Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 9/2017

30.06.2017 | Review

Colorectal cancer surgery in the very elderly patient: a systematic review of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection

verfasst von: Laurence Devoto, Valerio Celentano, Richard Cohen, Jim Khan, Manish Chand

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 9/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of death from neoplastic disease in men and third in women of all ages. Globally, life expectancy is increasing, and consequently, an increasing number of operations are being performed on more elderly patients with the trend set to continue.
Elderly patients are more likely to have cardiovascular and pulmonary comorbidities that are associated with increased peri-operative risk. They further tend to present with more locally advanced disease, more likely to obstruct or have disseminated disease.
The aim of this review was to investigate the feasibility of laparoscopic colorectal resection in very elderly patients, and whether there are benefits over open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed on Medline, Pubmed, Embase and Google Scholar. All comparative studies evaluating patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the patients population over 85 were included.
The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day overall morbidity. Secondary outcomes were operating time, time to oral diet, number of retrieved lymph nodes, blood loss and 5-year survival.

Results

The search provided 1507 citations. Sixty-nine articles were retrieved for full text analysis, and only six retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall mortality for elective laparoscopic resection was 2.92% and morbidity 23%. No single study showed a significant difference between laparoscopic and open surgery for morbidity or mortality, but pooled data analysis demonstrated reduced morbidity in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.032). Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery are more likely to have a shorter hospital stay and a shorter time to oral diet.

Conclusion

Elective laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in the over 85 age group is feasible and safe and offers similar advantages over open surgery to those demonstrated in patients of younger ages.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Malvezzi M, Arfe A, Bertuccio P et al (2011) European cancer mortality predictors for the year 2011. Ann Oncol 22:947–956CrossRefPubMed Malvezzi M, Arfe A, Bertuccio P et al (2011) European cancer mortality predictors for the year 2011. Ann Oncol 22:947–956CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Stepien S, Gluszek S, Koziel D et al (2014) The risk of surgical treatment in patients aged 85+, with special consideration of colorectal cancer. Pol Prezegl Chir 86(3):132–140 Stepien S, Gluszek S, Koziel D et al (2014) The risk of surgical treatment in patients aged 85+, with special consideration of colorectal cancer. Pol Prezegl Chir 86(3):132–140
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Merlin F, Prochilo T, Tondulli L et al (2008) Colorectal cancer treatment in elderly patients: an update on recent clinical studies. Clin Colorectal Cancer 7:357–363CrossRefPubMed Merlin F, Prochilo T, Tondulli L et al (2008) Colorectal cancer treatment in elderly patients: an update on recent clinical studies. Clin Colorectal Cancer 7:357–363CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M et al (2009) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients: is it safe and beneficial? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1614–1618CrossRefPubMed Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M et al (2009) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients: is it safe and beneficial? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1614–1618CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Amemiya T, Oda K, Ando M et al (2007) Activities of daily living and quality of life of elderly patients after elective surgery for gastric and colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 246:222–228CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Amemiya T, Oda K, Ando M et al (2007) Activities of daily living and quality of life of elderly patients after elective surgery for gastric and colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 246:222–228CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganai S, Lee KF, Merrill A et al (2007) Adverse outcomes of geriatric patients undergoing abdominal surgery who are at high risk for delirium. Arch Surg 142:1072–1078CrossRefPubMed Ganai S, Lee KF, Merrill A et al (2007) Adverse outcomes of geriatric patients undergoing abdominal surgery who are at high risk for delirium. Arch Surg 142:1072–1078CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott NA, Jeacock J, Kingston RD (1995) Risk factors in patients presenting as an emergency with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 82:321–323CrossRefPubMed Scott NA, Jeacock J, Kingston RD (1995) Risk factors in patients presenting as an emergency with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 82:321–323CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson V et al (2007) Surgical risk factors, morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:865–877CrossRef Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson V et al (2007) Surgical risk factors, morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:865–877CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jafari MD, Hafari F, Halabi WJ et al (2014) Colorectal cancer resections in the aging US population: a trend toward decreasing rates and improved outcomes. JAMA Surg 149:557–564CrossRefPubMed Jafari MD, Hafari F, Halabi WJ et al (2014) Colorectal cancer resections in the aging US population: a trend toward decreasing rates and improved outcomes. JAMA Surg 149:557–564CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE et al (2000) Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 43:4383–4391CrossRef Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE et al (2000) Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 43:4383–4391CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Neudecker J, Klein F, Bittner R et al (2009) Short-term outcomes from a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:1458–1467CrossRefPubMed Neudecker J, Klein F, Bittner R et al (2009) Short-term outcomes from a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:1458–1467CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahata O, Kunisawa T, Nagashima M et al (2007) Effect of age on pulmonary gas exchange during laparoscopy in the Trenedelenburg lithotomy position. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 51:687–692CrossRefPubMed Takahata O, Kunisawa T, Nagashima M et al (2007) Effect of age on pulmonary gas exchange during laparoscopy in the Trenedelenburg lithotomy position. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 51:687–692CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRefPubMed Van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Telzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Liberati A, Telzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group, European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group et al (2003) Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 7(27):iii-x):1–173CrossRef Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group, European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group et al (2003) Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 7(27):iii-x):1–173CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tominaga T, Takeshita H, Arai J et al (2015) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in oldest-old patients. Dig Surg 32:32–38CrossRefPubMed Tominaga T, Takeshita H, Arai J et al (2015) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in oldest-old patients. Dig Surg 32:32–38CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mukai T, Akiyoshi T, Ueno M et al (2014) Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in oldest-old patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:366–369CrossRefPubMed Mukai T, Akiyoshi T, Ueno M et al (2014) Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in oldest-old patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:366–369CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Vallribera Valls F, Landi F, Espin Basany E et al (2014) Laparoscopy-assisted versus open colectomy for treatment of colon cancer in the elderly: morbidity and mortality outcomes in 545 patients. Surg Endosc 28:3373–3378CrossRefPubMed Vallribera Valls F, Landi F, Espin Basany E et al (2014) Laparoscopy-assisted versus open colectomy for treatment of colon cancer in the elderly: morbidity and mortality outcomes in 545 patients. Surg Endosc 28:3373–3378CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura T, Sato T, Miura H et al (2014) Feasibility and outcomes of surgical therapy in very elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:85–88CrossRefPubMed Nakamura T, Sato T, Miura H et al (2014) Feasibility and outcomes of surgical therapy in very elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:85–88CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat van Walraven C, Austin PC, Jennings A et al (2009) A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data. Med Care 47:626–633CrossRefPubMed van Walraven C, Austin PC, Jennings A et al (2009) A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data. Med Care 47:626–633CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernandas AK, Abdelrahman T, Flashman KG et al (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high risk cancer patients compared to open surgery. Ann Surg 252:84–89CrossRef Hernandas AK, Abdelrahman T, Flashman KG et al (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high risk cancer patients compared to open surgery. Ann Surg 252:84–89CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Harari D, Hopper A, Dhesi J et al (2007) Proactive care of older people undergoing surgery (‘POPS’): designing, embedding, evaluating and funding a comprehensive geriatric assessment service for older elective surgical patients. Age Ageing 36(2):190–196CrossRefPubMed Harari D, Hopper A, Dhesi J et al (2007) Proactive care of older people undergoing surgery (‘POPS’): designing, embedding, evaluating and funding a comprehensive geriatric assessment service for older elective surgical patients. Age Ageing 36(2):190–196CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Marush F, Gastinger I, Schneider C et al (2001) Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results. Surg Endosc 15:116–120CrossRef Marush F, Gastinger I, Schneider C et al (2001) Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results. Surg Endosc 15:116–120CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Giglio MC, Celentano V, Tarquini R et al (2015) Conversion during laparoscopic colorectal resections: a complication or a drawback? A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Int J Color Dis 30(11):1445–1455CrossRef Giglio MC, Celentano V, Tarquini R et al (2015) Conversion during laparoscopic colorectal resections: a complication or a drawback? A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Int J Color Dis 30(11):1445–1455CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tekkis PP, Senagore A, Delaney et al (2005) Evaluation for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tekkis PP, Senagore A, Delaney et al (2005) Evaluation for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Mackenzie H, Miksovic D, Ni M et al (2013) Clinical and educational proficiency gain of supervised laparoscopic colorectal surgical trainees. Surg Endosc 27:2704–2711CrossRefPubMed Mackenzie H, Miksovic D, Ni M et al (2013) Clinical and educational proficiency gain of supervised laparoscopic colorectal surgical trainees. Surg Endosc 27:2704–2711CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Colorectal cancer surgery in the very elderly patient: a systematic review of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection
verfasst von
Laurence Devoto
Valerio Celentano
Richard Cohen
Jim Khan
Manish Chand
Publikationsdatum
30.06.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2848-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2017

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 9/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.