Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2019

22.04.2019 | Original Research

Comparing Diagnostic Evaluations for Rectal Bleeding and Breast Lumps in Primary Care: a Retrospective Cohort Study

verfasst von: Lydia E. Pace, MD, MPH, Sanja Percac-Lima, MD, PhD, Kevin H. Nguyen, MS, Charis N. Crofton, BA, Katharine A. Normandin, BS, Sara J. Singer, MBA, PhD, Meredith B. Rosenthal, PhD, Alyna T. Chien, MD, MS

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Inadequate diagnostic evaluations of breast lumps and rectal bleeding in primary care are an important source of medical errors. Delays appear particularly common in evaluation of rectal bleeding. Comparing pursuit and completion of diagnostic testing for these two conditions within the same practice settings could help highlight barriers and inform interventions.

Objectives

To examine processes undertaken for diagnostic evaluations of breast lumps and rectal bleeding within the same practices and to compare them with regard to (a) the likelihood that diagnostic tests are ordered according to guidelines and (b) the timeliness of order placement and completion.

Design

A retrospective cohort study using explicit chart abstraction methods.

Participants

Three hundred women aged 30–80 presenting with breast lumps and 300 men and women aged 40–80 years presenting with rectal bleeding to 15 academically affiliated primary care practices, 2012–2016.

Main Measures

Rates and timing of test ordering and completion and patterns of visits and communications.

Key Results

At initial presentation, physicians ordered recommended imaging or procedures at higher rates for patients with breast lumps compared to those with rectal bleeding (97% vs. 86% of patients recommended to receive imaging or endoscopy; p < 0.01). Most (90%) patients with breast lumps completed recommended diagnostic testing within 1 month, versus 31% of patients with rectal bleeding (p < 0.01). By 1 year, 7% of patients with breast lumps had not completed indicated imaging, versus 27% of those with rectal bleeding. Patients with breast lumps had fewer subsequent primary care visits related or unrelated to their symptom and had fewer related communications with specialists.

Limitations

The study relied on documented care, and findings may be most generalizable to academically affiliated institutions.

Conclusions

Diagnostic processes for rectal bleeding were less frequently guideline-concordant and timely than those for breast lumps. The largest discrepancies occurred in initial ordering of indicated tests and the timeliness of test completion.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Howlader, N. et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2014. (2017). Howlader, N. et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2014. (2017).
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Astin, M., Griffin, T., Neal, R. D., Rose, P. & Hamilton, W. The diagnostic value of symptoms for colorectal cancer in primary care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 61, 231–243 (2011).CrossRef Astin, M., Griffin, T., Neal, R. D., Rose, P. & Hamilton, W. The diagnostic value of symptoms for colorectal cancer in primary care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 61, 231–243 (2011).CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Talley, N. J. & Jones, M. Self-reported rectal bleeding in a United States community: prevalence, risk factors, and health care seeking. Am J Gastroenterol 93, 2179–2183 (1998).CrossRefPubMed Talley, N. J. & Jones, M. Self-reported rectal bleeding in a United States community: prevalence, risk factors, and health care seeking. Am J Gastroenterol 93, 2179–2183 (1998).CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Barlow, W. E. et al. Performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 94, 1151–9 (2002).CrossRefPubMed Barlow, W. E. et al. Performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 94, 1151–9 (2002).CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson, M. R., Asiimwe, A., Flashman, K. & Tsavellas, G. Is earlier referral and investigation of bowel cancer patients presenting with rectal bleeding associated with better survival? Color Dis 13, 1242–1248 (2011).CrossRef Thompson, M. R., Asiimwe, A., Flashman, K. & Tsavellas, G. Is earlier referral and investigation of bowel cancer patients presenting with rectal bleeding associated with better survival? Color Dis 13, 1242–1248 (2011).CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tørring, M. L. et al. Evidence of advanced stage colorectal cancer with longer diagnostic intervals: a pooled analysis of seven primary care cohorts comprising 11 720 patients in five countries. Br J Cancer 117, 888–897 (2017).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tørring, M. L. et al. Evidence of advanced stage colorectal cancer with longer diagnostic intervals: a pooled analysis of seven primary care cohorts comprising 11 720 patients in five countries. Br J Cancer 117, 888–897 (2017).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Neal, R. D. et al. Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review. Br J Cancer 112, S92–S107 (2015).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Neal, R. D. et al. Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review. Br J Cancer 112, S92–S107 (2015).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gandhi, T. K. et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med 145, 488–496 (2006).CrossRefPubMed Gandhi, T. K. et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med 145, 488–496 (2006).CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiff, G. D. et al. Primary Care Closed Claims Experience of Massachusetts Malpractice Insurers. JAMA Intern Med 173, 2063 (2013).CrossRefPubMed Schiff, G. D. et al. Primary Care Closed Claims Experience of Massachusetts Malpractice Insurers. JAMA Intern Med 173, 2063 (2013).CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh, H., Sethi, S., Raber, M. & Petersen, L. A. Errors in Cancer Diagnosis: Current Understanding and Future Directions. J Clin Oncol 25, 5009–5018 (2007).CrossRefPubMed Singh, H., Sethi, S., Raber, M. & Petersen, L. A. Errors in Cancer Diagnosis: Current Understanding and Future Directions. J Clin Oncol 25, 5009–5018 (2007).CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wells, K. J. et al. A cluster randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of patient navigation in improving quality of diagnostic care for patients with breast or colorectal cancer abnormalities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21, 1664–72 (2012).CrossRef Wells, K. J. et al. A cluster randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of patient navigation in improving quality of diagnostic care for patients with breast or colorectal cancer abnormalities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21, 1664–72 (2012).CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Haas, J. S., Cook, E. F., Puopolo, A. L., Burstin, H. R. & Brennan, T. A. Differences in the quality of care for women with an abnormal mammogram or breast complaint. J Gen Intern Med 15, 321–8 (2000).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Haas, J. S., Cook, E. F., Puopolo, A. L., Burstin, H. R. & Brennan, T. A. Differences in the quality of care for women with an abnormal mammogram or breast complaint. J Gen Intern Med 15, 321–8 (2000).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Weingart, S. N. et al. Delayed Workup of Rectal Bleeding in Adult Primary Care: Examining Process-of-Care Failures. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 43, 32–40 (2017).CrossRefPubMed Weingart, S. N. et al. Delayed Workup of Rectal Bleeding in Adult Primary Care: Examining Process-of-Care Failures. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 43, 32–40 (2017).CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen, A. S., Orav, E. J., Lee, T. H. & Sequist, T. D. Clinician personality and the evaluation of higher-risk patient symptoms. J Patient Saf 7, 122–6 (2011).CrossRefPubMed Allen, A. S., Orav, E. J., Lee, T. H. & Sequist, T. D. Clinician personality and the evaluation of higher-risk patient symptoms. J Patient Saf 7, 122–6 (2011).CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Controlled Risk Insurance Company. CRICO Breast Care Management Algorithm: A Decision Support Tool. (2014). Controlled Risk Insurance Company. CRICO Breast Care Management Algorithm: A Decision Support Tool. (2014).
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, C. A. et al. A population management system for improving colorectal cancer screening in a primary care setting. J Eval Clin Pract 22, 319–328 (2016).CrossRefPubMed Wu, C. A. et al. A population management system for improving colorectal cancer screening in a primary care setting. J Eval Clin Pract 22, 319–328 (2016).CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bitton, A. et al. The Harvard Medical School Academic Innovations Collaborative: transforming primary care practice and education. Acad Med 89, 1239–44 (2014).CrossRefPubMed Bitton, A. et al. The Harvard Medical School Academic Innovations Collaborative: transforming primary care practice and education. Acad Med 89, 1239–44 (2014).CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, R. et al. Cancer Screening in the United States, 2017: A Review of Current American Cancer Society Guidelines and Current Issues in Cancer Screening. CA Cancer J Clin 67, 100–121 (2017).CrossRefPubMed Smith, R. et al. Cancer Screening in the United States, 2017: A Review of Current American Cancer Society Guidelines and Current Issues in Cancer Screening. CA Cancer J Clin 67, 100–121 (2017).CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Green, A. R. et al. Barriers to Screening Colonoscopy for Low-income Latino and White Patients in an Urban Community Health Center. J Gen Intern Med 23, 834–840 (2008).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Green, A. R. et al. Barriers to Screening Colonoscopy for Low-income Latino and White Patients in an Urban Community Health Center. J Gen Intern Med 23, 834–840 (2008).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Zapka, J. et al. Factors in Quality Care--The Case of Follow-Up to Abnormal Cancer Screening Tests--Problems in the Steps and Interfaces of Care. JNCI Monogr 2010, 58–71 (2010).CrossRef Zapka, J. et al. Factors in Quality Care--The Case of Follow-Up to Abnormal Cancer Screening Tests--Problems in the Steps and Interfaces of Care. JNCI Monogr 2010, 58–71 (2010).CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Taplin, S. H., Yabroff, K. R. & Zapka, J. A multilevel research perspective on cancer care delivery: the example of follow-up to an abnormal mammogram. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21, 1709–15 (2012).CrossRef Taplin, S. H., Yabroff, K. R. & Zapka, J. A multilevel research perspective on cancer care delivery: the example of follow-up to an abnormal mammogram. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21, 1709–15 (2012).CrossRef
28.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon, E. G., Kachalia, A., Puopolo, A. L., Gandhi, T. K. & Studdert, D. M. Cognitive Errors and Logistical Breakdowns Contributing to Missed and Delayed Diagnoses of Breast and Colorectal Cancers: A Process Analysis of Closed Malpractice Claims. J Gen Intern Med 27, 1416–1423 (2012).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Poon, E. G., Kachalia, A., Puopolo, A. L., Gandhi, T. K. & Studdert, D. M. Cognitive Errors and Logistical Breakdowns Contributing to Missed and Delayed Diagnoses of Breast and Colorectal Cancers: A Process Analysis of Closed Malpractice Claims. J Gen Intern Med 27, 1416–1423 (2012).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhise, V. et al. Patient-Reported Attributions for Missed Colonoscopy Appointments in Two Large Healthcare Systems. Dig Dis Sci 61, 1853–1861 (2016).CrossRefPubMed Bhise, V. et al. Patient-Reported Attributions for Missed Colonoscopy Appointments in Two Large Healthcare Systems. Dig Dis Sci 61, 1853–1861 (2016).CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparing Diagnostic Evaluations for Rectal Bleeding and Breast Lumps in Primary Care: a Retrospective Cohort Study
verfasst von
Lydia E. Pace, MD, MPH
Sanja Percac-Lima, MD, PhD
Kevin H. Nguyen, MS
Charis N. Crofton, BA
Katharine A. Normandin, BS
Sara J. Singer, MBA, PhD
Meredith B. Rosenthal, PhD
Alyna T. Chien, MD, MS
Publikationsdatum
22.04.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05003-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.