Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Infectious Diseases 1/2021

Open Access 01.12.2021 | Research article

Combination inhibition activity of chlorhexidine and antibiotics on multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in vitro

verfasst von: Fei Lin, Bin Yu, Qinghui Wang, Mingyong Yuan, Baodong Ling

Erschienen in: BMC Infectious Diseases | Ausgabe 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Chlorhexidine is a widely used disinfectant in clinical settings and a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent effective against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. However, disinfectant resistant or non-susceptible bacteria, including antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, have been found. This study aimed to develop a new technique to prevent and control A. baumannii infection in the hospital setting.

Methods

Chlorhexidine combined with minocycline, doxycycline, meropenem, imipenem, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were tested against the 30 multidrug-resistant and extremely drug-resistant A. baumannii clinical isolates. The checkerboard test was used to calculate the fractional inhibitory concentration index according to the minimum inhibitory concentration value for chlorhexidine combined with antibiotics.

Results

The combination of chlorhexidine with minocycline, doxycycline, meropenem, or ciprofloxacin showed synergistic responses in all clinical isolates, and more than 50% of isolates showed FICI ≤0.5. However, chlorhexidine together with imipenem or levofloxacin showed indifferent responses in 10% and 3.33% clinical isolates, respectively. In all tests, combinations of chlorhexidine with each of the above six antibiotics showed synergistic and additive effects, and inhibited the clinical isolates.

Conclusions

We concluded that, chlorhexidine combined with antibiotics could be used to control the risk of infection with A. baumannii.
Hinweise

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Chlorhexidine is a bisbiguanide antiseptic, disinfectant and preservative that is effective against a wide range of bacteria, and also a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent that is active against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria [1, 2]. It is widely used in children and adults with an excellent record of safety and efficacy for applications as diverse as hand washing, preoperative skin preparation, vaginal antisepsis, treatment of gingivitis, and body washes to prevent neonatal sepsis [35]. Chlorhexidine acts primarily on the bacterial cell membrane causing leakage of intracellular material. Low concentrations of chlorhexidine affect membrane integrity, whereas high concentrations cause congealing of the cytoplasm [2]. One research has shown that chlorhexidine can decrease the mortality and infection rate in the hospital setting, especially in the intensive care unit [3]. However, other researches have also found that several bacteria, including A. baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, have reduced susceptibility or are resistant to chlorhexidine [68].
A. baumannii is an opportunistic nosocomial pathogen which can survive for prolonged periods in the hospital environment. A. baumannii causes infections including bacteremia, pneumonia, meningitis, septicemia, urinary tract infections, wound and skin infections [9, 10]. The multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extremely-drug resistant (XDR), even the pan-drug resistant (PDR) A. baumannii have been found in hospitals. The carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii was identified as a priority by the World Health Organization’s (WHO) report on pathogens requiring research and development of new antibiotics. An important technique to prevent and control the spread of A. baumannii infection in the hospital setting is to remove the bacterial cell from the surface of medical devices. In recent years, research has focused on the antimicrobial resistance and reduced biocide susceptibility of A. baumannii [1012]. The chlorhexidine non- susceptibility A. baumannii in clinical isolates has been described previously [11]. In addition, chlorhexidine bathing significantly reduces colonization of A. baumannii in intensive care unit settings [13]. Özçaka Ö et al [14] found chlorhexidine decreases the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care unit patients, and A. baumannii was the most common pathogen (64.7%, 27/34) of all species identified. However, whether bathing can reduce A. baumannii infections requires validation with further studies. Therefore, this study aimed to test chlorhexidine combined with antibiotics against the MDR and XDR A. baumannii isolated from clinical departments.

Material and methods

Bacterial strains and media

A. baumannii ATCC19606 was used as the wild-type strain. A total of 30 A. baumannii clinical isolates, comprising 6 multidrug-resistant (MDR), and 24 extremely-drug resistant (XDR) isolates, were used in this study and have been described previously [11]. Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth or agar (Oxoid, England) were the growth mediums used throughout the study. Bacteria were cultivated at 37 °C.

Antibiotics and other agents

The antibiotics and biocides used in this study were purchased commercially. Chlorhexidine acetate, Doxycycline (DOX), minocycline (MIN), levofloxacin (LEV), ciprofloxacin (CIP), imipenem (IMP), meropenem (MER) were purchased from Dalian Meilun Biological Technology (Dalian, China).

Checkerboard test

The interaction of chlorhexidine acetate with antibiotics was evaluated by the checkerboard method and expressed as the sum of the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) for the DOX, MIN, LEV, CIP, IMP and MER. A 96 well plate was used. Briefly, 170 μl of MH broth medium and 10 μl of bacterial suspension (1.5 × 108 CFU/ml) were added to a 96 well plate and followed by addition of 10 μl a serially diluted chlorhexidine acetate along the x-axis and antibiotics agent on the y-axis. The FICI of each agent was calculated as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the agent in combination divided by the MIC of the agent alone. The FICI was calculated in accordance with the following formula:
$$ \mathrm{FICI}={\mathrm{MIC}}_{\mathrm{A}\ \mathrm{combination}}/{\mathrm{MIC}}_{\mathrm{A}\ \mathrm{alone}}+{\mathrm{MIC}}_{\mathrm{B}\ \mathrm{combination}}/{\mathrm{MIC}}_{\mathrm{B}\ \mathrm{alone}}. $$
MICA alone and MICB alone are the MICs of drugs A and B when acting alone, MICA combination and MICB combination are the concentration of drug A and B in the effective combinations. In the equation, A is chlorhexidine, B is antibiotics agents. The results were interpreted as follows: 0.5 ≤ FICI < 1, synergistic; FICI = 1, additive; 1 < FICI ≤4, indifferent; and FICI > 4, antagonistic [15, 16].

Results

Checkerboard test

The checkerboard test showed the synergistic effects of biocides combined with antibiotics against the MDR and XDR A. baumannii (Table 1). Meanwhile, the MIC value of antibiotics was one to sixteen-fold decrease which combined with chlorhexidine than alone for clinical isolates of A. baumannii (Table 2). The combinations of chlorhexidine with DOX, MIN, MER, or CIP had synergistic effects in all test isolates, as more than 50% of isolates showed the FICI ≤0.5. When chlorhexidine was combined with LEX and IMP, more than 66.67% of isolates were 0.5 < FICI ≤1. However, chlorhexidine together with IMP or LEV were indifferent in only 10 and 3.33% of isolates, respectively. In all tests, chlorhexidine and the other 6 antibiotics showed synergistic and additive effects.
Table 1
Effects of biocide combinations on MDR and XDR A. baumannii isolates (n = 30)
 
Antibiotics
FICI range
Mechanism
MDR
XDR
Synergistic
Additive
Indifferent
Antagonistic
chlorhexidine
DOX
0.375–1
0.375–1
27 (90)
3 (10)
/
/
MIN
0.375–1
0.3125–1
27 (90)
3 (10)
/
/
IMP
0.625–1.5
0.3125–1.5
13 (43.33)
14 (46.67)
3 (10)
/
MER
0.25–0.625
0.3125–0.75
29 (96.67)
1 (3.33)
/
/
LEV
0.375–0.75
0.5–1.5
26 (86.67)
3 (10)
1 (3.33)
/
CIP
0.5–1
0.5–1
26 (86.67)
4 (13.33)
/
/
Table 2
The MIC values (μg/mL) of antibiotics which test alone or combined with chlorhexidine for 6 MDR and 24 XDR clinical isolates of A. baumannii
Isolates
Country
Age
Source
IMP
MER
LEV
CIP
DOX
MIN
CHG
MIC alone
MIC combination
MIC alone
MIC combination
MIC alone
MIC combination
MIC alone
MIC combination
MIC alone
MIC combination
MIC alone
MIC combination
MIC alone
MDR1
China
48
Sputum
16
16
8
1
4
1
64
16
64
32
16
4
64
MDR2
China
87
Sputum
64
32
64
8
4
2
128
32
64
8
8
1
64
MDR3
China
77
Sputum
16
4
16
4
4
2
64
16
64
16
8
4
32
MDR4
China
72
Sputum
16
4
8
1
8
1
64
16
64
32
16
4
32
MDR5
China
79
Sputum
16
8
4
0.5
8
4
64
32
64
32
16
8
16
MDR6
China
89
Sputum
4
0.5
2
1
8
4
64
32
64
32
8
4
16
XDR1
China
37
Sputum
16
4
8
1
4
1
64
16
32
2
4
1
64
XDR2
China
78
Sputum
64
32
32
8
4
2
128
32
1
0.5
1
0.5
64
XDR3
China
57
Sputum
16
16
8
1
8
4
128
32
64
16
16
4
64
XDR4
China
51
Sputum
64
64
32
2
8
4
128
32
64
16
16
4
128
XDR5
China
78
Sputum
16
1
8
1
8
2
128
32
64
16
16
4
128
XDR6
China
72
Sputum
16
2
8
1
8
4
64
16
64
16
16
1
128
XDR7
China
78
Sputum
64
32
32
4
8
4
128
64
64
16
8
2
64
XDR8
China
74
Sputum
64
32
32
8
8
2
128
32
64
16
8
2
64
XDR9
China
78
Sputum
64
32
64
16
8
2
64
16
64
16
16
2
128
XDR10
China
52
Sputum
64
32
32
2
8
4
128
32
64
16
16
4
64
XDR11
China
61
Sputum
32
16
16
2
8
4
128
64
64
16
8
2
64
XDR12
China
52
Sputum
64
4
32
8
8
2
64
16
64
16
8
2
64
XDR13
China
61
Sputum
32
4
16
4
8
2
128
32
64
16
8
2
64
XDR14
China
93
Sputum
64
8
16
4
8
2
64
16
64
16
8
1
64
XDR15
China
52
Sputum
64
32
16
2
8
2
128
16
64
16
16
2
64
XDR16
China
45
Sputum
16
4
16
2
8
4
128
32
64
16
16
1
64
XDR17
China
82
Sputum
16
4
8
4
8
1
64
16
64
32
8
4
16
XDR18
China
93
Lavage fluid
16
8
8
4
8
8
64
32
64
32
8
4
16
XDR19
China
66
Sputum
16
8
4
1
8
4
64
32
64
32
16
8
16
XDR20
China
80
Sputum
16
8
16
4
8
2
128
64
64
32
16
2
64
XDR21
China
72
Sputum
64
32
16
2
8
2
128
32
64
32
8
2
8
XDR22
China
70
Sputum
16
4
8
1
8
4
64
32
64
32
16
4
32
XDR23
China
66
Sputum
16
8
8
2
8
4
64
16
64
32
16
4
16
XDR24
China
82
Sputum
8
4
8
1
8
4
64
16
64
32
16
2
8
Fold change
   
1–16
1–16
1–8
2–4
2–16
2–16
 

Discussion

A. baumannii has become a major threat in the hospital environment by causing nosocomial infections and colonization. It is inherently resistant to multiple antibiotics [10, 17]. In the present study, MDR, XDR, PDR and biocides non-susceptible A. baumannii were isolated from clinical patients [11]. A. baumannii clinical isolates have been isolated from sputum samples which frequently lead to pneumonia. In a previous study, the sputum samples accounted for 89.36% of the total samples [11]. Chlorhexidine has good bactericidal effect and high safety on many bacteria. Some clinical research found chlorhexidine decreases the risk of pneumonia by maintaining good oral hygiene and body washing [14, 18] . A recent study has shown that chlorhexidine could reduce the susceptibility to A. baumannii infection [11].
Other studies have also shown that chlorhexidine alone or in combination with other antibiotics can prevent and reduce hospital-acquired infections, including respiratory catheter, gastric tube and urinary catheter [13, 1921]. For example, Jamal et al. [21] showed chlorhexidine alone, or combine with minocycline and rifampicin, reduced the incidence of A. baumannii catheter-related infections. In this study, chlorhexidine combinations with doxycycline, minocycline, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, or meropenem against 6 MDR and 24 XDR A. baumannii clinical isolates were tested in vitro. The results showed chlorhexidine combinations with DOX, MIN, MER, or CIP were synergistic in all biocide combinations, with more than 50% of isolates showing FICI ≤0.5. Additionally, the chlorhexidine and antimicrobial MIC values were decreased, which indicates that this technique could effectively reduce drug resistance. However, methods for implementation in clinical settings which avoid adverse drug reactions need to be elucidated. The biocides combined with antibiotics can be used in clinical isolate inhabitation. Since chlorhexidine can be used on the body surface, it can be mixed with antibacterial drugs for disinfectant wipes used in patients’ oral care, tracheal intubation and ventilators, to eliminate fixed-value bacteria and prevent the spread of infection.
The solution of IMP in normal saline solution was stable 3 to 4 h stored at 25 °C [22]. MER in 0.9% saline was stable at least 7 h if the temperature does not increase to 22 °C, while MER stability at 5 h when temperature does not exceed 33 °C [23]. Chlorhexidine combination with MER shown synergistic effects than IMP, and chlorhexidine together with IMP was indifferent in 10% of isolates. Cause IMP easy to lost activity when under test temperature. Meanwhile, solution of CIP was diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride, and the solution was stale at least 3 months when stored at room temperatures [24]. LEV was stable in 0.9% sodium chloride when stored at 25 °C for 3 days [25]. The MIN diluted in Mueller-Hinton agar plate was instable when stored under refrigeration, and DOX also lost activity at a slower rate [26]. The LEV, CIP, DOX and MIN are stable when under test temperature. The combinations of chlorhexidine with DOX and MIN as well as LEV and CIP had the same effects in all test isolates.

Conclusions

In conclusion, Chlorhexidine combined with antibacterial drugs has synergistic or additive antibacterial effects against multiple and pan-resistant A. baumannii. This new technique may have important implications for the treatment and transmission control of A. baumannii infection.

Acknowledgments

Not Applicable.

Declarations

Not applicable.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Günther F, Kaiser SJ, Fries T, Frank U, Mutters NT. Susceptibility of multidrug resistant clinical pathogens to a chlorhexidine formulation. J Prev Med Hyg. 2015;56(4):E176.PubMedPubMedCentral Günther F, Kaiser SJ, Fries T, Frank U, Mutters NT. Susceptibility of multidrug resistant clinical pathogens to a chlorhexidine formulation. J Prev Med Hyg. 2015;56(4):E176.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Vilela MCN, et al. Oral care and nosocomial pneumonia: a systematic review. Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2015;13(2):290–6.CrossRef Vilela MCN, et al. Oral care and nosocomial pneumonia: a systematic review. Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2015;13(2):290–6.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis SR, et al. Chlorhexidine bathing of the critically ill for the prevention of hospital-acquired infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;8:Cd012248.PubMed Lewis SR, et al. Chlorhexidine bathing of the critically ill for the prevention of hospital-acquired infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;8:Cd012248.PubMed
22.
Metadaten
Titel
Combination inhibition activity of chlorhexidine and antibiotics on multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in vitro
verfasst von
Fei Lin
Bin Yu
Qinghui Wang
Mingyong Yuan
Baodong Ling
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2021
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Infectious Diseases / Ausgabe 1/2021
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2334
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-05963-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

BMC Infectious Diseases 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.