Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 4/2018

07.02.2018 | Letter to the Editor

Comment on “Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis”

verfasst von: Renée J. Detollenaere, Hugo W. F. van Eijndhoven

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Dear Editor, …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat De Oliveira SA, Fonseca MCM, Bortolini MAT, Girão MJBC, Roque MT, Castro RA. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;208(11):1617–30.CrossRef De Oliveira SA, Fonseca MCM, Bortolini MAT, Girão MJBC, Roque MT, Castro RA. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;208(11):1617–30.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapoor S, Sivanesan K, Kapoor V, Veerasingham M. Comment on "Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis". Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(11):1761. Kapoor S, Sivanesan K, Kapoor V, Veerasingham M. Comment on "Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis". Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(11):1761.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat De Oliveira SA, Bortolini MAT, Castro RA. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analyses. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(11):1763. De Oliveira SA, Bortolini MAT, Castro RA. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analyses. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(11):1763.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717. Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietz V, van der Vaart CH, van der Graaf Y, Heintz P, Schraffordt Koops SE. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(2):209–16. Dietz V, van der Vaart CH, van der Graaf Y, Heintz P, Schraffordt Koops SE. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(2):209–16.
Metadaten
Titel
Comment on “Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis”
verfasst von
Renée J. Detollenaere
Hugo W. F. van Eijndhoven
Publikationsdatum
07.02.2018
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3553-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

International Urogynecology Journal 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.