Background
Cancer is a multigenic disease caused by the abnormal proliferation and differentiation of cells governed by tumorigenic factors [
1]. Chemotherapy is one of the major cancer treatment strategies, and it functions by targeting the biological capabilities of cancer cells, including sustained proliferation, the evasion of programmed cell death and tissue migration [
2]. Remarkably, among the FDA approved anticancer drugs, more than 75% originate from natural sources (e.g., Taxol, doxorubicin, or vincristine) and are used in their actual form or with simple modifications from the actual form [
3,
4]. Thus, natural products have garnered increased attention in the chemotherapy drug discovery field because they are biologically friendly and have high therapeutic effects [
5,
6].
Tetrandrine (Tet), a bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloid isolated from the medicinal plant
Stephania tetrandrine S. Moore, has been widely used as an effective agent to treat patients with hypertension, arrhythmia, arthritis, inflammation, and silicosis in traditional Chinese medicine [
7]. Of note, tetrandrine has recently been identified as a potential leading compound among anticancer agents with various pharmacological effects, including the regulation of cell viability, migration, invasion, angiogenesis and multidrug resistance of tumors [
8,
9]. Our previous studies have indicated that tetrandrine induced apoptosis at a high concentration and induced autophagy at low concentrations [
10‐
12]. Moreover, tetrandrine showed potential anti-tumor activity in leukemia and hepatocellular carcinoma [
13,
14].
However, tetrandrine, as a promising chemotherapeutic candidate, was in the preclinical phase [
9,
12]. At times, it has been observed that certain phytochemicals are active only when they are in combination with other metabolites of the source material [
15]. In addition, as a result of the complexity of cancer with the involvement of multiple signaling pathways, it is difficult for a single compound to combat cancer [
16,
17]. Nevertheless, if a compound exhibits a potent anticancer effect, there is a chance for the development of resistance against the compound by tumor cells, thereby making the drug ineffective [
18]. Thus, combination therapy may be an available strategy to improve the treatment efficacy [
19,
20]. Increasing studies have shown that tetrandrine may induce synergistic activity to enhance cytotoxicity when combined with molecularly targeted drugs, such as sorafenib [
21], methylprednisolone [
22] and glucocorticoids [
23].
H89, a potent protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor, has the ability to readily cross the cell membrane, with preclinical activity demonstrated in vitro and in vivo [
24‐
26]. H89 attenuates airway inflammation in mouse models of asthma [
27]. Of note, recent efforts have focused on its pharmacological activities against cancer. Numerous studies have demonstrated that H89 showed chemotherapy sensitization activity. Reports have documented that H89 enhanced HA22 (Moxetumomab pasudotox) treatment of CD22-positive ALL and mesothelin-expressing solid tumors [
28]. H89 has also been shown to dramatically synergize with oncolytic virus M1 to improve tumor regression and trigger apoptosis in aggressive cancer cells when combined with glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) [
29,
30].
In this work, we discovered that H89 and tetrandrine showed synergistic anti-tumor effects on various cancer cells in vitro and in vivo, and we investigated the underlying mechanisms of their anti-tumor activities. In addition, we determined that c-Myc amplified cells are more sensitive to H89/tetrandrine combined treatment, which may represent a novel, selective therapeutic strategy for cancer patients.
Methods
Cell lines and cell culture
The human breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, and MCF-7) were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). The human hepatoma cell lines (Hep3B and Huh7) and the normal cell lines (L02, HBL-100, and HEK293T) were purchased from CCTCC (Wuhan, China). The cell line HCCLM9 was purchased from the Liver Cancer Institute (Fudan University, China). These various cell lines were cultured in DMEM. The human renal carcinoma cell lines (769-P, ACHN, and 786-O) and the human lung cancer cell line (A549) were purchased from ATCC and maintained in 1640 RPMI. The human colon cancer cell lines (LOVO and HCT116) were purchased from ATCC and cultured in McCoy’s 5A. All cells were cultured in media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, HyClone), penicillin 100 U·mL− 1 and 100 μg·ml− 1 streptomycin and were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.
Reagents
The reagents used in this study are listed as follows: H89 2HCl (10 mM, dissolved in DMSO, S1582, Selleck, Houston, TX), forskolin (FSK) (10 mM, dissolved in DMSO, S2449, Selleck, Houston, TX), PKI (14–22) amide myristoylated (PKI) (0.5 mg, dissolved in DMSO, Sc471154, Santa Cruz, CA), Tetrandrine (10 mM, dissolved in DMSO, CAS:518–34-3, Shanghai Ronghe Medical, Shanghai, China), Caspase inhibitor z-VAD-fmk (10 mM, dissolved in DMSO, S7023, Selleck, Houston, TX), Bafilomycin A1 (dissolved in DMSO, S1413, Selleck, Houston, TX), Chloroquine (CQ) (C6628, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), PD98059 (Beverly, MA, USA), N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) (dissolved in ddH2O, A0150000, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 3-Methyladenine (3-MA) (dissolved in ddH2O, M9281-100MG, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) (Invitrogen Carlsbad, CA), and an FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit (556,547, BD Pharmingen). All reagents were formulated as recommended by their suppliers.
Cell viability assay
To measure viability following H89 and/or tetrandrine treatment, cells were seeded on 96-well plates at a density of 4 × 103 cells per well. Cells were allowed to attach overnight in complete media and were subsequently treated with the indicated concentrations of tetrandrine and/or H89 for an additional 72 h. Control cells received DMSO (< 0.1%) that contained medium. The cell viability was determined using the trypan blue dye exclusion assay according to established protocols.
Drug combination analysis
A drug combination analysis was performed using the method described by Chou and Talalay [
31]. Briefly, cells were plated in 96-well plates and treated with 1–5 μM tetrandrine and 1–10 μM H89 alone or in combination for 72 h; the cell viability was subsequently assessed. Multiple drug dose-effect calculations and the combination index plots were generated using Calcusyn 2.1 software (Biosoft, Cambridge, UK). CI values < 1, = 1 and > 1 indicate synergism, additive and antagonism between two drugs, respectively.
Apoptosis assay
Apoptosis was determined using an Annexin V-FITC/PI apoptosis detection kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the untreated and treated cells were washed with PBS and gently suspended in Annexin V binding buffer, followed by incubation with Annexin V-FITC and PI at room temperature for 15 min. Finally, the fluorescent intensities were determined by a flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, CA, USA), and the data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA).
Cell were seeded at 2500 cells per well in 6-well plates and treated with H89, tetrandrine or the combination. Cells were washed with fresh medium after 24 h, allowed to grow for 8 days under drug-free conditions, and stained with crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Colonies with more than 50 cells were counted.
Western blot and antibodies
After various treatments, both floating and adherent cells were harvested and subsequently washed with cold PBS. The cells were then lysed with 1% SDS on ice. The cell lysates were subsequently heated at 95 °C for 20 min and centrifuged at 12,000×g for 10 min, and the supernatant was collected. For the tumor tissue, the samples were homogenized and sonicated in RIPA buffer (Beyotime, Nantong, China) in the presence of protease inhibitor cocktail on ice. The tissue lysates were subsequently centrifuged at 12,000×g for 15 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was collected for Western blotting analysis. Protein was quantified using a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA). The proteins were separated by 8–12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The blots were blocked for 2 h at room temperature with freshly prepared 5% nonfat milk (Bio-Rad, USA) in TBST and were subsequently incubated with specific primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The membranes were then washed with TBST and incubated with HRP conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. After washing with TBST, the immunoblots were visualized by Immobilon™ Western HRP Substrate peroxide (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The following antibodies were employed: anti-PARP (# 9542), anti-Caspase-3 (# 9662), anti-Caspase-9 (# 9502), anti-Bcl-2 (# 2872), anti-Bcl-xL (# 2762), anti-Mcl-1 (# 4572), anti-Bim (# 2819), anti-Bid (# 2002), anti-cytochrome c (# 4272), anti-p-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204, # 9101), anti-T-ERK (# 9102), p-MEK (# 9121S), anti-p-CREB1-s133 (# 9198), and anti-CREB1 (# 9197), which were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology. Antibodies for LC3B (# L7543) and anti-β-actin (# A2228) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Antibody for c-Myc (9E10) (sc-40) was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
Determination of intracellular ROS
The intracellular ROS levels were detected by a flow cytometer utilizing Dichloro-dihydro-fluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA). Briefly, 7 × 104 cells were plated on 12-well plates, allowed to attach overnight and then treated with the indicated concentrations of tetrandrine and/or H89 for the indicated times. NAC pretreatment, where indicated, was conducted for 1 h. Cells were stained with DCFH-DA (1 μM) in serum-free media at 37 °C for 30 min in the dark. DCF fluorescence (produced in the presence of ROS) was analyzed using flow cytometry. For the detection of the mitochondrial membrane potential, the cell pretreatments were performed as described for the ROS detection protocol. A 5 μL solution of 0.1 mg·mL− 1 Rho123 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was added, and the cells were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. The fluorescence was measured via flow cytometry.
Tandem mRFP-GFP-LC3 reporter assay
Cells were transfected with the mRFP-GFP-LC3 plasmid (Addgene, # 21074) and were subsequently treated with DMSO or H89/tetrandrine. Autophagy flux was assessed by counting cells that were mRFP+GFP+LC3 (yellow puncta), which represents autophagosomes, and mRFP+GFP−LC3 (red puncta), which represents autolysosomes.
Lentiviral transduction
pLKO.1 plasmids that contained shRNA sequences targeting c-Myc (shc-Myc#1: target sequence: CCTGAGACAGATCAGCAACAA; shc-Myc#2: target sequence CAGTTGAAACACAAACTTGAA) were established. The empty vector was used as a negative control. PHAGE-puro-c-Myc and the control plasmids were kindly provided by Dr. Youjun Li (Wuhan University). A PHAGE-puro-Mcl-1 plasmid was constructed. To generate virus, 293 T cells were seeded in each 10 cm dish. After 24 h, the control and shRNA constructs that targeted c-Myc (12 μg each), packaging plasmid (psPAX2; 6 μg) and envelope plasmid (pMD2.G; 6 μg) were diluted with 0.5 mL Opti-MEM medium (Gibco, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and mixed with transfection reagent FuGENE™ HD (Roche, USA). Twelve hours after transfection, the culture medium was changed to fresh culture medium; after 48 h, the virus-containing supernatants were collected and used to infect cells in the presence of 8 μg·mL− 1 polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The cells were subsequently selected in the presence of puromycin (5 μg·mL− 1; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) to establish stable clones.
RT-PCR
RNA was isolated from cultured cells using an OMEGA-RNA Miniprep kit, and RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA molecules using a cDNA synthesis kit (Roche Applied Science, USA). The numbers of Mcl-1 and β-actin molecules were monitored in real time on a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) by measuring the fluorescence increases of SYBR Green (Roche Applied Science, USA). The primer sequences for PCR were as follows: Mcl-1 forward 5’-CCAAGAAAGCTGCATCGAACCAT-3′ and Mcl-1 reverse 5’-CAGCACATTCCTGATGCCACCT-3′; β-actin forward 5’-GGCATGGGTCAGAAGGATT-3′ and β-actin reverse 5’-AGGATGCCTCTCTTGCTCTG-3′. To determine the relative abundance of Mcl-1 in relation to β-actin, the Δ-ΔCT (cycle threshold) method was utilized.
Tumor xenograft
Animals were handled according to the Guidelines of the China Animal Welfare Legislation, as provided by the Committee on Ethics in the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Wuhan University. The experimental protocols were approved by the Experimental Animal Centre of Wuhan University. Female nude nu/nu BALB/c mice (14–16 g; 4–5 weeks of age) were purchased from Hunan SJA Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. (Changsha, China). Animals were housed at a constant room temperature with a 12/12 h light/dark cycle and were fed a standard rodent diet.
MDA-MB-231 cells (5 × 10
6), MDA-MB-231 control or Mcl-1 cells (5 × 10
6), or MDA-MB-231 shCtrl or shc-Myc cells (5 × 10
6) were subcutaneously implanted into the right flank of each mouse in 0.2 mL PBS. Once the tumor volume of MDA-MB-231 cells reached 50–100 mm
3, the tumor-bearing mice were randomly separated into four groups (
n = 6) and treated via gavage of 25 mg·kg
− 1tetrandrine with 0.5% sodium carboxyl methylcellulose, i.p. injection of 10 mg·kg
− 1 H89 (in a solution of PBS with 1% DMSO+ 30% polyethylene glycol+ 1%Tween 80) or a combination of H89 and tetrandrine (10 mg·kg
− 1 H89 and 25 mg·kg
− 1 tetrandrine) every other day for 28 days. The control group received the same vehicle. For the MDA-MB-231 control and Mcl-1 cells, tumor-bearing mice were randomized into two test groups (
n = 6) and were administered vehicle (0.5% carboxymethylcellulose sodium) or H89 (10 mg·kg
− 1) and tetrandrine (25 mg·kg
− 1) every other day for 36 days. For the MDA-MB-231 shCtrl and shc-Myc cells, tumor-bearing mice were randomized into two test groups (
n = 6) and were administered vehicle (0.5% carboxymethylcellulose sodium) or H89 (10 mg·kg
− 1) and tetrandrine (25 mg·kg
− 1) every other day for 30 days. The tumor volumes were determined by measuring the length (l) and width (w) and calculating the volume (V = 0.5 × l × w
2) every other day. At the end of the experiments, the mice were euthanized after being anesthetized with an i.p. injection with pentobarbital (50 mg·kg
− 1); their tumors were isolated by dissection, weighed and used for in vitro experiments. Samples were prepared for histology and protein assays. All studies involving animals are reported in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals [
32].
Malondialdehyde (MDA) assay
Tumor samples from mice were homogenized and sonicated. Tissue lysates were subsequently centrifuged at 12000×g for 10 min at 4 °C to collect the supernatant. The total protein content was determined using the Bradford assay. The MDA levels were measured by the Lipid Peroxidation MDA assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology).
Statistical analysis
All experiments were randomized and repeated at least three times. Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism Software version 5.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). All data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Student’s two-tailed t-tests were performed to calculate P values unless otherwise specified. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Discussion
Apoptosis, defined as type-I programmed cell death (PDC), is considered to be a major route by which chemotherapeutic agents eradicate cancer cells [
45,
46]. In this study, we showed that H89/tetrandrine activated caspase-dependent apoptosis through mitochondrial-mediated pathways, upregulated the expression of the pro-apoptotic proteins Bim and Bid, and downregulated the expression of the anti-apoptotic protein Mcl-1. Surprisingly, H89/tetrandrine-induced cell death could not be completely reversed by the apoptosis inhibitor z-VAD-fmk, which implies that apoptosis was not the only contributor. Autophagy is involved in type-II programmed cell death, particularly in apoptosis-deficient cells, and may be exploited to suppress tumor growth [
47,
48]. Our results showed that H89/tetrandrine-induced cell death was moderately diminished by the autophagy inhibitor, which demonstrates the contribution of autophagy to cell death in response to treatment. Therefore, a combination of agents that induce both apoptotic and autophagic cell death may have greater advantages during the treatment of cancer.
H89 is a strong PKA inhibitor. Moreover, our study suggests that PKA and ERK signaling are involved in the response to the PKA kinase inhibitor H89 and tetrandrine synergistic anti-tumor activity. H89/tetrandrine resulted in almost complete abrogation of the expression of phosphorylated CREB1. Moreover, pretreatment with the adenylyl cyclase activator FSK partially rescued cells from death, which suggests that combined treatment exerted anti-tumor effects in a cAMP/PKA-dependent manner. To mimic the H89-mediated inhibition of PKA, PKI (14–22) amide, another PKA special inhibitor, was used in combination with tetrandrine to treat AGS, 769-P and 786-O cells (Additional file
1: Figure S2D). PKI and tetrandrine also acted synergistically on cancer cells, which implies that the suppression of PKA activity plays a role in the anti-tumor activity of H89 plus tetrandrine.
However, the relationship between PKA and ERK signaling was not investigated in this study. Previous reports have demonstrated that cAMP increases inhibitory Raf-1 phosphorylation at Ser-259 and reduces activating Raf-1 phosphorylation at Ser-338 in a PKA-dependent manner, thereby inducing ERK deactivation [
49,
50], which is consistent with our finding that H89 induced PKA inhibition and tetrandrine induced ERK activation are concomitantly involved in H89/tetrandrine combination treatment induced cell death.
Mcl-1 is a pro-survival member of the Bcl-2 family and is highly expressed in various types of malignancy. Thus, Mcl-1 has emerged as a promising target for cancer treatment [
51]. In our study, we determined that H89/tetrandrine treatment synergistically inhibited Mcl-1 in cancer cells at both the transcription and protein expression levels. Furthermore, we identified that Mcl-1 plays an important role in H89/tetrandrine anti-tumor activity in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, Mcl-1 appears to inhibit apoptosis by preventing mitochondrial dysfunction, with a limited effect on autophagy. However, it is not clear why the expression of the anti-apoptotic protein Mcl-1 was decreased in response to H89/tetrandrine treatment. This finding must be investigated in our future studies.
c-Myc, a commonly activated oncogene, also increases cellular susceptibility to apoptosis [
52]. In this study, we interestingly determined that c-Myc-overexpressing cancer cells are more sensitive to H89/tetrandrine combination therapy. Consistently, the knockdown of c-Myc attenuated the sensitivity to H89/tetrandrine in vitro and in mouse xenograft models. We showed that the knockdown of c-Myc significantly increased the Mcl-1 expression, and the overexpression of c-Myc decreased the Mcl-1 levels, which indicates that c-Myc regulating sensitivity to H89/tetrandrine may be associated with downregulating Mcl-1. Other researchers have previously reported that oncogenes such that c-Myc activation induced DNA damage in human normal fibroblasts, which was correlated with the induction of ROS without induction of apoptosis [
53]. Having uncovered that c-Myc regulates ROS generation in cancer cells and affects chemotherapeutic sensitivity, in this study, we determined that c-Myc knockdown or ectopic expression significantly diminished or increased ROS generation, respectively. These findings may explain why c-Myc amplified cells are more sensitive to H89/tetrandrine treatment. Although intracellular ROS were increased in AGS and MDA-MB-231 shc-Myc cells when treated with H89/tetrandrine, the levels remained lower than in shCtrl cells, which implies that an appropriate ROS threshold is necessary for H89/tetrandrine induced cell death.