22.10.2016 | Correspondence
Clinically Significant IgM Anti-Cw: A Rare Report
verfasst von:
Nishant Saini, Tanvi Sood, Ravneet Kaur, Kshitija Mittal, Rakesh Kumar, Paramjit Kaur
Erschienen in:
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
|
Ausgabe 2/2017
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Excerpt
A 23-year-old primigravida Rh ‘D’ negative female visited the Rh clinic for indirect antiglobulin test (IAT). Her blood group was B Rh D negative and her husband’s blood group was B Rh D positive. IAT was positive (strength +3) by gel technique (ID-Micro Typing System, DiaMed AG 1785 Cressier, Switzerland) on LISS/Coombs cards (DiaMed GmbH 1785 Cressier, Switzerland) using commercial pooled cells (ID-DiaCell pool DiaMed GmbH 1785 Cressier, Switzerland). Further, anti-Cw antibody was identified on antibody screen (ID-DiaCell I–II–III, DiaMed GmbH 1785 Cressier, Switzerland) and identification (ID-DiaCell Panel, DiaMed GmbH 1785 Cressier, Switzerland). Anti-Cw showed wide thermal amplitude by tube technique (room temperature +1, 4 °C +2 and 37 °C +1). Antibody was IgM type as antibody screen after dithiothreitol (DTT) treatment using proper controls was negative. Both wife and husband were negative for Cw antigen. There was no history of blood transfusion in the patient. For other Rh antigens, the patient’s red cells typed as C+ c− E+ e− and her husband’s as C+ c+ E+ e+. Antibody titres by tube technique were negative in 1:2, however by gel technique they were 1:8. The patient delivered at 37 weeks and the baby’s haemoglobin was 19.2 gm/dl and serum bilirubin of cord sample was 5.6 mg/dl. Baby’s blood group was B Rh D positive and direct antiglobulin test (DAT) was negative using polyspecific antihuman globulin (Biorad Diaclon Coombs sera, polyvalent rabbit anti-IgG and monoclonal anti-C3d). Newborn’s red cells were negative for Cw antigen. …