Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 6/2018

05.03.2018 | Original Article

Comparative Quality of Life in Patients Following Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery and Healthy Control Subjects

verfasst von: Stefan H. E. M. Clermonts, Yu-Ting van Loon, Dareczka K. Wasowicz, Barbara S. Langenhoff, David D. E. Zimmerman

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is considered the successor of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS). It makes use of more readily available laparoscopic instruments and single-port access platforms with similar perioperative, clinical and oncological outcomes. Little is known about quality of life (QoL) outcomes after the use of TAMIS. The aim of this study was to assess QoL after TAMIS in our patients and compare this with QoL in the healthy Dutch population.

Methods

All patients undergoing TAMIS for selected rectal neoplasms between October 2011 and March 2014 were included in this analysis. Patients were studied for a minimal period of 24 months. QoL outcomes were measured using the Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire; faecal continence was measured using the Faecal Incontinence Severity Index questionnaire. Patient reported outcomes were compared to case-matched healthy Dutch control subjects. We hypothesise that undergoing TAMIS will subsequently result in a decreased quality of life in patients compared to healthy individuals.

Results

Thirty-seven patients (m:f = 17:20, median 67 years) were included in the current analysis. In four patients (10.8%), postoperative complications occurred. The median follow-up was 36 (range 21–47) months. Postoperative QoL scores are similar comparable to those reported by Dutch healthy controls. Patients reported a statistically significant better QoL score in the ‘bodily pain’ domain when compared to the controls (81.8 vs. 74.1 points) (p = 0.01). Significant worse QoL scores for the ‘social functioning’ domain were reported by patients after TAMIS (84.4 vs. 100 points) (p = 0.03).

Conclusion

TAMIS seems to be a safe technique with postoperative QoL scores similar to that of healthy case matched controls in 3-year follow-up. There seems to be no association between faecal incontinence and reported QoL. Negative effects of TAMIS on social functioning of patients should not be underestimated and should be discussed during preoperative counselling.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Buess, G., et al., A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation. Chirurg, 1984. 55(10): p. 677–80.PubMed Buess, G., et al., A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation. Chirurg, 1984. 55(10): p. 677–80.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore, J.S., et al., Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008. 51(7): p. 1026–30; discussion 1030-1.CrossRefPubMed Moore, J.S., et al., Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008. 51(7): p. 1026–30; discussion 1030-1.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat de Graaf, E.J., et al., Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is superior to transanal excision of rectal adenomas. Colorectal Dis, 2011. 13(7): p. 762–7.CrossRefPubMed de Graaf, E.J., et al., Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is superior to transanal excision of rectal adenomas. Colorectal Dis, 2011. 13(7): p. 762–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Atallah, S., M. Albert, and S. Larach, Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc, 2010. 24(9): p. 2200–5.CrossRefPubMed Atallah, S., M. Albert, and S. Larach, Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc, 2010. 24(9): p. 2200–5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Barendse, R.M., et al., Transanal employment of single access ports is feasible for rectal surgery. Ann Surg, 2012. 256(6): p. 1030–3.CrossRefPubMed Barendse, R.M., et al., Transanal employment of single access ports is feasible for rectal surgery. Ann Surg, 2012. 256(6): p. 1030–3.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dafnis, G., et al., Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: clinical and functional results. Colorectal Dis, 2004. 6(5): p. 336–42.CrossRefPubMed Dafnis, G., et al., Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: clinical and functional results. Colorectal Dis, 2004. 6(5): p. 336–42.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Herman, R.M., et al., Anorectal sphincter function and rectal barostat study in patients following transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2001. 16(6): p. 370–6.CrossRefPubMed Herman, R.M., et al., Anorectal sphincter function and rectal barostat study in patients following transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2001. 16(6): p. 370–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Doornebosch, P.G., et al., Impact of transanal endoscopic microsurgery on functional outcome and quality of life. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2008. 23(7): p. 709–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Doornebosch, P.G., et al., Impact of transanal endoscopic microsurgery on functional outcome and quality of life. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2008. 23(7): p. 709–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Allaix, M.E., et al., Long-term functional results and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg, 2011. 98(11): p. 1635–43.CrossRefPubMed Allaix, M.E., et al., Long-term functional results and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg, 2011. 98(11): p. 1635–43.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Clermonts S.H.E.M., et al., Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal polyps and selected malignant tumors: caution concerning intermediate term functional results. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2017. 32(12):1677–1685.CrossRefPubMed Clermonts S.H.E.M., et al., Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal polyps and selected malignant tumors: caution concerning intermediate term functional results. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2017. 32(12):1677–1685.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiphorst, A.H., et al., Transanal minimally invasive surgery: initial experience and short-term functional results. Dis Colon Rectum, 2014. 57(8): p. 927–32.CrossRefPubMed Schiphorst, A.H., et al., Transanal minimally invasive surgery: initial experience and short-term functional results. Dis Colon Rectum, 2014. 57(8): p. 927–32.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rockwood, T.H., et al., Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum, 1999. 42(12): p. 1525–32.CrossRefPubMed Rockwood, T.H., et al., Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum, 1999. 42(12): p. 1525–32.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rockwood, T.H., et al., Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum, 2000. 43(1): p. 9–16; discussion 16-7.CrossRefPubMed Rockwood, T.H., et al., Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum, 2000. 43(1): p. 9–16; discussion 16-7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Aaronson, N.K., et al., Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998. 51(11): p. 1055–68.CrossRefPubMed Aaronson, N.K., et al., Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998. 51(11): p. 1055–68.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware, J.E., Jr. and C.D. Sherbourne, The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care, 1992. 30(6): p. 473–83.CrossRefPubMed Ware, J.E., Jr. and C.D. Sherbourne, The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care, 1992. 30(6): p. 473–83.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Likert, R., A technique for the measurement of attitudes, in Archives of psychology 1932. p. 1–55. Likert, R., A technique for the measurement of attitudes, in Archives of psychology 1932. p. 1–55.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE, Kosinski M., Keller SD., SF-36 physical and menta; summery scales: a user's manual. 4th printing, revised ed. Boston, MA: Health Institue. 1994. Ware JE, Kosinski M., Keller SD., SF-36 physical and menta; summery scales: a user's manual. 4th printing, revised ed. Boston, MA: Health Institue. 1994.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Albert, M.R., et al., Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013. 56(3): p. 301–7.CrossRefPubMed Albert, M.R., et al., Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013. 56(3): p. 301–7.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Verseveld, M., et al., Transanal minimally invasive surgery: impact on quality of life and functional outcome. Surg Endosc, 2016. 30(3):1184–7.CrossRefPubMed Verseveld, M., et al., Transanal minimally invasive surgery: impact on quality of life and functional outcome. Surg Endosc, 2016. 30(3):1184–7.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Holzer, B., et al., Do geographic and educational factors influence the quality of life in rectal cancer patients with a permanent colostomy? Dis Colon Rectum, 2005. 48(12): p. 2209–16.CrossRefPubMed Holzer, B., et al., Do geographic and educational factors influence the quality of life in rectal cancer patients with a permanent colostomy? Dis Colon Rectum, 2005. 48(12): p. 2209–16.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Restivo, A., et al., Risk of complications and long-term functional alterations after local excision of rectal tumors with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Int J Colorectal Dis, 2016. 31(2): p. 257–66.CrossRefPubMed Restivo, A., et al., Risk of complications and long-term functional alterations after local excision of rectal tumors with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Int J Colorectal Dis, 2016. 31(2): p. 257–66.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Nord, E., The significance of contextual factors in valuing health states. Health Policy, 1989. 13(3): p. 189–98.CrossRefPubMed Nord, E., The significance of contextual factors in valuing health states. Health Policy, 1989. 13(3): p. 189–98.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Anthony, T., et al., The effect of treatment for colorectal cancer on long-term health-related quality of life. Ann Surg Oncol, 2001. 8(1): p. 44–9.CrossRefPubMed Anthony, T., et al., The effect of treatment for colorectal cancer on long-term health-related quality of life. Ann Surg Oncol, 2001. 8(1): p. 44–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bordeianou, L., et al., Does incontinence severity correlate with quality of life? Prospective analysis of 502 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis, 2008. 10(3): p. 273–9.CrossRefPubMed Bordeianou, L., et al., Does incontinence severity correlate with quality of life? Prospective analysis of 502 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis, 2008. 10(3): p. 273–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Langenhoff, B.S., et al., Quality of life after surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg, 2006. 93(8): p. 1007–14.CrossRefPubMed Langenhoff, B.S., et al., Quality of life after surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg, 2006. 93(8): p. 1007–14.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernhard, J., et al., Quality of life as subjective experience: reframing of perception in patients with colon cancer undergoing radical resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). Ann Oncol, 1999. 10(7): p. 775–82.CrossRefPubMed Bernhard, J., et al., Quality of life as subjective experience: reframing of perception in patients with colon cancer undergoing radical resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). Ann Oncol, 1999. 10(7): p. 775–82.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparative Quality of Life in Patients Following Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery and Healthy Control Subjects
verfasst von
Stefan H. E. M. Clermonts
Yu-Ting van Loon
Dareczka K. Wasowicz
Barbara S. Langenhoff
David D. E. Zimmerman
Publikationsdatum
05.03.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3718-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.