Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2007

01.09.2007 | Original Article

Comparison and validation of scoring systems in a cohort of patients treated for perforated peptic ulcer

verfasst von: Mahmut Koç, Ömer Yoldaş, Yusuf Alper Kılıç, Erdal Göçmen, Tamer Ertan, Hayrettin Dizen, Mesut Tez

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and aims

The aim of this study is to evaluate the predictive accuracy of different scoring systems on surgery for perforated peptic ulcer referred to an academic department of general surgery in a tertiary reference center.

Patients and methods

Seventy-five consecutive patients (Male/female ratio = 64:11; mean age, 44 years; range, 16–85) with perforated peptic ulcer disease were investigated. Disease severity scores and mortality predictions were calculated using the collected data during admission. Discrimination and calibration characteristics of each system, namely, the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II and III, the simplified acute physiology score II, and the mortality probability models (MPM) II, were determined by using the area under receiver operating characteristics curve and the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, respectively.

Results

Among the 75 patients included, there were eight (10.6%) mortalities. All systems had a reliable power of discrimination and calibration. Among the systems tested, MPM II was the best performing as far as discrimination and calibration characteristics were considered. The parameters of MPM II system that were related to systemic perfusion of the patient were significantly positive in patients who died compared to those who survived.

Conclusions

MPM II that predicted mortality at admission is better than the other systems in predicting mortality. Results also indicate the importance of maintenance of systemic perfusion of the patient at the early phases of peptic ulcer perforation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Testini M, Portincasa P, Piccinni G, Lissidini G, Pellegrini F, Greco L (2003) Significant factors associated with fatal outcome in emergency open surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. World J Gastroenterol 9:2338–2340PubMed Testini M, Portincasa P, Piccinni G, Lissidini G, Pellegrini F, Greco L (2003) Significant factors associated with fatal outcome in emergency open surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. World J Gastroenterol 9:2338–2340PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Eachempati SR, Hydo LJ, Barie PS (2003) Severity scoring for prognostication in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: comparative analysis of the Ranson score and the APACHE III score. Arch Surg 137:730–736CrossRef Eachempati SR, Hydo LJ, Barie PS (2003) Severity scoring for prognostication in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: comparative analysis of the Ranson score and the APACHE III score. Arch Surg 137:730–736CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA et al (1991) The APACHE III prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 100:1619–1639PubMed Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA et al (1991) The APACHE III prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 100:1619–1639PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963PubMedCrossRef Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J et al (1993) Mortality probability models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients. JAMA 270:2478–2486PubMedCrossRef Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J et al (1993) Mortality probability models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients. JAMA 270:2478–2486PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kilic YA, Dogrul AB, Karakoc D, Yildiz B, Yorganci K, Sayek I (2005) Impact of organ failure on mortality prediction in a Turkish surgical intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 31(Supp 1):S47 Kilic YA, Dogrul AB, Karakoc D, Yildiz B, Yorganci K, Sayek I (2005) Impact of organ failure on mortality prediction in a Turkish surgical intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 31(Supp 1):S47
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and the use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36PubMed Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and the use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW Jr (1982) A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol 115:92–106PubMed Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW Jr (1982) A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol 115:92–106PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamby LS, Zweng TN, Strodel WE (1993) Perforated gastric and duodenal ulcer: an analysis of prognostic factors. Am Surgeon 59:319–323PubMed Hamby LS, Zweng TN, Strodel WE (1993) Perforated gastric and duodenal ulcer: an analysis of prognostic factors. Am Surgeon 59:319–323PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kujath P, Schwandner O, Bruch HP (2002) Morbidity and mortality of perforated peptic gastroduodenal ulcer following emergency surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:298–302PubMedCrossRef Kujath P, Schwandner O, Bruch HP (2002) Morbidity and mortality of perforated peptic gastroduodenal ulcer following emergency surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:298–302PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Zittel TT, Jehle EC, Becker HD (2000) Surgical management of peptic ulcer disease today-indication, technique and outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg 385:84–96PubMedCrossRef Zittel TT, Jehle EC, Becker HD (2000) Surgical management of peptic ulcer disease today-indication, technique and outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg 385:84–96PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sillakivi T, Lang A, Tein A, Peetsalu A (2000) Evaluation of risk factors for mortality in surgically treated perforated peptic ulcer. Hepatogastroenterology 47:1765–1768PubMed Sillakivi T, Lang A, Tein A, Peetsalu A (2000) Evaluation of risk factors for mortality in surgically treated perforated peptic ulcer. Hepatogastroenterology 47:1765–1768PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee FY, Leung KL, Lai BS, Ng SS, Dexter S, Lau WY (2001) Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcers. Arch Surg 139:90–94CrossRef Lee FY, Leung KL, Lai BS, Ng SS, Dexter S, Lau WY (2001) Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcers. Arch Surg 139:90–94CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Boey J, Choi SKY, Alagaratnam TT, Poon A (1987) Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg 205:22–26PubMedCrossRef Boey J, Choi SKY, Alagaratnam TT, Poon A (1987) Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg 205:22–26PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Soares M, Fontes F, Dantas J, Gadelha D, Cariello P, Nardes F, Amorim C,Toscano L, Rocco JR (2004) Performance of six severity-of-illness scores in cancer patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit: a prospective observational study. Crit Care 8:R194–R203PubMedCrossRef Soares M, Fontes F, Dantas J, Gadelha D, Cariello P, Nardes F, Amorim C,Toscano L, Rocco JR (2004) Performance of six severity-of-illness scores in cancer patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit: a prospective observational study. Crit Care 8:R194–R203PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiarugi M, Buccianti P, Goletti O, Decanini L, Sidoti F, Cavina E (1996) Prognostic risk factors in patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcer. A retrospective analysis of critical factors of mortality and morbidity in a series of 40 patients who underwent simple closure surgery. Ann Ital Chir 67:609–613PubMed Chiarugi M, Buccianti P, Goletti O, Decanini L, Sidoti F, Cavina E (1996) Prognostic risk factors in patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcer. A retrospective analysis of critical factors of mortality and morbidity in a series of 40 patients who underwent simple closure surgery. Ann Ital Chir 67:609–613PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Martinez-Alario J, Tuesta ID, Plasencia E, Santana M, Mora ML (1999) Mortality prediction in cardiac surgery patients: comparative performance of Parsonnet and general severity systems. Circulation 99:2378–f2382PubMed Martinez-Alario J, Tuesta ID, Plasencia E, Santana M, Mora ML (1999) Mortality prediction in cardiac surgery patients: comparative performance of Parsonnet and general severity systems. Circulation 99:2378–f2382PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison and validation of scoring systems in a cohort of patients treated for perforated peptic ulcer
verfasst von
Mahmut Koç
Ömer Yoldaş
Yusuf Alper Kılıç
Erdal Göçmen
Tamer Ertan
Hayrettin Dizen
Mesut Tez
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2007
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-007-0156-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2007

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.