Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 6/2017

04.10.2016 | Original Article

Cobb-1 versus cobb-to-cobb anterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke 5C curves: a radiological comparative study

verfasst von: Arnaud Dubory, Lotfi Miladi, Brice Ilharreborde, Jean-Marie Gennari, Jihane Rouissi, Christophe Glorion, Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette, Thierry Odent

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Anterior fusion is a well-established procedure for the treatment of Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This retrospective study aimed to assess preoperative and postoperative radiographic differences between the conventional anterior fusion and anterior short fusions (ASF) in Lenke 5C AIS.

Methods

Radiographic data of 42 consecutive cases of Lenke 5C AIS, which were surgically treated through anterior segmental fusion, were analyzed retrospectively. Patients have been divided into two groups: C group (n = 19) treated by the conventional fusion from the proximal end vertebra to the distal end vertebra of the main curve and C-1 group (n = 23) treated by ASF, sparing the lowest end vertebra of the main curve. Cobb angles of main curve, apical vertebra tilt, C7 coronal tilt, lowest instrumented vertebra angle (LIV angle), LIV adjacent level disc angulation (LIVDA), and the first uninstrumented vertebra angle (FUV angle) were measured on anteroposterior radiographs of the entire spine. LIVDA, FUV wedging, and rotation were measured on stretch films. C7 sagittal tilt, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and proximal kyphosis junction were measured on lateral radiographs of the entire spine. Repeated-measures analysis of variance and fisher test were used for the statistical analysis.

Results

The preoperative main curve was 39.9 ± 9.1° in the C group vs. (versus) 42.8 ± 11.8° in the C-1 group. At a mean follow-up of 26.2 months (range 10.5–66.3 months), postoperative main curve improved of 75.8 ± 21.2 % (10.4 ± 9.2°, p < 0.001) in the C group and of 52.7 ± 18.7 % (20.1 ± 8.1°, p < 0.001) in the C-1 group. All parameters improved except the LIVDA, which was slightly impaired, especially in the C-1 group with 5.6 ± 4.2° vs. 4.4 ± 2.2° in the C group. On stretch films, FUV rotation was the only parameter to differ; it was graded at 1 ± 0.7 in the C-1 group vs. 0.6 ± 0.5 in the C group (p = 0.04). No disk obliquity just under the future instrumentation and equivalent FUV wedging were found in any of the two groups.

Conclusions

The conventional anterior fusion and ASF give equivalent correction in Lenke 5C AIS, but ASF seems to induce adding-on of the disk below the LIV. FUV rotation on stretch films does not seem to be a predictive factor of postoperative radiological outcome.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Senkoylu A, Luk KDK, Wong YW, Cheung KMC (2013) Prognosis of spontaneous thoracic curve correction after the selective anterior fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar (Lenke 5C) curves in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 14(7):1117–1124CrossRef Senkoylu A, Luk KDK, Wong YW, Cheung KMC (2013) Prognosis of spontaneous thoracic curve correction after the selective anterior fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar (Lenke 5C) curves in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 14(7):1117–1124CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat de Kleuver M, Lewis SJ, Germscheid NM, Kamper SJ, Alanay A, Berven SH et al (2014) Optimal surgical care for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an international consensus. Eur Spine J 23(12):2603–2618CrossRefPubMed de Kleuver M, Lewis SJ, Germscheid NM, Kamper SJ, Alanay A, Berven SH et al (2014) Optimal surgical care for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an international consensus. Eur Spine J 23(12):2603–2618CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dwyer AF, Newton NC, Sherwood AA (1969) An anterior approach to scoliosis. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop. 62:192–202CrossRefPubMed Dwyer AF, Newton NC, Sherwood AA (1969) An anterior approach to scoliosis. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop. 62:192–202CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zielke K, Stunkat R, Beaujean F (1976) Ventrale derotations-spondylodesis (author’s transl). Arch Für Orthop Unf-Chir 85(3):257–277CrossRef Zielke K, Stunkat R, Beaujean F (1976) Ventrale derotations-spondylodesis (author’s transl). Arch Für Orthop Unf-Chir 85(3):257–277CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaneda K, Shono Y, Satoh S, Abumi K (1996) New anterior instrumentation for the management of thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Application of the Kaneda two-rod system. Spine 21(10):1250–1261–1262CrossRefPubMed Kaneda K, Shono Y, Satoh S, Abumi K (1996) New anterior instrumentation for the management of thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Application of the Kaneda two-rod system. Spine 21(10):1250–1261–1262CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kusakabe T, Mehta JS, Gaines RW (2011) Short segment bone-on-bone instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a mean follow-up of six years. Spine 36(14):1123–1130CrossRefPubMed Kusakabe T, Mehta JS, Gaines RW (2011) Short segment bone-on-bone instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a mean follow-up of six years. Spine 36(14):1123–1130CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Brodner W, Mun Yue W, Möller HB, Hendricks KJ, Burd TA, Gaines RW (2003) Short segment bone-on-bone instrumentation for single curve idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 28(20):S224–S233CrossRefPubMed Brodner W, Mun Yue W, Möller HB, Hendricks KJ, Burd TA, Gaines RW (2003) Short segment bone-on-bone instrumentation for single curve idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 28(20):S224–S233CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gille O, Jolivet E, Dousset V, Degrise C, Obeid I, Vital J-M et al (2007) Erector spinae muscle changes on magnetic resonance imaging following lumbar surgery through a posterior approach. Spine 32(11):1236–1241CrossRefPubMed Gille O, Jolivet E, Dousset V, Degrise C, Obeid I, Vital J-M et al (2007) Erector spinae muscle changes on magnetic resonance imaging following lumbar surgery through a posterior approach. Spine 32(11):1236–1241CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1994) Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 2: histologic and histochemical analyses in humans. Spine 19(22):2598–2602CrossRefPubMed Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1994) Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 2: histologic and histochemical analyses in humans. Spine 19(22):2598–2602CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dong Y, Weng X, Zhao H, Zhang J, Shen J, Qiu G (2015) Lenke 5C curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: anterior vs posterior selective fusion. Neurosurg 78(3):324–331CrossRef Dong Y, Weng X, Zhao H, Zhang J, Shen J, Qiu G (2015) Lenke 5C curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: anterior vs posterior selective fusion. Neurosurg 78(3):324–331CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernstein RM, Hall JE (1998) Solid rod short segment anterior fusion in thoracolumbar scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop Part B 7(2):124–131CrossRef Bernstein RM, Hall JE (1998) Solid rod short segment anterior fusion in thoracolumbar scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop Part B 7(2):124–131CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall JE, Hall J (1997) Short segment anterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar scoliosis. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald RL (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 665–670 Hall JE, Hall J (1997) Short segment anterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar scoliosis. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald RL (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 665–670
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lonstein JE (2006) Scoliosis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop 443:248–259CrossRefPubMed Lonstein JE (2006) Scoliosis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop 443:248–259CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Violas P, Estivalezes E, Briot J, Sales de Gauzy J, Swider P (2007) Quantification of intervertebral disc volume properties below spine fusion, using magnetic resonance imaging, in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine 32(15):E405–E412CrossRefPubMed Violas P, Estivalezes E, Briot J, Sales de Gauzy J, Swider P (2007) Quantification of intervertebral disc volume properties below spine fusion, using magnetic resonance imaging, in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine 32(15):E405–E412CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaughan JJ, Winter RB, Lonstein JE (1996) Comparison of the use of supine bending and traction radiographs in the selection of the fusion area in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 21(21):2469–2473CrossRefPubMed Vaughan JJ, Winter RB, Lonstein JE (1996) Comparison of the use of supine bending and traction radiographs in the selection of the fusion area in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 21(21):2469–2473CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Polly DW, Sturm PF (1998) Traction versus supine side bending. Which technique best determines curve flexibility? Spine. 23(7):804–808CrossRefPubMed Polly DW, Sturm PF (1998) Traction versus supine side bending. Which technique best determines curve flexibility? Spine. 23(7):804–808CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe K, Kawakami N, Nishiwaki Y, Goto M, Tsuji T, Obara T et al (2007) Traction versus supine side-bending radiographs in determining flexibility: what factors influence these techniques? Spine. 32(23):2604–2609CrossRefPubMed Watanabe K, Kawakami N, Nishiwaki Y, Goto M, Tsuji T, Obara T et al (2007) Traction versus supine side-bending radiographs in determining flexibility: what factors influence these techniques? Spine. 32(23):2604–2609CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Koller H, Meier O, Hitzl W (2014) Criteria for successful correction of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in AIS patients: results of risk model calculations using target outcomes and failure analysis. Eur Spine J 23(12):2658–2671CrossRefPubMed Koller H, Meier O, Hitzl W (2014) Criteria for successful correction of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in AIS patients: results of risk model calculations using target outcomes and failure analysis. Eur Spine J 23(12):2658–2671CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, Fei Q, Qiu G, Lee CI, Shen J, Zhang J et al (2008) Anterior spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion for moderate lumbar/thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study. Spine 33(20):2166–2172CrossRefPubMed Wang Y, Fei Q, Qiu G, Lee CI, Shen J, Zhang J et al (2008) Anterior spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion for moderate lumbar/thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study. Spine 33(20):2166–2172CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee GA, Betz RR, Clements DH, Huss GK (1999) Proximal kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24(8):795–799CrossRefPubMed Lee GA, Betz RR, Clements DH, Huss GK (1999) Proximal kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24(8):795–799CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhee JM, Bridwell KH, Won DS, Lenke LG, Chotigavanichaya C, Hanson DS (2002) Sagittal plane analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of anterior versus posterior instrumentation. Spine 27(21):2350–2356CrossRefPubMed Rhee JM, Bridwell KH, Won DS, Lenke LG, Chotigavanichaya C, Hanson DS (2002) Sagittal plane analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of anterior versus posterior instrumentation. Spine 27(21):2350–2356CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sudo H, Ito M, Kaneda K, Shono Y, Abumi K (2013) Long-term outcomes of anterior dual-rod instrumentation for thoracolumbar and lumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a twelve to twenty-three-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(8):e491–e498CrossRef Sudo H, Ito M, Kaneda K, Shono Y, Abumi K (2013) Long-term outcomes of anterior dual-rod instrumentation for thoracolumbar and lumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a twelve to twenty-three-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(8):e491–e498CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamimura M, Ebara S, Kinoshita T, Itoh H, Nakakohji T, Takaoka K et al (1999) Anterior surgery with short fusion using the Zielke procedure for thoracic scoliosis: focus on the correction of compensatory curves. J Spinal Disord 12(6):451–460CrossRefPubMed Kamimura M, Ebara S, Kinoshita T, Itoh H, Nakakohji T, Takaoka K et al (1999) Anterior surgery with short fusion using the Zielke procedure for thoracic scoliosis: focus on the correction of compensatory curves. J Spinal Disord 12(6):451–460CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Wajanavisit W, Woratanarat P, Woratanarat T, Aroonjaruthum K, Kulachote N, Leelapatana W et al (2010) The evaluation of short fusion in idiopathic scoliosis. Indian J Orthop 44(1):28–34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wajanavisit W, Woratanarat P, Woratanarat T, Aroonjaruthum K, Kulachote N, Leelapatana W et al (2010) The evaluation of short fusion in idiopathic scoliosis. Indian J Orthop 44(1):28–34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL (2011) Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):609–618CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL (2011) Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):609–618CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hee H-T, Yu Z-R, Wong H-K (2007) Comparison of segmental pedicle screw instrumentation versus anterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Spine 32(14):1533CrossRefPubMed Hee H-T, Yu Z-R, Wong H-K (2007) Comparison of segmental pedicle screw instrumentation versus anterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Spine 32(14):1533CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tao F, Wang Z, Li M, Pan F, Shi Z, Zhang Y et al (2012) A comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for restoring and retaining sagittal balance in patients with idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 25(6):303–308CrossRefPubMed Tao F, Wang Z, Li M, Pan F, Shi Z, Zhang Y et al (2012) A comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for restoring and retaining sagittal balance in patients with idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 25(6):303–308CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, Bünger CE, Zhang Y, Wu C, Li H, Dahl B et al (2013) Lowest instrumented vertebra selection for Lenke 5C scoliosis: a minimum 2-year radiographical follow-up. Spine 38(14):E894–E900CrossRefPubMed Wang Y, Bünger CE, Zhang Y, Wu C, Li H, Dahl B et al (2013) Lowest instrumented vertebra selection for Lenke 5C scoliosis: a minimum 2-year radiographical follow-up. Spine 38(14):E894–E900CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee CS, Ha J-K, Hwang CJ, Lee D-H, Kim TH, Cho JH (2016) Is it enough to stop distal fusion at L3 in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with major thoracolumbar/lumbar curves? Eur Spine J Lee CS, Ha J-K, Hwang CJ, Lee D-H, Kim TH, Cho JH (2016) Is it enough to stop distal fusion at L3 in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with major thoracolumbar/lumbar curves? Eur Spine J
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu B, Zhang J-G, Qiu G-X, Lu W-C, Wang Y-P, Shen J-X et al (2010) Selective anterior thoracolumbar/lumbar fusion and instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Chin Med J (Engl) 123(21):3003–3008 Yu B, Zhang J-G, Qiu G-X, Lu W-C, Wang Y-P, Shen J-X et al (2010) Selective anterior thoracolumbar/lumbar fusion and instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Chin Med J (Engl) 123(21):3003–3008
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Li M, Zhu X-D, Zhou X-H, Chen H-J, Wang X-W et al (2009) Retrospective analysis of anterior correction and fusion for adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis: the relationship between preserving mobile segments and trunk balance. Int Orthop 33(1):191–196CrossRefPubMed Liu Y, Li M, Zhu X-D, Zhou X-H, Chen H-J, Wang X-W et al (2009) Retrospective analysis of anterior correction and fusion for adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis: the relationship between preserving mobile segments and trunk balance. Int Orthop 33(1):191–196CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowe TG, Betz R, Lenke L, Clements D, Harms J, Newton P et al (2003) Anterior single-rod instrumentation of the thoracic and lumbar spine: saving levels. Spine 28(20):S208–S216CrossRefPubMed Lowe TG, Betz R, Lenke L, Clements D, Harms J, Newton P et al (2003) Anterior single-rod instrumentation of the thoracic and lumbar spine: saving levels. Spine 28(20):S208–S216CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly DM, McCarthy RE, McCullough FL, Kelly HR (2010) Long-term outcomes of anterior spinal fusion with instrumentation for thoracolumbar and lumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 35(2):194–198CrossRefPubMed Kelly DM, McCarthy RE, McCullough FL, Kelly HR (2010) Long-term outcomes of anterior spinal fusion with instrumentation for thoracolumbar and lumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 35(2):194–198CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Satake K, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Blanke KM, Sides B et al (2005) Analysis of the lowest instrumented vertebra following anterior spinal fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: can we predict postoperative disc wedging? Spine 30(4):418–426CrossRefPubMed Satake K, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Blanke KM, Sides B et al (2005) Analysis of the lowest instrumented vertebra following anterior spinal fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: can we predict postoperative disc wedging? Spine 30(4):418–426CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M, Gamez L, Farcy J-PC, Pagala M (2002) Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine. 27(4):387–392CrossRefPubMed Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M, Gamez L, Farcy J-PC, Pagala M (2002) Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine. 27(4):387–392CrossRefPubMed
37.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Verma K, Auerbach JD, Kean KE, Chamas F, Vorsanger M, Lonner BS (2010) Anterior spinal fusion for thoracolumbar scoliosis: comprehensive assessment of radiographic, clinical, and pulmonary outcomes on 2-years follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop 30(7):664–669CrossRefPubMed Verma K, Auerbach JD, Kean KE, Chamas F, Vorsanger M, Lonner BS (2010) Anterior spinal fusion for thoracolumbar scoliosis: comprehensive assessment of radiographic, clinical, and pulmonary outcomes on 2-years follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop 30(7):664–669CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Cobb-1 versus cobb-to-cobb anterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke 5C curves: a radiological comparative study
verfasst von
Arnaud Dubory
Lotfi Miladi
Brice Ilharreborde
Jean-Marie Gennari
Jihane Rouissi
Christophe Glorion
Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette
Thierry Odent
Publikationsdatum
04.10.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4788-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

European Spine Journal 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.