Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Investigational New Drugs 1/2018

13.10.2017 | REVIEW

Clinical toxicity of antibody drug conjugates: a meta-analysis of payloads

verfasst von: Joanna C. Masters, Dana J. Nickens, Dawei Xuan, Ronald L. Shazer, Michael Amantea

Erschienen in: Investigational New Drugs | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Background Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) utilize a monoclonal antibody to deliver a cytotoxic payload specifically to tumor cells, limiting exposure to healthy tissues. Major clinical toxicities of ADCs include hematologic, hepatic, neurologic, and ophthalmic events, which are often dose-limiting. These events may be off-target effects caused by premature release of payload in circulation. A meta-analysis was performed to summarize key clinical safety data for ADCs by payload, and data permitting, establish a dose-response model for toxicity incidence as a function of payload, dose/regimen, and cancer type. Methods A literature search was performed to identify and extract data from clinical ADC studies. Toxicity incidence and severity were collected by treatment arm for anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, hepatic toxicity, peripheral neuropathy, and ocular toxicity. Exploratory plots, descriptive summaries, and logistic regression modelling were used to explore Grade ≥ 3 (G3/4) toxicities and assess the impact of covariates, including cancer type and dose/regimen. Results The dataset contained 70 publications; quantitative analysis included 43 studies with G3/4 toxicity information reported for the endpoints above. G3/4 anemia, neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy were consistently reported for MMAE ADCs, thrombocytopenia and hepatic toxicity for DM1, and ocular toxicity for MMAF. Safety profiles of MMAE, DM1, and DM4 ADCs differed between solid and hematologic cancers. Conclusions Published ADC clinical data is limited by non-uniform reporting for toxicity and lack of dosing information, limiting the ability to develop quantitative models relating toxicity to exposure. However, the current analysis suggests that key G3/4 toxicities of ADCs in the clinic are likely off-target and related to payload.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Agresti AC, Brent A (1998) Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Stat 52(2):119–126 Agresti AC, Brent A (1998) Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Stat 52(2):119–126
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical toxicity of antibody drug conjugates: a meta-analysis of payloads
verfasst von
Joanna C. Masters
Dana J. Nickens
Dawei Xuan
Ronald L. Shazer
Michael Amantea
Publikationsdatum
13.10.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Investigational New Drugs / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-017-0520-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Investigational New Drugs 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.