05.05.2024 | Short communication
Cognitive load in tele-robotic surgery: a comparison of eye tracker designs
verfasst von:
Roger D. Soberanis-Mukul, Paola Ruiz Puentes, Ayberk Acar, Iris Gupta, Joyraj Bhowmick, Yizhou Li, Ahmed Ghazi, Jie Ying Wu, Mathias Unberath
Erschienen in:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
|
Ausgabe 7/2024
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
Eye gaze tracking and pupillometry are evolving areas within the field of tele-robotic surgery, particularly in the context of estimating cognitive load (CL). However, this is a recent field, and current solutions for gaze and pupil tracking in robotic surgery require assessment. Considering the necessity of stable pupillometry signals for reliable cognitive load estimation, we compare the accuracy of three eye trackers, including head and console-mounted designs.
Methods
We conducted a user study with the da Vinci Research Kit (dVRK), to compare the three designs. We collected eye tracking and dVRK video data while participants observed nine markers distributed over the dVRK screen. We compute and analyze pupil detection stability and gaze prediction accuracy for the three designs.
Results
Head-worn devices present better stability and accuracy of gaze prediction and pupil detection compared to console-mounted systems. Tracking stability along the field of view varies between trackers, with gaze predictions detected at invalid zones of the image with high confidence.
Conclusion
While head-worn solutions show benefits in confidence and stability, our results demonstrate the need to improve eye tacker performance regarding pupil detection, stability, and gaze accuracy in tele-robotic scenarios.