Zum Inhalt

Clostridioides difficile concentration-dependant alterations in gut microbiota of asymptomatic infants

  • Open Access
  • 01.12.2025
  • Research
Erschienen in:

Abstract

Background

Asymptomatic carriage of Clostridioides difficile is highly prevalent in early infancy, affecting approximately 40% of infants. This phenomenon offers a unique opportunity to study its impact on the gut microbiota without the confounding effects of disease. In this study, we analysed C. difficile-associated gut microbiome alterations in 76 asymptomatic infants, one year after receiving antibiotic treatment during early infancy. The presence and concentration of C. difficile were assessed in relation to gut microbiota structure and an extensive set of metadata.

Results

Bacterial gut community structure was characterized using 16 S rRNA amplicon sequencing, while C. difficile concentration and the presence of the tcdB gene were quantified via digital PCR. C. difficile was detected in 36.8% of infants, with 10.5% testing positive for the tcdB gene. Significant alterations in gut microbiota were observed in relation to C. difficile concentration. Specifically, higher C. difficile loads were associated with reduced microbial diversity, greater deviations from average community structure, and co-occurrence with the genus Escherichia. Conversely, C. difficile colonization alone or the presence of the tcdB gene did not result in significant gut microbiota alterations. Additionally, no host-specific factors were significantly linked to C. difficile prevalence or concentration.

Conclusions

Asymptomatic carriage of C. difficile in neonates is not associated with significant gut microbiota alterations unless pathogen concentration is considered. Our findings suggest that elevated C. difficile proliferation occurs in dysbiotic infant gut microbiota, characterized by reduced alpha diversity and an increase in Escherichia.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-025-00687-3.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Background

Prevalence of asymptomatic colonization with Clostridioides difficile in infants is estimated at approximately 40% [1], however varies considerably according to geographic location, age, breastfeeding, and underlying medical conditions [2, 3]. Colonization rates with both toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains peak in the first year of life before declining after the age of 2 [1, 4], with considerable disparities in reported prevalences across various studies [58]. However, symptomatic C. difficile infection (CDI) remains low in infants, ranging from 2.6 to 4 cases per 1000 admissions [9] and 7.24 to 12.80 CDI-related hospitalizations per 10.000 [10], both reported in the United States of America.
In adults, the development of CDI is often preceded by disruption in the gut microbiota leading to decreased colonization resistance [11]. The disruption is commonly attributed to antibiotic therapy, age, and other underlying gastrointestinal complications [1215]. Consequently, the microbiota associated with CDI typically displays dysbiosis, characterized by lower diversity and reduced relative abundance of Bacteroidota (previously Bacteroidetes) and Bacillota (previously Firmicutes), with subsequent increase in Pseudomonadota (previously Proteobacteria) [16]. Notably, asymptomatic colonization with C. difficile has also been linked to adverse effects on gut microbiota composition, suggesting the bacterium’s active role in inducing alterations to facilitate its own proliferation [17, 18]. This phenomenon has been further demonstrated in vitro, showing ribotype-specific effect of C. difficile on infant’s gut microbiota [19] and adult dysbiotic microbiota [20].
Understanding of gut microbiota in correlation to C. difficile in infants remains limited to a few studies. The most notable among them is a large study involving longitudinal surveillance of 817 children up to 2 years of age, which found no significant association between C. difficile colonization and specific gut microbiota characteristics [3]. Conversely, other studies have reported conflicting results, with some indicating reduced microbiota diversity [21, 22], while others suggest increased diversity in C. difficile colonized children [5]. Additionally, the taxa found to be differentially abundant vary considerably across studies, underscoring substantial, unexplained cohort-specific variability.
In this study, we present findings on C. difficile colonization and concentration-specific microbiota characteristics in a cohort of 76 infants who received antibiotic therapy during neonatal period. Furthermore, we explore potential risk factors associated with C. difficile status by analysing extensive metadata collected at an early age.

Methods

Sample collection

The stool samples used in this study were collected as part of a previously published study [23]. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at three Slovenian neonatal units between November 2016 and March 2019. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02865564) and received approval from the National Medical Ethics Committee (No. 89/03/15). Detailed methodologies are provided in [23]. Briefly, stool samples used in this study were obtained from 76 infants along with clinical, anthropometric, demographic and feeding data. The inclusion criteria into original study were antibiotic administration for suspected early or late neonatal sepsis for at least five days (ampicillin/flucloxacillin and gentamicin), at the age of less than 21 days, and gestational age of at least 37 weeks. In present study, we included only stool samples collected from these infants at follow-up visit, one year after the completion of antibiotic treatment. None of the infants included in this study were diagnosed with or actively treated for C. difficile infection during the study period.

Total DNA isolation

Stool samples were collected in sealed sterile containers and promptly refrigerated for less than 24 h before storage at − 80 °C for subsequent analyses. Initially, suspensions of stool samples weighing between 0.1 and 0.5 g were prepared in Ringer’s solution, diluted at a ratio of 1:100. Following centrifugation at 3600 g for 10 min at 10 °C, the resultant pellet underwent lysis and sonication according to the methodology outlined by Matijašić et al. 2014 [24]. DNA extraction was then carried out using the automated Maxwell 16 System protocol (Promega, USA).

C. difficile and tcdB quantification

Number of copies of C. difficile 16S rRNA gene and toxin tcdB gene were determined using digital PCR (dPCR) technology on the QX200 system (Bio-Rad, USA), employing ddPCR EvaGreen Supermix (Bio-Rad, USA) for fluorescence detection with C. difficile specific primers Fcdiff (5‘-TTGAGCGATTTACTTCGGTAAAGA-3’) and Rcdiff (5’-CCATCCTGTACTGGCTCACCT-3’) [25] and tcdB gene specific primers TcdB_398F (5’- GAAAGTCCAAGTTTACGCTCAAT-3’) and TcdB_399R (5’- GCTGCACCTAAACTTACACCA-3’) [26]. The dPCR analysis was performed to quantify the absolute number of copies of C. difficile per ng of DNA. To achieve this, droplet PCR events were normalized to the input DNA concentration, which was assessed using the Quant-iT™ PicoGreen™ dsDNA Assay (ThermoFisher, USA).

Microbiota 16S amplicon sequencing and statistical analysis

Bacterial community structure was acquired through targeted amplicon sequencing of the V3-V4 variable region of the 16S rRNA gene utilizing the primer pair Bakt_341F (5’-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3’)-Bakt_805R (5’-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3’) [17]. Sequencing was conducted on the MiSeq Illumina platform (2 × 300 bp, Illumina, USA). Sequence data processing involved quality filtering of reads and construction of Zero-radius Operational Taxonomic Unit (ZOTUs) using the UNOISE3 pipeline implemented in USEARCH v.11.0.667 [27, 28] with default settings except the addition of parameter -fastq-minlen 400 (fastq_filter command). Taxonomy was assigned using the RDP trainset (version 18). The sequencing data generated in this study are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number PRJNA954698.
Statistical analysis and visualization of the microbiome data was performed in R (v4.2.2, R Core Team, 2022) implementing packages ‘vegan’, ‘picante’ and ‘ggplot’. Alpha diversity was presented as Faith’s phylogenetic diversity calculated based on neighbour-joining tree constructed from ZOTU representative sequences and Shannon diversity index. Beta diversity analysis was conducted using Bray-Curtis dissimilarities. Differences in community composition between groups were evaluated with permutation-based test ANOSIM (R package ‘vegan’).

Results

Our dataset comprises 76 infants who all underwent antibiotic treatment within the first 3 weeks of life. Stool samples were collected one year after treatment completion. In our cohort, we observed a C. difficile colonization rate of 36.8% (95% CI: 26.0-47.7%), out of which 28.6% (95% CI: 11.9–45.3%) were toxigenic based on the presence of tcdB gene. None of the cases resulted in hospitalization due to C. difficile infection. Several cases reported diarrhoea in the previous 6 months (Table 1); however, its association with C. difficile was not confirmed (clinical investigations have not been performed).

Subject metadata correlation with C. difficile colonization and concentration

C. difficile colonization and concentration was analysed in relation to an extensive set of subject metadata. Risk for C. difficile colonization did not significantly correlate with metadata collected, including factors typically associated with CDI in adults such as antibiotic use and hospitalization (Table 1).
Table 1
Correlation between C. difficile colonization and concentration with subject-collected metadata. Fisher’s exact test was employed for categorical environmental values, and student’s t-test was utilized for comparing distributions of continuous environmental values when addressing C. difficile colonization status. Wilcoxon test was applied for categorical environmental values, and Pearson’s correlation was used for continuous environmental values when analysing C. difficile concentration associations. None of the categories in metadata yielded statistically significant correlation with C. difficile status beyond the 0.05 significance threshold. Data on maternal antibiotic use was available only for breastfeeding mothers
 
C. difficile colonization status
C. difficile concentration
Categorical environmental factors
Percent colonized [%]
Significance (p value)
Significance (p value)
Gender (Male/Female)
37.0 / 36.6
1.000
0.547
Diarrhoea between 1 and 6 months of age (Yes/No)
42.9 / 39.6
1.000
0.586
Diarrhoea between 6 and- 12 months of age (Yes/No)
50.0 / 37.3
0.495
0.679
Visit to the doctor between 1 and 6 months of age (Yes/No)
39.6 / 35.7
1.000
0.570
Visit to the doctor between 6 and 12 months of age (Yes/No)
40.4 / 30.8
0.753
0.111
Hospitalization between 1 and 6 months of age (Yes/No)
37.5 / 39.0
1.000
0.157
Hospitalization between 6 and 12 months of age (Yes/No)
53.3 / 34.5
0.236
0.075
Antibiotics between 1 and 6 months of age (Yes/No)
39.1 / 38.6
1.000
0.650
Antibiotics between 6 and 12 months of age (Yes/No)
43.8 / 34.2
0.466
0.312
Probiotics between 2 and 12 months of age (Yes/No)
42.1 / 31.6
0.476
0.159
Delivery mode (Caesarean section/vaginal)
28.6 / 37.1
1.000
0.480
Breastfed at 6 months (Yes/No)
50.0 / 50.0
1.000
0.894
Mother - antibiotics between 1 and 6 months of child’s age (Yes/No)
33.3 / 33.3
1.000
0.250
Mother - antibiotics between 1 and 6 months of child’s age (Yes/No)
33.3 / 33.3
1.000
0.250
Continuous environmental factors
Mean (SD)
Significance (p value)
Significance (p value)
Gestational age [weeks] (Colonized/non-colonized)
39.6 (1.0) / 39.4 (1.2)
0.456
0.638
Weight at birth [g] (Colonized/non-colonized)
3567 (518) / 3536 (500)
0.805
0.757

C. difficile concentration dependant alterations in gut microbiota composition

C. difficile colonization was in our cohort not associated with specific microbial community structure characteristics. No significant differences were found in either alpha diversity (Shannon diversity, p = 0.235; Faith’s phylogenetic diversity, p = 0.245) or beta diversity (ANOSIM, p = 0.369) (Fig. 1A and B). Furthermore, among C. difficile colonized, no differences between tcdB positive and negative samples were found in either alpha (Shannon diversity, p = 0.980; Faith’s phylogenetic diversity, p = 0.823) or beta diversity (ANOSIM, p = 0.220) (Fig. 1B). Finally, population level analysis did not yield any differentially abundant taxa between C. difficile colonized and non-colonized infants.
On the other hand, we found strong associations between microbiome composition and C. difficile concentration. Higher concentration of C. difficile was significantly positively correlated with the mean Bray-Curtis dissimilarity from the cohort average (Spearman’s rho = 0.595, p = 0.001; Fig. 1C), indicating alterations in community composition, found to be predominantly associated with decreased alpha diversity. While concentration-associated decreases in both richness and diversity were observed (observed ZOTUs, p = 0.016; Shannon diversity, p = 0.017; Shannon evenness, p = 0.044; Supplementary Fig. 1), the correlation was most significant with Faith’s phylogenetic diversity (Spearman’s rho = -0.514, p = 0.005, Fig. 1D). The lowest alpha diversity was observed in samples with highest concentrations of C. difficile, but group minimum values were comparable to those observed in the group of C. difficile non-colonized infants, therefore not indicating any exacerbating effect of C. difficile colonization on dysbiosis-like features in gut microbiota. Among detected ZOTUs, the one linked to C. difficile (ZOTU171) exhibited strongest positive correlation with increasing mean Bray-Curtis dissimilarity (Pearson’s r = 0.427, p < 0.001). Along with negative correlation observed with Fusicatenibacter (ZOTU13) (Pearson’s r = -0.470, p < 0.001), these two represented the only taxa significantly correlated with mean Bray-Curtis dissimilarity beyond false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 (Supplementary Fig. 2). C. difficile concentration also positively correlated with the relative abundance of Escherichia, with the correlation most evident at the highest concentrations of C. difficile (Spearman’s rho = 0.585, p = 0.001) (Fig. 1E).
Fig. 1
C. difficile associated gut microbial community characteristics. (A) C. difficile colonization associated characteristics presented with non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot illustrating beta diversity using Bray-Curtis dissimilarities, with colours indicating C. difficile colonization status and dot size representing C. difficile concentration. (B) Alpha diversity analysis depicted by Shannon diversity and Faith’s phylogenetic diversity. (C, D and E) C. difficile concentration (ddPCR; copies per ng DNA) associated changes in (C) mean Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, (D) Faith’s phylogenetic diversity and (E) Escherichia/Shigella (ZOTU1) relative abundance. All correlations are supported with Spearman’s rho and significance
Bild vergrößern

Discussion

The predominantly asymptomatic carriage of C. difficile in infants is well documented, yet it still presents certain diagnostic challenges. However, it also offers an opportunity to study C. difficile dynamics in the absence of disease. In this study, we report C. difficile concentration-associated alterations in the gut microbiome of 76 asymptomatic one year old infants, all of whom received antibiotic therapy during the first three weeks of life.
In our cohort, C. difficile was detected in 36.8% of the infants, consistent with the 41% colonisation prevalence reported in a systematic review of 95 studies [1]. Additionally, our prevalence of toxigenic C. difficile at 10.5% is comparable to the 14% reported in the same review [1] and the 7.1% reported by Rousseau et al. [6], while significantly lower than the 40% reported by Mani et al. [3]. It is most likely that infants acquire C. difficile from the environment, as indicated by its lower prevalence immediately after birth [3]. The potential sources are numerous, as C. difficile is commonly found in both hospital and home environments, including pets [7, 29]. In our study, none of the collected environmental factors were associated with C. difficile prevalence, including typical adult risk factors such as antibiotic use and hospitalization [30, 31]. Higher C. difficile prevalence has also been reported in non-breastfed infants [3, 7, 32], Caesarean deliveries, and infants with diarrhoea [7], none of which was confirmed as statistically significant in our cohort.
No statistically significant differences in microbial community structure were associated solely with either C. difficile colonization or toxigenic strain colonization. Previous studies have reported a C. difficile colonization-associated decrease in diversity [21, 22], a feature typically seen in adult CDI cases. However, the most comprehensive studies to date, in agreement with ours, did not confirm these findings in infants [3, 6]. In contrast to earlier studies, we did not identify any differentially abundant taxa between C. difficile-colonized and non-colonized infants. However, the reported taxa tend to be largely study-specific [3, 6, 21, 22].
We did, however, observe significant alterations in the gut microbiota related to C. difficile concentration, particularly lower phylogenetic diversity. Importantly, samples with large deviations from the population average and low microbial abundance were found in both C. difficile-colonized and non-colonized groups. This suggests that disrupted microbiota supports better growth of C. difficile while we found no indications that the presence of C. difficile further exacerbates microbiota disruption. High C. difficile concentrations were also positively correlated with increased Escherichia relative abundance, a co-occurrence previously described in murine model [33]. To our knowledge, ours is the first study to investigate C. difficile concentration-associated alterations in the gut microbiota of infants. Studies in adults have reported different alterations, mainly a negative correlation between C. difficile concentration and Clostridium scindens, as well as different Blautia species [34, 35]. However, adult microbiota differs significantly from that in early childhood, which likely affects C. difficile interactions and contributes to the frequent symptomatic disease seen in adults compared to the high prevalence of asymptomatic carriage in infants. Therefore, future studies are required to further validate our observations.
A significant limitation of our study is the small sample size, particularly regarding the statistical analyses performed on the subgroup of C. difficile-positive subjects. The observed associations with metadata, influenced by the heterogeneity of the analysed cohort, would greatly benefit from validation in a larger cohort. Furthermore, all children included in this study received antibiotic therapy within the first three weeks after birth, which potentially influenced the development of their microbiota, and the subsequent C. difficile colonization associated microbiota characteristics.

Conclusion

Our study of 76 asymptomatic infants found that C. difficile-associated alterations in the gut microbiota, primarily lower microbial diversity and greater deviation from population averages, are closely linked to C. difficile concentration in the gut. Colonization alone, however, did not significantly alter the bacterial community structure. Furthermore, no host-specific factors from the extensive metadata were significantly correlated with either colonization status or C. difficile concentration.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgments.

Declarations

The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02865564) and received approval from the National Medical Ethics Committee (No. 89/03/15). The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and the legal requirements of the study country. Informed consent was obtained from the parent or legal guardian of each neonate after written and verbal study information was provided.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Download
Titel
Clostridioides difficile concentration-dependant alterations in gut microbiota of asymptomatic infants
Verfasst von
Aleksander Mahnic
Jana Lozar Krivec
Darja Paro-Panjan
Andreja Valcl
Tanja Obermajer
Bojana Bogovič Matijašić
Evgen Benedik
Petra Bratina
Maja Rupnik
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2025
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Gut Pathogens / Ausgabe 1/2025
Elektronische ISSN: 1757-4749
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-025-00687-3

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Tougas SR, Lodha N, Vandermeer B, Lorenzetti DL, Tarr PI, Tarr GAM, et al. Prevalence of detection of clostridioides difficile among asymptomatic children: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.2328CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyanova L, Kalvatchev N, Yordanov D, Hadzhiyski P, Markovska R, Gergova G, et al. Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile carriage in asymptomatic children since 2010: a narrative review. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2019;33:1228–36.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mani J, Levy S, Angelova A, Hazrati S, Fassnacht R, Subramanian P, et al. Epidemiological and Microbiome associations of clostridioides difficile carriage in infancy and early childhood. Gut Microbes. 2023;15:2203969.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat McDonald LC, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Bakken JS, Carroll KC, Coffin SE, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA) and society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:e1–48.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Couturier J, Lepage P, Jolivet S, Delannoy J, Mesa V, Ancel PY, et al. Gut microbiota diversity of preterm neonates is associated with clostridioides difficile colonization. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.907323CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rousseau C, Lemée L, Le Monnier A, Poilane I, Pons JL, Collignon A. Prevalence and diversity of clostridium difficile strains in infants. J Med Microbiol. 2011;60:1112–8.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoesser N, Eyre DW, Quan TP, Godwin H, Pill G, Mbuvi E, et al. Epidemiology of clostridium difficile in infants in Oxfordshire, UK: risk factors for colonization and carriage, and genetic overlap with regional C. difficile infection strains. PLoS ONE. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182307CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferraris L, Couturier J, Eckert C, Delannoy J, Barbut F, Butel MJ, et al. Carriage and colonization of C. difficile in preterm neonates: A longitudinal prospective study. PLoS ONE. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212568CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim J, Smathers SA, Prasad P, Leckerman KH, Coffin S, Zaoutis T. Epidemiological features of clostridium difficile-associated disease among inpatients at children’s hospitals in the united States, 2001–2006. Pediatrics. 2008;122(6):1266–70.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Zilberberg MD, Tillotson GS, McDonald C. Clostridium difficile infections among hospitalized children, united States, 1997–2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(4):604–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pike CM, Theriot CM. Mechanisms of colonization resistance against clostridioides difficile. J Infect Dis. 2021;223(3):S194–200.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller AC, Arakkal AT, Sewell DK, Segre AM, Tholany J, Polgreen PM, et al. Comparison of different antibiotics and the risk for Community-Associated clostridioides difficile infection: A Case–Control study. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad413CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Berkell M, Mysara M, Xavier BB, van Werkhoven CH, Monsieurs P, Lammens C, et al. Microbiota-based markers predictive of development of clostridioides difficile infection. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2241.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dalal RS, Allegretti JR. Diagnosis and management of clostridioides difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2021;37(4):336–43.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee AA, Rao K, Limsrivilai J, Gillilland M, Malamet B, Briggs E, et al. Temporal gut microbial changes predict recurrent clostridiodes difficile infection in patients with and without ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2020;26(11):1748–58.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Vasilescu IM, Chifiriuc MC, Pircalabioru GG, Filip R, Bolocan A, Lazăr V, et al. Gut dysbiosis and clostridioides difficile infection in neonates and adults. Front Microbiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.651081CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahnic A, Pintar S, Skok P, Rupnik M. Gut community alterations associated with clostridioides difficile colonization in hospitalized gastroenterological patients with or without inflammatory bowel disease. Front Microbiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.988426CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang L, Dong D, Jiang C, Li Z, Wang X, Peng Y. Insight into alteration of gut microbiota in clostridium difficile infection and asymptomatic C. difficile colonization. Anaerobe. 2015;34:1–7.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Horvat S, Mahnic A, Makuc D, Pečnik K, Plavec J, Rupnik M. Children gut microbiota exhibits a different composition and metabolic profile after in vitro exposure to clostridioides difficile and increases its sporulation. Front Microbiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1042526CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Horvat S, Rupnik M. Interactions between clostridioides difficile and fecal microbiota in in vitro batch model: growth, sporulation, and microbiota changes. Front Microbiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01633CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen LA, Hourigan SK, Grigoryan Z, Gao Z, Clemente JC, Rideout JR, et al. Decreased fecal bacterial diversity and altered Microbiome in children colonized with clostridium difficile. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019;68(4):502–8.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ling Z, Liu X, Jia X, Cheng Y, Luo Y, Yuan L, et al. Impacts of infection with different toxigenic clostridium difficile strains on faecal microbiota in children. Sci Rep. 2014;4(1):7485.PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Krivec JL, Bratina P, Valcl A, Manfreda KL, Petrovčič A, Benedik E, et al. Effects of Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in neonates exposed to antibiotics: a randomised controlled trial. Beneficial Microbes. 2024;1:1–13.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Matijašić BB, Obermajer T, Lipoglavšek L, Grabnar I, Avguštin G, Rogelj I. Association of dietary type with fecal microbiota in vegetarians and omnivores in Slovenia. Eur J Nutr. 2014;53(4):1051–64.PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Rinttilä T, Kassinen A, Malinen E, Krogius L, Palva A. Development of an extensive set of 16S rDNA-targeted primers for quantification of pathogenic and Indigenous bacteria in faecal samples by real-time PCR. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97(6):1166–77.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat van den Berg RJ, Kuijper EJ, van Coppenraet LESB, Claas ECJ. Rapid diagnosis of toxinogenic clostridium difficile in faecal samples with internally controlled real-time PCR. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12(2):184–6.PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(19):2460–1.PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(16):2194–200.PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodriguez-Diaz C, Seyboldt C, Rupnik M. Non-human clostridioides difficile reservoirs and sources: animals, food, environment. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1435:329–50.PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown K, Valenta K, Fisman D, Simor A, Daneman N. Hospital ward antibiotic prescribing and the risks of clostridium difficile infection. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(4):626–33.PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Webb BJ, Subramanian A, Lopansri B, Goodman B, Jones PB, Ferraro J, et al. Antibiotic exposure and risk for Hospital-Associated clostridioides difficile infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02169-19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Jangi S, Lamont JT. Asymptomatic colonization by clostridium difficile in infants: implications for disease in later life. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;51(1):2–7.PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Schubert AM, Sinani H, Schloss PD. Antibiotic-Induced alterations of the murine gut microbiota and subsequent effects on colonization resistance against clostridium difficile. mBio. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00974-15CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Buffie CG, Bucci V, Stein RR, McKenney PT, Ling L, Gobourne A, et al. Precision Microbiome reconstitution restores bile acid mediated resistance to clostridium difficile. Nature. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13828CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Daquigan N, Seekatz AM, Greathouse KL, Young VB, White JR. High-resolution profiling of the gut Microbiome reveals the extent of clostridium difficile burden. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-017-0043-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Innere Medizin (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Mit medbee Pocketcards schnell und sicher entscheiden.
Leitlinien-Wissen kostenlos und immer griffbereit auf ihrem Desktop, Handy oder Tablet.

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Lipoprotein(a) erhöht bei Statintherapie: Wie steht es um das kardiovaskuläre Risiko?

Wann ist das Lipoprotein(a) zu hoch? Diese Frage stellte sich ein deutsches Forschungsteam – und analysierte die Risiken durch Lp(a) bei Patienten, die bereits Statine einnehmen.

Adipositas und Vorhofflimmern: Wie hängen sie zusammen?

Adipositas begünstigt die Entstehung von Vorhofflimmern. Die Frage ist, inwieweit dabei direkte oder indirekte, über Begleiterkrankungen vermittelte Effekte im Spiel sind. In einer beim DGK-Kongress vorgestellten Studie wurde versucht, das zu klären.

Mehr als eine Hydrozele

Starke Schmerzen im rechten Hoden führen einen 37-jährigen Mann in die urologische Praxis. An ein Trauma kann sich der Fitnesstrainer nicht erinnern. Es gibt auch keine Hinweise auf eine Harnwegsinfektion, Harnsteine oder eine sexuell übertragbare Erkrankung. Was ist Ihre Verdachtsdiagnose?

Podcast

Warum wir mehr Peritonealdialysen durchführen sollten

Die Peritonealdialyse wird in Deutschland noch selten genutzt, bietet aber unterschätzte Vorteile: mehr Selbstbestimmung, mehr Lebensqualität, schonender für den Kreislauf. Warum wird sie trotzdem so wenig eingesetzt? Expertin Dr. Grit Esser erklärt, was hinter der Bauchfelldialyse steckt, wie Betroffene informierte Entscheidungen treffen können und worauf Hausärztinnen und Hausärzte achten sollten.

Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin, DEGAM

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Bildnachweise
Die Leitlinien für Ärztinnen und Ärzte, Ärztin misst Blutdruck bei adipöser Frau/© DG PhotoStock / stock.adobe.com (Symbolbild mit Fotomodellen), Hoden an einem Schaubild /© Mathias Ernert/ Urologische Klinik/ Universitätsklinikum Mannheim (Symbolbild mit Fotomodellen), ZFA TALKS - Peritonealdialyse/© (M) Jakovo / Getty Images / iStock (Symbolbild mit Fotomodell) Logo: Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH