Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2013

01.11.2013

Colonoscopy using a small-caliber colonoscope with passive-bending after incomplete colonoscopy due to sharp angulation or pain

verfasst von: Koichiro Sato, Fumiko Shigiyama, Sayo Ito, Tomoyuki Kitagawa, Kenji Tominaga, Takeshi Suzuki, Iruru Maetani

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

We evaluated the performance of a newly developed small-caliber (SC) colonoscope (PCF-PQ260L). This colonoscope (diameter 9.2 mm) is designed with passive-bending and high-force transmission. The SC colonoscope was used for rescue colonoscopy following incomplete colonoscopy with a standard (SD) colonoscope caused by sharp angulation, loop formation, or pain.

Methods

Records of SC colonoscopy given to patients following an incomplete colonoscopy with the SD colonoscope and in the same session were analyzed. Cecal intubation rate, pain using a visual analog scale (0 = none, 100 = extremely painful) in the first and second colonoscopy, total time, new lesions detected with the SC colonoscopy, dosage of sedation used, and any complications were assessed. Examinations that could not be completed, because the colonoscope was not long enough to reach the cecum due to a redundant colon were excluded.

Results

The records of 43 patients who were given SC colonoscopy following incomplete examinations using the SD colonoscope were reviewed. In 97.7 % of cases (42/43), cecal intubation was achieved with the SC colonoscope in the same session. The mean pain score during colonoscopy was significantly lower for the second SC colonoscopy than for the first SD colonoscopy (40.6 ± 14.1 vs. 74.5 ± 10.8, P < 0.001). Lesions were detected with the SC colonoscope in 41.8 % of cases (18/43).

Conclusions

When a colonoscopy with SD colonoscope failed due to sharp angulations, loop formation, or pain, subsequent colonoscopy with a SC colonoscope increased cecal intubation and lesion detection rates and decreased severity of reported pain.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Goodwine BW (2002) Method of colonoscopy in 42 consecutive patients presenting after prior incomplete colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1148–1151PubMedCrossRef Rex DK, Goodwine BW (2002) Method of colonoscopy in 42 consecutive patients presenting after prior incomplete colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1148–1151PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, Levin TR, Burt RW, Johnson DA, Kirk LM, Litlin S, Lieberman DA, Waye JD, Church J, Marshall JB, Riddell RH (2002) Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1296–1308PubMedCrossRef Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, Levin TR, Burt RW, Johnson DA, Kirk LM, Litlin S, Lieberman DA, Waye JD, Church J, Marshall JB, Riddell RH (2002) Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1296–1308PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Saifuddin T, Trivedi M, King PD, Madsen R, Marshall JB (2000) Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for colonoscopy in adults. Gastrointest Endosc 51:314–317PubMedCrossRef Saifuddin T, Trivedi M, King PD, Madsen R, Marshall JB (2000) Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for colonoscopy in adults. Gastrointest Endosc 51:314–317PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall JB (1996) Use of a pediatric colonoscope improves the success of total colonoscopy in selected adult patients. Gastrointest Endosc 44:675–678PubMedCrossRef Marshall JB (1996) Use of a pediatric colonoscope improves the success of total colonoscopy in selected adult patients. Gastrointest Endosc 44:675–678PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Coppola F, Gaia S, Cosimato M, Recchia S (2011) Enteroscope without overtube for cecal intubation after an incomplete colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 43:475–477PubMedCrossRef Coppola F, Gaia S, Cosimato M, Recchia S (2011) Enteroscope without overtube for cecal intubation after an incomplete colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 43:475–477PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cirocco WC, Rusin LC (1995) Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 38:964–968PubMedCrossRef Cirocco WC, Rusin LC (1995) Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 38:964–968PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lichtenstein GR, Park PD, Long WB, Ginsberg GG, Kochman ML (1999) Use of a push enteroscope improves ability to perform total colonoscopy in previously unsuccessful attempts at colonoscopy in adult patients. Am J Gastroenterol 94:187–190PubMedCrossRef Lichtenstein GR, Park PD, Long WB, Ginsberg GG, Kochman ML (1999) Use of a push enteroscope improves ability to perform total colonoscopy in previously unsuccessful attempts at colonoscopy in adult patients. Am J Gastroenterol 94:187–190PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Chen SC, Overhiser AJ (2007) Colonoscopy technique in consecutive patients referred for prior incomplete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:879–883PubMedCrossRef Rex DK, Chen SC, Overhiser AJ (2007) Colonoscopy technique in consecutive patients referred for prior incomplete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:879–883PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Morini S, Zullo A, Hassan C, Lorenzetti R, Campo SM (2011) Endoscopic management of failed colonoscopy in clinical practice: to change endoscopist, instrument, or both? Int J Colorectal Dis 26:103–108PubMedCrossRef Morini S, Zullo A, Hassan C, Lorenzetti R, Campo SM (2011) Endoscopic management of failed colonoscopy in clinical practice: to change endoscopist, instrument, or both? Int J Colorectal Dis 26:103–108PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaffes AJ, Mishra A, Ding SL, Hope R, Williams SJ, Gillespie PE, Bourke MJ (2003) A prospective trial of variable stiffness pediatric vs. standard instrument colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 58:685–689PubMedCrossRef Kaffes AJ, Mishra A, Ding SL, Hope R, Williams SJ, Gillespie PE, Bourke MJ (2003) A prospective trial of variable stiffness pediatric vs. standard instrument colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 58:685–689PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pasha SF, Harrison ME, Das A, Corrado CM, Arnell KN, Leighton JA (2007) Utility of double-balloon colonoscopy for completion of colon examination after incomplete colonoscopy with conventional colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 65:848–853PubMedCrossRef Pasha SF, Harrison ME, Das A, Corrado CM, Arnell KN, Leighton JA (2007) Utility of double-balloon colonoscopy for completion of colon examination after incomplete colonoscopy with conventional colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 65:848–853PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedland S, Soetikno RM (2007) Small caliber overtube-assisted colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 13:5933–5937PubMed Friedland S, Soetikno RM (2007) Small caliber overtube-assisted colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 13:5933–5937PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat May A, Nachbar L, Ell C (2006) Push-and-pull enteroscopy using a single-balloon technique for difficult colonoscopy. Endoscopy 38:395–398PubMedCrossRef May A, Nachbar L, Ell C (2006) Push-and-pull enteroscopy using a single-balloon technique for difficult colonoscopy. Endoscopy 38:395–398PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee YT, Hui AJ, Wong VW, Hung LC, Sung JJ (2006) Improved colonoscopy success rate with a distally attached mucosectomy cap. Endoscopy 38:739–742PubMedCrossRef Lee YT, Hui AJ, Wong VW, Hung LC, Sung JJ (2006) Improved colonoscopy success rate with a distally attached mucosectomy cap. Endoscopy 38:739–742PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sato K, Ito S, Shigiyama F, Kitagawa T, Hirahata K, Tominaga K, Maetani I (2012) A prospective randomized study on the benefits of a new small-caliber colonoscope. Endoscopy 44:746–753PubMedCrossRef Sato K, Ito S, Shigiyama F, Kitagawa T, Hirahata K, Tominaga K, Maetani I (2012) A prospective randomized study on the benefits of a new small-caliber colonoscope. Endoscopy 44:746–753PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Luo DJ, Hui AJ, Yan KK, Ng SC, Wong VW, Chan FK, Cheong JP, Lam PP, Tse YK, Lau JY (2012) A randomized comparison of ultrathin and standard colonoscope in cecal intubation rate and patient tolerance. Gastrointest Endosc 75:484–490PubMedCrossRef Luo DJ, Hui AJ, Yan KK, Ng SC, Wong VW, Chan FK, Cheong JP, Lam PP, Tse YK, Lau JY (2012) A randomized comparison of ultrathin and standard colonoscope in cecal intubation rate and patient tolerance. Gastrointest Endosc 75:484–490PubMedCrossRef
17.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Garborg KK, Loberg M, Matre J, Holme O, Kalager M, Hoff G, Bretthauer M (2012) Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 44:740–746PubMedCrossRef Garborg KK, Loberg M, Matre J, Holme O, Kalager M, Hoff G, Bretthauer M (2012) Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 44:740–746PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wewers ME, Lowe NK (1990) A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 13:227–236PubMedCrossRef Wewers ME, Lowe NK (1990) A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 13:227–236PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wehrmann T, Lechowicz I, Martchenko K, Riphaus A (2008) Routine colonoscopy with a standard gastroscope. A randomized comparative trial in a western population. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:443–446PubMedCrossRef Wehrmann T, Lechowicz I, Martchenko K, Riphaus A (2008) Routine colonoscopy with a standard gastroscope. A randomized comparative trial in a western population. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:443–446PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Park CH, Lee WS, Joo YE, Kim HS, Choi SK, Rew JS, Kim SJ (2006) Sedation-free colonoscopy using an upper endoscope is tolerable and effective in patients with low body mass index: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2504–2510PubMedCrossRef Park CH, Lee WS, Joo YE, Kim HS, Choi SK, Rew JS, Kim SJ (2006) Sedation-free colonoscopy using an upper endoscope is tolerable and effective in patients with low body mass index: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2504–2510PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall JB, Perez RA, Madsen RW (2002) Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for routine colonoscopy in women who have undergone hysterectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 55:838–841PubMedCrossRef Marshall JB, Perez RA, Madsen RW (2002) Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for routine colonoscopy in women who have undergone hysterectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 55:838–841PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, Fujii H, Tanaka N (2004) Usefulness of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope as a backup in patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1936–1940PubMedCrossRef Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, Fujii H, Tanaka N (2004) Usefulness of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope as a backup in patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1936–1940PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Suzuki T, Matsushima M, Tsukune Y, Fujisawa M, Yazaki T, Uchida T, Gocyo S, Okita I, Shirakura K, Sasao K, Saito T, Sakamoto I, Igarashi M, Koike J, Takagi A, Mine T (2012) Double-balloon endoscopy versus magnet-imaging enhanced colonoscopy for difficult colonoscopies, a randomized study. Endoscopy 44:38–42PubMedCrossRef Suzuki T, Matsushima M, Tsukune Y, Fujisawa M, Yazaki T, Uchida T, Gocyo S, Okita I, Shirakura K, Sasao K, Saito T, Sakamoto I, Igarashi M, Koike J, Takagi A, Mine T (2012) Double-balloon endoscopy versus magnet-imaging enhanced colonoscopy for difficult colonoscopies, a randomized study. Endoscopy 44:38–42PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Farraye FA, Horton K, Hersey H, Trnka Y, Heeren T, Provenzale D (2004) Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy using an upper endoscope is better tolerated by women. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1074–1080PubMedCrossRef Farraye FA, Horton K, Hersey H, Trnka Y, Heeren T, Provenzale D (2004) Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy using an upper endoscope is better tolerated by women. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1074–1080PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Han Y, Uno Y, Munakata A (2000) Does flexible small-diameter colonoscope reduce insertion pain during colonoscopy? World J Gastroenterol 6:659–663PubMed Han Y, Uno Y, Munakata A (2000) Does flexible small-diameter colonoscope reduce insertion pain during colonoscopy? World J Gastroenterol 6:659–663PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Huppertz-Hauss G, Sauar J, Paulsen J, Dahler S, Kjellevold O (2005) Evaluation of a novel colonoscope designed for easier passage through flexures: a randomized study. Endoscopy 37:1123–1126PubMedCrossRef Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Huppertz-Hauss G, Sauar J, Paulsen J, Dahler S, Kjellevold O (2005) Evaluation of a novel colonoscope designed for easier passage through flexures: a randomized study. Endoscopy 37:1123–1126PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Okamoto M, Kawabe T, Kato J, Yamaji Y, Ikenoue T, Omata M (2005) Ultrathin colonoscope with a diameter of 9.8 mm for total colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 39:679–683PubMedCrossRef Okamoto M, Kawabe T, Kato J, Yamaji Y, Ikenoue T, Omata M (2005) Ultrathin colonoscope with a diameter of 9.8 mm for total colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 39:679–683PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson JC, Walker G, Birk JW, Alpern Z, Von Althen I (2007) Tapered colonoscope performs better than the pediatric colonoscope in female patients: a direct comparison through tandem colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 65:1042–1047PubMedCrossRef Anderson JC, Walker G, Birk JW, Alpern Z, Von Althen I (2007) Tapered colonoscope performs better than the pediatric colonoscope in female patients: a direct comparison through tandem colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 65:1042–1047PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Colonoscopy using a small-caliber colonoscope with passive-bending after incomplete colonoscopy due to sharp angulation or pain
verfasst von
Koichiro Sato
Fumiko Shigiyama
Sayo Ito
Tomoyuki Kitagawa
Kenji Tominaga
Takeshi Suzuki
Iruru Maetani
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2013
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3016-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.