Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 12/2016

06.10.2016 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Clinical pregnancy rate following frozen embryo transfer is higher with blastocysts vitrified on day 5 than on day 6

verfasst von: Jigal Haas, Jim Meriano, Carl Laskin, Yaakov Bentov, Eran Barzilay, Robert F. Casper, Ken Cadesky

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 12/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the pregnancy rates between good quality blastocysts vitrified on day 6 versus blastocysts vitrified on day 5 after fertilization.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of 791 freeze-thaw cycles of blastocysts vitrified either on day 5 or on day 6 and transferred between January 2012 and October 2015. Five hundred and thirty-seven cycles included blastocysts vitrified on day 5, and 254 cycles included blastocysts vitrified on day 6.

Results

The age of the patients and the proportion of embryos that survived the thawing process were comparable between the two groups. More good quality embryos were transferred in the group in which blastocysts were vitrified on day 6 (1.2 vs. 1.3, p = 0.005), but the clinical pregnancy rate (44 vs. 33 %, p = 0.002) and the ongoing pregnancy rate (41 vs. 28 %, p < 0.001) were higher in the group in which blastocysts were vitrified on day 5. Multivariate regression analysis adjusting for patient’s age, number of good quality embryos transferred (≥3BB), and treatment protocol demonstrated that the day 6 vitrified group had a significantly lower clinical pregnancy rate compared to the day 5 vitrified group (OR 0.54, 95 % CI 0.38–0.76).

Conclusions

The clinical pregnancy rate following frozen embryo transfer is significantly lower with blastocysts vitrified on day 6 compared to blastocysts vitrified on day 5.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro BS et al. Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(2):389–92.CrossRefPubMed Shapiro BS et al. Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(2):389–92.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro BS et al. Clinical rationale for cryopreservation of entire embryo cohorts in lieu of fresh transfer. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(1):3–9.CrossRefPubMed Shapiro BS et al. Clinical rationale for cryopreservation of entire embryo cohorts in lieu of fresh transfer. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(1):3–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro BS et al. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):344–8.CrossRefPubMed Shapiro BS et al. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):344–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozgur K et al. Perinatal outcomes after fresh versus vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: retrospective analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(4):899–907. e3.CrossRefPubMed Ozgur K et al. Perinatal outcomes after fresh versus vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: retrospective analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(4):899–907. e3.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Thurin A et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(23):2392–402.CrossRefPubMed Thurin A et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(23):2392–402.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Lannou D et al. Contribution of embryo cryopreservation to elective single embryo transfer in IVF-ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13(3):368–75.CrossRefPubMed Le Lannou D et al. Contribution of embryo cryopreservation to elective single embryo transfer in IVF-ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13(3):368–75.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Karaki RZ et al. Blastocyst culture and transfer: a step toward improved in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(1):114–8.CrossRefPubMed Karaki RZ et al. Blastocyst culture and transfer: a step toward improved in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(1):114–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Schroder AK et al. Cumulative pregnancy rates and drop-out rates in a German IVF programme: 4102 cycles in 2130 patients. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;8(5):600–6.CrossRefPubMed Schroder AK et al. Cumulative pregnancy rates and drop-out rates in a German IVF programme: 4102 cycles in 2130 patients. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;8(5):600–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Glujovsky D et al. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;7:CD002118. Glujovsky D et al. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;7:CD002118.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarzler P et al. Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(9):2097–102.CrossRefPubMed Schwarzler P et al. Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(9):2097–102.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrenetxea G et al. Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(1):49–53.CrossRefPubMed Barrenetxea G et al. Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(1):49–53.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R, editor. Towards reproductive certainty. Carnforth: Parthenon; 1999. p. 378–88. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R, editor. Towards reproductive certainty. Carnforth: Parthenon; 1999. p. 378–88.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Elgindy E, Elsedeek MS. Day 5 expanded blastocysts transferred on same day have comparable outcome to those left for more extended culture and transferred on day 6. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(10):1111–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elgindy E, Elsedeek MS. Day 5 expanded blastocysts transferred on same day have comparable outcome to those left for more extended culture and transferred on day 6. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(10):1111–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashimoto S et al. Growth retardation in human blastocysts increases the incidence of abnormal spindles and decreases implantation potential after vitrification. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(6):1528–35.CrossRefPubMed Hashimoto S et al. Growth retardation in human blastocysts increases the incidence of abnormal spindles and decreases implantation potential after vitrification. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(6):1528–35.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro BS et al. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):20–6.CrossRefPubMed Shapiro BS et al. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):20–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Liebermann J, Tucker MJ. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(1):20–6.CrossRefPubMed Liebermann J, Tucker MJ. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(1):20–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Behr B et al. Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(4):697–9.CrossRefPubMed Behr B et al. Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(4):697–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Richter KS et al. Cryopreserved embryo transfers suggest that endometrial receptivity may contribute to reduced success rates of later developing embryos. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(4):862–6.CrossRefPubMed Richter KS et al. Cryopreserved embryo transfers suggest that endometrial receptivity may contribute to reduced success rates of later developing embryos. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(4):862–6.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sunkara SK et al. The influence of delayed blastocyst formation on the outcome of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(8):1906–15.CrossRefPubMed Sunkara SK et al. The influence of delayed blastocyst formation on the outcome of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(8):1906–15.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kroener L et al. The effect of timing of embryonic progression on chromosomal abnormality. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(4):876–80.CrossRefPubMed Kroener L et al. The effect of timing of embryonic progression on chromosomal abnormality. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(4):876–80.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Capalbo A et al. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1173–81.CrossRefPubMed Capalbo A et al. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1173–81.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor TH et al. Comparison of aneuploidy, pregnancy and live birth rates between day 5 and day 6 blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(3):305–10.CrossRefPubMed Taylor TH et al. Comparison of aneuploidy, pregnancy and live birth rates between day 5 and day 6 blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(3):305–10.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical pregnancy rate following frozen embryo transfer is higher with blastocysts vitrified on day 5 than on day 6
verfasst von
Jigal Haas
Jim Meriano
Carl Laskin
Yaakov Bentov
Eran Barzilay
Robert F. Casper
Ken Cadesky
Publikationsdatum
06.10.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 12/2016
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0818-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2016

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 12/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.