Background
Transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) are characterized by acute onset focal neurological symptoms of vascular origin that resolve completely within 24 hours [
1]. Often patients are encountered with a myriad of acute onset and short-lasting nonfocal symptoms, which do not fulfill the criteria for TIA and might have another cause than focal cerebral ischemia. In the absence of a clear alternative cause, these attacks are referred to as transient neurological attacks (TNAs) [
2]. TNAs are almost as prevalent as TIAs, but their etiology is unknown [
3].
In contrast to the definition of TIA, which states symptom resolution within 24 hours, many patients report cognitive problems afterwards [
4]. In addition, particularly patients with a TNA or a mixture of focal and nonfocal symptoms (mixed TNA) have an increased risk of dementia [
5].
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) studies show signs of cytotoxic edema beyond the point of symptom resolution in 30% of TIA patients [
6]. Cerebrovascular damage, even in the absence of clinical signs of stroke, may lead to cognitive decline [
7-
9]. Moreover, reduced microstructural integrity and functional connectivity are associated with worse cognitive performance [
10,
11]. The influence of DWI lesions and other cerebrovascular damage on the cognitive outcome of TNA patients is unknown, In addition, the cognitive profile of TIA and TNA patients is unclear.
Previous studies on cognitive function after TNA are scarce and have focused almost exclusively on TIA patients [
12-
14]. These were mostly cross-sectional studies, without brain imaging and information on previous cerebrovascular events. Furthermore, cognitive testing was often performed several months to years after the initial event. Since the risk of new stroke is highest shortly after TIA, a delay in testing can influence cognitive results [
15].
Establishing a relationship between TIA or TNA and cognitive decline could identify a group of patients at risk of cognitive impairment and dementia and provides an opportunity to clarify how transient neurological symptoms relate to lasting cognitive consequences. By widening the scope beyond TIA to ‘TNAs’ with nonfocal and mixed symptoms, the previously described but not understood association between TNA and worse cognitive outcome can be prospectively investigated. Finally, performing brain imaging in these patients could provide insight in the early developmental mechanisms of dementia.
We therefore set up the Cohort study ON Neuroimaging, Etiology and Cognitive consequences of Transient neurological attacks (CONNECT); a prospective cohort study on cognitive function and its determinants in patients with a TIA or TNA and aged ≥45 years.
Methods/Design
Study design
CONNECT is a prospective cohort study on the cognitive function of patients with a TIA or TNA and aged ≥45 years. Patient recruitment takes place at a university hospital and a large regional nonacademic hospital. The Medical Review Ethics Committee region Arnhem-Nijmegen approved the study (NL31651.091.10) and written informed consent is obtained from all participants.
Objectives
The primary objective of our study is to determine the course and profile of cognitive function and the causes of cognitive impairment after TIA and TNA, and its relationship with DWI abnormalities. Secondary objectives are to determine the prevalence and course of subjective cognitive complaints, depressive symptoms, fatigue and sleep disorders and their effect on cognitive outcome in patients with TIA or TNA.
Study population
All consecutive patients referred to the specialized TIA clinics of the Radboud university medical center and the Rijnstate Hospital will be screened for eligibility. Patients with a final diagnosis of TIA or TNA within seven days after onset and aged ≥45 years at the time of the qualifying event are considered eligible for participation. TIA is defined as a sudden onset focal loss of brain function of vascular origin with complete resolution of focal symptoms within 24 hours [
1]. TNA is defined as an attack of sudden nonfocal neurological symptoms that completely resolve within 24 hours, without clear evidence for migraine, epilepsy, Ménière disease, hyperventilation, cardiac syncope, hypoglycaemia, or orthostatic hypotension [
5]. In order to minimize the influence of concomitant neurological disorders on cognitive function, the following exclusion criteria will be applied:
1.
Prior stroke with clinical symptoms.
2.
Prior diagnosis of dementia.
3.
Intracerebral space-occupying lesion.
4.
Prior neurological disease which can influence cognitive function (e.g. Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis).
5.
Inability to undergo MRI.
Prior TIA and TNA are not a reason for exclusion.
Procedures
Eligible patients will be recruited at specialized TIA clinics. We intend to include 150 patients and expect to complete inclusion over a 3-year period. Patients formally enter the study after informed consent and written approval. Baseline assessments will take place during admission to the TIA clinic at the participating center and follow-up is performed six months later at the Radboud university medical center and Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour. Baseline and follow-up assessments are summarized in Table
1.
Table 1
Schedule of assessments
Demographics
| | |
Age, sex | X | |
Education | X | |
Working status | X | |
Marital status | X | |
Structured assessment of TIA/TNA presentation
| | |
Duration of symptoms | X | |
Number of episodes in week before inclusion | X | |
Focal symptoms* | X | |
Nonfocal symptoms* | X | |
Incident focal symptoms* | | X |
Incident nonfocal symptoms* | | X |
Medical history
| | |
Hypertension | X | X |
Dyslipidemia | X | X |
Diabetes mellitus | X | X |
Atrial fibrillation | X | X |
Other cardiovascular diseases† | X | |
First-degree relatives with cardiovascular disease | X | |
Smoking status | X | X |
Alcohol consumption | X | X |
Drug abuse | X | X |
Hypercoagulability | X | |
Acute infection | X | |
Migraine | X | |
Previous TIA/TNA | X | |
Carotid endarterectomy | X | X |
Epilepsy | X | X |
Depression | X | X |
Current medication use | X | X |
Incident cardiovascular events† | | X |
Incident TIA, cerebral infarction or hemorrhage | | X |
Physical examination
| | |
Length and weight, BMI | X | |
Blood pressure | X | |
Neurological examination | X | |
ECG
| | |
(Paroxysmal) atrial fibrillation | X | |
Ischemia | X | |
Left ventricular hypertrophy | X | |
Fasting laboratory investigations
| | |
Glucose | X | |
Lipid profile | X | |
Creatinine | X | |
Neuropsychological assessment
| | |
Global cognitive function
| | |
Mini Mental State Examination | X | |
Frontal Assessment Battery | X | X |
Episodic memory
| | |
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test | X | X |
Executive function
| | |
Verbal fluency | X | X |
Stroop Color Word Test (interference score) | X | X |
Brixton Spatial Anticipation Test | X | X |
Information processing speed
| | |
Symbol-Digit Modalities Test | X | X |
Stroop Color Word Test (Cards I and II) | X | X |
Attention
| | |
Verbal Series Attention Test | X | X |
Subjective cognitive failures
| | |
Cognitive failures Questionnaire | X | X |
Depressive symptoms
| | |
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale | X | X |
Sleep disorders
| | |
Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease - Sleep | X | X |
Fatigue
| | |
Checklist on Individual Strength | X | X |
Prior cognitive performance
| | |
Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly | X | X |
MRI
| | |
Anatomical sequences (T1, T2, FLAIR, T2*) | X | X |
Diffusion-weighted imaging | X | |
MR angiography | X | |
Susceptibility-weighted imaging | | X |
Diffusion tensor imaging | | X |
Resting-state functional MRI | | X |
Sample size and power calculation
The sample size is based on the ability to detect a difference in average cognitive performance between the three patient groups, expressed as z-score, equal to 0.5 standard deviation. With a power of 80% and a type-I error rate of 0.1, we need 50 patients per group to identify this difference.
Assessments - baseline
All patients referred to the TIA clinic are analyzed and treated according to a dedicated TIA protocol, which includes investigations as recommended in international guidelines [
16].
Symptom presentation
We will obtain a detailed history of the signs and symptoms of the qualifying event. The patient’s own account of events is noted, after which a structured interview consisting of 18 questions about the presence of specific neurological symptoms (nine focal and nine nonfocal symptoms, Table
2) will be administered. These symptoms are derived from the latest classification of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and previous research on nonfocal TNAs [
1,
5]. The duration of symptoms and number of episodes in the week before presentation are also recorded.
Table 2
Structured assessment of transient focal and nonfocal neurological symptoms
Hemiparesis | Decreased consciousness or unconsciousness |
Hemihypesthesia | Confusion |
Dysphasia | Amnesia |
Dysarthria | Unsteadiness |
Hemianopia | Nonrotatory dizziness |
Transient monocular blindness | Positive visual phenomena |
Hemiataxia | Paresthesias |
Diplopia | Bilateral weakness of arms or legs |
Vertigo | Unwell feelings |
Demographics and medical history
Standardized, structured questionnaires will be used to obtain information on demographics and level of education (classified using seven categories, in accordance with the Dutch educational system: 1 being less than primary school and 7 reflecting an academic degree) [
17].
The presence of established and potential stroke risk factors as classified by the American Heart Association will be determined by standardized, structured questionnaires [
18]. Established risk factors include age, sex, history of cardiovascular disease in first-degree relatives, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking, atrial fibrillation and cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, valvular heart disease and peripheral revascularization procedures). Potential risk factors include alcohol consumption (excess consumption defined as an intake of >200 g of pure alcohol per week), drug abuse, hypercoagulability, acute infection, a history of migraine, and the use of oral contraceptives. In addition, all patients will be asked about a history of TIA, carotid endarterectomy, epilepsy, and depression. Current medication use is recorded and classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system (World Health Organization, WHO Collaborating Centre for drug statistics and methodology,
http://www.whocc.no/atcddd/).
Physical examination
All patients will undergo a neurological examination. Blood pressure will be measured in a supine position after five minutes of rest. The average of three measurements will be used for analysis. Hypertension is defined as a systolic blood pressure ≥135 mmHg and/or a diastolic blood pressure ≥85 mmHg and/or the use of blood pressure-lowering medication.
Neuropsychological assessment
Participants will undergo an extensive neuropsychological assessment covering the main cognitive domains. Neuropsychological tests are administered by a trained examiner in a quiet, well-lit room and under standard circumstances. The Mini-Mental State Examination and Frontal Assessment Battery are used as screening tools for global cognitive function and executive function, respectively [
19,
20]. The three-trial version of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) will be applied to assess verbal episodic memory. This test also includes delayed free-recall and recognition trials [
21]. To evaluate executive function three tests will be used; a verbal fluency test (naming as many animals and professions within 60 seconds each; response generation), the interference score of the abbreviated Stroop Color Word Test (response inhibition), and the Brixton Spatial Anticipation Test (rule detection) [
22,
23]. Information processing speed will be tested with the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test and Cards I and II of the abbreviated Stroop Color Word Test [
24,
25]. Attention is measured with the Verbal Series Attention Test [
26].
In addition to cognitive tests, patients will complete several self-report questionnaires. Subjective cognitive failures will be registered with the modified Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) [
27]. Both nighttime sleep and daytime sleepiness will be assessed with the Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease - Sleep, and the presence of depressive symptoms with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [
28,
29]. Furthermore, patients will fill out the Checklist on Individual Strength, a validated questionnaire on fatigue [
30]. Finally, cognitive function prior to the qualifying event will be assessed by asking relatives to complete the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) [
31].
Classification of TNA
Three experienced stroke neurologists will independently adjudicate qualifying events as TIA, nonfocal TNA, or mixed TNA, based on the complete description of signs and symptoms as provided by the patient, the presence or absence of specific focal and nonfocal neurological symptoms, and the medical history. Fifty case descriptions will be assigned to each possible pair of classifying neurologists, such that each event is independently adjudicated by two specialists. In case of disagreement a consensus meeting including the third stroke neurologist will be held. The classifying neurologists will be blinded to the results of neuropsychological tests, brain imaging studies, or any other ancillary investigations. An attack containing at least one focal neurological symptom will be classified as TIA or mixed TNA, depending on the presence of additional nonfocal symptoms. When only nonfocal symptoms are present, the event is categorized as nonfocal TNA.
Assessments - follow-up
Six months after baseline all patients are contacted for follow-up. In case of inability or unwillingness to undergo (part of) the follow-up investigations, the reasons are recorded. Follow-up measurements are summarized in Table
1.
Incident events
Patients will be asked whether they have experienced any of the 18 predefined neurological symptoms between baseline and follow-up (Table
2). Symptoms had to develop within seconds to minutes, last less than 24 hours and disappear completely. Reported symptoms are evaluated for these features by an investigator.
In addition, a standardized, structured questionnaire will be administered to determine the occurrence of new cardiovascular events between baseline and follow-up. Whenever an event is suspected, additional information on the exact date of diagnosis, treating physician and initiated therapies will be gathered. When necessary, the treating physician will be contacted for further information. All suspected events will be evaluated and adjudicated by a medical specialist trained in the specific field. The following items are assessed: TIA, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and carotid endarterectomy.
Neuropsychological assessment
A comprehensive neuropsychological assessment covering the main cognitive domains will be performed under the same conditions as baseline. To minimize material-specific learning effects, parallel versions are used for the verbal fluency task (items of clothing and fruit) and the RAVLT.
Subjective cognitive failures occurring between baseline and follow-up will be assessed with the modified CFQ. The presence of depressive symptoms, fatigue and sleep disturbances will be determined with the same questionnaires as at baseline [
27-
30]. Patients are specifically asked to reflect on the presence of these symptoms in the last two weeks. Furthermore, the influence of cognitive performance on daily functioning between baseline and follow-up as experienced by relatives will be determined by means of the IQCODE [
31].
MRI protocol
MRI scanning at follow-up will be performed on a similar 1.5-Tesla Magnetom scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) as baseline. The scanning protocol consists of the following: whole brain 3-dimensional T1 magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequence (TR/TE/T1 2730/2.95/1000 ms; flip angle 7°; voxel size 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0 mm), transversal FLAIR pulse sequence (TR/TE/T1 12220/85/2200 ms; voxel size 1.2 × 1.0 × 3.0 mm; slice gap 0.6 mm), transversal T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence (TR/TE 7440/96 ms; voxel size 0.9 × 0.9 × 3.0 mm), transversal T2*-weighted gradient echo sequence (TR/TE 727/19.1 ms; voxel size 1.0 × 0.7 × 5.0 mm), gradient echo susceptibility weighted imaging sequence (TR/TE 49/40 ms; voxel size 0.8 × 0.7 × 1.0 mm), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) (TR/TE 9100/98 ms; voxel size 2.2 × 2.2 × 2.2 mm; 7 unweighted scans, 61 diffusion weighted scans, with non co-linear orientation of the diffusion weighting gradient and b-value 1000 s/mm3), and resting state imaging using a gradient echo EPI (TR/TE 1870/35 ms; voxel size 3.5 × 3.5 × 3.0 mm; slice gap 0.5 mm). During resting state, patients will be told to relax with their eyes closed, without concentrating on anything particular. The complete scanning protocol takes approximately 60 minutes.
Outcome measures
Clinical outcomes
The primary clinical outcome measure will be domain-specific cognitive performance at baseline and six months after the qualifying event. Raw cognitive test results at baseline and follow-up will be transformed into z-scores, based on the mean and standard deviation of the baseline tests. Next, domain-specific compound scores will be computed by averaging z-scores of tests assessing the same cognitive domain. The compound score for global cognitive function is the average of the z-scores of all tests [
32]. Other clinical outcomes will be incident vascular events, subjective cognitive failures, fatigue, depressive symptoms, and sleep disorders.
Imaging outcomes
Two experienced raters will evaluate both baseline and follow-up brain MRI without knowledge of any clinical information.
Analysis
In the first analyses cognitive domain-specific composite z-scores are the outcome variables. Analysis of (co) variance will be performed to test for differences in cognitive performance at baseline and follow-up (using baseline mean and SD as reference) between TIA, mixed, and nonfocal TNA patients, adjusting for known determinants of cognitive function. The relationship between cognitive function and DWI lesions will be determined, adjusting for differences in other MRI parameters (WMH volume, total brain volume, silent brain infarcts, microbleeds). Analyses will be performed before and after exclusion of patients with incident stroke during follow-up. Next, multinominal logistic regression analysis will be used to identify determinants of cognitive decline among demographics, type of event, MRI parameters and vascular risk factors. Subsequently, the relationship between DTI parameters at follow-up and both explanatory determinants and cognitive function will be determined. Finally, functional connectivity will be compared between TIA, mixed, and nonfocal TNA and between strata of cognitive performance.
Discussion
CONNECT provides an opportunity to identify patients who are not routinely included in cerebrovascular cohort studies but who are potentially at risk of cognitive decline [
5]. The added value of our study to the current knowledge of cognition after TIA and TNA lies in the longitudinal design and the combination of comprehensive neuropsychological testing with both conventional and advanced neuroimaging. This could potentially provide more clarity in the causes and mechanisms of decline in cognitive function after short-lasting neurological deficits.
CONNECT may therefore contribute to the growing notion that TIA is not just a warning sign but has lasting consequences of its own, and identify TNA as a potential new group of patients at risk of cognitive decline.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a Fellowship from the Netherlands Brain Foundation received by Dr. van Dijk (grant F2009(1)-16). The funding body approved the design of the study, but had no role in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
FR participated in the design and coordination of the study and drafted the manuscript. AT participated in the design of the study and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. RK participated in the design of the study and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. SV participated in the design and coordination of the study and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. BG participated in the design of the study and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. PK participated in the design of the study and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. DN participated in the design of the study and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. FL participated in the design of the study and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. ED conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.