Anzeige
Erschienen in:
06.04.2020 | Original Research
Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin: a National Cohort Study of Nursing Home Residents
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 8/2020
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Background
Research comparing direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to warfarin has excluded nursing home residents, a vulnerable and high-risk population.
Objective
To compare the safety and effectiveness of DOACs versus warfarin.
Design
New-user cohort study (2011–2016).
Patients
US nursing home residents aged > 65 years with non-valvular atrial fibrillation enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare for > 6 months.
Exposures
Initiators of DOACs (2881 apixaban, 1289 dabigatran, 3735 rivaroxaban) were 1:1 propensity matched to warfarin initiators.
Main Measures
Outcomes included ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (i.e., ischemic cerebrovascular event), bleeding (extracranial or intracranial), other vascular events, death, and a composite of all outcomes. Absolute rate differences (RD) and cause-specific hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Subgroup analyses were performed by alignment of DOAC dosing with labeling.
Key Results
Median age (84 years), CHA2DS2-Vasc (5), and ATRIA risk scores (3) were similar across medications. Clinical outcome rates were similar for dabigatran and rivaroxaban users versus warfarin users. However, ischemic cerebrovascular event rates were higher among dabigatran and rivaroxaban users that received reduced dosages without an indication. Overall, apixaban users had higher ischemic cerebrovascular event rates (HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.00–3.45) and lower bleeding rates (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.49–0.88), but outcome rates varied by dosing alignment. Mortality rates (per 100 person-years) were lower for apixaban (RDs − 9.30; 95% CI − 13.18 to − 5.42), dabigatran (RDs − 10.79; 95% CI − 14.98 to − 6.60), and rivaroxaban (RDs − 8.92; 95% CI − 12.01 to − 5.83) versus warfarin; composite outcome findings were similar.
Conclusions
Among US nursing home residents, the DOACs were each associated with lower mortality versus warfarin. Misaligned DOAC dosing was common in nursing homes and was associated with clinical and mortality outcomes. Overall, DOAC users had lower rates of adverse outcomes including mortality compared with warfarin users.