Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics 4/2009

01.08.2009 | Original Paper

Clinical value of motor evoked potentials with transcranial magnetic stimulation in the assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis

verfasst von: Xinyu Liu, Shunsuke Konno, Masabumi Miyamoto, Yoshikazu Gembun, Gen Horiguchi, Hiromoto Ito

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 4/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of assessing motor evoked potentials (MEP) in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Twenty-three LSS patients were enrolled. The preoperative data of MEP latency (MEPLT), clinical symptoms, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores for low back pain, visual analogue scale (VAS) for back pain, leg pain and numbness, walking distance and the minimal cross-sectional area (mCSA) of the dural sac were evaluated. The mean MEPLT was 42.1 ± 2.8 ms. Fourteen patients had bilateral leg symptoms. The mean walking distance and mCSA were 302.1 ± 302.8 m and 0.4 ± 0.2 cm2, respectively. The mean JOA score and VAS scores for back pain, leg pain and numbness were 15.9 ± 4.8, 6.0 ± 2.9, 7.7 ± 1.9 and 7.3 ± 3.0, respectively. MEPLT was related to the walking distance, limb symptoms and the VAS for numbness. MEPLT was significantly delayed in patients who showed a walking distance less than 500 m. MEP is useful in LSS assessment. It can reflect the subjective severity of motor disturbance and predict the neurological deficit prior to appearance.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Aalto TJ, Malmivaara A, Kovacs F, Herno A, Alen M, Salmi L, Kröger H, Andrade J, Jiménez R, Tapaninaho A, Turunen V, Savolainen S, Airaksinen O (2006) Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review. Spine 31:E648–E663PubMedCrossRef Aalto TJ, Malmivaara A, Kovacs F, Herno A, Alen M, Salmi L, Kröger H, Andrade J, Jiménez R, Tapaninaho A, Turunen V, Savolainen S, Airaksinen O (2006) Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review. Spine 31:E648–E663PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Adamova B, Vohanka S, Dusek L (2003) Differential diagnostics in patients with mild lumbar spinal stenosis: the contributions and limits of various tests. Eur Spine J 12:190–196PubMed Adamova B, Vohanka S, Dusek L (2003) Differential diagnostics in patients with mild lumbar spinal stenosis: the contributions and limits of various tests. Eur Spine J 12:190–196PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Adamova B, Vohanka S, Dusek L (2005) Dynamic electrophysiological examination in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: is it useful in clinical practice? Eur Spine J 14:269–276PubMedCrossRef Adamova B, Vohanka S, Dusek L (2005) Dynamic electrophysiological examination in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: is it useful in clinical practice? Eur Spine J 14:269–276PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Robson D, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2000) Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 25:556–562PubMedCrossRef Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Robson D, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2000) Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 25:556–562PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Banerjee TK, Mostofi MS, Us O, Weerasinghe V, Sedgwick EM (1993) Magnetic stimulation in the determination of lumbosacral motor radiculopathy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 89:221–226PubMedCrossRef Banerjee TK, Mostofi MS, Us O, Weerasinghe V, Sedgwick EM (1993) Magnetic stimulation in the determination of lumbosacral motor radiculopathy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 89:221–226PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Baramki HG, Steffen T, Schondorf R, Aebi M (1999) Motor conduction alterations in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis following the onset of neurogenic claudication. Eur Spine J 8:411–416PubMedCrossRef Baramki HG, Steffen T, Schondorf R, Aebi M (1999) Motor conduction alterations in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis following the onset of neurogenic claudication. Eur Spine J 8:411–416PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bischoff C, Meyer BU, Machetanz J, Conrad B (1993) The value of magnetic stimulation in the diagnosis of radiculopathies. Muscle Nerve 16:154–161PubMedCrossRef Bischoff C, Meyer BU, Machetanz J, Conrad B (1993) The value of magnetic stimulation in the diagnosis of radiculopathies. Muscle Nerve 16:154–161PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Deen HG Jr, Zimmerman RS, Lyons MK, McPhee MC, Verheijde JL, Lemens SM (1995) Measurement of exercise tolerance on the treadmill in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a useful indicator of functional status and surgical outcome. J Neurosurg 83:27–30PubMedCrossRef Deen HG Jr, Zimmerman RS, Lyons MK, McPhee MC, Verheijde JL, Lemens SM (1995) Measurement of exercise tolerance on the treadmill in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a useful indicator of functional status and surgical outcome. J Neurosurg 83:27–30PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Lazzaro V, Pilato F, Oliviero A, Saturno E, Dileone M, Tonali PA (2004) Role of motor evoked potentials in diagnosis of cauda equina and lumbosacral cord lesions. Neurology 63:2266–2271PubMed Di Lazzaro V, Pilato F, Oliviero A, Saturno E, Dileone M, Tonali PA (2004) Role of motor evoked potentials in diagnosis of cauda equina and lumbosacral cord lesions. Neurology 63:2266–2271PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Egli D, Hausmann O, Schmid M, Boos N, Dietz V, Curt A (2007) Lumbar spinal stenosis: assessment of cauda equina involvement by electrophysiological recordings. J Neurol 254:741–750PubMedCrossRef Egli D, Hausmann O, Schmid M, Boos N, Dietz V, Curt A (2007) Lumbar spinal stenosis: assessment of cauda equina involvement by electrophysiological recordings. J Neurol 254:741–750PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh KJ, Khalifa W, Anslow P, Cadoux-Hudson T, Donaghy M (2004) The clinical syndrome associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Neurol 52:242–249PubMedCrossRef Goh KJ, Khalifa W, Anslow P, Cadoux-Hudson T, Donaghy M (2004) The clinical syndrome associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Neurol 52:242–249PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Haig AJ, Geisser ME, Tong HC, Yamakawa KS, Quint DJ, Hoff JT, Chiodo A, Miner JA, Phalke VV (2007) Electromyographic and magnetic resonance imaging to predict lumbar stenosis, low-back pain, and no back symptoms. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:358–366PubMedCrossRef Haig AJ, Geisser ME, Tong HC, Yamakawa KS, Quint DJ, Hoff JT, Chiodo A, Miner JA, Phalke VV (2007) Electromyographic and magnetic resonance imaging to predict lumbar stenosis, low-back pain, and no back symptoms. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:358–366PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Haro H, Maekawa S, Hamada Y (2008) Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. Spine J 8:380–384PubMedCrossRef Haro H, Maekawa S, Hamada Y (2008) Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. Spine J 8:380–384PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz JN, Stucki G, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN (1999) Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 24:2229–2233PubMedCrossRef Katz JN, Stucki G, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN (1999) Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 24:2229–2233PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lang E, Hilz MJ, Erxleben H, Ernst M, Neundörfer B, Liebig K (2002) Reversible prolongation of motor conduction time after transcranial magnetic brain stimulation after neurogenic claudication in spinal stenosis. Spine 27:2284–2290PubMedCrossRef Lang E, Hilz MJ, Erxleben H, Ernst M, Neundörfer B, Liebig K (2002) Reversible prolongation of motor conduction time after transcranial magnetic brain stimulation after neurogenic claudication in spinal stenosis. Spine 27:2284–2290PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Leinonen V, Määttä S, Taimela S, Herno A, Kankaanpää M, Partanen J (2002) Impaired lumbar movement perception in association with postural stability and motor- and somatosensory-evoked potentials in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 27:975–983PubMedCrossRef Leinonen V, Määttä S, Taimela S, Herno A, Kankaanpää M, Partanen J (2002) Impaired lumbar movement perception in association with postural stability and motor- and somatosensory-evoked potentials in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 27:975–983PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lohman CM, Tallroth K, Kettunen JA, Lindgren KA (2006) Comparison of radiologic signs and clinical symptoms of spinal stenosis. Spine 31:1834–1840PubMedCrossRef Lohman CM, Tallroth K, Kettunen JA, Lindgren KA (2006) Comparison of radiologic signs and clinical symptoms of spinal stenosis. Spine 31:1834–1840PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng LC, Tafazal S, Sell P (2007) The effect of duration of symptoms on standard outcome measures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 16:199–206PubMedCrossRef Ng LC, Tafazal S, Sell P (2007) The effect of duration of symptoms on standard outcome measures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 16:199–206PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ogikubo O, Forsberg L, Hansson T (2007) The relationship between the cross-sectional area of the cauda equina and the preoperative symptoms in central lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 32:1423–1428PubMedCrossRef Ogikubo O, Forsberg L, Hansson T (2007) The relationship between the cross-sectional area of the cauda equina and the preoperative symptoms in central lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 32:1423–1428PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sato K, Kikuchi S (1997) Clinical analysis of two-level compression of the cauda equina and the nerve roots in lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine 22:1898–1903PubMedCrossRef Sato K, Kikuchi S (1997) Clinical analysis of two-level compression of the cauda equina and the nerve roots in lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine 22:1898–1903PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sato K, Konno S, Yabuki S, Mao GP, Olmarker K, Kikuchi S (1995) A model for acute, chronic, and delayed graded compression of the dog cauda equina. Neurophysiologic and histologic changes induced by acute, graded compression. Spine 20:2386–2391PubMedCrossRef Sato K, Konno S, Yabuki S, Mao GP, Olmarker K, Kikuchi S (1995) A model for acute, chronic, and delayed graded compression of the dog cauda equina. Neurophysiologic and histologic changes induced by acute, graded compression. Spine 20:2386–2391PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tobimatsu S, Sun SJ, Fukui R, Kato M (1998) Effects of sex, height and age on motor evoked potentials with magnetic stimulation. J Neurol 245:256–261PubMedCrossRef Tobimatsu S, Sun SJ, Fukui R, Kato M (1998) Effects of sex, height and age on motor evoked potentials with magnetic stimulation. J Neurol 245:256–261PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamashita K, Aono H, Yamasaki R (2007) Clinical classification of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis based on their leg pain syndrome: its correlation with 2-year surgical outcome. Spine 32:980–985PubMedCrossRef Yamashita K, Aono H, Yamasaki R (2007) Clinical classification of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis based on their leg pain syndrome: its correlation with 2-year surgical outcome. Spine 32:980–985PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Yukawa Y, Lenke LG, Tenhula J, Bridwell KH, Riew KD, Blanke K (2002) A comprehensive study of patients with surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1954–1959PubMed Yukawa Y, Lenke LG, Tenhula J, Bridwell KH, Riew KD, Blanke K (2002) A comprehensive study of patients with surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1954–1959PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Zanoli G, Strömqvist B, Jönsson B (2001) Visual analog scales for interpretation of back and leg pain intensity in patients operated for degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Spine 26:2375–2380PubMedCrossRef Zanoli G, Strömqvist B, Jönsson B (2001) Visual analog scales for interpretation of back and leg pain intensity in patients operated for degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Spine 26:2375–2380PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical value of motor evoked potentials with transcranial magnetic stimulation in the assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis
verfasst von
Xinyu Liu
Shunsuke Konno
Masabumi Miyamoto
Yoshikazu Gembun
Gen Horiguchi
Hiromoto Ito
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0604-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2009

International Orthopaedics 4/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.