Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2012

01.02.2012

Comparison between Different Cost Devices for Digital Capture of X-ray Films: An Image Characteristics Detection Approach

verfasst von: Antonio José Salazar, Juan Camilo Camacho, Diego Andrés Aguirre

Erschienen in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

A common teleradiology practice is digitizing films. The costs of specialized digitizers are very high, that is why there is a trend to use conventional scanners and digital cameras. Statistical clinical studies are required to determine the accuracy of these devices, which are very difficult to carry out. The purpose of this study was to compare three capture devices in terms of their capacity to detect several image characteristics. Spatial resolution, contrast, gray levels, and geometric deformation were compared for a specialized digitizer ICR (US$ 15,000), a conventional scanner UMAX (US$ 1,800), and a digital camera LUMIX (US$ 450, but require an additional support system and a light box for about US$ 400). Test patterns printed in films were used. The results detected gray levels lower than real values for all three devices; acceptable contrast and low geometric deformation with three devices. All three devices are appropriate solutions, but a digital camera requires more operator training and more settings.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Eng J, Mysko WK, Weller GER, Renard R, Gitlin JN, Bluemke DA, Magid D, Kelen GD, Scott Jr, WW: Interpretation of emergency department radiographs: A comparison of emergency medicine physicians with radiologists, residents with faculty, and film with digital display. Am J Roentgenol 175:1233–1238, 2000 Eng J, Mysko WK, Weller GER, Renard R, Gitlin JN, Bluemke DA, Magid D, Kelen GD, Scott Jr, WW: Interpretation of emergency department radiographs: A comparison of emergency medicine physicians with radiologists, residents with faculty, and film with digital display. Am J Roentgenol 175:1233–1238, 2000
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Powell K, Obuchowski N, Chilcote W, Barry M, Ganobcik S, Cardenosa G: Film-screen versus digitized mammography: assessment of clinical equivalence. Am J Roentgenol 173:889–894, 1999 Powell K, Obuchowski N, Chilcote W, Barry M, Ganobcik S, Cardenosa G: Film-screen versus digitized mammography: assessment of clinical equivalence. Am J Roentgenol 173:889–894, 1999
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Slasky BS, Gur D, Good WF, Costa-Greco MA, Harris KM, Cooperstein LA, Rockette HE: Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images. Radiology 174:775–780, 1990PubMed Slasky BS, Gur D, Good WF, Costa-Greco MA, Harris KM, Cooperstein LA, Rockette HE: Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images. Radiology 174:775–780, 1990PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gitlin J, Narayan A, Mitchell C, Akmal A, Eisner D, Peterson L, Nie D, McClintock T: A comparative study of conventional mammography film interpretations with soft copy readings of the same examinations. J Digit Imaging 20:42–52, 2007PubMedCrossRef Gitlin J, Narayan A, Mitchell C, Akmal A, Eisner D, Peterson L, Nie D, McClintock T: A comparative study of conventional mammography film interpretations with soft copy readings of the same examinations. J Digit Imaging 20:42–52, 2007PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Szot A, Jacobson FL, Munn S, Jazayeri D, Nardell E, Harrison D, Drosten R, Ohno-Machado L, Smeaton LM, Fraser HSF: Diagnostic accuracy of chest X-rays acquired using a digital camera for low-cost teleradiology. Int J Med Inform 73:65–73, 2004PubMedCrossRef Szot A, Jacobson FL, Munn S, Jazayeri D, Nardell E, Harrison D, Drosten R, Ohno-Machado L, Smeaton LM, Fraser HSF: Diagnostic accuracy of chest X-rays acquired using a digital camera for low-cost teleradiology. Int J Med Inform 73:65–73, 2004PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Krupinski E, Gonzales M, Gonzales C, Weinstein RS: Evaluation of a digital camera for acquiring radiographic images for telemedicine applications. Telemed J e-Health 6:297–302, 2000PubMedCrossRef Krupinski E, Gonzales M, Gonzales C, Weinstein RS: Evaluation of a digital camera for acquiring radiographic images for telemedicine applications. Telemed J e-Health 6:297–302, 2000PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cone SW, Carucci LR, Yu J, Rafiq A, Doarn CR, Merrell RC: Acquisition and evaluation of radiography images by digital camera. Telemed e-Health 11:130–136, 2005CrossRef Cone SW, Carucci LR, Yu J, Rafiq A, Doarn CR, Merrell RC: Acquisition and evaluation of radiography images by digital camera. Telemed e-Health 11:130–136, 2005CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Javadi M, Subhannachart P, Levine S, Vijitsanguan C, Tungsagunwattana S, Dowell SF, Olsen SJ: Diagnosing pneumonia in rural Thailand: Digital cameras versus film digitizers for chest radiograph teleradiology. Int J Infect Dis 10:129–135, 2006PubMedCrossRef Javadi M, Subhannachart P, Levine S, Vijitsanguan C, Tungsagunwattana S, Dowell SF, Olsen SJ: Diagnosing pneumonia in rural Thailand: Digital cameras versus film digitizers for chest radiograph teleradiology. Int J Infect Dis 10:129–135, 2006PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruess L, Uyehara CF, Shiels KC, Cho KH, O'Connor SC, Person DA, Whitton RK: Digitizing pediatric chest radiographs: Comparison of low-cost, commercial off-the-shelf technologies. Pediatr Radiol 31:841–847, 2001PubMedCrossRef Ruess L, Uyehara CF, Shiels KC, Cho KH, O'Connor SC, Person DA, Whitton RK: Digitizing pediatric chest radiographs: Comparison of low-cost, commercial off-the-shelf technologies. Pediatr Radiol 31:841–847, 2001PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kundel HL, Gefter W, Aronchick J, Miller W, Hatabu H, Whitfill CH: Accuracy of bedside chest hard-copy screen-film versus hard- and soft-copy computed radiographs in a medical intensive care unit: Receiver operating characteristic analysis. Radiology 205:859–863, 1997PubMed Kundel HL, Gefter W, Aronchick J, Miller W, Hatabu H, Whitfill CH: Accuracy of bedside chest hard-copy screen-film versus hard- and soft-copy computed radiographs in a medical intensive care unit: Receiver operating characteristic analysis. Radiology 205:859–863, 1997PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kido S, Ikezoe J, Takeuchi N, Kondoh H, Tomiyama N, Jokoh T, Kohno N, Takashima S, Yamagami H, Naito H: Interpretation of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities: Conventional versus storage phosphor radiography. Radiology 187:527–533, 1993PubMed Kido S, Ikezoe J, Takeuchi N, Kondoh H, Tomiyama N, Jokoh T, Kohno N, Takashima S, Yamagami H, Naito H: Interpretation of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities: Conventional versus storage phosphor radiography. Radiology 187:527–533, 1993PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueguchi T, Johkoh T, Tomiyama N, Honda O, Mihara N, Hamada S, Murai S, Ogata Y, Matsumoto M, Nakamura H: Full-size digital storage phosphor chest radiography: Effect of 4 K versus 2 K matrix size on observer performance in detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities. Radiat Med 23:170–174, 2005PubMed Ueguchi T, Johkoh T, Tomiyama N, Honda O, Mihara N, Hamada S, Murai S, Ogata Y, Matsumoto M, Nakamura H: Full-size digital storage phosphor chest radiography: Effect of 4 K versus 2 K matrix size on observer performance in detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities. Radiat Med 23:170–174, 2005PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Obuchowski NA: Sample size tables for receiver operating characteristic studies. Am J Roentgenol 175:603–608, 2000 Obuchowski NA: Sample size tables for receiver operating characteristic studies. Am J Roentgenol 175:603–608, 2000
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Forsberg DA: Quality assurance in teleradiology. Telemed J 1:107–114, 1998CrossRef Forsberg DA: Quality assurance in teleradiology. Telemed J 1:107–114, 1998CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat SoMPaT E: Specifications for medical diagnostic imaging test pattern for television monitors and hard-copy recording cameras. SMPTE J 95:693–695, 1986 SoMPaT E: Specifications for medical diagnostic imaging test pattern for television monitors and hard-copy recording cameras. SMPTE J 95:693–695, 1986
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gray JE, Lisk KG, Haddick DH, Harshbarger JH, Oosterhof A, Schwenker R: Test pattern for video displays and hard-copy cameras. Radiology 154:519–527, 1985PubMed Gray JE, Lisk KG, Haddick DH, Harshbarger JH, Oosterhof A, Schwenker R: Test pattern for video displays and hard-copy cameras. Radiology 154:519–527, 1985PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gray J: Use of the SMPTE test pattern in picture archiving and communication systems. J Digit Imaging 5:54–58, 1992PubMedCrossRef Gray J: Use of the SMPTE test pattern in picture archiving and communication systems. J Digit Imaging 5:54–58, 1992PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat ACR: American College of Radiology Standard for Teleradiology. Washington, DC: American College of Radiology, 1998 ACR: American College of Radiology Standard for Teleradiology. Washington, DC: American College of Radiology, 1998
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikezoe J, Kohno N, Kido S, Takeuchi N, Johkoh T, Arisawa J, Kozuka T: Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: Conventional radiography versus high-resolution storage-phosphor radiography—A preliminary study. J Digit Imaging 8:31–36, 1995PubMedCrossRef Ikezoe J, Kohno N, Kido S, Takeuchi N, Johkoh T, Arisawa J, Kozuka T: Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: Conventional radiography versus high-resolution storage-phosphor radiography—A preliminary study. J Digit Imaging 8:31–36, 1995PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Salazar AJ, Camacho JC, Aguirre DA: Comparison between different cost devices for digital capture of X-ray films with computed tomography (CT) correlation. Telemedicine and e-Health 14 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0189, 2011 Salazar AJ, Camacho JC, Aguirre DA: Comparison between different cost devices for digital capture of X-ray films with computed tomography (CT) correlation. Telemedicine and e-Health 14 doi: 10.​1089/​tmj.​2010.​0189, 2011
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Fawcett T: An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett 27:861–874, 2006CrossRef Fawcett T: An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett 27:861–874, 2006CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36, 1982PubMed Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36, 1982PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Obuchowski NA: Multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic curve studies: hypothesis testing and sample size estimation using an analysis of variance approach with dependent observations. Acad Radiol 2(Suppl 1):S22–S29, 1995. discussion S57-64, S70-21 pasPubMed Obuchowski NA: Multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic curve studies: hypothesis testing and sample size estimation using an analysis of variance approach with dependent observations. Acad Radiol 2(Suppl 1):S22–S29, 1995. discussion S57-64, S70-21 pasPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison between Different Cost Devices for Digital Capture of X-ray Films: An Image Characteristics Detection Approach
verfasst von
Antonio José Salazar
Juan Camilo Camacho
Diego Andrés Aguirre
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-011-9391-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe

BriefCommunication

The Next Wave: Confexting

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.