Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2022

20.01.2022 | Original Article

Comparison of 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid and 4 L Polyethylene Glycol in Elderly Patients Aged 60–79: A Prospective Randomized Study

verfasst von: Sung Hoon Jung, Chul-Hyun Lim, Tae-Geun Gweon, Jinsu Kim, Jung Hwan Oh, Kyu-Tae Yoon, Jee Young An, Jeong‑Seon Ji, Hwang Choi

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 10/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The bowel-cleansing efficacy and safety of 2 L polyethylene glycol (PEG) with ascorbic acid (2L PEG + Asc) has rarely been studied in the elderly population. In this randomized trial, we compared the bowel cleanliness, safety, and tolerability of 2L PEG + Asc with those of 4 L PEG in an elderly population aged 60–79.

Methods

Study participants were randomized either to 2L PEG + Asc or 4L PEG. The primary endpoint was the success rate of bowel preparation, using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Before colonoscopy, all participants were questioned about adverse events and tolerability regarding purgative ingestion.

Results

A total of 347 individuals were enrolled (2L PEG + Asc, 174; 4L PEG, 173). Mean age in the 2L PEG + Asc and the 4L PEG was 69.3 ± 5.6 and 69.3 ± 5.0, respectively (P = 0.917). The rate for successful bowel cleansing was comparable between the 2L PEG + Asc (92%) and the 4L PEG (96%, P = 0.118). Total ingested liquid including purgative and water was lower in the 2L PEG + Asc group (2.9 L) than in the 4L PEG group (4.2 L, P < 0.001). The tolerability of purgative was superior in the 2L PEG + Asc (overall satisfaction, P < 0.001; willingness to reuse, P < 0.001). There were no serious adverse events during the trial.

Conclusions

The bowel-cleansing efficacy of 2L PEG + Asc was comparable to that of 4L PEG. Tolerability was superior in the 2L PEG + Asc group. For older people, 2L PEG + Asc is an efficacious and safe bowel cleanser. (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0004123).
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Committee ASoP, Saltzman JR, Cash BD, et al. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81:781–94. Committee ASoP, Saltzman JR, Cash BD, et al. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81:781–94.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019. Endoscopy 2019;51:775–794.CrossRef Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019. Endoscopy 2019;51:775–794.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gweon TG, Jung SH, Kim SW et al. Risk factors for peritonitis in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis who undergo colonoscopy: a retrospective multicentre study. BMC Gastroenterol 2019;19:175.CrossRef Gweon TG, Jung SH, Kim SW et al. Risk factors for peritonitis in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis who undergo colonoscopy: a retrospective multicentre study. BMC Gastroenterol 2019;19:175.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gweon TG, Huh CW, Ji JS et al. Comparison of bowel-cleansing efficacy of split-dose and same-day dose bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopy in patients with gastrectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 2020;34:4413–4421.CrossRef Gweon TG, Huh CW, Ji JS et al. Comparison of bowel-cleansing efficacy of split-dose and same-day dose bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopy in patients with gastrectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 2020;34:4413–4421.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gu P, Lew D, Oh SJ et al. Comparing the Real-World Effectiveness of Competing Colonoscopy Preparations: Results of a Prospective Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2019;114:305–314.CrossRef Gu P, Lew D, Oh SJ et al. Comparing the Real-World Effectiveness of Competing Colonoscopy Preparations: Results of a Prospective Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2019;114:305–314.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JM, Lee JH, Kim ES, et al. The safety and effectiveness of 2-liter polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid in patients with liver cirrhosis: A retrospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e9011. Lee JM, Lee JH, Kim ES, et al. The safety and effectiveness of 2-liter polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid in patients with liver cirrhosis: A retrospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e9011.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gweon TG, Kim SW, Noh YS, et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of same-day dose of 2 different bowel cleanser for afternoon colonoscopy: picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid versus polyethylene glycol. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e628. Gweon TG, Kim SW, Noh YS, et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of same-day dose of 2 different bowel cleanser for afternoon colonoscopy: picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid versus polyethylene glycol. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e628.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon CM, Park DI, Choe YG et al. Randomized trial of 2-L polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid versus 4-L polyethylene glycol as bowel cleansing for colonoscopy in an optimal setting. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;29:1223–1228.CrossRef Moon CM, Park DI, Choe YG et al. Randomized trial of 2-L polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid versus 4-L polyethylene glycol as bowel cleansing for colonoscopy in an optimal setting. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;29:1223–1228.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee HH, Lim CH, Kim JS et al. Comparison Between an Oral Sulfate Solution and a 2 L of Polyethylene Glycol/Ascorbic Acid as a Split Dose Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2019;53:e431–e437.CrossRef Lee HH, Lim CH, Kim JS et al. Comparison Between an Oral Sulfate Solution and a 2 L of Polyethylene Glycol/Ascorbic Acid as a Split Dose Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2019;53:e431–e437.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Shafrir A, Koslowsky B, Wengrower D et al. Colonoscopy in Nonagenarians Is Safe and May Be Associated with Clinical Benefit. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019;67:1158–1163.CrossRef Shafrir A, Koslowsky B, Wengrower D et al. Colonoscopy in Nonagenarians Is Safe and May Be Associated with Clinical Benefit. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019;67:1158–1163.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cha JM, Kozarek RA, La Selva D et al. Risks and Benefits of Colonoscopy in Patients 90 Years or Older, Compared With Younger Patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14:80–6.e1.CrossRef Cha JM, Kozarek RA, La Selva D et al. Risks and Benefits of Colonoscopy in Patients 90 Years or Older, Compared With Younger Patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14:80–6.e1.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sim JS, Koo JS. Predictors of Inadequate Bowel Preparation and Salvage Options on Colonoscopy. Clin Endosc 2016;49:346–349.CrossRef Sim JS, Koo JS. Predictors of Inadequate Bowel Preparation and Salvage Options on Colonoscopy. Clin Endosc 2016;49:346–349.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gandhi K, Tofani C, Sokach C et al. Patient Characteristics Associated With Quality of Colonoscopy Preparation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;16:357-369.e10.CrossRef Gandhi K, Tofani C, Sokach C et al. Patient Characteristics Associated With Quality of Colonoscopy Preparation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;16:357-369.e10.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nam JH, Hong SB, Lim YJ et al. Comparison of Oral Sulfate Solution and Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid on the Efficacy of Bowel Preparation. Clin Endosc 2020;53:568–574.CrossRef Nam JH, Hong SB, Lim YJ et al. Comparison of Oral Sulfate Solution and Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid on the Efficacy of Bowel Preparation. Clin Endosc 2020;53:568–574.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang JY, Moon CM, Lee HJ, et al. Predictive factors for missed adenoma on repeat colonoscopy in patients with suboptimal bowel preparation on initial colonoscopy: A KASID multicenter study. PLoS One 2018;13:e0195709. Chang JY, Moon CM, Lee HJ, et al. Predictive factors for missed adenoma on repeat colonoscopy in patients with suboptimal bowel preparation on initial colonoscopy: A KASID multicenter study. PLoS One 2018;13:e0195709.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang X, Zhao L, Zhu Z et al. Same-Day Single Dose of 2 Liter Polyethylene Glycol is Not Inferior to The Standard Bowel Preparation Regimen in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized. Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2018;113:601–610.CrossRef Kang X, Zhao L, Zhu Z et al. Same-Day Single Dose of 2 Liter Polyethylene Glycol is Not Inferior to The Standard Bowel Preparation Regimen in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized. Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2018;113:601–610.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Woo DH, Kim KO, Jeong DE et al. Prospective analysis of factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in actual clinical practice. Intest Res 2018;16:293–298.CrossRef Woo DH, Kim KO, Jeong DE et al. Prospective analysis of factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in actual clinical practice. Intest Res 2018;16:293–298.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Aronchick CA, Lipshutz WH, Wright SH et al. A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:346–352.CrossRef Aronchick CA, Lipshutz WH, Wright SH et al. A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:346–352.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:620–625.CrossRef Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:620–625.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gweon TG, Lee SW, Ji JS et al. Comparison of adenoma detection by colonoscopy between polypectomy performed during both insertion and withdrawal versus during withdrawal only: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2020;34:5461–5468.CrossRef Gweon TG, Lee SW, Ji JS et al. Comparison of adenoma detection by colonoscopy between polypectomy performed during both insertion and withdrawal versus during withdrawal only: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2020;34:5461–5468.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gweon TG, Lee KM, Lee SW et al. Effect of prophylactic clip application for the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding of large pedunculated colonic polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2021;94:148–154.CrossRef Gweon TG, Lee KM, Lee SW et al. Effect of prophylactic clip application for the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding of large pedunculated colonic polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2021;94:148–154.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoo HM, Gweon TG, Seo HS et al. Role of preoperative colonoscopy in patients with gastric cancer: a case control study of the prevalence of coexisting colorectal neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:1614–1622.CrossRef Yoo HM, Gweon TG, Seo HS et al. Role of preoperative colonoscopy in patients with gastric cancer: a case control study of the prevalence of coexisting colorectal neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:1614–1622.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gweon TG, Yoon KT, Kim CH, Kim JJ. Postgastrectomy gastric cancer patients are at high risk for colorectal neoplasia: a case control study. Intest Res 2021;19:239–246.CrossRef Gweon TG, Yoon KT, Kim CH, Kim JJ. Postgastrectomy gastric cancer patients are at high risk for colorectal neoplasia: a case control study. Intest Res 2021;19:239–246.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Hernandez G, Aldea A et al. Comparison of Two Intensive Bowel Cleansing Regimens in Patients With Previous Poor Bowel Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112:951–958.CrossRef Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Hernandez G, Aldea A et al. Comparison of Two Intensive Bowel Cleansing Regimens in Patients With Previous Poor Bowel Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112:951–958.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Horton N, Garber A, Hasson H, et al. Impact of Single- vs. Split-Dose Low-Volume Bowel Preparations on Bowel Movement Kinetics, Patient Inconvenience, and Polyp Detection: A Prospective Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2016;111:1330–7. Horton N, Garber A, Hasson H, et al. Impact of Single- vs. Split-Dose Low-Volume Bowel Preparations on Bowel Movement Kinetics, Patient Inconvenience, and Polyp Detection: A Prospective Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2016;111:1330–7.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddiqui AA, Yang K, Spechler SJ et al. Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:700–706.CrossRef Siddiqui AA, Yang K, Spechler SJ et al. Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:700–706.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee YJ, Kim ES, Choi JH et al. Impact of reinforced education by telephone and short message service on the quality of bowel preparation: a randomized controlled study. Endoscopy 2015;47:1018–1027.CrossRef Lee YJ, Kim ES, Choi JH et al. Impact of reinforced education by telephone and short message service on the quality of bowel preparation: a randomized controlled study. Endoscopy 2015;47:1018–1027.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeon SC, Kim JH, Kim SJ et al. Effect of Sending Educational Video Clips via Smartphone Mobile Messenger on Bowel Preparation before Colonoscopy. Clin Endosc 2019;52:53–58.CrossRef Jeon SC, Kim JH, Kim SJ et al. Effect of Sending Educational Video Clips via Smartphone Mobile Messenger on Bowel Preparation before Colonoscopy. Clin Endosc 2019;52:53–58.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon W. Optimal and safe bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Endosc 2013;46:219–223.CrossRef Moon W. Optimal and safe bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Endosc 2013;46:219–223.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Huh CW, Gweon TG, Seo M, et al. Validation of same-day bowel preparation regimen using 4L polyethylene glycol: Comparison of morning and afternoon colonoscopy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e12431. Huh CW, Gweon TG, Seo M, et al. Validation of same-day bowel preparation regimen using 4L polyethylene glycol: Comparison of morning and afternoon colonoscopy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e12431.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Seo M, Gweon TG, Huh CW et al. Comparison of Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety, Bowel Movement Kinetics, and Patient Tolerability of Same-Day and Split-Dose Bowel Preparation Using 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol: A Prospective Randomized Study. Dis Colon Rectum 2019;62:1518–1527.CrossRef Seo M, Gweon TG, Huh CW et al. Comparison of Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety, Bowel Movement Kinetics, and Patient Tolerability of Same-Day and Split-Dose Bowel Preparation Using 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol: A Prospective Randomized Study. Dis Colon Rectum 2019;62:1518–1527.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Day LW, Kwon A, Inadomi JM et al. Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:885–896.CrossRef Day LW, Kwon A, Inadomi JM et al. Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:885–896.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Eun CS, Han DS, Hyun YS et al. The timing of bowel preparation is more important than the timing of colonoscopy in determining the quality of bowel cleansing. Dig Dis Sci 2011;56:539–544.CrossRef Eun CS, Han DS, Hyun YS et al. The timing of bowel preparation is more important than the timing of colonoscopy in determining the quality of bowel cleansing. Dig Dis Sci 2011;56:539–544.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid and 4 L Polyethylene Glycol in Elderly Patients Aged 60–79: A Prospective Randomized Study
verfasst von
Sung Hoon Jung
Chul-Hyun Lim
Tae-Geun Gweon
Jinsu Kim
Jung Hwan Oh
Kyu-Tae Yoon
Jee Young An
Jeong‑Seon Ji
Hwang Choi
Publikationsdatum
20.01.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 10/2022
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07354-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2022

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.