Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 8/2019

13.03.2019 | Review Article

Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations in the (Modern) Treatment of Melanoma

verfasst von: Hannah Yejin Kim, Parth J. Upadhyay, Alia Fahmy, Xiaoman Liu, Janna K. Duong, Alan V. Boddy

Erschienen in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Ausgabe 8/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Targeted therapies, based on identification of common oncogenic mutations such as BRAF V600E/K and monoclonal antibody immunotherapies, have transformed the treatment of melanoma. Dual mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway inhibition of BRAF V600E/K and MEK 1/2 kinases with BRAF–MEK inhibitors using dabrafenib–trametinib, vemurafenib–cobimetinib and encorafenib–binimetinib is now the standard of care for BRAF V600E/K tumours. Monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, against programmed cell death protein (PD-1) on T cells, as well as ipilimumab against cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), enable restoration of suppressed T-cell antitumour response, and have also shown improved clinical benefit compared with traditional chemotherapy. Exploration of different combination therapies, sequence of treatment, and dosing strategies is ongoing, and the understanding of the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of these new agents is fundamental in devising the optimal regimen. Preclinical and clinical studies, as well as population PK modelling, provide essential data in terms of PK parameters, metabolism, interpatient variability, drug interactions and PD effects at the target. This review gathers the current evidence and understanding of the clinical PK and PD of drugs used in the modern treatment of melanoma, and the factors determining drug disposition, exposure and clinical response, and also highlighting areas of further research.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlay J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–86.CrossRefPubMed Ferlay J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–86.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Schadendorf D, Hauschild A. Melanoma in 2013: melanoma—the run of success continues. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11(2):75–6.CrossRefPubMed Schadendorf D, Hauschild A. Melanoma in 2013: melanoma—the run of success continues. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11(2):75–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Matthews NH, et al. Epidemiology of melanoma. In: Ward WH, Farma JM, editors. Cutaneous melanoma: etiology and therapy. Brisbane: Codon Publications; 2017. Matthews NH, et al. Epidemiology of melanoma. In: Ward WH, Farma JM, editors. Cutaneous melanoma: etiology and therapy. Brisbane: Codon Publications; 2017.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Guy GP Jr, et al. Vital signs: melanoma incidence and mortality trends and projections—United States, 1982–2030. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(21):591–6. Guy GP Jr, et al. Vital signs: melanoma incidence and mortality trends and projections—United States, 1982–2030. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(21):591–6.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Luikart SD, Kennealey GT, Kirkwood JM. Randomized phase III trial of vinblastine, bleomycin, and cis-dichlorodiammine-platinum versus dacarbazine in malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 1984;2(3):164–8.CrossRefPubMed Luikart SD, Kennealey GT, Kirkwood JM. Randomized phase III trial of vinblastine, bleomycin, and cis-dichlorodiammine-platinum versus dacarbazine in malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 1984;2(3):164–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chapman PB, et al. Phase III multicenter randomized trial of the Dartmouth regimen versus dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(9):2745–51.CrossRefPubMed Chapman PB, et al. Phase III multicenter randomized trial of the Dartmouth regimen versus dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(9):2745–51.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lui P, et al. Treatments for metastatic melanoma: synthesis of evidence from randomized trials. Cancer Treat Rev. 2007;33(8):665–80.CrossRefPubMed Lui P, et al. Treatments for metastatic melanoma: synthesis of evidence from randomized trials. Cancer Treat Rev. 2007;33(8):665–80.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Atkins MB, et al. High-dose recombinant interleukin 2 therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma: analysis of 270 patients treated between 1985 and 1993. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(7):2105–16.CrossRefPubMed Atkins MB, et al. High-dose recombinant interleukin 2 therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma: analysis of 270 patients treated between 1985 and 1993. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(7):2105–16.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Atkins MB, et al. High-dose recombinant interleukin-2 therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma: long-term survival update. Cancer J Sci Am. 2000;6(Suppl 1):S11–4.PubMed Atkins MB, et al. High-dose recombinant interleukin-2 therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma: long-term survival update. Cancer J Sci Am. 2000;6(Suppl 1):S11–4.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Creagan ET, et al. Phase II trials of recombinant leukocyte A interferon in disseminated malignant melanoma: results in 96 patients. Cancer Treat Rep. 1986;70(5):619–24.PubMed Creagan ET, et al. Phase II trials of recombinant leukocyte A interferon in disseminated malignant melanoma: results in 96 patients. Cancer Treat Rep. 1986;70(5):619–24.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fecher LA, Amaravadi RK, Flaherty KT. The MAPK pathway in melanoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2008;20(2):183–9.CrossRefPubMed Fecher LA, Amaravadi RK, Flaherty KT. The MAPK pathway in melanoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2008;20(2):183–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ji Z, Flaherty KT, Tsao H. Molecular therapeutic approaches to melanoma. Mol Asp Med. 2010;31(2):194–204.CrossRef Ji Z, Flaherty KT, Tsao H. Molecular therapeutic approaches to melanoma. Mol Asp Med. 2010;31(2):194–204.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dhomen N, Marais R. BRAF signaling and targeted therapies in melanoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2009;23(3):529–45, ix. Dhomen N, Marais R. BRAF signaling and targeted therapies in melanoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2009;23(3):529–45, ix.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Houben R, et al. Constitutive activation of the Ras-Raf signaling pathway in metastatic melanoma is associated with poor prognosis. J Carcinog. 2004;3:6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Houben R, et al. Constitutive activation of the Ras-Raf signaling pathway in metastatic melanoma is associated with poor prognosis. J Carcinog. 2004;3:6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ugurel S, et al. B-RAF and N-RAS mutations are preserved during short time in vitro propagation and differentially impact prognosis. PLoS One. 2007;2(2):e236.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ugurel S, et al. B-RAF and N-RAS mutations are preserved during short time in vitro propagation and differentially impact prognosis. PLoS One. 2007;2(2):e236.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Davies H, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002;417(6892):949–54.CrossRefPubMed Davies H, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002;417(6892):949–54.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Long GV, et al. Prognostic and clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(10):1239–46.CrossRefPubMed Long GV, et al. Prognostic and clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(10):1239–46.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Willmore-Payne C, et al. Human malignant melanoma: detection of BRAF- and c-kit-activating mutations by high-resolution amplicon melting analysis. Hum Pathol. 2005;36(5):486–93.CrossRefPubMed Willmore-Payne C, et al. Human malignant melanoma: detection of BRAF- and c-kit-activating mutations by high-resolution amplicon melting analysis. Hum Pathol. 2005;36(5):486–93.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Long GV, et al. Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9992):444–51.CrossRefPubMed Long GV, et al. Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9992):444–51.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Long GV, et al. Dabrafenib plus trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma: long-term survival and safety analysis of a phase 3 study. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(7):1631–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Long GV, et al. Dabrafenib plus trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma: long-term survival and safety analysis of a phase 3 study. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(7):1631–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Dummer R, et al. Overall survival in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma receiving encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(10):1315–27.CrossRefPubMed Dummer R, et al. Overall survival in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma receiving encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(10):1315–27.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Atkins MB, Larkin J. Immunotherapy combined or sequenced with targeted therapy in the treatment of solid tumors: current perspectives. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108(6):djv414.CrossRefPubMed Atkins MB, Larkin J. Immunotherapy combined or sequenced with targeted therapy in the treatment of solid tumors: current perspectives. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108(6):djv414.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman GJ, et al. Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J Exp Med. 2000;192(7):1027–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Freeman GJ, et al. Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J Exp Med. 2000;192(7):1027–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen L. Co-inhibitory molecules of the B7-CD28 family in the control of T-cell immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4(5):336–47.CrossRefPubMed Chen L. Co-inhibitory molecules of the B7-CD28 family in the control of T-cell immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4(5):336–47.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ascierto PA, et al. Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg versus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(5):611–22.CrossRefPubMed Ascierto PA, et al. Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg versus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(5):611–22.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Schadendorf D, et al. Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from phase II and phase III trials of ipilimumab in unresectable or metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(17):1889–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schadendorf D, et al. Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from phase II and phase III trials of ipilimumab in unresectable or metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(17):1889–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Robert C, et al. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(4):320–30.CrossRefPubMed Robert C, et al. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(4):320–30.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber JS, et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(4):375–84.CrossRefPubMed Weber JS, et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(4):375–84.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Schachter J, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: final overall survival results of a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006). Lancet. 2017;390(10105):1853–62.CrossRefPubMed Schachter J, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: final overall survival results of a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006). Lancet. 2017;390(10105):1853–62.CrossRefPubMed
33.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma A, et al. Mutant V599EB-Raf regulates growth and vascular development of malignant melanoma tumors. Cancer Res. 2005;65(6):2412–21.CrossRefPubMed Sharma A, et al. Mutant V599EB-Raf regulates growth and vascular development of malignant melanoma tumors. Cancer Res. 2005;65(6):2412–21.CrossRefPubMed
35.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Hauschild A, et al. Results of a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study of sorafenib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel as second-line treatment in patients with unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(17):2823–30.CrossRefPubMed Hauschild A, et al. Results of a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study of sorafenib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel as second-line treatment in patients with unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(17):2823–30.CrossRefPubMed
37.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai J, et al. Discovery of a selective inhibitor of oncogenic B-Raf kinase with potent antimelanoma activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(8):3041–6.CrossRefPubMed Tsai J, et al. Discovery of a selective inhibitor of oncogenic B-Raf kinase with potent antimelanoma activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(8):3041–6.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Rizos H, et al. BRAF inhibitor resistance mechanisms in metastatic melanoma: spectrum and clinical impact. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(7):1965–77.CrossRefPubMed Rizos H, et al. BRAF inhibitor resistance mechanisms in metastatic melanoma: spectrum and clinical impact. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(7):1965–77.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Shi H, et al. Acquired resistance and clonal evolution in melanoma during BRAF inhibitor therapy. Cancer Discov. 2014;4(1):80–93.CrossRefPubMed Shi H, et al. Acquired resistance and clonal evolution in melanoma during BRAF inhibitor therapy. Cancer Discov. 2014;4(1):80–93.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Allen EM, et al. The genetic landscape of clinical resistance to RAF inhibition in metastatic melanoma. Cancer Discov. 2014;4(1):94–109.CrossRefPubMed Van Allen EM, et al. The genetic landscape of clinical resistance to RAF inhibition in metastatic melanoma. Cancer Discov. 2014;4(1):94–109.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Long GV, et al. Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition versus BRAF inhibition alone in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(20):1877–88.CrossRefPubMed Long GV, et al. Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition versus BRAF inhibition alone in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(20):1877–88.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Robert C, et al. Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib and trametinib. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):30–9.CrossRefPubMed Robert C, et al. Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib and trametinib. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):30–9.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Ascierto PA, et al. Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib in advanced BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma (coBRIM): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(9):1248–60.CrossRefPubMed Ascierto PA, et al. Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib in advanced BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma (coBRIM): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(9):1248–60.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Dummer R, et al. Encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(5):603–15.CrossRefPubMed Dummer R, et al. Encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(5):603–15.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang W, Heinzmann D, Grippo JF. Clinical pharmacokinetics of vemurafenib. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56(9):1033–43.CrossRefPubMed Zhang W, Heinzmann D, Grippo JF. Clinical pharmacokinetics of vemurafenib. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56(9):1033–43.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Grippo JF, et al. A phase I, randomized, open-label study of the multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of vemurafenib in patients with BRAF V600E mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;73(1):103–11.CrossRefPubMed Grippo JF, et al. A phase I, randomized, open-label study of the multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of vemurafenib in patients with BRAF V600E mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;73(1):103–11.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldinger SM, et al. A single-dose mass balance and metabolite-profiling study of vemurafenib in patients with metastatic melanoma. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2015;3(2):e00113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goldinger SM, et al. A single-dose mass balance and metabolite-profiling study of vemurafenib in patients with metastatic melanoma. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2015;3(2):e00113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts MS, et al. Enterohepatic circulation: physiological, pharmacokinetic and clinical implications. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41(10):751–90.CrossRefPubMed Roberts MS, et al. Enterohepatic circulation: physiological, pharmacokinetic and clinical implications. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41(10):751–90.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim G, et al. FDA approval summary: vemurafenib for treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma with the BRAFV600E mutation. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(19):4994–5000.CrossRefPubMed Kim G, et al. FDA approval summary: vemurafenib for treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma with the BRAFV600E mutation. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(19):4994–5000.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Puszkiel A, et al. Plasma vemurafenib exposure and pre-treatment hepatocyte growth factor level are two factors contributing to the early peripheral lymphocytes depletion in BRAF-mutated melanoma patients. Pharmacol Res. 2016;113(Pt A):709–18.CrossRefPubMed Puszkiel A, et al. Plasma vemurafenib exposure and pre-treatment hepatocyte growth factor level are two factors contributing to the early peripheral lymphocytes depletion in BRAF-mutated melanoma patients. Pharmacol Res. 2016;113(Pt A):709–18.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Z-X, et al. Prediction of the likelihood of drug interactions with kinase inhibitors based on in vitro and computational studies. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2014;28(5):551–82.CrossRefPubMed Wang Z-X, et al. Prediction of the likelihood of drug interactions with kinase inhibitors based on in vitro and computational studies. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2014;28(5):551–82.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang W, et al. Effect of vemurafenib on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of digoxin in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic malignancy. J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;58(8):1067–73.CrossRef Zhang W, et al. Effect of vemurafenib on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of digoxin in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic malignancy. J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;58(8):1067–73.CrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Ribas A, et al. The effects of a high-fat meal on single-dose vemurafenib pharmacokinetics. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;54(4):368–74.CrossRef Ribas A, et al. The effects of a high-fat meal on single-dose vemurafenib pharmacokinetics. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;54(4):368–74.CrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Trunzer K, et al. Pharmacodynamic effects and mechanisms of resistance to vemurafenib in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(14):1767–74.CrossRefPubMed Trunzer K, et al. Pharmacodynamic effects and mechanisms of resistance to vemurafenib in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(14):1767–74.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Denton CL, et al. Concomitant oral and intravenous pharmacokinetics of dabrafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive solid tumors. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;53(9):955–61.CrossRefPubMed Denton CL, et al. Concomitant oral and intravenous pharmacokinetics of dabrafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive solid tumors. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;53(9):955–61.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Ouellet D, et al. Effects of particle size, food, and capsule shell composition on the oral bioavailability of dabrafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, in patients with BRAF mutation-positive tumors. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102(9):3100–9.CrossRefPubMed Ouellet D, et al. Effects of particle size, food, and capsule shell composition on the oral bioavailability of dabrafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, in patients with BRAF mutation-positive tumors. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102(9):3100–9.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Ouellet D, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of dabrafenib, a BRAF inhibitor: effect of dose, time, covariates, and relationship with its metabolites. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;54(6):696–706.CrossRefPubMed Ouellet D, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of dabrafenib, a BRAF inhibitor: effect of dose, time, covariates, and relationship with its metabolites. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;54(6):696–706.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Falchook GS, et al. Dose selection, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (GSK2118436). Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(17):4449–58.CrossRefPubMed Falchook GS, et al. Dose selection, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (GSK2118436). Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(17):4449–58.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Suttle AB, et al. Assessment of the drug interaction potential and single- and repeat-dose pharmacokinetics of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib. J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;55(4):392–400.CrossRefPubMed Suttle AB, et al. Assessment of the drug interaction potential and single- and repeat-dose pharmacokinetics of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib. J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;55(4):392–400.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawrence SK, et al. The metabolic drug–drug interaction profile of Dabrafenib: in vitro investigations and quantitative extrapolation of the P450-mediated DDI risk. Drug Metab Dispos. 2014;42(7):1180–90.CrossRefPubMed Lawrence SK, et al. The metabolic drug–drug interaction profile of Dabrafenib: in vitro investigations and quantitative extrapolation of the P450-mediated DDI risk. Drug Metab Dispos. 2014;42(7):1180–90.CrossRefPubMed
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Falchook GS, et al. Dabrafenib in patients with melanoma, untreated brain metastases, and other solid tumours: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9829):1893–901.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Falchook GS, et al. Dabrafenib in patients with melanoma, untreated brain metastases, and other solid tumours: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9829):1893–901.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Bershas DA, et al. Metabolism and disposition of oral dabrafenib in cancer patients: proposed participation of aryl nitrogen in carbon–carbon bond cleavage via decarboxylation following enzymatic oxidation. Drug Metab Dispos. 2013;41(12):2215–24.CrossRefPubMed Bershas DA, et al. Metabolism and disposition of oral dabrafenib in cancer patients: proposed participation of aryl nitrogen in carbon–carbon bond cleavage via decarboxylation following enzymatic oxidation. Drug Metab Dispos. 2013;41(12):2215–24.CrossRefPubMed
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Menzies AM, et al. Characteristics of pyrexia in BRAFV600E/K metastatic melanoma patients treated with combined dabrafenib and trametinib in a phase I/II clinical trial. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(2):415–21.CrossRefPubMed Menzies AM, et al. Characteristics of pyrexia in BRAFV600E/K metastatic melanoma patients treated with combined dabrafenib and trametinib in a phase I/II clinical trial. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(2):415–21.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Rousset M, et al. Trough dabrafenib plasma concentrations can predict occurrence of adverse events requiring dose reduction in metastatic melanoma. Clin Chim Acta. 2017;472:26–9.CrossRefPubMed Rousset M, et al. Trough dabrafenib plasma concentrations can predict occurrence of adverse events requiring dose reduction in metastatic melanoma. Clin Chim Acta. 2017;472:26–9.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Kulkarni DA, et al. Pharmacogenetic investigation of dabrafenib efficacy in a meta-analysis of three melanoma studies. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(15 Suppl):e20018.CrossRef Kulkarni DA, et al. Pharmacogenetic investigation of dabrafenib efficacy in a meta-analysis of three melanoma studies. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(15 Suppl):e20018.CrossRef
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Kulkarni D, et al. Pyrexia in dabrafenib-treated melanoma patients is not associated with common genetic variation or HLA polymorphisms. Pharmacogenomics. 2016;17(5):459–62.CrossRefPubMed Kulkarni D, et al. Pyrexia in dabrafenib-treated melanoma patients is not associated with common genetic variation or HLA polymorphisms. Pharmacogenomics. 2016;17(5):459–62.CrossRefPubMed
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Cappellini MD, Fiorelli G. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Lancet. 2008;371(9606):64–74.CrossRef Cappellini MD, Fiorelli G. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Lancet. 2008;371(9606):64–74.CrossRef
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Dean L. Dabrafenib therapy and BRAF and G6PD genotype. In: Pratt V, et al., editors. Medical genetics summaries. Bethesda: National Center for Biotechnology Information; 2012. Dean L. Dabrafenib therapy and BRAF and G6PD genotype. In: Pratt V, et al., editors. Medical genetics summaries. Bethesda: National Center for Biotechnology Information; 2012.
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Delord JP, et al. Phase I dose-escalation and -expansion study of the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib (LGX818) in metastatic BRAF-mutant melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(18):5339–48.CrossRefPubMed Delord JP, et al. Phase I dose-escalation and -expansion study of the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib (LGX818) in metastatic BRAF-mutant melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(18):5339–48.CrossRefPubMed
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho M, et al. A phase I clinical trial of binimetinib in combination with FOLFOX in patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer who failed prior standard therapy. Oncotarget. 2017;8(45):79750–60.PubMedPubMedCentral Cho M, et al. A phase I clinical trial of binimetinib in combination with FOLFOX in patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer who failed prior standard therapy. Oncotarget. 2017;8(45):79750–60.PubMedPubMedCentral
79.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Shea J, et al. A preclinical evaluation of the MEK inhibitor refametinib in HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines including those with acquired resistance to trastuzumab or lapatinib. Oncotarget. 2017;8(49):85120–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral O’Shea J, et al. A preclinical evaluation of the MEK inhibitor refametinib in HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines including those with acquired resistance to trastuzumab or lapatinib. Oncotarget. 2017;8(49):85120–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Finn RS, et al. Phase 1b investigation of the MEK inhibitor binimetinib in patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. Investig New Drugs. 2018;36(6):1037–43.CrossRef Finn RS, et al. Phase 1b investigation of the MEK inhibitor binimetinib in patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. Investig New Drugs. 2018;36(6):1037–43.CrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikeda M, et al. Efficacy and safety of trametinib in Japanese patients with advanced biliary tract cancers refractory to gemcitabine. Cancer Sci. 2018;109(1):215–24.CrossRefPubMed Ikeda M, et al. Efficacy and safety of trametinib in Japanese patients with advanced biliary tract cancers refractory to gemcitabine. Cancer Sci. 2018;109(1):215–24.CrossRefPubMed
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim HY, et al. A phase II study of the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of the MEK inhibitor refametinib (BAY 86-9766) plus sorafenib for Asian patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(23):5976–85.CrossRefPubMed Lim HY, et al. A phase II study of the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of the MEK inhibitor refametinib (BAY 86-9766) plus sorafenib for Asian patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(23):5976–85.CrossRefPubMed
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Grisham RN, et al. Phase Ib study of binimetinib with paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: final results, potential biomarkers, and extreme responders. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(22):5525–33.CrossRefPubMed Grisham RN, et al. Phase Ib study of binimetinib with paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: final results, potential biomarkers, and extreme responders. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(22):5525–33.CrossRefPubMed
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilmartin AG, et al. GSK1120212 (JTP-74057) is an inhibitor of MEK activity and activation with favorable pharmacokinetic properties for sustained in vivo pathway inhibition. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(5):989–1000.CrossRefPubMed Gilmartin AG, et al. GSK1120212 (JTP-74057) is an inhibitor of MEK activity and activation with favorable pharmacokinetic properties for sustained in vivo pathway inhibition. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(5):989–1000.CrossRefPubMed
86.
87.
Zurück zum Zitat Larkin J, et al. Combined vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAF-mutated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(20):1867–76.CrossRefPubMed Larkin J, et al. Combined vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAF-mutated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(20):1867–76.CrossRefPubMed
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox DS, et al. Evaluation of the effects of food on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of trametinib, a first-in-class MEK inhibitor, in patients with cancer. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;53(9):946–54.CrossRefPubMed Cox DS, et al. Evaluation of the effects of food on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of trametinib, a first-in-class MEK inhibitor, in patients with cancer. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;53(9):946–54.CrossRefPubMed
89.
Zurück zum Zitat Infante JR, et al. Safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy data for the oral MEK inhibitor trametinib: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(8):773–81.CrossRefPubMed Infante JR, et al. Safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy data for the oral MEK inhibitor trametinib: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(8):773–81.CrossRefPubMed
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamazaki N, et al. Phase 1/2 study assessing the safety and efficacy of dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy in Japanese patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive advanced cutaneous melanoma. J Dermatol. 2018;45(4):397–407.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yamazaki N, et al. Phase 1/2 study assessing the safety and efficacy of dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy in Japanese patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive advanced cutaneous melanoma. J Dermatol. 2018;45(4):397–407.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
91.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho MY, et al. Trametinib, a first-in-class oral MEK inhibitor mass balance study with limited enrollment of two male subjects with advanced cancers. Xenobiotica. 2014;44(4):352–68.CrossRefPubMed Ho MY, et al. Trametinib, a first-in-class oral MEK inhibitor mass balance study with limited enrollment of two male subjects with advanced cancers. Xenobiotica. 2014;44(4):352–68.CrossRefPubMed
92.
Zurück zum Zitat Ouellet D, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response of trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016;77(4):807–17.CrossRefPubMed Ouellet D, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response of trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016;77(4):807–17.CrossRefPubMed
93.
Zurück zum Zitat Filppula AM, Mustonen TM, Backman JT. In vitro screening of six protein kinase inhibitors for time-dependent inhibition of CYP2C8 and CYP3A4: possible implications with regard to drug–drug interactions. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018;123(6):739–48.CrossRefPubMed Filppula AM, Mustonen TM, Backman JT. In vitro screening of six protein kinase inhibitors for time-dependent inhibition of CYP2C8 and CYP3A4: possible implications with regard to drug–drug interactions. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018;123(6):739–48.CrossRefPubMed
95.
Zurück zum Zitat Tolcher AW, et al. A phase IB trial of the oral MEK inhibitor trametinib (GSK1120212) in combination with everolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(1):58–64.CrossRefPubMed Tolcher AW, et al. A phase IB trial of the oral MEK inhibitor trametinib (GSK1120212) in combination with everolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(1):58–64.CrossRefPubMed
96.
Zurück zum Zitat LoRusso PM, et al. Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the oral MAPK/ERK kinase inhibitor PD-0325901 in patients with advanced cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(6):1924–37.CrossRefPubMed LoRusso PM, et al. Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the oral MAPK/ERK kinase inhibitor PD-0325901 in patients with advanced cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(6):1924–37.CrossRefPubMed
97.
Zurück zum Zitat Musib L, et al. Absolute bioavailability and effect of formulation change, food, or elevated pH with rabeprazole on cobimetinib absorption in healthy subjects. Mol Pharm. 2013;10(11):4046–54.CrossRefPubMed Musib L, et al. Absolute bioavailability and effect of formulation change, food, or elevated pH with rabeprazole on cobimetinib absorption in healthy subjects. Mol Pharm. 2013;10(11):4046–54.CrossRefPubMed
98.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosen LS, et al. A first-in-human phase I study to evaluate the MEK1/2 inhibitor, cobimetinib, administered daily in patients with advanced solid tumors. Investig New Drugs. 2016;34(5):604–13.CrossRef Rosen LS, et al. A first-in-human phase I study to evaluate the MEK1/2 inhibitor, cobimetinib, administered daily in patients with advanced solid tumors. Investig New Drugs. 2016;34(5):604–13.CrossRef
99.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi RH, et al. Absorption, metabolism, excretion, and the contribution of intestinal metabolism to the oral disposition of [14C]cobimetinib, a MEK inhibitor, in humans. Drug Metab Dispos. 2016;44(1):28–39.CrossRefPubMed Takahashi RH, et al. Absorption, metabolism, excretion, and the contribution of intestinal metabolism to the oral disposition of [14C]cobimetinib, a MEK inhibitor, in humans. Drug Metab Dispos. 2016;44(1):28–39.CrossRefPubMed
100.
Zurück zum Zitat Han K, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and dosing implications for cobimetinib in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2015;76(5):917–24.CrossRefPubMed Han K, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and dosing implications for cobimetinib in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2015;76(5):917–24.CrossRefPubMed
101.
Zurück zum Zitat Choo EF, et al. Use of transgenic mouse models to understand the oral disposition and drug–drug interaction potential of cobimetinib, a MEK inhibitor. Drug Metab Dispos. 2015;43(6):864–9.CrossRefPubMed Choo EF, et al. Use of transgenic mouse models to understand the oral disposition and drug–drug interaction potential of cobimetinib, a MEK inhibitor. Drug Metab Dispos. 2015;43(6):864–9.CrossRefPubMed
102.
Zurück zum Zitat Budha NR, et al. Evaluation of cytochrome P450 3A4-mediated drug–drug interaction potential for cobimetinib using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55(11):1435–45.CrossRefPubMed Budha NR, et al. Evaluation of cytochrome P450 3A4-mediated drug–drug interaction potential for cobimetinib using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55(11):1435–45.CrossRefPubMed
104.
Zurück zum Zitat Jakob JA, et al. NRAS mutation status is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic melanoma. Cancer. 2012;118(16):4014–23.CrossRefPubMed Jakob JA, et al. NRAS mutation status is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic melanoma. Cancer. 2012;118(16):4014–23.CrossRefPubMed
105.
Zurück zum Zitat Dummer R, et al. Binimetinib versus dacarbazine in patients with advanced NRAS-mutant melanoma (NEMO): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(4):435–45.CrossRefPubMed Dummer R, et al. Binimetinib versus dacarbazine in patients with advanced NRAS-mutant melanoma (NEMO): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(4):435–45.CrossRefPubMed
106.
Zurück zum Zitat Bendell JC, et al. A phase 1 dose-escalation and expansion study of binimetinib (MEK162), a potent and selective oral MEK1/2 inhibitor. Br J Cancer. 2017;116(5):575–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bendell JC, et al. A phase 1 dose-escalation and expansion study of binimetinib (MEK162), a potent and selective oral MEK1/2 inhibitor. Br J Cancer. 2017;116(5):575–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
109.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee PA, et al. Abstract 2515: preclinical development of ARRY-162, a potent and selective MEK 1/2 inhibitor. Cancer Res. 2010;70(8 Suppl):2515. Lee PA, et al. Abstract 2515: preclinical development of ARRY-162, a potent and selective MEK 1/2 inhibitor. Cancer Res. 2010;70(8 Suppl):2515.
110.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74.CrossRefPubMed Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74.CrossRefPubMed
111.
Zurück zum Zitat Curiel TJ, et al. Blockade of B7-H1 improves myeloid dendritic cell-mediated antitumor immunity. Nat Med. 2003;9(5):562–7.CrossRefPubMed Curiel TJ, et al. Blockade of B7-H1 improves myeloid dendritic cell-mediated antitumor immunity. Nat Med. 2003;9(5):562–7.CrossRefPubMed
112.
Zurück zum Zitat Hino R, et al. Tumor cell expression of programmed cell death-1 ligand 1 is a prognostic factor for malignant melanoma. Cancer. 2010;116(7):1757–66.CrossRefPubMed Hino R, et al. Tumor cell expression of programmed cell death-1 ligand 1 is a prognostic factor for malignant melanoma. Cancer. 2010;116(7):1757–66.CrossRefPubMed
113.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang C, et al. In vitro characterization of the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab, BMS-936558, and in vivo toxicology in non-human primates. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2(9):846–56.CrossRefPubMed Wang C, et al. In vitro characterization of the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab, BMS-936558, and in vivo toxicology in non-human primates. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2(9):846–56.CrossRefPubMed
114.
Zurück zum Zitat Brahmer JR, et al. Phase I study of single-agent anti-programmed death-1 (MDX-1106) in refractory solid tumors: safety, clinical activity, pharmacodynamics, and immunologic correlates. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(19):3167–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brahmer JR, et al. Phase I study of single-agent anti-programmed death-1 (MDX-1106) in refractory solid tumors: safety, clinical activity, pharmacodynamics, and immunologic correlates. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(19):3167–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
115.
116.
Zurück zum Zitat Patnaik A, et al. Phase I study of pembrolizumab (MK-3475; anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(19):4286–93.CrossRefPubMed Patnaik A, et al. Phase I study of pembrolizumab (MK-3475; anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(19):4286–93.CrossRefPubMed
117.
Zurück zum Zitat Ribas A, et al. Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(8):908–18.CrossRefPubMed Ribas A, et al. Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(8):908–18.CrossRefPubMed
119.
Zurück zum Zitat Longoria TC, Tewari KS. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of pembrolizumab in the treatment of melanoma. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016;12(10):1247–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Longoria TC, Tewari KS. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of pembrolizumab in the treatment of melanoma. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016;12(10):1247–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
120.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahamadi M, et al. Model-based characterization of the pharmacokinetics of pembrolizumab: a humanized anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody in advanced solid tumors. CPT Pharmacomet Syst Pharmacol. 2017;6(1):49–57.CrossRef Ahamadi M, et al. Model-based characterization of the pharmacokinetics of pembrolizumab: a humanized anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody in advanced solid tumors. CPT Pharmacomet Syst Pharmacol. 2017;6(1):49–57.CrossRef
122.
Zurück zum Zitat Robert C, et al. Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1109–17.CrossRefPubMed Robert C, et al. Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1109–17.CrossRefPubMed
123.
Zurück zum Zitat Robert C, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2521–32.CrossRefPubMed Robert C, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2521–32.CrossRefPubMed
124.
Zurück zum Zitat Eggermont AMM, et al. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(19):1789–801.CrossRefPubMed Eggermont AMM, et al. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(19):1789–801.CrossRefPubMed
125.
Zurück zum Zitat Daud AI, et al. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression and response to the anti-programmed death 1 antibody pembrolizumab in melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(34):4102–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Daud AI, et al. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression and response to the anti-programmed death 1 antibody pembrolizumab in melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(34):4102–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
127.
Zurück zum Zitat Bajaj G, et al. Model-based population pharmacokinetic analysis of nivolumab in patients with solid tumors. CPT Pharmacomet Syst Pharmacol. 2017;6(1):58–66.CrossRef Bajaj G, et al. Model-based population pharmacokinetic analysis of nivolumab in patients with solid tumors. CPT Pharmacomet Syst Pharmacol. 2017;6(1):58–66.CrossRef
128.
Zurück zum Zitat Long GV, et al. Assessment of nivolumab exposure and clinical safety of 480 mg every 4 weeks flat-dosing schedule in patients with cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(11):2208–13.PubMedPubMedCentral Long GV, et al. Assessment of nivolumab exposure and clinical safety of 480 mg every 4 weeks flat-dosing schedule in patients with cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(11):2208–13.PubMedPubMedCentral
129.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao X, et al. Assessment of nivolumab benefit-risk profile of a 240-mg flat dose relative to a 3-mg/kg dosing regimen in patients with advanced tumors. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(8):2002–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhao X, et al. Assessment of nivolumab benefit-risk profile of a 240-mg flat dose relative to a 3-mg/kg dosing regimen in patients with advanced tumors. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(8):2002–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
131.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu C, et al. Association of time-varying clearance of nivolumab with disease dynamics and its implications on exposure response analysis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;101(5):657–66.CrossRefPubMed Liu C, et al. Association of time-varying clearance of nivolumab with disease dynamics and its implications on exposure response analysis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;101(5):657–66.CrossRefPubMed
132.
Zurück zum Zitat Agrawal S, et al. Nivolumab dose selection: challenges, opportunities, and lessons learned for cancer immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2016;4:72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Agrawal S, et al. Nivolumab dose selection: challenges, opportunities, and lessons learned for cancer immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2016;4:72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
133.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchbinder EI, Desai A. CTLA-4 and PD-1 pathways: similarities, differences, and implications of their inhibition. Am J Clin Oncol. 2016;39(1):98–106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Buchbinder EI, Desai A. CTLA-4 and PD-1 pathways: similarities, differences, and implications of their inhibition. Am J Clin Oncol. 2016;39(1):98–106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
134.
Zurück zum Zitat Krummel MF, Allison JP. CD28 and CTLA-4 have opposing effects on the response of T cells to stimulation. J Exp Med. 1995;182(2):459–65.CrossRefPubMed Krummel MF, Allison JP. CD28 and CTLA-4 have opposing effects on the response of T cells to stimulation. J Exp Med. 1995;182(2):459–65.CrossRefPubMed
135.
137.
Zurück zum Zitat Robert C, et al. Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(26):2517–26.CrossRefPubMed Robert C, et al. Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(26):2517–26.CrossRefPubMed
138.
Zurück zum Zitat Maio M, et al. Five-year survival rates for treatment-naive patients with advanced melanoma who received ipilimumab plus dacarbazine in a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(10):1191–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maio M, et al. Five-year survival rates for treatment-naive patients with advanced melanoma who received ipilimumab plus dacarbazine in a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(10):1191–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
139.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber JS, et al. Phase I/II study of ipilimumab for patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(36):5950–6.CrossRefPubMed Weber JS, et al. Phase I/II study of ipilimumab for patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(36):5950–6.CrossRefPubMed
140.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolchok JD, et al. Ipilimumab monotherapy in patients with pretreated advanced melanoma: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2, dose-ranging study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(2):155–64.CrossRefPubMed Wolchok JD, et al. Ipilimumab monotherapy in patients with pretreated advanced melanoma: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2, dose-ranging study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(2):155–64.CrossRefPubMed
142.
Zurück zum Zitat Merchant MS, et al. Phase I clinical trial of ipilimumab in pediatric patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(6):1364–70.CrossRefPubMed Merchant MS, et al. Phase I clinical trial of ipilimumab in pediatric patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(6):1364–70.CrossRefPubMed
143.
Zurück zum Zitat Feng Y, et al. Model-based clinical pharmacology profiling of ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;78(1):106–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Feng Y, et al. Model-based clinical pharmacology profiling of ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;78(1):106–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
144.
Zurück zum Zitat Postow MA, et al. Pharmacodynamic effect of ipilimumab on absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and association with overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(15 Suppl):9052. Postow MA, et al. Pharmacodynamic effect of ipilimumab on absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and association with overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(15 Suppl):9052.
145.
Zurück zum Zitat Delyon J, et al. Experience in daily practice with ipilimumab for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma: an early increase in lymphocyte and eosinophil counts is associated with improved survival. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(6):1697–703.CrossRefPubMed Delyon J, et al. Experience in daily practice with ipilimumab for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma: an early increase in lymphocyte and eosinophil counts is associated with improved survival. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(6):1697–703.CrossRefPubMed
146.
Zurück zum Zitat Simeone E, et al. Immunological and biological changes during ipilimumab treatment and their potential correlation with clinical response and survival in patients with advanced melanoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2014;63(7):675–83.CrossRefPubMed Simeone E, et al. Immunological and biological changes during ipilimumab treatment and their potential correlation with clinical response and survival in patients with advanced melanoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2014;63(7):675–83.CrossRefPubMed
147.
Zurück zum Zitat Martens A, et al. Increases in absolute lymphocytes and circulating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are associated with positive clinical outcome of melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(19):4848–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Martens A, et al. Increases in absolute lymphocytes and circulating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are associated with positive clinical outcome of melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(19):4848–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
148.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang DN, et al. Increased frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Cancer Immunol Res. 2013;1(4):229–34.CrossRefPubMedCentral Tang DN, et al. Increased frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Cancer Immunol Res. 2013;1(4):229–34.CrossRefPubMedCentral
149.
Zurück zum Zitat Feng Y, et al. Exposure-response relationships of the efficacy and safety of ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(14):3977–86.CrossRefPubMed Feng Y, et al. Exposure-response relationships of the efficacy and safety of ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(14):3977–86.CrossRefPubMed
150.
Zurück zum Zitat Queirolo P, et al. Association of CTLA-4 gene variants with response to therapy and long-term survival in metastatic melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab: an Italian melanoma intergroup study. Front Immunol. 2017;8:386.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Queirolo P, et al. Association of CTLA-4 gene variants with response to therapy and long-term survival in metastatic melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab: an Italian melanoma intergroup study. Front Immunol. 2017;8:386.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
151.
Zurück zum Zitat Breunis WB, et al. Influence of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) common polymorphisms on outcome in treatment of melanoma patients with CTLA-4 blockade. J Immunother. 2008;31(6):586–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Breunis WB, et al. Influence of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) common polymorphisms on outcome in treatment of melanoma patients with CTLA-4 blockade. J Immunother. 2008;31(6):586–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
152.
Zurück zum Zitat Romano E, et al. Ipilimumab-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity of regulatory T cells ex vivo by nonclassical monocytes in melanoma patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(19):6140–5.CrossRefPubMed Romano E, et al. Ipilimumab-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity of regulatory T cells ex vivo by nonclassical monocytes in melanoma patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(19):6140–5.CrossRefPubMed
153.
154.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu C, et al. BRAF inhibition increases tumor infiltration by T cells and enhances the antitumor activity of adoptive immunotherapy in mice. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(2):393–403.CrossRefPubMed Liu C, et al. BRAF inhibition increases tumor infiltration by T cells and enhances the antitumor activity of adoptive immunotherapy in mice. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(2):393–403.CrossRefPubMed
155.
156.
Zurück zum Zitat Comin-Anduix B, et al. The oncogenic BRAF kinase inhibitor PLX4032/RG7204 does not affect the viability or function of human lymphocytes across a wide range of concentrations. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(24):6040–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Comin-Anduix B, et al. The oncogenic BRAF kinase inhibitor PLX4032/RG7204 does not affect the viability or function of human lymphocytes across a wide range of concentrations. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(24):6040–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
157.
Zurück zum Zitat Boni A, et al. Selective BRAFV600E inhibition enhances T-cell recognition of melanoma without affecting lymphocyte function. Cancer Res. 2010;70(13):5213–9.CrossRefPubMed Boni A, et al. Selective BRAFV600E inhibition enhances T-cell recognition of melanoma without affecting lymphocyte function. Cancer Res. 2010;70(13):5213–9.CrossRefPubMed
158.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu-Lieskovan S, et al. Improved antitumor activity of immunotherapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF(V600E) melanoma. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(279):279ra41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hu-Lieskovan S, et al. Improved antitumor activity of immunotherapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF(V600E) melanoma. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(279):279ra41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
159.
Zurück zum Zitat Frederick DT, et al. BRAF inhibition is associated with enhanced melanoma antigen expression and a more favorable tumor microenvironment in patients with metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(5):1225–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Frederick DT, et al. BRAF inhibition is associated with enhanced melanoma antigen expression and a more favorable tumor microenvironment in patients with metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(5):1225–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
160.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu L, et al. The BRAF and MEK inhibitors dabrafenib and trametinib: effects on immune function and in combination with immunomodulatory antibodies targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(7):1639–51.CrossRefPubMed Liu L, et al. The BRAF and MEK inhibitors dabrafenib and trametinib: effects on immune function and in combination with immunomodulatory antibodies targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(7):1639–51.CrossRefPubMed
161.
Zurück zum Zitat Wyluda EJ, et al. Durable complete responses off all treatment in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma after sequential immunotherapy followed by a finite course of BRAF inhibitor therapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2015;16(5):662–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wyluda EJ, et al. Durable complete responses off all treatment in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma after sequential immunotherapy followed by a finite course of BRAF inhibitor therapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2015;16(5):662–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
162.
Zurück zum Zitat Ascierto PA, et al. Sequential treatment with ipilimumab and BRAF inhibitors in patients with metastatic melanoma: data from the Italian cohort of the ipilimumab expanded access program. Cancer Investig. 2014;32(4):144–9.CrossRef Ascierto PA, et al. Sequential treatment with ipilimumab and BRAF inhibitors in patients with metastatic melanoma: data from the Italian cohort of the ipilimumab expanded access program. Cancer Investig. 2014;32(4):144–9.CrossRef
163.
Zurück zum Zitat Ackerman A, et al. Outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy prior to or after BRAF inhibitors. Cancer. 2014;120(11):1695–701.CrossRefPubMed Ackerman A, et al. Outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy prior to or after BRAF inhibitors. Cancer. 2014;120(11):1695–701.CrossRefPubMed
164.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez-Cao M, et al. Fatal gastrointestinal toxicity with ipilimumab after BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination in a melanoma patient achieving pathological complete response. Oncotarget. 2016;7(35):56619–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gonzalez-Cao M, et al. Fatal gastrointestinal toxicity with ipilimumab after BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination in a melanoma patient achieving pathological complete response. Oncotarget. 2016;7(35):56619–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
165.
Zurück zum Zitat Ribas A, et al. Hepatotoxicity with combination of vemurafenib and ipilimumab. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(14):1365–6.CrossRefPubMed Ribas A, et al. Hepatotoxicity with combination of vemurafenib and ipilimumab. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(14):1365–6.CrossRefPubMed
166.
Zurück zum Zitat ClinicalTrials.gov, National Library of Medicine (US). A study of the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in combination with trametinib and dabrafenib in participants with advanced melanoma (MK-3475-022/KEYNOTE-022) [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02130466]. 29 Feb 2000. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02130466. Accessed 9 Feb 2019. ClinicalTrials.gov, National Library of Medicine (US). A study of the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in combination with trametinib and dabrafenib in participants with advanced melanoma (MK-3475-022/KEYNOTE-022) [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02130466]. 29 Feb 2000. https://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​ct2/​show/​NCT02130466. Accessed 9 Feb 2019.
167.
Zurück zum Zitat Dummer R, et al. The anti-PD-1 antibody spartalizumab (PDR001) in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib in previously untreated patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma: first efficacy, safety, and biomarker findings from the part 2 biomarker cohort of COMBi-i. Cancer Res. 2018;78(13 Suppl):abstract no. CT182. Dummer R, et al. The anti-PD-1 antibody spartalizumab (PDR001) in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib in previously untreated patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma: first efficacy, safety, and biomarker findings from the part 2 biomarker cohort of COMBi-i. Cancer Res. 2018;78(13 Suppl):abstract no. CT182.
168.
Zurück zum Zitat ClinicalTrials.gov, National Library of Medicine (US). A prospective randomized and phase 2 trial for metastatic melanoma using adoptive cell therapy with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes plus IL-2 either alone or following the administration of pembrolizumab [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02621021]. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02621021. Accessed 9 Feb 2019. ClinicalTrials.gov, National Library of Medicine (US). A prospective randomized and phase 2 trial for metastatic melanoma using adoptive cell therapy with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes plus IL-2 either alone or following the administration of pembrolizumab [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02621021]. https://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​ct2/​show/​NCT02621021. Accessed 9 Feb 2019.
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations in the (Modern) Treatment of Melanoma
verfasst von
Hannah Yejin Kim
Parth J. Upadhyay
Alia Fahmy
Xiaoman Liu
Janna K. Duong
Alan V. Boddy
Publikationsdatum
13.03.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Ausgabe 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-019-00753-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2019

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 8/2019 Zur Ausgabe