Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International 3/2021

07.01.2021 | Original Article

Comparing three machine learning approaches to design a risk assessment tool for future fractures: predicting a subsequent major osteoporotic fracture in fracture patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis

verfasst von: B. C. S. de Vries, J. H. Hegeman, W. Nijmeijer, J. Geerdink, C. Seifert, C. G. M. Groothuis-Oudshoorn

Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Summary

Four machine learning models were developed and compared to predict the risk of a future major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), defined as hip, wrist, spine and humerus fractures, in patients with a prior fracture. We developed a user-friendly tool for risk calculation of subsequent MOF in osteopenia patients, using the best performing model.

Introduction

Major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs), defined as hip, wrist, spine and humerus fractures, can have serious consequences regarding morbidity and mortality. Machine learning provides new opportunities for fracture prediction and may aid in targeting preventive interventions to patients at risk of MOF. The primary objective is to develop and compare several models, capable of predicting the risk of MOF as a function of time in patients seen at the fracture and osteoporosis outpatient clinic (FO-clinic) after sustaining a fracture.

Methods

Patients aged > 50 years visiting an FO-clinic were included in this retrospective study. We compared discriminative ability (concordance index) for predicting the risk on MOF with a Cox regression, random survival forests (RSF) and an artificial neural network (ANN)-DeepSurv model. Missing data was imputed using multiple imputations by chained equations (MICE) or RSF’s imputation function. Analyses were performed for the total cohort and a subset of osteopenia patients without vertebral fracture.

Results

A total of 7578 patients were included, 805 (11%) patients sustained a subsequent MOF. The highest concordance-index in the total dataset was 0.697 (0.664–0.730) for Cox regression; no significant difference was determined between the models. In the osteopenia subset, Cox regression outperformed RSF (p = 0.043 and p = 0.023) and ANN-DeepSurv (p = 0.043) with a c-index of 0.625 (0.562–0.689). Cox regression was used to develop a MOF risk calculator on this subset.

Conclusion

We show that predicting the risk of MOF in patients who already sustained a fracture can be done with adequate discriminative performance. We developed a user-friendly tool for risk calculation of subsequent MOF in patients with osteopenia.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Determined with the CKD-EPI formula
 
Literatur
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Weda M, Jansen ME, Vonk RAA (2017) Personalised medicine - Implementatie in de praktijk en data-infrastructuren. RIVM Briefrapport 2017–0006 Weda M, Jansen ME, Vonk RAA (2017) Personalised medicine - Implementatie in de praktijk en data-infrastructuren. RIVM Briefrapport 2017–0006
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hegeman JH, Willemsen G, van Nieuwpoort J, Kreeftenberg HG, van der Veer E, Slaets JP, ten Duis H (2004) Effective tracing of osteoporosis at a fracture and osteoporosis clinic in Groningen; an analysis of the first 100 patients. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 148:2180–2185PubMed Hegeman JH, Willemsen G, van Nieuwpoort J, Kreeftenberg HG, van der Veer E, Slaets JP, ten Duis H (2004) Effective tracing of osteoporosis at a fracture and osteoporosis clinic in Groningen; an analysis of the first 100 patients. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 148:2180–2185PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B 34:187–220 Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B 34:187–220
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Steyerberg EW (2019) Clinical prediction models. Springer International Publishing, ChamCrossRef Steyerberg EW (2019) Clinical prediction models. Springer International Publishing, ChamCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kingma DP, Ba JL (2015) Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. 3rd Int Conf Learn Represent ICLR 2015 - Conf Track Proc 1–15 Kingma DP, Ba JL (2015) Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. 3rd Int Conf Learn Represent ICLR 2015 - Conf Track Proc 1–15
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Moradi R, Berangi R, Minaei B (2020) A survey of regularization strategies for deep models. Springer, Netherlands Moradi R, Berangi R, Minaei B (2020) A survey of regularization strategies for deep models. Springer, Netherlands
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Nissinen T (2019) Convolutional neural networks in osteoporotic fracture risk prediction using spine DXA images - Master’s thesis Computer Sciences, University of Eastern Finland Nissinen T (2019) Convolutional neural networks in osteoporotic fracture risk prediction using spine DXA images - Master’s thesis Computer Sciences, University of Eastern Finland
37.
Zurück zum Zitat de Klerk G (2017) Osteoporosis, identification and treatment in fracture patients. de Klerk G. Osteoporosis, identification and treatment in fracture patients: an essential part of fracture management in elderly patients. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, p 144 de Klerk G (2017) Osteoporosis, identification and treatment in fracture patients. de Klerk G. Osteoporosis, identification and treatment in fracture patients: an essential part of fracture management in elderly patients. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, p 144
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao D, Cheng P, Zhu B (2016) Epilepsy and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 9:564–569 Zhao D, Cheng P, Zhu B (2016) Epilepsy and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 9:564–569
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Perna S, Avanzato I, Nichetti M, D’Antona G, Negro M, Rondanelli M (2017) Association between dietary patterns of meat and fish consumption with bone mineral density or fracture risk: a systematic literature. Nutrients 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9091029 Perna S, Avanzato I, Nichetti M, D’Antona G, Negro M, Rondanelli M (2017) Association between dietary patterns of meat and fish consumption with bone mineral density or fracture risk: a systematic literature. Nutrients 9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​nu9091029
41.
Metadaten
Titel
Comparing three machine learning approaches to design a risk assessment tool for future fractures: predicting a subsequent major osteoporotic fracture in fracture patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis
verfasst von
B. C. S. de Vries
J. H. Hegeman
W. Nijmeijer
J. Geerdink
C. Seifert
C. G. M. Groothuis-Oudshoorn
Publikationsdatum
07.01.2021
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Osteoporosis International / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05735-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Osteoporosis International 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.