Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 1/2019

12.01.2019 | Original Research Article

Comparison between broadband and monochromatic photopic negative response in full-field electroretinogram in controls and subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma

verfasst von: Aniruddha Banerjee, Mona Khurana, Ramya Sachidanandam, Parveen Sen

Erschienen in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

A prospective, cross-sectional, case–control study was conducted to investigate the role of broadband and monochromatic photopic negative response (PhNR) of the full-field flash electroretinogram (ERG) in the evaluation of ganglion cell damage in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects.

Methods

Subjects with POAG and age-matched normal subjects were recruited from the outpatient department of a tertiary eye care center in South India. A total of 25 patients with POAG and 50 age-matched normal subjects were recruited. ERG was recorded using broadband (3.5 cd.s/m2 white stimulus on 10 cd/m2 white background) and monochromatic (3.5 cd.s/m2 red stimulus on 10 cd/m2 blue background and 1 cd.s/m2 blue stimulus on 10 cd/m2 yellow background) stimuli.

Results

The reduction in PhNR amplitude in POAG compared to normal individuals was higher in red-on-blue PhNR [26.37 µV; p < 0.001, confidence interval (CI) 19.34 to 33.4] as compared to broadband stimuli (16.41 µV; p < 0.001, CI 8.68 to 24.13), and blue on yellow (21.96 µV; p < 0.001, CI 10.12 to 33.8). Red-on-blue PhNR amplitudes correlated better with mean deviation (MD; r = − 0.66, p < 0.05), pattern standard deviation (PSD; r = − 0.4, p = 0.04), visual field index (VFI; r = − 0.58, p < 0.05), and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (r = − 0.67, p < 0.05) in comparison with broadband and monochromatic blue-on-yellow PhNR. Receiver operating characteristic curve revealed largest area under the curve (0.89) in red-on-blue PhNR compared to broadband (0.76) and blue on yellow (0.74). The sensitivity and specificity was also higher in red-on-blue PhNR (72% and 80%, respectively) as compared to the other stimuli (sensitivity and specificity of broadband 0.68 and 0.7, blue on yellow 0.64 and 0.7, respectively).

Conclusion

Correlation of PhNR with Humphrey visual field parameters and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness showed that red-on-blue PhNR can be a useful additional tool for clinical assessment of retinal ganglion cell dysfunction in glaucoma patients. Red-on-blue PhNR was more sensitive as compared to white-on-white and blue-on-yellow PhNR in identifying ganglion cell dysfunction and correlates well with other structural and functional tests for glaucoma such as MD, PSD, VFI, and RNFL thickness.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ (2002) The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol 86(2):238–242CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ (2002) The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol 86(2):238–242CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat JunoyMontolio FG, Wesselink C, Gordijn M, Jansonius NM (2012) Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day, and season. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53(11):7010–7017. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-10268 CrossRef JunoyMontolio FG, Wesselink C, Gordijn M, Jansonius NM (2012) Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day, and season. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53(11):7010–7017. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1167/​iovs.​12-10268 CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kutzko KE, Brito CF, Wall M (2000) Effect of instructions on conventional automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(7):2006–2013PubMed Kutzko KE, Brito CF, Wall M (2000) Effect of instructions on conventional automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(7):2006–2013PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Drasdo N, Aldebasi YH, Chiti Z, Mortlock KE, Morgan JE, North RV (2001) The s-cone PHNR and pattern ERG in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42(6):1266–1272PubMed Drasdo N, Aldebasi YH, Chiti Z, Mortlock KE, Morgan JE, North RV (2001) The s-cone PHNR and pattern ERG in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42(6):1266–1272PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ (2002) The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol 86(2):238–242CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ (2002) The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol 86(2):238–242CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Colotto A, Falsini B, Salgarello T, Iarossi G, Galan ME, Scullica L (2000) Photopic negative response of the human ERG: losses associated with glaucomatous damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(8):2205–2211PubMed Colotto A, Falsini B, Salgarello T, Iarossi G, Galan ME, Scullica L (2000) Photopic negative response of the human ERG: losses associated with glaucomatous damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(8):2205–2211PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Machida S, Gotoh Y, Kaneko M, Toba Y, Ohtaki A, Kurosaka D (2007) Comparison of the photopic negative response obtained under different recording conditions in glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48(13):215–221 Machida S, Gotoh Y, Kaneko M, Toba Y, Ohtaki A, Kurosaka D (2007) Comparison of the photopic negative response obtained under different recording conditions in glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48(13):215–221
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison between broadband and monochromatic photopic negative response in full-field electroretinogram in controls and subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma
verfasst von
Aniruddha Banerjee
Mona Khurana
Ramya Sachidanandam
Parveen Sen
Publikationsdatum
12.01.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-018-09668-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Documenta Ophthalmologica 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.