Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2008

01.01.2008 | Review Article

Comparative studies on hearing aid selection and fitting procedures: a review of the literature

verfasst von: Mick Metselaar, Bert Maat, Hans Verschuure, Wouter A. Dreschler, Louw Feenstra

Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Ausgabe 1/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Although a large number of fitting procedures have been developed and are nowadays generally applied in modern hearing aid fitting technology, little is known about their effectiveness in comparison with each other. This paper argues the need for comparative validation studies on hearing aid fitting procedures based on the design of a randomized clinical trial and carried out in a large-scale clinical population. These studies are hard to conduct but can provide detailed information on the various aspects of the rehabilitation with hearing aids. The design of several recently reported comparative studies of hearing aid fitting procedures will be reviewed. This gives rise to a number of comments on aspects like, study design, composition of the study population and definition of outcome measures rather than on the outcome or conclusions of these studies themselves.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Alcántara JI, Moore BCJ, Marriage JE (2004) Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. II. Experienced users, fitted unilaterally. Int J Audiol 43:3–14PubMedCrossRef Alcántara JI, Moore BCJ, Marriage JE (2004) Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. II. Experienced users, fitted unilaterally. Int J Audiol 43:3–14PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat American National Standard (ANSI) (1973) American national standard method for coupler calibration of earphones. S3.7-1973. Rev. 1986 American National Standard (ANSI) (1973) American national standard method for coupler calibration of earphones. S3.7-1973. Rev. 1986
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Barton G, Bankart J, Davis A, Summerfield Q (2004) Comparing utility scores before and after hearing aid provision: results according to the EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D. Appl Health Econ Health Policies 3:103–105CrossRef Barton G, Bankart J, Davis A, Summerfield Q (2004) Comparing utility scores before and after hearing aid provision: results according to the EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D. Appl Health Econ Health Policies 3:103–105CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bess FH (2000) The role of generic health-related quality of life measures in establishing audiological rehabilitation outcomes. Ear Hear 21(Suppl 4):74S–79SPubMedCrossRef Bess FH (2000) The role of generic health-related quality of life measures in establishing audiological rehabilitation outcomes. Ear Hear 21(Suppl 4):74S–79SPubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Carhart R (1946) Tests for selection of hearing aids. Laryngoscope 56:780–794PubMed Carhart R (1946) Tests for selection of hearing aids. Laryngoscope 56:780–794PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cornelisse LE, Seewald RC, Jamieson DG (1995) The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Am 97:1854–1864PubMedCrossRef Cornelisse LE, Seewald RC, Jamieson DG (1995) The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Am 97:1854–1864PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox RM (2003) Assessment of subjective outcome of hearing aid fitting: getting the client’s point of view. Int J Audiol 42:S90–S96PubMed Cox RM (2003) Assessment of subjective outcome of hearing aid fitting: getting the client’s point of view. Int J Audiol 42:S90–S96PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox RM, Alexander GC (1991) Hearing aid benefit in everyday environments. Ear Hear 12:127–139PubMedCrossRef Cox RM, Alexander GC (1991) Hearing aid benefit in everyday environments. Ear Hear 12:127–139PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox RM, Alexander GC (1995) The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 16:176–186PubMedCrossRef Cox RM, Alexander GC (1995) The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 16:176–186PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dalton DS, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM (2003) The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist 43:661–668PubMed Dalton DS, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM (2003) The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist 43:661–668PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dreschler WA, Verschuure H, Ludvigsen C, Westermann S (2001) ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International collegium for rehabilitative audiology. Audiology 40:148–157PubMed Dreschler WA, Verschuure H, Ludvigsen C, Westermann S (2001) ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International collegium for rehabilitative audiology. Audiology 40:148–157PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, Torrance GW (1995) Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health utilities index. Pharmacoeconomics 7:490–502PubMed Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, Torrance GW (1995) Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health utilities index. Pharmacoeconomics 7:490–502PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gatehouse S (1993) Hearing aid evaluation: limitations of present procedures and future requirements. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol Monograph Suppl 1:50–57 Gatehouse S (1993) Hearing aid evaluation: limitations of present procedures and future requirements. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol Monograph Suppl 1:50–57
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gatehouse S (1999) A self-report outcome measure for the evaluation of hearing aid fittings and services. Health Bull 57:424–436 Gatehouse S (1999) A self-report outcome measure for the evaluation of hearing aid fittings and services. Health Bull 57:424–436
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gatehouse S, Noble W (2004) The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (ssq). Int J Audiol 43:85–99PubMedCrossRef Gatehouse S, Noble W (2004) The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (ssq). Int J Audiol 43:85–99PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilson BS, Gilson JS, Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Kressel S, Pollard WE, Vessalago M (1975) The sickness impact profile: development of an outcome measure of health care. Am J Public Health 65:1304–1310PubMedCrossRef Gilson BS, Gilson JS, Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Kressel S, Pollard WE, Vessalago M (1975) The sickness impact profile: development of an outcome measure of health care. Am J Public Health 65:1304–1310PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagerman B (1982) Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol 13:57–63 Hagerman B (1982) Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol 13:57–63
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagerman B (1984) Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise. Scand Audiol 13:57–63PubMed Hagerman B (1984) Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise. Scand Audiol 13:57–63PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Haggard MP, Foster JR, Iredale FE (1981) Use and benefit of postaural aids in sensory hearing loss. Scand Audiol 10:45–52PubMed Haggard MP, Foster JR, Iredale FE (1981) Use and benefit of postaural aids in sensory hearing loss. Scand Audiol 10:45–52PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamill TA, Barron TP (1992) Frequency response differences of four gain-equalized hearing aid prescription formulae. Audiology 31:87–94PubMed Hamill TA, Barron TP (1992) Frequency response differences of four gain-equalized hearing aid prescription formulae. Audiology 31:87–94PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hawkins D (1992) Prescriptive approaches to selection of gain and frequency response. In: Mueller HG, Hawkins DB, Northern JL (eds) Probe tube microphone measurements: hearing aid selection and assessment. Singular Publishing, San Diego Hawkins D (1992) Prescriptive approaches to selection of gain and frequency response. In: Mueller HG, Hawkins DB, Northern JL (eds) Probe tube microphone measurements: hearing aid selection and assessment. Singular Publishing, San Diego
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Humes L, Hackett T (1990) Comparison of frequency response and aided speech-recognition performance for hearing aids selected by three different prescriptive methods. J Am Acad Audiol 1:101–108PubMed Humes L, Hackett T (1990) Comparison of frequency response and aided speech-recognition performance for hearing aids selected by three different prescriptive methods. J Am Acad Audiol 1:101–108PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat International Electrotechnical Commission (1973) IEC reference coupler for the measurement of hearing aids using earphones coupled to the ear by means of ear inserts, 2nd edn. IEC Publication 126, Geneva International Electrotechnical Commission (1973) IEC reference coupler for the measurement of hearing aids using earphones coupled to the ear by means of ear inserts, 2nd edn. IEC Publication 126, Geneva
24.
Zurück zum Zitat International Electrotechnical Commission (1981) Occluded ear simulator for the measurement of earphones coupled to the ear by ear inserts. IEC publication 711, Geneva International Electrotechnical Commission (1981) Occluded ear simulator for the measurement of earphones coupled to the ear by ear inserts. IEC publication 711, Geneva
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Joore MA, Brunenberg DE, Chenault MN, Antheunis LJ (2003) Societal effects of hearing aid fitting among the moderately hearing impaired. Int J Audiol 42:152–160PubMedCrossRef Joore MA, Brunenberg DE, Chenault MN, Antheunis LJ (2003) Societal effects of hearing aid fitting among the moderately hearing impaired. Int J Audiol 42:152–160PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Keidser G, Grant F (2001) Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device. Ear Hear 22:501–515PubMedCrossRef Keidser G, Grant F (2001) Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device. Ear Hear 22:501–515PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiessling J, Schubert M, Archut A (1996) Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (ScalAdapt). Scand Audiol 25:153–160PubMed Kiessling J, Schubert M, Archut A (1996) Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (ScalAdapt). Scand Audiol 25:153–160PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lunner T, Hellgren J, Arlinger S, Elberling C (1997) A digital filterbank hearing aid. Improving a prescriptive fitting with subjective adjustments. Scand Audiol 26:169–176PubMed Lunner T, Hellgren J, Arlinger S, Elberling C (1997) A digital filterbank hearing aid. Improving a prescriptive fitting with subjective adjustments. Scand Audiol 26:169–176PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Marriage JE, Moore BCJ, Alcántara JI (2004) Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. III. Inexperienced versus experienced users. Int J Audiol 43:198–210PubMedCrossRef Marriage JE, Moore BCJ, Alcántara JI (2004) Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. III. Inexperienced versus experienced users. Int J Audiol 43:198–210PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat MacLeod A, Summerfield Q (1990) A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. Br J Audiol 24:29–43PubMed MacLeod A, Summerfield Q (1990) A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. Br J Audiol 24:29–43PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore BC, Alcántara JI, Glasberg BR (1998) Development and evaluation of a procedure for fitting multi-channel compression hearing aids. Br J Audiol 32:177–195PubMed Moore BC, Alcántara JI, Glasberg BR (1998) Development and evaluation of a procedure for fitting multi-channel compression hearing aids. Br J Audiol 32:177–195PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore BCJ, Alcántara JI, Marriage JE (2001) Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally. Br J Audiol 35:339–353PubMed Moore BCJ, Alcántara JI, Marriage JE (2001) Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally. Br J Audiol 35:339–353PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore BCJ, Marriage JE, Alcántara JI, Glasberg BR (2005) Comparison of two adaptive procedures for fitting a multi-channel compression hearing aid. Int J Audiol 44:345–357PubMedCrossRef Moore BCJ, Marriage JE, Alcántara JI, Glasberg BR (2005) Comparison of two adaptive procedures for fitting a multi-channel compression hearing aid. Int J Audiol 44:345–357PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA (1994) Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 95:1085–1099PubMedCrossRef Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA (1994) Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 95:1085–1099PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Parsons JO, Clark CR (2002) Comparison of an ‘intuitive’ NHS hearing aid prescription method with DSL 4.1 targets for amplification. Int J Audiol 41:357–362PubMed Parsons JO, Clark CR (2002) Comparison of an ‘intuitive’ NHS hearing aid prescription method with DSL 4.1 targets for amplification. Int J Audiol 41:357–362PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters RW, Moore BC, Glasberg BR, Stone MA (2000) Comparison of the NAL-R and Cambridge formulae for the fitting of linear hearing aids. Br J Audiol 34:21–36PubMed Peters RW, Moore BC, Glasberg BR, Stone MA (2000) Comparison of the NAL-R and Cambridge formulae for the fitting of linear hearing aids. Br J Audiol 34:21–36PubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Plomp R, Mimpen AM (1979) Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 18:43–52PubMed Plomp R, Mimpen AM (1979) Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 18:43–52PubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Ricketts TA (1996) Fitting hearing aids to individual loudness-perception measures. Ear Hear 17:124–132PubMedCrossRef Ricketts TA (1996) Fitting hearing aids to individual loudness-perception measures. Ear Hear 17:124–132PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Sammeth CA, Peek BF, Bratt GW, Bess FH, Amberg SM (1993) Ability to achieve gain/frequency response and SSPL-90 under three prescription formulas with in-the-ear hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 4:33–41PubMed Sammeth CA, Peek BF, Bratt GW, Bess FH, Amberg SM (1993) Ability to achieve gain/frequency response and SSPL-90 under three prescription formulas with in-the-ear hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 4:33–41PubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Smeds K (2004) Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users? Ear Hear 25:159–172PubMedCrossRef Smeds K (2004) Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users? Ear Hear 25:159–172PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Stelmachowicz PG, Dalzell S, Peterson D, Kopun J, Lewis DE, Hoover BE (1998) A comparison of threshold-based strategies for nonlinear hearing aids. Ear Hear 19:131–138PubMedCrossRef Stelmachowicz PG, Dalzell S, Peterson D, Kopun J, Lewis DE, Hoover BE (1998) A comparison of threshold-based strategies for nonlinear hearing aids. Ear Hear 19:131–138PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat The EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16:199–208CrossRef The EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16:199–208CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat van den Brink RHS, Wit HP, Kempen GIJM, van Heuvelen MJG (1996) Attitude and help-seeking for hearing impairment. Br J Audiol 30:313–324PubMed van den Brink RHS, Wit HP, Kempen GIJM, van Heuvelen MJG (1996) Attitude and help-seeking for hearing impairment. Br J Audiol 30:313–324PubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Verschuure J (1994) Selektie van het hoortoestel. In: Kapteyn TS, Clemens A, Glazenburg BE, Joustra J (eds) Slechthorende en hoortoestel. De Leeuw Press, Rijnsburg, The Netherlands Verschuure J (1994) Selektie van het hoortoestel. In: Kapteyn TS, Clemens A, Glazenburg BE, Joustra J (eds) Slechthorende en hoortoestel. De Leeuw Press, Rijnsburg, The Netherlands
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Versfeld NJ, Daalder L, Festen JM, Houtgast T (2000) Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 107:1671–1684PubMedCrossRef Versfeld NJ, Daalder L, Festen JM, Houtgast T (2000) Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 107:1671–1684PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagener K, Brand T, Kollmeier B (1999) Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache I-III: Design, Optimierung und Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests. Z Audiol 38(1–3):4–15. (44–56, 86–95) Wagener K, Brand T, Kollmeier B (1999) Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache I-III: Design, Optimierung und Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests. Z Audiol 38(1–3):4–15. (44–56, 86–95)
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). Med Care 30:473–483PubMedCrossRef Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). Med Care 30:473–483PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Wesselkamp M, Margolf-Hackl S, Kiessling J (2001) Comparison of two digital hearing instrument fitting strategies. Scand Audiol 30(Suppl 52):73–75CrossRef Wesselkamp M, Margolf-Hackl S, Kiessling J (2001) Comparison of two digital hearing instrument fitting strategies. Scand Audiol 30(Suppl 52):73–75CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization (1980) International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. World Health Organization, Geneva World Health Organization (1980) International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. World Health Organization, Geneva
50.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). World Health Organization, Geneva World Health Organization (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). World Health Organization, Geneva
Metadaten
Titel
Comparative studies on hearing aid selection and fitting procedures: a review of the literature
verfasst von
Mick Metselaar
Bert Maat
Hans Verschuure
Wouter A. Dreschler
Louw Feenstra
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Ausgabe 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0494-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2008

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.