of CT practices, risk estimations and an epidemiologic cohort study proposal. Radiat Environ Biophys 51:103–111PubMedCrossRef

Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A et al (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 167:700–707PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Fahey FH, Goodkind A, MacDougall RD et al (2017) Operational and dosimetric aspects of pediatric PET/CT. J Nucl Med 58:1360–1366PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Parisi MT, Bermo MS, Alessio AM et al (2017) Optimization of pediatric PET/CT. Semin Nucl Med 47:258–274PubMedCrossRef

10.

Ponisio MR, McConathy J, Laforest R, Khanna G (2016) Evaluation of diagnostic performance of whole-body simultaneous PET/MRI in pediatric lymphoma. Pediatr Radiol 46:1258–1268

11.

Schafer JF, Gatidis S, Schmidt H et al (2014) Simultaneous whole-body PET/MR imaging in comparison to PET/CT in pediatric oncology: initial results. Radiology 273:220–231PubMedCrossRef

12.

Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography — an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRef

13.

Goske MJ (2013) Image Gently: child-sizing radiation dose for children. JAMA Pediatr 167:1083PubMedCrossRef

14.

Bosch de Basea M, Pearce MS, Kesminiene A et al (2015) EPI-CT: design, challenges and epidemiological methods of an international study on cancer risk after paediatric and young adult CT. J Radiol Prot 35:611–628PubMedCrossRef

15.

Hirsch FW, Sattler B, Sorge I et al (2013) PET/MR in children. Initial clinical experience in paediatric oncology using an integrated PET/MR scanner. Pediatr Radiol 43:860–875PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

16.

Zaidi H, Ojha N, Morich M et al (2011) Design and performance evaluation of a whole-body Ingenuity TF PET-MRI system. Phys Med Biol 56:3091–3106PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

17.

Delso G, Fürst S, Jakoby B et al (2011) Performance measurements of the Siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MR scanner. J Nucl Med 52:1914–1922PubMedCrossRef

18.

Jadvar H, Colletti PM (2014) Competitive advantage of PET/MRI. Eur J Radiol 83:84–94PubMedCrossRef

19.

Sher AC, Orth R, McClain K et al (2017) PET/MR in the assessment of pediatric histiocytoses: a comparison to PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 42:582–588PubMedCrossRef

20.

Lyons K, Seghers V, Sorensen JI et al (2015) Comparison of standardized uptake values in normal structures between PET/CT and PET/MRI in a tertiary pediatric hospital: a prospective study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:1094–1101PubMedCrossRef

21.

Rauscher I, Beer AJ, Schaeffeler C et al (2015) Evaluation of 18F-fluoride PET/MR and PET/CT in patients with foot pain of unclear cause. J Nucl Med 56:430–435PubMedCrossRef

22.

Muzic RF, DiFilippo FP (2014) PET/MRI — technical review. Semin Roentgenol 49:242–254PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

23.

Oldan JD, Shin HW, Khandani AH et al (2018) Subsequent experience in hybrid PET-MRI for evaluation of refractory focal onset epilepsy. Seizure 61:128–134PubMedCrossRef

24.

Mayerhoefer ME, Prosch H, Beer L et al (2019) PET/MRI versus PET/CT in oncology: a prospective single-center study of 330 examinations focusing on implications for patient management and cost considerations. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04452-y

25.

Uslu L, Donig J, Link M et al (2015) Value of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT for evaluation of pediatric malignancies. J Nucl Med 56:274–286PubMedCrossRef

26.

Buchanan M, Marsden PK, Mielke CH et al (1996) A system to obtain radiotracer uptake data simultaneously with NMR spectra in a high field magnet. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 43:2044–2048CrossRef

27.

Garlick PB, Marsden PK, Cave AC et al (1998) PET and NMR dual acquisition (PANDA): applications to isolated, perfused rat hearts. NMR Biomed 10:138–142CrossRef

28.

Shao Y, Cherry SR, Farahani K et al (1997) Simultaneous PET and MR imaging. Phys Med Biol 42:1965–1970PubMedCrossRef

29.

Wehrl HF, Judenhofer MS, Wiehr S, Pichler BJ (2009) Pre-clinical PET/MR: technological advances and new perspectives in biomedical research. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:S56–S68PubMedCrossRef

30.

Sauter AW, Wehrl HF, Kolb A et al (2010) Combined PET/MRI: one step further in multimodality imaging. Trends Mol Med 16:508–515PubMedCrossRef

31.

Kwee TC, van Ufford HM, Beek FJ et al (2009) Whole-body MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging, for the initial staging of malignant lymphoma: comparison to computed tomography. Investig Radiol 44:683–690CrossRef

32.

Catalano OA, Rosen BR, Sahani DV et al (2013) Clinical impact of PET/MR imaging in patients with cancer undergoing same-day PET/CT: initial experience in 134 patients — a hypothesis-generating exploratory study. Radiology 269:857–869PubMedCrossRef

33.

Ishii S, Shimao D, Hara T et al (2016) Comparison of integrated whole-body PET/MR and PET/CT: is PET/MR alternative to PET/CT in routine clinical oncology? Ann Nucl Med 30:225–233PubMedCrossRef

34.

Melsaether AN, Raad RA, Pujara AC et al (2016) Comparison of whole-body (18)F FDG PET/MR imaging and whole-body (18)F FDG PET/CT in terms of lesion detection and radiation dose in patients with breast cancer. Radiology 281:193–202PubMedCrossRef

35.

Lee SM, Goo JM, Park CM et al (2016) Preoperative staging of non-small cell lung cancer: prospective comparison of PET/MR and PET/CT. Eur Radiol 26:3850–3857PubMedCrossRef

36.

Berzaczy D, Giraudo C, Haug AR et al (2017) Whole-body 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/MRI versus 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: a prospective study in 28 patients. Clin Nucl Med 42:669–674PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

37.

Rauscher I, Eiber M, Fürst S et al (2014) PET/MR imaging in the detection and characterization of pulmonary lesions: technical and diagnostic evaluation in comparison to PET/CT. J Nucl Med 55:724–729PubMedCrossRef

38.

Stolzmann P, Veit-Haibach P, Chuck N et al (2013) Detection rate, location, and size of pulmonary nodules in trimodality PET/CT-MR: comparison of low-dose CT and Dixon-based MR imaging. Investig Radiol 48:241–246CrossRef

39.

Chandarana H, Heacock L, Rakheja R et al (2013) Pulmonary nodules in patients with primary malignancy: comparison of hybrid PET/MR and PET/CT imaging. Radiology 268:874–881PubMedCrossRef

40.

Jaimes C, Gee MS (2016) Strategies to minimize sedation in pediatric body magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol 46:916–927PubMedCrossRef

41.

Theodore WH (1989) The role of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in the evaluation of seizure disorders. Semin Neurol 9:301–306PubMedCrossRef

42.

Todd MM, Weeks J (1996) Comparative effects of propofol, pentobarbital, and isoflurane on cerebral blood flow and blood volume. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 8:296–303PubMedCrossRef

43.

Gelfand MJ, O'hara SM, Curtwright LA, Maclean JR (2005) Pre-medication to block [(18)F]FDG uptake in the brown adipose tissue of pediatric and adolescent patients. Pediatr Radiol 35:984–990PubMedCrossRef

44.

Niederle B, Pape UF, Costa F et al (2016) ENETS consensus guidelines update for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the jejunum and ileum. Neuroendocrinology 103:125–138PubMedCrossRef

45.

Falconi M, Eriksson B, Kaltsas G et al (2016) ENETS consensus guidelines update for the management of patients with functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology 103:153–171PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Clinical pediatric positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance program: a guide to successful implementation
verfasst von: Sandra Saade-Lemus
Elad Nevo
Iman Soliman
Hansel J. Otero
Ralph W. Magee
Elizabeth T. Drum
Lisa J. States
Publikationsdatum: 19.02.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04578-z

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

18.04.2024 | Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Clinical pediatric positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance program: a guide to successful implementation

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

Ovarian torsion: developing a machine-learned algorithm for diagnosis

Healthy pancreatic parenchymal volume and its relationship to exocrine function

Establishing signs for acute and healing phases of distal tibial classic metaphyseal lesions

The current status and further prospects for lung magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric radiology

Cochlear–facial dehiscence in a pediatric patient

Gastric emptying of milk in infants and children up to 5 years of age: normative data and influencing factors

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie