Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 3/2019

05.07.2018 | Original Article

Clinical results of a dorsally positioned hydraulic ID-sling in male patients with post-prostatectomy-incontinence

verfasst von: Sabina Sevcenco, Peter Nyirady, Attila Majoros, Lukas Lusuardi, Hans-Christoph Klingler

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To prospectively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of and the long-term experience with a re-adjustable hydraulic sling (ID-sling) device positioned dorsally to the urethra for the treatment of male post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI).

Materials and methods

Between September 2007 and November 2009 13 patients with persisting SUI were treated consecutively with an ID-sling™ in two European tertiary centers by a single surgeon. Physical examinations and standardized questionnaires (ICIQ-SF + VAS), pad tests, and 24-h pad number counts were performed at baseline and during follow-up.

Results

The implantation of the hydraulic cuff was uncomplicated in all cases. The ICIQ-SF score diminished from a preoperative mean value of 18 to a mean of five postoperatively. One patient remained completely dry with normal micturition. All patients demonstrated a mild improvement at primary filling but did not show any significant improvement after the second or any subsequent filling. In total, 1/13 (7.7%) patients were completely dry and 5/13 (38.4%) showed improved continence. In 6/13 (46.2%) patients, satisfactory continence results according to subjective criteria, were not achieved. Subsequently, artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation was offered to one patient (7.7%) after 12 months and to ten patients (76,9%) after 24 months.

Conclusions

The implantation of a dorsally placed hydraulic sling is a not yet standardized and complex procedure, even for the experienced surgeon. To date, this implantation method is not an alternative to other devices. An improved sling design is necessary to simplify the surgical procedure and to improve long-term stability.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsson LE, Salomon L, Nadu A et al (2001) Prospective patient-reported continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 58:570–572CrossRefPubMed Olsson LE, Salomon L, Nadu A et al (2001) Prospective patient-reported continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 58:570–572CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooperberg MR, Master VA, Carroll PR (2003) Health related quality of life significance of single pad urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 170:512–515CrossRefPubMed Cooperberg MR, Master VA, Carroll PR (2003) Health related quality of life significance of single pad urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 170:512–515CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Trigo Rocha F, Gomes CM, Mitre AI, Arap S, Srougi M (2008) A prospective study evaluating the efficacy of the artificial sphincter AMS 800 for the treatment of postradical prostatectomy urinary incontinence and the correlation between preoperative urodynamic and surgical outcomes. Urology 71:85–89CrossRefPubMed Trigo Rocha F, Gomes CM, Mitre AI, Arap S, Srougi M (2008) A prospective study evaluating the efficacy of the artificial sphincter AMS 800 for the treatment of postradical prostatectomy urinary incontinence and the correlation between preoperative urodynamic and surgical outcomes. Urology 71:85–89CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson LC, Gilling PJ (2011) Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a review of surgical treatment options. BJU Int 107(Suppl 3):7–10CrossRefPubMed Wilson LC, Gilling PJ (2011) Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a review of surgical treatment options. BJU Int 107(Suppl 3):7–10CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW (1974) Treatment of urinary incontinence by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter. J Urol 112:75–80CrossRefPubMed Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW (1974) Treatment of urinary incontinence by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter. J Urol 112:75–80CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Hubner W, Nitti VW, Novara G (2011) Contemporary management of postprostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol 59:985–996CrossRefPubMed Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Hubner W, Nitti VW, Novara G (2011) Contemporary management of postprostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol 59:985–996CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kretschmer A, Hübner W, Sandhu JS, Bauer RM (2016) Evaluation and management of postprostatectomy incontinence: a systematic review of current literature. Eur Urol Focus 2(3):245–259CrossRefPubMed Kretschmer A, Hübner W, Sandhu JS, Bauer RM (2016) Evaluation and management of postprostatectomy incontinence: a systematic review of current literature. Eur Urol Focus 2(3):245–259CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kretschmer A, Nitti V (2017) Surgical treatment of male postprostatectomy incontinence: current concepts. Eur Urol Focus 3(4–5):364–376CrossRefPubMed Kretschmer A, Nitti V (2017) Surgical treatment of male postprostatectomy incontinence: current concepts. Eur Urol Focus 3(4–5):364–376CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bauer RM, Bastian PJ, Gozzi C, Stief CG (2009) Postprostatectomy incontinence: all about diagnosis and management. Eur Urol 55:322–333CrossRefPubMed Bauer RM, Bastian PJ, Gozzi C, Stief CG (2009) Postprostatectomy incontinence: all about diagnosis and management. Eur Urol 55:322–333CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Margreiter M, Farr A, Sharma V, Schauer I, Klingler HC (2013) Urethral buttressing in patients undergoing artificial urinary sphincter surgery. J Urol 189:1777–1781CrossRefPubMed Margreiter M, Farr A, Sharma V, Schauer I, Klingler HC (2013) Urethral buttressing in patients undergoing artificial urinary sphincter surgery. J Urol 189:1777–1781CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lucas MG, Bosch RJ, Burkhard FC, Cruz F, Madden TB (2012) European Association of Urology, EAU guidelines on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 62:1118–1129CrossRefPubMed Lucas MG, Bosch RJ, Burkhard FC, Cruz F, Madden TB (2012) European Association of Urology, EAU guidelines on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 62:1118–1129CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hubner WA, Gallistl H, Rutkowski M, Huber ER (2011) Adjustable bulbourethral male sling: experience after 101 cases of moderate-to-severe male stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 107:777–782CrossRefPubMed Hubner WA, Gallistl H, Rutkowski M, Huber ER (2011) Adjustable bulbourethral male sling: experience after 101 cases of moderate-to-severe male stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 107:777–782CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat James MH, McCammon KA (2014) Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a review. Int J Urol 21:536–543CrossRefPubMed James MH, McCammon KA (2014) Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a review. Int J Urol 21:536–543CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Elliott DS, Barrett DM (1998) Mayo clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: a review of 323 cases. J Urol 159:1206–1208CrossRefPubMed Elliott DS, Barrett DM (1998) Mayo clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: a review of 323 cases. J Urol 159:1206–1208CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SP, Sarmast Z, Daignault S, Faerber GJ, McGuire EJ (2008) Long-term durability and functional outcomes among patients with artificial urinary sphincters: a 10-year retrospective review from the University of Michigan. J Urol 179:1912–1916CrossRefPubMed Kim SP, Sarmast Z, Daignault S, Faerber GJ, McGuire EJ (2008) Long-term durability and functional outcomes among patients with artificial urinary sphincters: a 10-year retrospective review from the University of Michigan. J Urol 179:1912–1916CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar A, Litt ER, Ballert KN, Nitti VW (2009) Artificial urinary sphincter versus male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence—what do patients choose? J Urol 181:1231–1235CrossRefPubMed Kumar A, Litt ER, Ballert KN, Nitti VW (2009) Artificial urinary sphincter versus male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence—what do patients choose? J Urol 181:1231–1235CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Welk BK, Herschorn S (2012) The male sling for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a review of contemporary sling designs and outcomes. BJU Int 109:328–344CrossRefPubMed Welk BK, Herschorn S (2012) The male sling for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a review of contemporary sling designs and outcomes. BJU Int 109:328–344CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical results of a dorsally positioned hydraulic ID-sling in male patients with post-prostatectomy-incontinence
verfasst von
Sabina Sevcenco
Peter Nyirady
Attila Majoros
Lukas Lusuardi
Hans-Christoph Klingler
Publikationsdatum
05.07.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2391-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

World Journal of Urology 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.